RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transarterial embolization (TAE) for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) can be technically challenging due to the compromise between achieving haemostasis and causing tissue ischaemia. The goal of the present study is to determine its technical success, rebleeding, and post-embolization ischaemia rates through meta-analysis of published literature in the last twenty years. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. Technical success, rebleeding, and ischaemia rates were extracted. Baseline characteristics such as author, publication year, region, study design, embolization material, percentage of superselective embolization were retrieved. Subgroup analysis was performed based on publication time and embolization agent. RESULTS: A total of 66 studies including 2121 patients who underwent embolization for acute LGIB were included. Endoscopic management was attempted in 34.5%. The pooled overall technical success, rebleeding, post-embolization ischaemia rates were 97.0%, 20.7%, and 7.5%, respectively. Studies published after 2010 showed higher technical success rates (97.8% vs 95.2%), lower rebleeding rates (18.6% vs 23.4%), and lower ischaemia rates (7.3% vs 9.7%). Compared to microcoils, NBCA was associated with a lower rebleeding rate (9.3% vs 20.8%) at the expense of a higher post-embolization ischaemia rate (9.7% vs 4.0%). Coagulopathy (P = .034), inotropic use (P = .040), and malignancy (P = .002) were predictors of post-embolization rebleeding. Haemorrhagic shock (P < .001), inotropic use (P = .026), malignancy (P < .001), coagulopathy (P = .002), blood transfusion (P < .001), and enteritis (P = .023) were predictors of mortality. Empiric embolization achieved a similarly durable haemostasis rate compared to targeted embolization (23.6% vs 21.1%) but a higher risk of post-embolization ischaemia (14.3% vs 4.7%). CONCLUSION: For LGIB, TAE has a favourable technical success rate and low risk of post-embolization ischaemia. Its safety and efficacy profile has increased over the last decade. Compared to microcoils, NBCA seemed to offer a more durable haemostasis rate at the expense of higher ischaemia risk. Due to the heterogeneity of currently available evidence, future prospective and comparative studies are warranted. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: (1) Acute LGIB embolization demonstrate a high technical success rate with acceptable rate of rebleeding and symptomatic ischaemia rates. Most ischaemic stigmata discovered during routine post-embolization colonoscopy were minor. (2) Although NBCA seemed to offer a more durable haemostasis rate, it was also associated with a higher risk of ischaemia compared to microcoils. (3) Coagulopathy, malignant aetiology, and inotropic use were predictors of rebleeding and mortality. (4) Routine post-embolization endoscopy to assess for ischaemia is not indicated.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Isquemia , Recidiva , Humanos , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Isquemia/terapia , Doença Aguda , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) embolization and compare adverse event (AE) rates after embolization in patients with and without portal hypertension (PHTN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent embolization of SAAs at 2 institutions was performed (34 patients from institution 1 and 7 patients from institution 2). Baseline demographic characteristics, preprocedural imaging, procedural techniques, and postprocedural outcomes were evaluated. Thirty-day postprocedural severe and life-threatening AEs were evaluated using the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. Thirty-day mortality and readmission rates were also evaluated. t test, χ2 test, and/or Fisher exact test were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without PHTN in the location, number, and size of SAA(s). All procedures were technically successful. There were 13 (32%) patients with and 28 (68%) patients without PHTN. The 30-day mortality rate (31% vs 0%; P = .007), readmission rates (61% vs 7%; P < .001), and severe/life-threatening AE rates (69% vs 0%; P < .001) were significantly higher in patients with PHTN than in those without PHTN. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significantly higher mortality and severe/life-threatening AE rate in patients with PHTN than in those without PHTN. SAAs in patients with PHTN need to be managed very cautiously, given the risk of severe/life-threatening AEs after embolization.
Assuntos
Aneurisma , Embolização Terapêutica , Hipertensão Portal , Humanos , Artéria Esplênica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma/terapia , Hipertensão Portal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hipertensão Portal/etiologia , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we identified and reviewed the outcomes of bellwether cases related to inferior vena cava (IVC) filter multidistrict litigations (MDLs). METHODS: The legal research database, LexisNexis (New York, NY), was used to identify all cases related to IVC filters. Cases unrelated to the MDLs were excluded. Court documents recording the proceedings for bellwether cases sent to jury trials were retrieved from the LexisNexis subsidiary, Law360. Data on plaintiffs, filter models, reported complications, filed claims, decision-making body, verdicts, and rewards were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 678 cases pertaining to IVC filters were found in the database, of which 12 were identified as bellwether cases for MDL. Of the 12, 2 (16.7%) were initially ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in jury trials, although the judgment for 1 of these was later vacated by a judge. The remaining 10 (83.3%) had been decided in favor of the manufacturers by judges and juries. CONCLUSIONS: Verdicts in all bench trials were in favor of manufacturers, suggesting that judges perceived the presented complications by patients to be within the normal realm of the expected risk of IVC filter use. The findings from the present study have emphasized the treating physicians' legal responsibility to adequately warn patients of all the associated risks with IVC filters. The findings have also indicated that physicians can still be found liable in product liability cases directed at manufacturers. Physicians should continue to actively monitor patients to optimize the IVC retrieval windows.
Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Filtros de Veia Cava , Bases de Dados Factuais , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Humanos , New York , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Filtros de Veia Cava/efeitos adversos , Veia Cava Inferior/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To report the utility of real-time arteriography-directed percutaneous MWA (rad-pMWA) in a hybrid angiography-computed tomography (Angio-CT) suite to treat small or inconspicuous hepatic tumors on non-contrast CT. METHOD: This single-center retrospective cohort included 15 consecutive patients who underwent rad-pMWA (6 HCC, 4 mCRC, 4 NET, and 1 cholangiocarcinoma). The median longest axial diameter of treated tumors was 1.7 (range: 1.4-6.0) cm. Technical success, contrast use, procedure-related complication, and initial treatment response were recorded. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 15/15 (100%) as shown by no residual enhancement on catheter-directed CT-angiography at the conclusion of the procedure. Average contrast volume use was 63.1 (SD: 29.1) ml. No major arterial access-related complication or residual tumor was noted. Complete ablation rate was 14/14 (100%) at initial 6-8-week follow-up. Local disease progression occurred in one patient during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Rad-pMWA using Angio-CT is safe and effective for improving tumor visibility and operator convenience. Tumors can be localized with low contrast dosage and ablated with high efficacy with immediate real-time evaluation of the ablation cavity.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Ablação por Cateter , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Angiografia , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos/patologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Micro-Ondas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To analyze the financial impact following implementation of a hybrid Angio-CT system at a tertiary care academic medical center. METHODS: Aggregate case types and volumes were compared 24 months before and 12 months after a hybrid Angio-CT system replaced a traditional interventional C-arm angiography suite at an academic medical center. Procedure revenues from this 36-month study period were derived from five payors mixes (Medicare, Medicaid, commercial insurance, out-of-pocket and managed care program) and Medicare-rate adjusted to each individual payor types. RESULTS: Average case volume per month increased 12% in the hybrid Angio-CT suite when compared to the previous traditional angiography suite (P < 0.05). The variety of IR procedures in the hybrid Angio-CT suite also expanded to include more complex interventional radiology and interventional oncology procedures; the breadth of cases performed in the hybrid Angio-CT suite were associated with CPT codes of higher rates (average CPT value/case increased from $2,334.61 to $2,567.25). The estimated average annual revenue of the hybrid Angio-CT suite increased 23% as compared to previous traditional angiography suite. CONCLUSION: A hybrid Angio-CT system is a financially feasible endeavor at a tertiary care academic medical center that facilitated higher complexity procedure codes and increased procedure-related revenue.
Assuntos
Angiografia , Medicare , Idoso , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Humanos , Radiologia Intervencionista , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the association between complication rate and time to feeding in a cohort of patients undergoing radiologically guided placement of gastrostomy tubes. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all patients receiving pull-type and push-type gastrostomy tubes placed by interventional radiologists between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2018 at a single institution. Primary outcomes included procedural and tube-related complications per medical chart review with a follow-up interval of 30 days. Exclusion criteria were enteral nutrition delayed more than 48 hours, no feeding information, and tubes placed for venting (n=20). Overall, 303 gastrostomy tubes (pull-type, n=184; push-type, n=119) were included. The most common indications for placement included head and neck carcinoma for push-type tubes (n=76, 63.9%) and cerebral vascular accident for pull-type tubes (n=78, 42.4%). RESULTS: In a multiple regression analysis, there was no statistically significant association between complications and time to feeding (p = 0.096), age (p = 0.758), gender (p = 0.127), indication for tube placement (p = 0.206), or type of tube placed (p = 0.437). Average time to initiation of enteral nutrition was 12.3 hours for the pull-type and 21.7 hours for the push-type cohort (p < 0.001). Additional multiple regression analyses of pull-type tubes and push-type tubes separately also did not find any significant association between complications and the above factors (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant correlation between time to feed and complications, suggesting that there is no clinical difference between early and late feeding following gastrostomy tube placement.
Assuntos
Gastrostomia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Cateterismo , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Gastrostomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Embolização Terapêutica , Fístula , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Radioisótopos de ÍtrioRESUMO
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of empiric embolization compared with targeted embolization in the treatment of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). MATERIALS AND METHODS. We searched the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for studies performed without language restrictions from January 2000 to November 2019. Only clinical studies with a sample size of five or more were included. Clinical success, rebleeding and complication rates, survival rates, bleeding cause, embolic materials, and vessels embolized were recorded. Empiric embolization and targeted embolization (i.e., embolization performed based on angiographic evidence of ongoing bleeding) were compared when possible. Meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS. Among 13 included studies (12 retrospective and 1 prospective), a total of 357 of 725 patients (49.2%) underwent empiric embolization for UGIB. The clinical success rate of empiric embolization was 74.7% (95% CI, 63.1-86.3%) among the 13 studies, and the survival rate was 80.9% (95% CI, 73.8-88.0%) for 10 studies. On the basis of comparative studies, no statistically significant difference was observed between empiric and targeted embolization in terms of rebleeding rate in 111 studies (36.5% vs 29.6%; odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.77-1.65; p = .53), mortality in eight studies (23.3% vs 18.0%; OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.89-2.33; p = .14), and need for surgery to control rebleeding in four studies (17.8% vs 13.4%; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.58-3.07; p = .49). The pooled embolization-specific complications were 1.9% (empiric) and 2.4% (targeted). CONCLUSION. According to all available published evidence, empiric embolization assessed with endoscopic or preprocedural imaging findings (or both) appears to be as effective as targeted embolization in preventing rebleeding and mortality in patients with angiographically negative acute UGIB. Because of its favorable safety profile, empiric embolization should be considered for patients in this clinical scenario.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Embolização Terapêutica , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
Although hybrid angiography-CT (Angio-CT) has a long history of use for interventional oncology procedures, its applications for transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are not as well described in the literature. This pictorial essay demonstrates a single-institution experience with the utilization of an Angio-CT system for TARE treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Procedural images and clinical data for twenty-four patients who underwent initial angiographic mapping with hepatopulmonary shunt fraction assessment and or administration of Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres using the Angio-CT system to date were reviewed. Cases were reviewed for examples that highlight the specific utility of Angio-CT. Three representative TARE cases were selected which illustrate unique advantages and applications of the Angio-CT system when performing TARE. These include the ability to optimally delineate hepatic vascular anatomy, accurately calculate liver volumes for dosimetry, and improve the detection and characterization of equivocal lesions. Angio-CT has unique advantages which can be applied to TARE treatment of patients with HCC. The technology has potential to be an especially effective tool for those who aim to be at the cutting edge of the rapidly growing field of interventional oncology.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Embolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Angiografia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Radioisótopos de ÍtrioRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose differences for intraprocedural computed tomography (CT) imaging between cone-beam CT and angio-CT acquired during transarterial radioembolization (TARE) therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 22 patients who underwent 23 TARE procedures were selected. Patients were imaged in both cone-beam CT and angio-CT rooms as a part of their conventional treatment plan. Effective dose contributions from individual CT acquisitions as well as the cumulative dose contributions from procedural 3D imaging were evaluated. Angiography dose contributions were omitted. Cone-beam CT images were acquired on a C-arm Philips Allura system. Effective doses were evaluated by coupling previously published conversion factors (effective dose per dose-area product) to patient's dose-area product meter readings after the procedure. Angio-CT images were acquired on a hybrid Canon Infinix-i Aquilion PRIME system. Effective doses from angio-CT scans were estimated using Radimetrics. Comparisons of a single patient's dose differential between the 2 technologies were made. RESULTS: The mean effective dose from a single CT scan was 6.42 mSv and 5.99 mSv in the cone-beam CT room and the angio-CT room, respectively (P = .3224), despite the greater field of view and average craniocaudal scan coverage in angio-CT. The mean effective dose summed across all CTs in a procedure was 12.89 mSv and 34.35 mSv in the cone-beam CT room and the angio-CT room, respectively (P = .0018). CONCLUSIONS: The mean effective dose per CT scan is comparable between cone-beam CT and angio-CT when considered in direct comparison for a single patient.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Embolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Doses de Radiação , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE. This study evaluates the prevalence of an abnormal international normalized ratio (INR) and platelet count before image-guided percutaneous needle biopsies over a 10-year period, comparing data from patients with and those without known conditions predisposing to coagulopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A review of electronic medical records identified patients who were scheduled for a biopsy in a single institution's radiology department for the period of 2007-2016. The following information was recorded: demographic data, patient history of conditions that predispose to bleeding (e.g., liver disease, anticoagulant therapy, history of coagulopathy), and INR and platelet values within 30 days before biopsy. Data were stratified by biopsies that were performed versus those that were cancelled. RESULTS. Over 10 years, 3864 percutaneous biopsies were performed, and 6371 were cancelled. Approximately half of the biopsies (48.2%) were performed in patients without a predisposing condition; of those patients, 0.8% and 0.1% had an INR greater than 1.5 and greater than 1.8, respectively, and 0.4% had a platelet count of 50,000/µL or less (≤ 50 × 109/L). In patients with no known predisposing condition, 0.6% and 0.0% of biopsies cancelled were in patients who had an INR greater than 1.5 and greater than 1.8, respectively, and 0.1% of biopsies cancelled were in patients who had a platelet count of 50,000/µL or less. Ordering prebiopsy testing of patients with no predisposing conditions for the 1864 percutaneous biopsies performed over the 10-year study period resulted in more than $850,000 in laboratory-related health care costs. Our results suggest that the cost of identifying one abnormal INR is nearly $700,000. CONCLUSION. For patients without any known bleeding risks who are scheduled to undergo image-guided percutaneous biopsies, identifying an abnormal INR or abnormal platelet count is rare. Eliminating this testing in patients without predisposing conditions has the potential to create savings in costs and time for both physicians and patients.
Assuntos
Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado , Contagem de Plaquetas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia por Agulha/efeitos adversos , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Feminino , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
A 28-year-old woman with resistant hypertension was given a diagnosis of fibromuscular dysplasia with 100% occlusion of a right renal artery branch supplying an atrophied lower pole, collateralized by the right adrenal artery. Successful adrenal collateral coil embolization restored normotension, but hypertension recurred, necessitating right partial heminephrectomy with blood pressure normalization off medications. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of bronchial artery embolization (BAE) in patients with malignant hemoptysis. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective study at our academic institution was conducted on all patients treated by BAE for hemoptysis from lung malignancy. Outcome and safety measures were documented according to Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) practice guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients (13 male, 13 female) with lung malignancy underwent BAE for hemoptysis from 2003-2013. Histologic analysis revealed 80% (21/26) of cases were from primary lung malignancies, while the remaining 20% (4/26) represented metastatic disease. Sixty-five percent (17/26) of patients underwent bronchoscopy prior to BAE. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 1,909 days, with average of 155 days. Technical success was achieved in 77% of patients (20/26). Clinical success rate was 75% (15/20). Eighty-five percent of embolized patients (17/20) were treated with particles, 15% (3/20) with gelfoam, and 20% (4/20) with coils. Single-vessel embolization was performed in 70% (14/20), two-vessel in 20% (4/20), and multiple vessels in 10% (2/20). No complications were reported. Six-month all-cause mortality of treated cases was 55% (11/20) with an in-hospital mortality of 25% (5/20). Ten percent (2/20) had remote re-bleeding events beyond 6 months. Statistically significant predictors of mortality were intubation status, hemoglobin/hematocrit at presentation, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: BAE is a safe and useful treatment for clinically significant hemoptysis in patients with primary or metastatic lung masses despite high overall mortality. Intubation status, low hemoglobin/hematocrit, and thrombocytopenia may represent clinical predictors of short term mortality following BAE. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Most patients undergoing BAE for malignant hemoptysis achieve high clinical success despite suffering a high mortality from underlying disease.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess long-term outcomes including risk of complications and nutritional benefits of mushroom-retained (pull-type) gastrostomy catheters placed in patients by interventional radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who received pull-type gastrostomy tubes between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed, including 142 men (average weight, 169.6 lb [76.32 kg]; mean age, 65.2 years; range, 22-92 years) and 158 women (average weight, 150.4 lb [67.68 kg]; mean age, 65.2 years; range, 18-98 years). Indications for placement were cerebrovascular accident (n = 80), failure to thrive (n = 71), other central nervous system disorder (n = 51), head and neck cancer (n = 47), and other malignancy (n = 51). Complications were recorded per Society of Interventional Radiology practice guidelines. Patient weight was documented at specific follow-up intervals. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Student t test and one-way analysis of variance for the effects of sex and indication for placement, respectively, on average weight change. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 98.4% (300 of 305 patients). Major and minor complications occurred at a rate of 3.7% (n = 11) and 13% (n = 39), respectively. Follow-up weight during the early (≤45 days), intermediate (≤180 days), and long-term (>180 days) periods was available for 71% (n = 214), 36% (n = 108), and 15% (n = 44) of the 300 patients, respectively. Weight gain occurred in 77% (160 of 214), 60% (65 of 108), and 73% (32 of 44) of the patients, respectively. Patients who gained weight gained 6.7, 10.6, and 16.3 lb (3.02, 4.77, and 7.34 kg) during each follow-up period, respectively. Average weight gain at follow-up in all patients was 4.2, 0.6, and 5.4 lb (1.89, 0.27, and 2.43 kg), respectively. No significant differences in average weight change were seen among groups when they were classified according to sex or indication for placement. CONCLUSION: Placement of mushroom-retained gastrostomy catheters is a viable long-term treatment option for enteral nutrition, with complication rates similar to those reported for other gastrostomy techniques. Improvement in nutrition status measured as weight gain was seen in most patients in both early and long-term periods.
Assuntos
Cateterismo/métodos , Catéteres , Gastrostomia/instrumentação , Radiografia Intervencionista , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to accurately characterize the cephalic arch segments into four domains and to enable more specific evaluation of cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) and determine the frequency of stenosis in each domain. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, a retrospective chart review was done to define a population of patients receiving hemodialysis who developed CAS as apparent on clinically indicated radiologic imaging. A standardized approach was devised to categorize four domains of the cephalic arch. Domain I was defined as the peripheral portion of the arch and Domain IV was the distal portion of the cephalic vein near termination with the axillary vein. The magnitude of stenosis as measured by percentage was determined and compared in the four domains. RESULTS: The most frequent location for stenosis was found in domain IV when compared with domains II or I (p<0.01). The magnitude of stenosis differed across all domains (p<0.001) with the least common place for CAS in domain I. Treatment of CAS included angioplasty in all, thrombectomy in eight, and stent placement in five. CONCLUSIONS: CAS occurs most commonly in the terminal portion of the arch. Four standardized domains have been defined; future work will validate these findings and determine the best intervention for each domain.
Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Veias Braquiocefálicas/cirurgia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Diálise Renal , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Adulto , Idoso , Angioplastia/instrumentação , Veias Braquiocefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Constrição Patológica , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Flebografia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Trombectomia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate dual-lumen chest port infection rates in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) compared to those with other malignancies (non-HNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective study was performed on 1,094 consecutive chest ports placed over a 2-year period. Patients with poor follow-up (n = 53), no oncologic history (n = 13), or single-lumen ports (n = 183) were excluded yielding a study population of 845 patients. The electronic medical records were queried for demographic information, data regarding ports and infections, and imaging review. RESULTS: HNC patients experienced more infections (42 vs. 30), an increased infection rate per 1,000 catheter days (0.68 vs. 0.21), and more early infections within 30 days compared to non-HNC patients (10 vs. 6) (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.02, respectively). An existing tracheostomy at the time of port placement was associated with infection in the HNC group (p = 0.02) but was not an independent risk factor for infection in the study population overall (p = 0.06). There was a significant difference in age, male gender, and right-sided ports between the HNC and non-HNC groups (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p = 0.01), although these were not found to be independent risk factors for infection (p = 0.32, p = 0.76, p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: HNC patients are at increased risk for infection of dual-lumen chest ports placed via a jugular approach compared to patients with other malignancies. Tracheostomy is associated with infection in HNC patients but is not an independent risk factor for infection in the oncologic population as a whole.