Severe autoimmune pancytopenia after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma.

Autoimmune pancytopenia is rarely seen with Hodgkin lymphoma, and only one pediatric case of pancytopenia after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been reported. We herein report a case of autoimmune pancytopenia that developed after autologous HSCT for nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL). A 56-year-old Japanese woman underwent autologous HSCT for NLPHL. She developed autoimmune pancytopenia seven months after autologous HSCT. In this case, PSL was effective, and the blood cell counts normalized completely. However, the patient suffered from a fatal infection, probably because of immunosuppression caused by prolonged administration of PSL, as well as a history of several chemotherapies and autologous HSCT. To our knowledge, this is the first adult case of autoimmune pancytopenia after autologous HSCT for Hodgkin lymphoma. To further validate the optimal treatment strategy for autoimmune cytopenia after autologous HSCT, more cases are necessary.

Daratumumab in first-line therapy is cost-effective in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Triplet regimens, such as lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) or thalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (VTd), are standard induction therapies for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The addition of daratumumab to RVd and VTd has been investigated in the GRIFFIN and CASSIOPEIA trials, respectively, resulting in improvement in the rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. In this study, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis with a 10-year time horizon to compare first-line and second-line use of daratumumab for transplant-eligible patients with NDMM. Because long-term follow-up data for these clinical trials are not yet available, we developed a Markov model that uses MRD status to predict progression-free survival. Daratumumab was used either in the first-line setting in combination with RVd or VTd or in the second-line setting with carfilzomib plus dexamethasone (Kd). Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated from a Japanese and US payer perspective. In the Japanese analysis, D-RVd showed higher QALYs (5.43 vs 5.18) and lower costs (¥64 479,793 vs ¥71 287 569) compared with RVd, and D-VTd showed higher QALYs (5.67 vs 5.42) and lower costs (¥43 600 310 vs ¥49 471,941) compared with VTd. Similarly, the US analysis demonstrated dominance of a strategy incorporating daratumumab in first-line treatment regimens. Given that overall costs are reduced and outcomes are improved when daratumumab is used as part of a first-line regimen, the economic analysis indicates that addition of daratumumab to first-line RVd and VTd regimens is a dominant strategy compared with reserving its use for the second-line setting.