Spleen volume is a predictor of posthepatectomy liver failure and short-term mortality for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed at retrospectively assessing the impact of spleen volume (SpV) on the development of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: 152 patients with primary HCC who underwent hepatectomy (sectionectomy or more) were classified into PHLF and non-PHLF groups, and then the relationship between PHLF and SpV was assessed. SpV (cm3) was obtained from preoperative CT and standardized based on the patient's body surface area (BSA, m2). RESULTS: PHLF was observed in 39 (26%) of the 152 cases. SpV/BSA was significantly higher in the PHLF group, and the postoperative 1-year survival rate was significantly worse in the PHLF group than that in the non-PHLF group (p = 0.044). Multivariable analysis revealed SpV/BSA as a significant independent risk factor for PHLF. Using the cut-off value (160 cm3/m2), the 152 cases were divided into small SpV and large SpV groups. The incidence of PHLF was significantly higher in the large SpV group (p = 0.002), the liver failure-related mortality rate was also significantly higher in the large SpV group (p = 0.007), and the 1-year survival rate was significantly worse in the large SpV group (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: These results suggest SpV as a predictor of PHLF and short-term mortality in patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC. Moreover, SpV measurement is a simple and potentially useful method for predicting PHLF in patients with HCC.

High tumor budding is a strong predictor of poor prognosis in the resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients regardless of neoadjuvant therapy, showing survival similar to those without resection.

BACKGROUND: Tumor budding (TB) is used as an indicator of poor prognosis in various cancers. However, studies on TB in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are still limited. We examined the significance of TB in resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with or without neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients who underwent surgical resection at our institution for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from 2004 to 2017, (36 with neoadjuvant therapy), were enrolled in this study. TB was defined as an isolated cancer cell or clusters (< 5 cells) at the invasive front and the number of TB was counted using a 20 times objective lens. Patients were classified into two groups according to TB counts: low TB (TB < 5) and high TB (TB ≥5). RESULTS: In this 78 patient cohort, high TB was significantly associated with advanced tumor status (pT4: 50.0% vs 22.2%, p = 0.007, pN1/2: 70.8% vs 39.6%, p = 0.011, M1: 20.8% vs 1.9%) and higher histological grade (G3: 25.0% vs 5.7%, p = 0.014). Disease specific survival (DSS) in high TB was significantly inferior compared to that in low TB group (3-y DSS 14.5% vs 67.7%, p < 0.001). Interestingly, DSS in high TB showed similar to survival in unresected patients. In addition, high TB was also associated with advanced tumor status and poor prognosis in patients with neoadjuvant therapy. Multivariate analysis identified high TB as an independent poor prognostic factors for DSS (HR: 5.206, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that high TB was strongly associated with advanced tumor status and poor prognosis in resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients. High TB can be a novel poor prognostic factor in resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma regardless of neoadjuvant therapy.