Proposed Priorities for Low-Dose Radiation Research and Their Relevance to the Practice of Radiology.

Because ionizing radiation is widely used in medical imaging and in military, industry, and commercial applications, programmatic management and advancement in knowledge is needed, especially related to the health effects of low-dose radiation. The U.S. Congress in partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy called on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) to develop a long-term strategic and prioritized agenda for low-dose radiation research. Low doses were defined as dose amounts less than 100 mGy or low-dose rates less than 5 mGy per hour. The 2022 NASEM report was divided into sections detailing the low-dose radiation exposure and health effects, scientific basis for radiation protection, status of low-dose radiation research, a prioritized radiation research agenda, and essential components of a low-dose radiation research program, including resources needed and recommendations for financial recourse. The purpose of this review is to summarize this report and examine the recommendations to assess how these pertain to the practice of radiology and medicine.

Comparison of the different imaging modalities used to image pediatric oncology patients: A COG diagnostic imaging committee/SPR oncology committee white paper.

Diagnostic imaging is essential in the diagnosis and management, including surveillance, of known or suspected cancer in children. The independent and combined roles of the various modalities, consisting of radiography, fluoroscopy, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear medicine (NM), are both prescribed through protocols but also function in caring for complications that may occur during or subsequent to treatment such as infection, bleeding, or organ compromise. Use of a specific imaging modality may be based on situational circumstances such as a brain CT or MR for a new onset seizure, chest CT for respiratory signs or symptoms, or US for gross hematuria. However, in many situations, there are competing choices that do not easily lend themselves to a formulaic approach as options; these situations depend on the contributions of a variety of factors based on a combination of the clinical scenario and the strengths and limitations of the imaging modalities. Therefore, an improved understanding of the potential influence of the imaging decision pathways in pediatric cancer care can come from comparison among the individual diagnostic imaging modalities. The purpose of the following material to is to provide such a comparison. To do this, pediatric imaging content experts for the individual modalities of radiography and fluoroscopy, US, CT, MRI, and NM will discuss the individual modality strengths and limitations.

Thyroid Nodules on Ultrasound in Children and Young Adults: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Radiologists' Impressions, ACR TI-RADS, and a Deep Learning Algorithm.

BACKGROUND. In current clinical practice, thyroid nodules in children are generally evaluated on the basis of radiologists' overall impressions of ultrasound images. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare the diagnostic performance of radiologists' overall impression, the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS), and a deep learning algorithm in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules on ultrasound in children and young adults. METHODS. This retrospective study included 139 patients (median age 17.5 years; 119 female patients, 20 male patients) evaluated from January 1, 2004, to September 18, 2020, who were 21 years old and younger with a thyroid nodule on ultrasound with definitive pathologic results from fine-needle aspiration and/or surgical excision to serve as the reference standard. A single nodule per patient was selected, and one transverse and one longitudinal image each of the nodules were extracted for further evaluation. Three radiologists independently characterized nodules on the basis of their overall impression (benign vs malignant) and ACR TI-RADS. A previously developed deep learning algorithm determined for each nodule a likelihood of malignancy, which was used to derive a risk level. Sensitivities and specificities for malignancy were calculated. Agreement was assessed using Cohen kappa coefficients. RESULTS. For radiologists' overall impression, sensitivity ranged from 32.1% to 75.0% (mean, 58.3%; 95% CI, 49.2-67.3%), and specificity ranged from 63.8% to 93.9% (mean, 79.9%; 95% CI, 73.8-85.7%). For ACR TI-RADS, sensitivity ranged from 82.1% to 87.5% (mean, 85.1%; 95% CI, 77.3-92.1%), and specificity ranged from 47.0% to 54.2% (mean, 50.6%; 95% CI, 41.4-59.8%). The deep learning algorithm had a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI, 78.3-95.5%) and specificity of 36.1% (95% CI, 25.6-46.8%). Interobserver agreement among pairwise combinations of readers, expressed as kappa, for overall impression was 0.227-0.472 and for ACR TI-RADS was 0.597-0.643. CONCLUSION. Both ACR TI-RADS and the deep learning algorithm had higher sensitivity albeit lower specificity compared with overall impressions. The deep learning algorithm had similar sensitivity but lower specificity than ACR TI-RADS. Interobserver agreement was higher for ACR TI-RADS than for overall impressions. CLINICAL IMPACT. ACR TI-RADS and the deep learning algorithm may serve as potential alternative strategies for guiding decisions to perform fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules in children.

Medical workforce in the United States.

This section focuses on the professional workforce comprised of the primary medical specialties that utilize ionizing radiation in their practices. Those discussed include the specialties of radiology and radiation oncology, as well as the subspecialties of radiology, namely diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, nuclear radiology, and nuclear medicine. These professionals provide essential health care services, for example, the interpretation of imaging studies, the provision of interventional procedures, radionuclide therapeutic treatments, and radiation therapy. In addition, they may be called on to function as part of a radiologic emergency response team to care for potentially exposed persons following radiation events, for example, detonation of a nuclear weapon, nuclear power plant accidents, and transportation incidents. For these reasons, maintenance of an adequate workforce in each of these professions is essential to meeting the nation's future needs. Currently, there is a shortage for all physicians in the medical radiology workforce.

Intrapersonal and Institutional Influences On Overall Perception of Radiation Safety Among Radiologic Technologists.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to examine mean differences between intrapersonal and institutional variables and the overall perception of radiation safety (OPRS) among U.S. radiologic technologists. The study also sought to demonstrate the applicability of the socioecological model for radiation safety decision-making. METHODS: A quantitative, cross-sectional design with the Radiation Actions and Dimensions of Radiation Safety survey instrument was used to collect data and guide hypotheses testing. The 425 research participants included radiologic technologists working in radiography, mammography, computed tomography, and radiology management. Categorical and descriptive data were calculated, and 1-way analysis of variance tests were used to analyze hypotheses. RESULTS: Seven main effects demonstrated mean differences between groups for the OPRS, including age (F5,419 = 2.55, P = .03), years of experience (F5,419 = 4.27, P = .001), primary employed imaging modality (F2,422 = 9.04, P < .001), primary role (F2,422 = 4.58, P = .01), shift length (F3,421 = 10.33, P < .001), primary practice facility (F4,404 = 5.00, P = .001), and work shift (F3,405 = 4.14, P = .007), with shift length having the largest effect. Level of education, employment status, number of imaging credentials, gender, patient population, and practice location were not significant at the level of P ≤ .05. DISCUSSION: Radiation safety culture is a multidimensional topic that requires consideration of several intervening influences, making the socioecological model well aligned when considering radiation safety culture and radiation safety perception in medical imaging. Previous research on radiation safety perception among radiologic technologists demonstrated that leadership actions, teamwork across imaging stakeholders, organizational learning, and questioning behavior are drivers of OPRS. However, this study's findings demonstrate that radiologic technologist scheduling practices and primary employed imaging modalities also should be considered when seeking to improve OPRS. CONCLUSION: This study presents an extensive examination of intrapersonal and institutional variables on OPRS among U.S.-based radiologic technologists and provides findings to support radiation safety culture decision-making in medical imaging, particularly for shift length considerations.

The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imaging.

Medical imaging professionals have an accountability for both quality and safety in the care of patients that have unexpected or anticipated repeated imaging examinations that use ionizing radiation. One measure in the safety realm for repeated imaging is cumulative effective dose (CED). CED has been increasingly scrutinized in patient populations, including adults and children. Recognizing the challenges with effective dose, including the cumulative nature, effective dose is still the most prevalent exposure currency for recurrent imaging examinations. While the responsibility for dose monitoring incorporates an element of tracking an individual patient cumulative radiation record, a more complex aspect is what should be done with this information. This challenge also differs between the pediatric and adult population, including the fact that high cumulative doses (e.g.,>100 mSv) are reported to occur much less frequently in children than in the adult population. It is worthwhile, then, to review the general construct of CED, including the comparison between the relative percentage occurrence in adult and pediatric populations, the relevant pediatric medical settings in which high CED occurs, the advances in medical care that may affect CED determinations in the future, and offer proposals for the application of the CED paradigm, considering the unique aspects of pediatric care.

Variability in image quality and radiation dose within and across 97 medical facilities.

Purpose: To characterize variability in image quality and radiation dose across a large cohort of computed tomography (CT) examinations and identify the scan factors with the highest influence on the observed variabilities. Approach: This retrospective institutional-review-board-exempt investigation was performed on 87,629 chest and abdomen-pelvis CT scans acquired for 97 facilities from 2018 to 2019. Images were assessed in terms of noise, resolution, and dose metrics (global noise, frequency in which modulation transfer function is at 0.50, and volumetric CT dose index, respectively). The results were fit to linear mixed-effects models to quantify the variabilities as affected by scan parameters and settings and patient characteristics. A list of factors, ranked by t -value with p < 0.05 , was ascertained for each of the six mixed effects models. A type III p -value test was used to assess the influence of facility. Results: Across different facilities, image quality and dose were significantly different ( p < 0.05 ), with little correlation between their mean magnitudes and consistency (Pearson's correlation coefficient < 0.34 ). Scanner model, slice thickness, recon field-of-view and kernel, mAs, kVp, patient size, and centering were the most influential factors. The two body regions exhibited similar rankings of these factors for noise (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.76 ) and dose (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.86 ) but not for resolution (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.52 ). Conclusions: Clinical CT scans can vary in image quality and dose with broad implications for diagnostic utility and radiation burden. Average scan quality was not correlated with interpatient scan-quality consistency. For a given facility, this variability can be quite large, with magnitude differences across facilities. The knowledge of the most influential factors per body region may be used to better manage these variabilities within and across facilities.

Radiation use in diagnostic imaging in children: approaching the value of the pediatric radiology community.

Medical imaging is foundational in the care of children, and much of the medical imaging province depends on ionizing radiation: radiography, fluoroscopy, CT and nuclear imaging. Many considerations for this imaging in children are distinct in the domains of appropriate radiation use, other factors that determine examination quality, the opportunities to engage and educate through networking, and the translation of research efforts. Given these needs, it is worth approaching the contributions and their impact by the pediatric radiology community, especially to the enhancement of this value in the care of children.

Patient-based Performance Assessment for Pediatric Abdominal CT: An Automated Monitoring System Based on Lesion Detectability and Radiation Dose.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To deploy an automated tool for evaluating pediatric body computed tomography (CT) performance utilizing metrics of radiation dose and image quality for the task of liver lesion detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB approved retrospective investigation used 507 IV-contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT scans of pediatric patients (<18 years) between June 2014 and November 2017 acquired on three scanner models from two manufacturers. The scans were evaluated in terms of radiation metrics (CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE) as well as task-based performance based on the clinical task of detecting a 5 mm liver lesion with a 10 HU attenuation difference from background liver. An informatics algorithm extracted a previously-validated quantitative detectability index (d') from each case reflective of the likelihood of detecting a liver lesion. The results were analyzed in terms of the relationship between d' and radiation dose metrics. RESULTS: There was minimal SSDE variability by age. Median SSDE at 100 kV on one scanner model was 5.2 mGy (5.0-5.4 mGy interquartile range). However, when assessing image quality by applying d', the age groups separated such that the younger patients had higher d' values than older patients. Similar trends were seen in all scanners. CONCLUSIONS: An automated method to assess clinical image quality for pediatric CT provided a metric of image quality that varied as expected across ages (i.e., higher quality for younger patients). This tool affords the establishment of a quality reference level that, in addition to dose estimations currently available, would allow for enhanced assessment (e.g., facilitated audit) of CT imaging performance.

Radiation in Pediatric Imaging: A Primer for Pediatricians.

Medical imaging in children makes up a considerable percentage of all imaging procedures performed in the United States. Although in recent years there has been a 15% to 20% reduction in the exposure to ionizing radiation from medical imaging in the US population, the total number of computed tomography (CT) scans has increased from 2006 to 2016, and about 85% of all medical ionizing radiation in children is due to CT. [Pediatr Ann. 2020;49(9):e370-e373.].

A Simulation Paradigm for Evaluation of Subtle Liver Lesions at Pediatric CT: Performance and Confidence.

Purpose: To create and validate a systematic observer performance platform for evaluation of simulated liver lesions at pediatric CT and to test this paradigm to measure the effect of radiation dose reduction on detection performance and reader confidence. Materials and Methods: Thirty normal pediatric (from patients aged 0-10 years) contrast material-enhanced, de-identified abdominal CT scans obtained from July 1, 2012, through July 1, 2016, were retrospectively collected from the clinical database. The study was exempt from institutional review board approval. Zero to three simulated, low-contrast liver lesions (≤6 mm) were digitally inserted by using software, and noise was added to simulate reductions in volume CT dose index (representing radiation dose estimation) of 25% and 50%. Pediatric, abdominal, and resident radiologists (three of each) reviewed 90 data sets in three sessions using an online interface, marking each lesion location and rating confidence (scale, 0-100). Statistical analysis was performed by using software. Results: Mixed-effects models revealed a significant decrease in detection sensitivity as radiation dose decreased (P < .001). The mean confidence of the full-dose and 25% dose reduction examinations was significantly higher than that of the 50% dose reduction examinations (P = .011 and .012, respectively) but not different from one another (P = .866). Dose was not a significant predictor of time to complete each case, and subspecialty was not a significant predictor of sensitivity or false-positive results. Conclusion: Sensitivity for lesion detection significantly decreased as dose decreased; however, confidence did not change between the full-dose and 25% reduced-dose scans. This suggests that readers are unaware of this decrease in performance, which should be accounted for in clinical dose reduction efforts.Keywords: Abdomen/GI, CT, Liver, Observer Performance, Pediatrics, Perception Image© RSNA, 2019.

Radiation Protection Responsibility in Medicine: A Wrap-up.

The 54th Annual Meeting of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements was held at the Hyatt Regency Bethesda, Maryland, on 5-6 March 2018. This annual meeting, entitled "Radiation Protection Responsibility in Medicine," was the first to deal entirely with radiation protection in medical imaging since the 43rd annual meeting in 2007 ("Advances in Radiation Protection in Medicine"). The 2018 meeting addressed updates for various modalities and included discussion on radiation dose metrics and benefit/risk dialogue. In addition, the 2018 meeting dedicated entire sessions to patient communications and innovations in medical imaging.