Reconstruction with submental flap for aggressive orofacial cancer- an updated series.

PURPOSE: Submental flap is gaining popularity for head and neck reconstruction. We have reported in 2007 our early experience of using submental flap for aggressive orofacial malignancy. Novel flap design and application is described in this updated series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 patients who had received submental flap reconstruction after extirpation of newly diagnosed aggressive orofacial lesions were retrieved. The details of the flap harvest was studied for flap size, inclusion of mylohyoid muscle, antegrade versus retrograde blood supply, and compared with our previous series. RESULTS: The dimension of flap skin paddle was 30cm2 (range 20-72). Retrograde pedicle flow was used in 2(13.3%) patients. Mylohyoid muscle was included in the flap in 6(40%) patients. There was no total flap necrosis while partial flap necrosis occurred in 1 patient(6.7%). There was a significant increase of inclusion of mylohyoid muscle to the flap in this series (p = 0.02). Novel techniques including double-paddled flap skin to resurface full-thickness defect and chimeric osteocutaneous mandible submental flap for maxillary defect were successfully performed. CONCLUSIONS: Submental flap is a viable reconstructive option in selected patients with aggressive orofacial malignancy. The indications are expanding and its technical modification is evolving and resulting in more innovative applications.

Prognostic value of lymph node density in buccal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Lymph node density(LND) has been shown to be a better prognosticator than conventional nodal classification to predict prognosis for squamous cell carcinoma(SCC) of the oral cavity. However, studies focusing on subsites of oral cancer are meager. The role of LND for buccal SCC was evaluated in this study. METHODS: A total of 39 patients with buccal SCC primarily treated surgically with neck dissection were identified. LND was defined as the number of positive nodes over the number of nodal yield. The cut-off of LND was ≤0.07 or >0.07. Patient demographic data and clincopathologic parameters were described. Survival was expressed by Kaplan-Meier method and correlation with survival is analyzed with log-rank test. IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 was used for data computation. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 79.0months and median nodes removed was 23 (range 8-93). Positive nodal involvement was found in 19(48.7%) patients. The 5-year and 10-year OS were 67.4% and 42.5% whilst for DSS were 69.2% and 65.5%, respectively. When pT-, pN-, LND-classification and AJCC stage were analyzed for the whole series, only pN- (p=0.006) and LND-classification (p=0.002) were significant factors for OS, while pT-, pN-, LND-classification and AJCC stage were all significant factors for DSS. When only cases with positive nodal spread were considered, the pN-classification (pN1 vs pN2) was not a significant risk factor for either OS (p=0.075, HR 3.10(CI 0.89-10.76)) and DSS (p=0.074, HR 3.58(CI 0.88-14.56)). By contrast, LND-classification (≤0.07 vs >0.07) remained a significant predictor for OS (p=0.03, HR 3.95(CI 1.15-13.63)), but not for the DSS (p=0.112, HR 2.92(CI 0.78-10.99)). CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of LND on buccal SCC is supported in this study. The results also suggest that LND is better than the conventional pN-classification to predict OS. Further studies on LND with big sample size for buccal SCC or other subsites of OSCC are worthwhile.

The role of human papillomavirus in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A case control study on a southern Chinese population.

HPV plays a role in the development of a portion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but only limited information on its role in southern Chinese population is available. A multicenter case-control study was conducted. HPV type, viral integration, E6/7 mRNA expression status, and TP53 mutation were determined. A total of 228 HNSCC were recruited including 137 (60.1%) oral SCC, 34 (14.9%) oropharyngeal SCC, 31 (13.6%) laryngeal SCC, 21 (9.2%) hypopharyngeal SCC, and 5 (2.2%) lip and paranasal sinus SCC. High-risk HPV infection was found in 7.5% (17/228) of HNSCC, but only a small proportion of samples had evidence of viral integration (5.3%, 12/228) or E6/7 mRNA expression (4.4%, 10/228). HPV infection with oncogenic phenotype (integration and E6/7 mRNA expression) was significantly more common in oropharyngeal SCC than controls (9/34, 26.5% vs. 0/42, 0.0%, P < 0.001). Smoking showed a significant association with HNSCC, oropharyngeal SCC, and laryngeal SCC. TP53 mutation was associated with HNSCC (P < 0.001). Older age, TP53 mutation, and HPV16 infection with oncogenic phenotypes were independently associated factors for HNSCC with odds ratios of 1.03 (1.02-1.05), 3.38 (1.71-6.66), and 9.19 (1.13-74.68), respectively. High-risk HPV infection of head and neck mucosa is not uncommon in the Hong Kong population. This study found that 26-30% of oropharyngeal carcinoma was associated with HPV infection, mostly HPV16, and that smoking which predisposes to TP53 mutations was another important risk factor.

The use of bipaddled submental flap for reconstructing composite buccal defect.

Reconstruction of full-thickness buccal defect is challenging as two linings need to be addressed. Either two different flaps or double-paddle for one free flaps are necessary for this defect. The prolonged operation might not be tolerated by patients because of advanced age or medical comorbidity. A 77-year-old gentleman, with significant medical comorbidity, presented with a 4.0 × 4.5 cm ulcerative mass due to squamous cell carcinoma arising from the left buccal mucosa. The tumor extended to the left cheek skin. There was no palpable neck node. CT scan did not show any bony erosion or suspicious neck node. Full-thickness resection of the tumour was undertaken. For the full-thickness buccal defect, a bi-paddled pedicled submental flap after de-epithelialization of the flap skin was used for both the cutaneous and mucosal resurfacing. The flap survived completely and patient recovered smoothly. The surgery is simple and operation time is much shorter than free flap reconstruction. This modified utilization of submental flap simplifies the closure of complicated oro-facial wound.

Reconstruction with submental flap for aggressive orofacial cancer.

BACKGROUND: The submental flap was described for head and neck reconstruction more than a decade ago. Its application is confined mainly to nonmalignant diseases or low-grade malignancies, as the submental flap resides in the level I lymphatic drainage region of the neck. The authors report the use of the submental flap for soft-tissue reconstruction in a selected group of patients with aggressive orofacial cancer. METHODS: From March of 2003 to September of 2005, 10 patients (nine with intraoral squamous cell carcinoma and one with facial angiosarcoma) underwent submental flap reconstruction after surgical extirpation of aggressive orofacial malignancies. The indications were severe comorbidity, old age, the presence of another incurable cancer, and/or the patient's skepticism about undergoing a free flap operation. RESULTS: Of the surviving patients, the median follow-up was 21 months (range, 2 to 37 months). There were no cases of total flap failure, but partial necrosis occurred in two cases. Three patients experienced tumor recurrence, but only one case might have been related to use of the submental flap. Postoperative oral function, in terms of swallowing and speech, was well preserved; conventional dentures were fabricated for four patients. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with aggressive orofacial cancer, the submental flap is an expedient alternative to free tissue transfer for reconstruction. Nonetheless, indiscriminate use might compromise the oncological outcome, so it cannot be regarded as a standard method of treatment.

Contralateral neck recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity and oropharynx.

PURPOSE: Contralateral neck failure after therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx has rarely been studied in detail. We aimed to examine the pattern and outcome of contralateral neck relapse and possible predictive clinicopathologic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients undergoing surgery for cancer of oral cavity/oropharynx with curative intent were recruited from the hospital head and neck cancer registry. The age, gender, tumor site, primary tumor laterality, TNM status, clinical N status, pathologic T status, ipsilateral pathologic N status, tumor stage, status of residual disease, histopathologic differentiation, postoperative radiotherapy, local relapse, distant relapse, extracapsular spread of lymph node metastasis and neck dissection were evaluated for association with contralateral neck relapse. RESULTS: Seven patients developed ipsilateral, 5 patients developed contralateral, and 3 patients developed bilateral neck recurrence after therapy. Only 1 patient with contralateral or bilateral neck relapse survived after salvage therapy. Ipsilateral positive nodal status was the only significant clinicopathologic parameter associated with contralateral neck relapse, which occurred rather commonly in well-lateralized tumors. CONCLUSION: Contralateral and ipsilateral neck relapses are similar in occurrence. Pathologic positive nodal status is associated with a higher incidence of contralateral neck relapse. Aggressive and comprehensive adjuvant radiotherapy to the neck plus close surveillance in the first 2 years postoperatively might curtail the frequency and mortality due to contralateral neck failure.