Healthcare utilization and associated barriers experienced by wheelchair users: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: More than twenty-five years after passage of the ADA, little remains known about the experiences of wheelchair users when attempting to access health care and how accessibility may influence health care utilization. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To describe health care utilization among wheelchair users and characterize barriers encountered when attempting to obtain access to health care. METHODS: An internet-based survey of wheelchair users was conducted. Measures included demographics, condition, socioeconomic status, health care utilization and receipt of preventive services within the past year, physical barriers encountered at outpatient facilities, and satisfaction with care. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-two wheelchair users responded to the survey. Nearly all respondents (97.2%) had a primary care appointment within the past year and most reported 3-5 visits to both primary and specialty care providers. Most encountered physical barriers when accessing care (73.8% primary, 68.5% specialty). Participants received most preventive interventions at rates similar to national averages with the exception of Pap tests. Most participants remained clothed for their primary care evaluation (76.1%), and were examined seated in their wheelchair (69.7%). More than half of participants (54.1%) felt they received incomplete care, and 57% believed their physician had no more than a moderate understanding of their disability-specific medical concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Wheelchair users face persistent barriers to care, may receive less than thorough physical evaluations, receive fewer screenings for cervical cancer, and largely believe they receive incomplete care.

Health care utilization and barriers experienced by individuals with spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVES: To identify from whom individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) seek health care, the percentage who receive preventative care screenings, and the frequency and types of barriers they encounter when accessing primary and specialty care services; and to examine how sociodemographic factors affect access to care and receipt of preventative screenings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study using an Internet-based survey. SETTING: Internet based. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=108) with SCI who use a wheelchair as their primary means of mobility in the community. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health care utilization during the past year, barriers encountered when accessing health care facilities, and receipt of routine care and preventative screenings. RESULTS: All but 1 participant had visited a primary care provider within the past 12 months, and 85% had had ≥ 1 visit to specialty care providers. Accessibility barriers were encountered during both primary care (91.1%) and specialty care (80.2%) visits; most barriers were clustered in the examination room. The most prevalent barriers were inaccessible examination tables (primary care=76.9%; specialty care=51.4%) and lack of transfer aids (primary care=69.4%; specialty care=60.8%). Most participants had not been weighed during their visit (89%) and had remained seated in their wheelchair during their examinations (85.2%). Over one third of individuals aged ≥ 50 years had not received a screening colonoscopy, 60% of women aged ≥ 50 years had not had a mammogram within the past year, 39.58% of women had not received a Papanicolaou smear within the previous 3 years, and only 45.37% of respondents had ever received bone density testing. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with SCI face remediable obstacles to care and receive fewer preventative care screenings than their nondisabled counterparts. We recommend that clinics conduct Americans with Disabilities Act self-assessments, ensure that their clinical staff are properly trained in assisting individuals with mobility disabilities, and take a proactive approach in discussing preventative care screenings with their patients who have SCI.

Prehabilitation before knee arthroplasty increases postsurgical function: a case study.

Conditioning the body to undergo physical stress such as joint arthroplasty has been termed prehabilitation. This case study examined the effect of a 4-week prehabilitation intervention on functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two female subjects completed baseline strength and functional assessments before TKA. Subjects were randomized to either a 4-week prehabilitation intervention (ES) aimed at increasing strength and range of motion or a usual care condition (CS). After 4 weeks of training, subjects were reassessed and underwent TKA. Subjects completed a final assessment 12 weeks after TKA. Functional outcomes included 6-minute walk, number of times up from a chair in 30 seconds, proprioception, and self-reported function and pain using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. The data suggest that 4 weeks of prehabilitation had a positive effect on functional task performance and knee proprioception before surgery. After surgery, the ES continued to exhibit higher levels of functioning and less pain compared with the CS. Prehabilitation before TKA may contribute to improved recovery after surgery.

Isokinetic performance after total hip replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in isokinetic hip flexion, extension, and abduction muscle performance of operated vs. nonoperated hips in older adults who have undergone elective, unilateral, total hip replacement (THR) surgery and completed rehabilitation. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study using a nonequivalent posttest-only control group design, comprising 20 unilateral THR patients and a convenience sample of 22 healthy older adults. THR patients participated between 4 and 5 mos after surgery. THR subjects received an average of 13 outpatient or home-based physical therapy sessions. Isokinetic muscle strength and fatigue was assessed through measurement of hip peak torque per body weight, total work, and average power using a robotic dynamometer. RESULTS: Comparisons of THR subjects' operated vs. nonoperated hips showed no significant differences in isokinetic performance for any of the examined variables. THR subjects' operated hips generated significantly less peak torque per body weight, total work, and average power across all exercises as compared with a population of healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: THR subjects' operated and nonoperated hips showed similar biomechanical performance. THR patients are not being restored to the same level of strength and muscular endurance as compared with a population of healthy adults. These findings may be useful in providing a preliminary rationale for revising current approaches in THR rehabilitation protocols.