RESUMO
Drug-induced kidney injury (DIKI) is of significant concern, both during drug development and in clinical practice. We report a patient-centric approach for clinical implementation of the FDA-qualified kidney safety biomarker panel, highlighting Phase 1 and 2 trials for candidate therapeutics in Pfizer's portfolio (PFE-1 and PFE-2, respectively) that induced kidney tubular injury in rat toxicity studies. Clusterin (CLU), cystatin-C (CysC), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and osteopontin (OPN) were measured in urine samples from (i) Phase 1 healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 12) dosed with PFE-1, (ii) Phase 2 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (n = 266) dosed with PFE-2, (iii) lupus patients on standard-of-care therapies (n = 121), and (iv) healthy volunteers (n = 60). The FDA-defined composite measure (CM), calculated as the geometric mean response across the 6 biomarkers, was increased â¼30% in HVs administered 100 mg PFE-1 relative to placebo, providing evidence of DIKI. In contrast, the CM for RA patients dosed with PFE-2 was comparable to placebo controls, helping to de-risk the concern for DIKI at clinically relevant doses. Comparing individual biomarker concentrations across disease states revealed that CLU, KIM-1, NAG, NGAL, and OPN are elevated in the urine of RA and lupus patients (those without severe active proliferative lupus nephritis) relative to HVs. Overall, these case studies demonstrate the value of using the FDA-qualified kidney biomarker panel to guide risk assessment, dose selection, and clinical decision making for novel therapeutics, both in HVs and patient populations.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Biomarcadores , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Biomarcadores/urina , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/urina , Animais , Masculino , Feminino , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/urina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Osteopontina/urina , Receptor Celular 1 do Vírus da Hepatite A/metabolismo , RatosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We present integrated analyses of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) incidence in the tofacitinib UC clinical program. METHODS: Nonmelanoma skin cancer events were evaluated from 3 randomized, placebo-controlled studies: 2 identical, 8-week induction studies (NCT01465763, NCT01458951), a 52-week maintenance study (NCT01458574), and an open-label, long-term extension study (NCT01470612). Cohorts analyzed were: Induction, Maintenance, and Overall (patients receiving ≥1 dose of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily [BID]). An independent adjudication committee reviewed potential NMSC. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events per 100 patient-years of exposure) for NMSC were evaluated. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for risk factor analysis. RESULTS: Nonmelanoma skin cancer was evaluated for 1124 patients (2576.4 patient-years of tofacitinib exposure; ≤6.8 years' treatment). In the Induction Cohort, NMSC IR was 0.00 for placebo and 1.26 for 10 mg BID. Nonmelanoma skin cancer IR was 0.97 for placebo, 0.00 for 5 mg BID and 1.91 for 10 mg BID in the Maintenance Cohort, and 0.73 (n = 19) in the Overall Cohort. No NMSC was metastatic or led to discontinuation. In the Overall Cohort, Cox regression identified prior NMSC (hazard ratio [HR], 9.09; P = 0.0001), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) failure (3.32; P = 0.0363), and age (HR per 10-year increase, 2.03; P = 0.0004) as significant independent NMSC risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: For patients receiving tofacitinib, NMSC occurred infrequently. Older age, prior NMSC, and TNFi failure, which are previously reported NMSC risk factors in patients with UC, were associated with increased NMSC risk.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Humanos , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Highly integrated, flexible, and ultrathin wireless communication components are in significant demand due to the explosive growth of portable and wearable electronic devices in the fifth-generation (5G) network era, but only conventional metals meet the requirements for emerging radio-frequency (RF) devices so far. Here, it is reported on Ti3 C2 Tx MXene microstrip transmission lines with low-energy attenuation and patch antennas with high-power radiation at frequencies from 5.6 to 16.4 GHz. The radiation efficiency of a 5.5 µm thick MXene patch antenna manufactured by spray-coating from aqueous solution reaches 99% at 16.4 GHz, which is about the same as that of a standard 35 µm thick copper patch antenna at about 15% of its thickness and 7% of the copper weight. MXene outperforms all other materials evaluated for patch antennas to date. Moreover, it is demonstrated that an MXene patch antenna array with integrated feeding circuits on a conformal surface has comparable performance with that of a copper antenna array at 28 GHz, which is a target frequency in practical 5G applications. The versatility of MXene antennas in wide frequency ranges coupled with the flexibility, scalability, and ease of solution processing makes MXene promising for integrated RF components in various flexible electronic devices.
RESUMO
Faced with the health and economic consequences of the global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the biomedical community came together to identify, diagnose, prevent, and treat the novel disease at breathtaking speeds. The field advanced from a publicly available viral genome to a commercialized globally scalable diagnostic biomarker test in less than 2 months, and first-in-human dosing with vaccines and repurposed antivirals followed shortly thereafter. This unprecedented efficiency was driven by three key factors: 1) international multistakeholder collaborations, 2) widespread data sharing, and 3) flexible regulatory standards tailored to meet the urgency of the situation. Learning from the remarkable success achieved during this public health crisis, we are proposing a biomarker-centric approach throughout the drug development pipeline. Although all therapeutic areas would benefit from end-to-end biomarker science, efforts should be prioritized to areas with the greatest unmet medical needs, including neurodegenerative diseases, chronic lower respiratory diseases, metabolic disorders, and malignant neoplasms. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Faced with the unprecedented threat of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic, the biomedical community collaborated to develop a globally scalable diagnostic biomarker (viral DNA) that catalyzed therapeutic development at breathtaking speeds. Learning from this remarkable efficiency, we propose a multistakeholder biomarker-centric approach to drug development across therapeutic areas with unmet medical needs.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Defesa Civil/tendências , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/tendências , Descoberta de Drogas/tendências , Animais , Biomarcadores/análise , COVID-19/genética , Defesa Civil/métodos , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/métodos , Descoberta de Drogas/métodos , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Humanos , Pandemias , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19RESUMO
CONTEXT: The antipsychotic drug haloperidol has antiproliferative and growth-inhibiting properties on prostate cancer cell lines in vitro by binding the sigma 1 protein. Evidence is needed regarding a possible preventive association in men. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether our epidemiologic data support an inverse association of haloperidol use with risk of prostate cancer. DESIGN: These case-control analyses used conditional logistic regression to estimate relative risk by odds ratios (ORs) adjusting for race/ethnicity and aspects of medical care related to detection of prostate cancer. We tested 3 other commonly used antipsychotic drugs, risperidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine, for sigma 1 protein binding and inhibition of clonogenic growth of prostate cancer cells. Use of any of these by men was considered use of a comparator drug. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) association of haloperidol with prostate cancer; 2) sigma 1 binding and clonogenic growth. RESULTS: Probably owing to small numbers of haloperidol recipients, evidence of a preventive association was inconsistent, depending on the definition of long-term use. If duration of use was greater than 1 year, the odds ratio (OR) was 0.38 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.14-1.01) for haloperidol and 0.80 (95% CI = 0.66-0.98) for the comparator drug; if the duration of use was greater than 2 years, the OR was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.24-1.76) for haloperidol and 0.84 (95% CI = 0.66-1.08) for the comparator drug. Unlike haloperidol, risperidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine did not bind sigma 1 or inhibit clonogenic growth. CONCLUSION: Given the laboratory evidence, our ambiguous epidemiologic findings should encourage more epidemiologic evaluation of haloperidol use and risk of prostate cancer. Finding a negative association could be a scientific advance in prostate cancer prevention but would not be sufficient basis for recommending the prescription of haloperidol for that purpose.
RESUMO
CONTEXT: Epidemiologic analyses of gabapentin use and cancer risk in Kaiser Permanente Northern California were previously carried out in a collaborative study and independently evaluated in a UK database. OBJECTIVE: To update these epidemiologic analyses with 7.5 more years of follow-up. DESIGN: Case-control analyses using conditional logistic regression to estimate relative risk by odds ratios using the prior collaboration's criteria for identifying positive drug-cancer associations and our more stringent criteria requiring stronger association, lower p values, and evidence of dose response. New associations were reanalyzed with additional control for limited measures of smoking and alcohol use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gabapentin-cancer associations. RESULTS: No previously found associations met our stringent criteria, but cancers of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus, liver, and vagina did. All odds ratios for 3 or more and 8 or more prescriptions were moderately reduced by control for smoking and alcohol. Substantial elevations of risk of mouth/pharynx, liver, and vaginal cancers were associated with only 1 prescription dispensed. Sensitivity analyses aimed at possible confounding and other biases did not change our conclusions but did reveal a markedly increased risk of vaginal cancer in gabapentin users with epilepsy compared with users without. CONCLUSION: The reduced magnitude of relative risk with control for smoking and alcohol use suggests confounding by known risk factors. Biologically implausible elevated risk from just 1 prescription suggests confounding by indication. Either or both of these concerns applies to each of the 4 cancer sites associated with gabapentin use. Updated analyses show little if any evidence for carcinogenic effects of gabapentin.
Assuntos
Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Gabapentina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
In order to identify the practical implications for both health care practitioners and patients in understanding differences between the results of trials assessing therapies for ulcerative colitis [UC], we reviewed clinical trials of therapies for moderate to severe UC, with a focus on trial design. Over time, patient populations in UC trials have become more refractory, reflecting that patients are failing treatment with additional and different classes of drug, including conventional therapies, immunosuppressant drugs, and anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies. Outcomes used to measure efficacy have become increasingly stringent in order to meet the expectations of patients and physicians, and the requirements of regulatory bodies. Trial design has also evolved to integrate induction and maintenance therapy phases, so as to facilitate patient recruitment and to answer clinically important questions such as how efficacious therapies are in specific subpopulations of patients and during long-term use. As UC clinical trial design continues to evolve, and with limited head-to-head trials and real-world comparative effectiveness studies evaluating UC therapies, careful judgment is required to appreciate the differences and similarities in trial designs, and to understand how these variances may affect the observed efficacy and safety outcomes.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Colite Ulcerativa/patologia , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/normas , Indução de Remissão , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule inhibitor of JAK for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated the onset of symptom improvement in post-hoc analyses of data from 2 phase 3 trials of induction therapy with tofacitinib in patients with UC (OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2). METHODS: The studies comprised patients with moderate to severe active UC who were intolerant to, or failed by previous treatment with, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and/or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. Patients received tofacitinib (10 mg twice daily, n = 905) or placebo (n = 234) for 8 weeks. Daily Mayo stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores were calculated using diary data from the first 15 days of therapy. We analyzed data from subgroups including failure of prior anti-TNF therapy, baseline corticosteroid use, and baseline serum levels of C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Mean changes were significantly greater in patients given tofacitinib vs placebo in reductions from baseline stool frequency subscore (tofacitinib: -0.27 vs placebo: -0.11; P < .01), total number of daily bowel movements (-1.06 vs -0.27; P < .0001), and rectal bleeding subscore (-0.30 vs -0.14; P < .01) by day 3. Compared with placebo, more tofacitinib-treated patients had reductions from baseline in stool frequency subscore (by ≥1 point for tofacitinib, 241/837, 28.8% vs placebo, 39/218, 17.9%) (P < .01) and rectal bleeding subscore (by ≥1 point for tofacitinib, 266/830, 32.0% vs placebo, 43/214, 20.1%) (P < .01) by day 3. A consistent effect of tofacitinib was observed in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In a post-hoc analysis of data from phase 3 trials of induction therapy with tofacitinib in patients with UC, we found significant improvements in symptoms among patients given tofacitinib compared with placebo within 3 days. These findings indicate the rapid onset of effect of this drug in patients with UC. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01465763 and NCT01458951.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/patologia , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia de Indução/métodos , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor of JAK approved in several countries for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We report integrated safety analyses of tofacitinib-treated patients with moderate to severe UC. METHODS: Patients receiving placebo or tofacitinib (5 or 10 mg) twice daily were analyzed as 3 cohorts: induction (phase 2 and 3 induction studies, n = 1220), maintenance (phase 3 maintenance study, n = 592), and overall (patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily in phase 2, phase 3, or open-label, long-term extension studies, n = 1157; 1613 patient-years' exposure). Incidence rates (IRs; patients with events per 100 patient-years of exposure) were evaluated for select adverse events. RESULTS: In the maintenance cohort, IRs for select adverse events were similar among treatment groups, except for a numerically higher IR of herpes zoster infection among patients who received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (2.1; 95% CI, 0.4-6.0) and statistically higher IR among patients who received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (IR, 6.6; 95% CI, 3.2-12.2) vs placebo (IR, 1.0, 95% CI, 0.0-5.4). For the overall cohort (84% received average dose of tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily), IRs were: death, 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.6); serious infections, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4-2.8); opportunistic infections, 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8-2.0); herpes zoster infection, 4.1 (95% CI, 3.1-5.2); malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer), 0.7 (95% CI, 0.3-1.2); non-melanoma skin cancer, 0.7 (95% CI, 0.3-1.2); major adverse cardiovascular events, 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.6); and gastrointestinal perforations, 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.5). CONCLUSIONS: In safety analyses of patients with moderate to severe UC treated with tofacitinib, we observed a dose relationship with herpes zoster infection. Although follow-up time was relatively short, the safety profile of tofacitinib for patients with UC appeared similar to that reported for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and for patients with UC treated with biologic agents, except for the higher IR of herpes zoster infection. ClinicalTrials.gov, no: NCT00787202, NCT01465763, NCT01458951, NCT01458574, and NCT01470612.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Janus Quinase 3 , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil compared with that of imiquimod for preventing keratinocyte carcinoma is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil and that of imiquimod in preventing keratinocyte carcinoma in a real-world practice setting. METHODS: We identified 5700 subjects who filled prescriptions for 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod for treatment of actinic keratosis in 2007. An intention-to-treat analysis controlling for potential confounding variables was used to calculate 2- and 5-year cumulative risk differences for subsequent keratinocyte carcinoma overall and in field-treated areas. RESULTS: 5-Fluorouracil was associated with a statistically significant decreased risk of any keratinocyte carcinoma compared with imiquimod (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.97), but there were no significant differences in risk by tumor subtype (for squamous cell carcinoma: aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.07; for basal cell carcinoma: aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.74-1.03) or site-specific keratinocyte carcinoma (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.14). There were no significant differences in 2- or 5-year cumulative risk of keratinocyte carcinoma among those treated with 5-fluorouracil versus with imiquimod. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability to other practice settings may be limited. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas 5-fluorouracil was more effective in reducing keratinocyte carcinoma risk overall, we found no differences in the short- or long-term risk of subsequent site-specific keratinocyte carcinoma in a real-world practice setting.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Imiquimode/uso terapêutico , Ceratose Actínica/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Administração Cutânea , Idoso , California/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/prevenção & controle , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Imiquimode/administração & dosagem , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Queratinócitos/patologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Reports of a role of postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy in the development of breast cancer have been inconsistent. Although many epidemiologic studies have failed to show an association between short-term use of estrogen and breast cancer, there are indications that long-term use may present an increased risk. We undertook a long-term, retrospective cohort study of the incidence of breast cancer in women who had taken long-term estrogen (average 17.2 years), compared to women who had not taken estrogen. Subjects were 454 women born between 1900 and 1915, who were members of a large health maintenance organization in northern California. By the end of 1995, 26 (11.2%) of estrogen users developed breast cancer, as did 9 (4.1%) of the nonusers; the relative risk (RR) for estrogen use was 2.8 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.3-5.9]. Adjustment for age and multiple breast cancer risk factors, including breast cancer surveillance, reduced the RR for estrogen to 2.0 (95% CI 0.9-4.5). We conclude that long-term estrogen use is associated with a substantially increased risk of breast cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Pós-Menopausa , Administração Oral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estrogênios/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , São Francisco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The most widely used topical agents for the field-based treatment of multiple actinic keratoses (AKs) are 5-fluorouracil and imiquimod, but their comparative effectiveness has not been assessed in a real-world setting. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil and imiquimod in reducing risk for subsequent AKs in a large, integrated health care delivery system in northern California. METHODS: In this cohort study, we identified adult health plan members who had an AK diagnosed in 2007 and who subsequently filled a prescription for 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod (N = 5700). We followed subjects for subsequent AKs identified by the International Classification of Diseases codes and estimated the 2-year (short-term) and 5-year (long-term) differences in cumulative risk while controlling for potential confounding by pretreatment variables. RESULTS: 5-Fluorouracil reduced the short-term incidence of subsequent AKs (cumulative risk difference -4.54% [95% confidence interval, -7.91% to -1.17%]), but there was no statistically significant evidence of a long-term decreased risk (cumulative risk difference -1.43% [95% confidence interval, -3.43% to 0.05%]) compared with that with imiquimod. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study with limited ascertainment of all relevant potential confounding variables. CONCLUSION: We found that 5-fluorouracil appeared to be significantly more effective than imiquimod in the short-term, but not long-term, prevention of subsequent AKs.
Assuntos
Aminoquinolinas/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Ceratose Actínica/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Imiquimode , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib, an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor, was shown to have potential efficacy as induction therapy for ulcerative colitis in a phase 2 trial. We further evaluated the efficacy of tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy. METHODS: We conducted three phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of tofacitinib therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. In the OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 trials, 598 and 541 patients, respectively, who had moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis despite previous conventional therapy or therapy with a tumor necrosis factor antagonist were randomly assigned to receive induction therapy with tofacitinib (10 mg twice daily) or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary end point was remission at 8 weeks. In the OCTAVE Sustain trial, 593 patients who had a clinical response to induction therapy were randomly assigned to receive maintenance therapy with tofacitinib (either 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end point was remission at 52 weeks. RESULTS: In the OCTAVE Induction 1 trial, remission at 8 weeks occurred in 18.5% of the patients in the tofacitinib group versus 8.2% in the placebo group (P=0.007); in the OCTAVE Induction 2 trial, remission occurred in 16.6% versus 3.6% (P<0.001). In the OCTAVE Sustain trial, remission at 52 weeks occurred in 34.3% of the patients in the 5-mg tofacitinib group and 40.6% in the 10-mg tofacitinib group versus 11.1% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons with placebo). In the OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 trials, the rates of overall infection and serious infection were higher with tofacitinib than with placebo. In the OCTAVE Sustain trial, the rate of serious infection was similar across the three treatment groups, and the rates of overall infection and herpes zoster infection were higher with tofacitinib than with placebo. Across all three trials, adjudicated nonmelanoma skin cancer occurred in five patients who received tofacitinib and in one who received placebo, and adjudicated cardiovascular events occurred in five who received tofacitinib and in none who received placebo; as compared with placebo, tofacitinib was associated with increased lipid levels. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis, tofacitinib was more effective as induction and maintenance therapy than placebo. (Funded by Pfizer; OCTAVE Induction 1, OCTAVE Induction 2, and OCTAVE Sustain ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01465763 , NCT01458951 , and NCT01458574 , respectively.).
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Janus Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Quimioterapia de Manutenção , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/farmacocinética , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To supplement published cohort data about incident cancer in Asian Americans (Asians) including risk of specific Asian ethnic groups. METHODS: A cohort study in 124,193 persons (13,344 Asians) with baseline examination data in 1978-1985 used Cox proportional hazards models with seven covariates to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Through 2012 cancer was diagnosed in 18,687 persons including 1,522 Asians. Compared to Whites, the HR (CIs) for any cancer in Asians was 0.8 (0.7-0.9, p < 0.001). Lower Asian risk was stronger for men (HR = 0.7, p < 0.001) than for women (HR = 0.9, p = 0.003). Lower Asian vs. White risks with p < 0.05 were found for cancers of the upper airway digestive area, hematologic malignancies, melanoma, and cancers of the prostate, bladder, and brain. Melanoma contributed substantially to lower Asian risk, especially in women. HRs for specific Asian groups versus Whites follow: Chinese = 0.9 (p < 0.001), Japanese = 0.9 (p = 0.01), Filipinos = 0.8 (p < 0.001), South Asians = 0.5 (p < 0.001), and Other Asians = 0.7 (p = 0.006). Both South Asian men and women had lower risk than Whites, and South Asians had lower risk than any other racial/ethnic group. CONCLUSIONS: Asians had lower cancer risk than Whites, due to lower risk of several cancer types. Each Asian ethnic group had lower risk than Whites with South Asians at the lowest risk.
Assuntos
Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/etnologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Risco , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
A negative association of statin use with liver cancer risk has been reported frequently. We added laboratory measurements, to our knowledge not included in previous investigations, to a case-control analysis of 2877 case patients and 142 850 matched control subjects enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Addressing confounding by indication by restricting subjects to those with elevated cholesterol greatly attenuated the negative association; eg, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) rose from 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35 to 0.49) to 0.87 (95% CI = 0.55 to 1.39) for receipt of 18 or more prescriptions. Confounding by contraindication was addressed by controlling for degree of abnormality of liver function tests, alanine or aspartate transaminase, measured within one year of the elevated cholesterol and strongly related to risk. The negative association of statins disappeared for all numbers of prescriptions received, with an odds ratio of 1.21 (95% CI = 0.53 to 2.75) for 18 or more prescriptions. Findings cast doubt on the causality of the frequently observed preventive association.
Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipercolesterolemia/sangue , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Alanina Transaminase/sangue , Aspartato Aminotransferases/sangue , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Colesterol/sangue , Intervalos de Confiança , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Razão de Chances , Fatores de ProteçãoRESUMO
Non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma has attracted great interest due to its multiple potential biomedical applications with cancer treatment being among the most urgent. To realize the clinical potential of non-thermal plasma, the exact cellular and molecular mechanisms of plasma effects must be understood. This work aimed at studying the prostate cancer specific mechanisms of non-thermal plasma effects on energy metabolism as a central regulator of cell homeostasis and proliferation. It was found that cancer cells with higher metabolic rate initially are more resistant to plasma treated phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) since the respiratory and calcium sensitive signaling systems were not responsive to plasma exposure. However, dramatic decline of cancer oxidative phosphorylation developed over time resulted in significant progression of cell lethality. The normal prostate cells with low metabolic activity immediately responded to plasma treated PBS by suppression of respiratory functions and sustained elevation of cytosolic calcium. However, over time the normal cells start recovering their mitochondria functions, proliferate and restore the cell population. We found that the non-thermal plasma induced increase in intracellular ROS is of primarily non-mitochondrial origin. The discriminate non-thermal plasma effects hold a promise for clinical cancer intervention.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Mitocôndrias/fisiologia , Gases em Plasma/farmacologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Sinalização do Cálcio/efeitos dos fármacos , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Metabolismo Energético/efeitos dos fármacos , Metabolismo Energético/fisiologia , Homeostase/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Potencial da Membrana Mitocondrial/efeitos dos fármacos , Mitocôndrias/efeitos dos fármacos , Mitocôndrias/metabolismo , Fosforilação Oxidativa/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismoRESUMO
The authors studied incident cancer risk from 1978 to 1985 and through follow-up in 2012 relative to light-to-moderate and heavy drinking and to the choice of alcoholic beverage in a cohort of 124,193 persons. With lifelong abstainers as referent, heavy drinking (≥ 3 drinks per day) was associated with increased risk of 5 cancer types: upper airway/digestive tract, lung, female breast, colorectal, and melanoma, with light-to-moderate drinking related to all but lung cancer.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Bebidas Alcoólicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Comportamento de Escolha , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER , São Francisco/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: There is compelling evidence that heavy alcohol drinking is related to increased risk of several cancer types, but the relationship of light-moderate drinking is less clear. We explored the role of inferred underreporting among light-moderate drinkers on the association between alcohol intake and cancer risk. METHODS: In a cohort of 127,176 persons, we studied risk of any cancer, a composite of five alcohol-associated cancer types, and female breast cancer. Alcohol intake was reported at baseline health examinations, and 14,880 persons were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. Cox proportional hazard models were controlled for seven covariates. Based on other computer-stored information about alcohol habits, we stratified subjects into 18.4 % (23,363) suspected of underreporting, 46.5 % (59,173) not suspected of underreporting, and 35.1 % (44,640) of unsure underreporting status. RESULTS: Persons reporting light-moderate drinking had increased cancer risk in this cohort. For example, the hazard ratios (95 % confidence intervals) for risk of any cancer were 1.10 (1.04-1.17) at <1 drink per day and 1.15 (1.08-1.23) at 1-2 drinks per day. Increased risk of cancer was concentrated in the stratum suspected of underreporting. For example, among persons reporting 1-2 drinks per day risk of any cancer was 1.33 (1.21-1.45) among those suspected of underreporting, 0.98 (0.87-1.09) among those not suspected, and 1.20 (1.10-1.31) among those of unsure status. These disparities were similar for the alcohol-related composite and for breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the apparent increased risk of cancer among light-moderate drinkers may be substantially due to underreporting of intake.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , California/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/etiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Re-examine association of fluoxetine and paroxetine with risk of testicular cancer noted in drug screening, with 4 years more follow-up and expanded study of these and other antidepressant drugs. METHODS: In the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in Northern California, 906 men with testicular cancer diagnosed August 1996-December 2010 were compared with 38,253 matched controls with race/ethnicity recorded regarding receipt of antidepressant drugs at least 2 years before diagnosis or control index date. Analyses emphasized duration of use and histological subgroups. RESULTS: With control for race/ethnicity and use of other antidepressant drugs, odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for associations with testicular cancer were as follows: fluoxetine 1.22 (0.88-1.71), paroxetine 1.19 (0.78-1.83), and 1.21 (0.92-1.58) for all serotonin reuptake inhibitors. There was no statistically significant association with risk of all testicular cancers or their histological subtypes for any individual drug or for tricyclics or all antidepressants combined except for citalopram with all testicular cancers 2.55 (1.43-4.52) and those of mixed histology 4.36 (1.50-12.68) and nefazodone with embryonal cancers 9.79 (1.85-51.81). These could readily be chance findings in the context of the many analyses that were performed. Duration of use was not associated with risk of the drugs and drug groups with sufficient numbers of exposed cases for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found little evidence to support a testicular carcinogenic effect of fluoxetine, paroxetine, or other antidepressant drugs, but a weakly positive association is not ruled out. The signals in prior screening may have been due to chance and/or uncontrolled confounding.