Inadvertent Injection of Ciprofloxacin Instead of Ropivacaine Through Epidural Catheter.

Purpose: Patient harm is often due to medication errors related to neuraxial and peripheral misconnection. We report a case of inadvertent injection of ciprofloxacin into the epidural space and discuss the strategies that could prevent such an incident. Summary: A 74-year-old woman presented a recurrence of an ovarian cancer. The recent discovery of an intrabdominal recurrence on CT-scan led us to propose a new surgical procedure. A thoracic epidural analgesia was performed prior to general anesthesia. Postoperative pain was controlled with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with ropivacaine-epinephrine. During the first night, abdominal pain appeared. During the second day, a nurse discovered that the bag connected to the pump contained ciprofloxacin and not ropivacaine. After aspiration of 2.5 ml sent to laboratory for analysis, the epidural catheter was removed. The investigation revealed the different causes leading to such an error. Three days after, the patient returned home, without any adverse symptoms. Conclusion: This is the first report of the inadvertent administration of ciprofloxacin into the epidural space via a patient-controlled epidural analgesia technique. As there is no effective treatment for such errors, we discuss the neurological risk of ciprofloxacin and prevention strategy mainly based on organizational and human factors.

Radiation dose reduction during venous access port implantation: the importance of upgrading equipment and radiation-protection training.

BACKGROUND: Implantable central venous port systems are widely used in oncology. We upgraded our fluoroscopy machines, and all anesthetists completed two training courses focusing on the risks of ionizing radiation for patients and health workers. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of upgrading the machines and the radiation-protection training on ionizing radiation exposure during venous port system implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive venous port implantations between 2019 and 2022. The older fluoroscopy machines were replaced by two new machines. A first training session about health worker radioprotection was organized. The medical staff completed a second training course focused on protecting patients from ionizing radiation. We defined four distinct time intervals (TI): venous port implantations performed with the old equipment, the new fluoroscopy machines, after the first training course, and after the second training course. The air kerma-area product (KAP) was compared between these four TI and fluoroscopy times and the number of exposures only with the new machines. RESULTS: We analyzed 2587 procedures. A 93% decrease in the median KAP between the first and last TI was noted (median KAP = 323.0 mGy.cm2 vs. 24.0 mGy.cm2, p < 0.0001). A decrease in the KAP was observed for each of the 11 anesthetists. We also noted a significant decrease in the time of fluoroscopy and the number of exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Upgrading the fluoroscopy equipment and completing two dedicated training courses allowed for a drastic decrease patient exposure to ionizing radiation during venous access port implantation by non-radiologist practitioners.

Benefits of cardiac coherence combined with medical hypnosis on preoperative anxiety before cancer surgery: the COHEC II study trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative anxiety is a frequent problem that can lead to complications both during anaesthesia and in the postoperative period, especially in oncology. Studies have shown that it can be managed using non-pharmacological approaches, but few works have evaluated psychoeducational programmes. The aim of the COHErence Cardiaque (COHEC) II Study is to evaluate the combination of medical hypnosis (MH) and cardiac coherence (CC) training to manage preoperative anxiety in patients with cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: COHEC II is an ongoing multicentre randomised clinical trial carried out in three French comprehensive cancer centres. In total, 296 patients who will undergo surgery for cancer will be recruited during 18 months and will be randomised in the control arm or the intervention arm. Patients in the intervention arm will follow a daily programme that combines MH and CC, starting 7 days before surgery. The control arm will receive the standard treatment to manage preoperative anxiety. The primary endpoint is the anxiety level on surgery day, measured using a Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary endpoints are patient adherence to the programme, satisfaction and postsurgery recovery quality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the French Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes EST-II) on 24 November 2021 and will be carried out following the good practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05197972.

Open abdominal vacuum pack technique for the management of severe abdominal complications after cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications and management of grade III-IV postoperative complications in patients requiring vacuum-assisted open abdomen after debulking surgery for ovarian carcinomatosis. METHODS: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent a cytoreductive surgery by laparotomy for an epithelial ovarian cancer that required postoperative management of an open abdomen. An abdominal vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAWC) was applied in cases of abdominal compartmental syndrome (ACS) or intra-abdominal hypertension, to prevent ACS. The fascia was closed with a suture or a biologic mesh. The primary aim was to achieve primary fascial closure. Secondary outcomes considered included complications of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and open abdominal wounds (hernia, fistula). RESULTS: Two percent of patients who underwent CRS required VAWC during the study's patient inclusion period. VAWC indications included: (i) seven cases of gastro-intestinal perforation, (ii) three necrotic enterocolitis, (iii) two intestinal ischemia, (iv) three anastomotic leakages and (v) four intra-abdominal hemorrhages. VAWC was used to treat indications (i) to (iv) (which represented 73.7% of cases), to prevent compartmental syndrome. Primary fascia closure was achieved in 100% of cases, in four cases (21.0%) a biologic mesh was used. Median hospital stay was 65 days (range: 18-153). Four patients died during hospitalization, three of these within 30 days of VAWC completion. CONCLUSION: VAWC for managing open abdominal wounds is a reliable technique to treat surgical post-CRS complications in advanced ovarian cancer and reduces the early post-operative mortality in cases presenting with severe complications.

Influence of Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block on Chronic Pain at 3 Months After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Prospective, Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: In 2015, we evaluated our practices regarding pain after breast-conserving surgery. Thereafter, we have adapted our practices by performing a systematic deep serratus plane block before the surgical incision. In 2019, we assessed the impact of these changes in terms of chronic pain. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of chronic pain 3 months after this type of surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated with breast-conserving surgery as outpatients were included in this prospective study between April and July 2019. After inducing general anesthesia, 20 mL of ropivacaine 3.75 mg/mL were injected under the serratus muscle. Morphine titration was performed in the recovery room according to pain scores. A pain and quality of life questionnaire was sent 3 months after surgery. A backward logistic regression model was applied to calculate the adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: The final analysis involved 137 patients. Three months after surgery, 43 patients (31%) reported persistent pain related to the surgery. Maximum pain in the last 24 hours was moderate to severe in 60% of cases, 16 patients (35%) took painkillers. Morphine titration in the recovery room was required in 25 patients (18%). Younger age and the use of lidocaine to prevent after injection of propofol during general anesthesia induction appeared to be protective factors for the risk of pain at 3 months (secondary endpoints). DISCUSSION: No persistent pain at 3 months was reported in 69% of cases. Furthermore, the use of a deep serratus anterior plane block before the surgical incision has limited the need for morphine titration in the recovery room to <1 patient in 5. These evaluations of professional practices should be encouraged.

Unexplained pain after scheduled limb surgery.

Orthopedic surgery can lead to pain that is poorly if at all explicable, both in the immediate postoperative period and at longer term, impairing the surgical result and necessitating a multidisciplinary approach of multimodal analgesia throughout the patient's care pathway. Preoperatively, patients at high risk of postoperative pain need to be identified and referred to a pain specialist to optimize pain management. Surgical and anesthesiological measures then need to be taken intraoperatively to limit the risk of pain. Finally, and most importantly, when pain does occur postoperatively, the surgeon needs to be able to treat any obvious cause and then rapidly to call in a pain specialist to identify the underlying causes and treat them effectively.

A case report of sustained resolution of cancer pain by continuous perineural infusion of local anaesthetic.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are currently offered as first-line treatment for chronic pain from cancer. Continuous regional analgesia could be an alternative to opioids. However, the required duration of catheterization and the sustained analgesic effects of this technique after catheter removal have yet to be clarified. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a patient with a shoulder desmoid tumour for which monitoring of tumour progression was the sole therapeutic strategy. Analgesia took the form of patient-controlled infusion of local anaesthetics through an interscalene catheter. Due to the need of an MRI control 45 days later, the pump was stopped. The persistence of pain relief 48 hr later led to the decision to remove the perineural catheter. No pain was reported by the patient over the following 42 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this patient, it would seem that continuous analgesia allowed for a sustained resolution of pain from the shoulder-located tumour. One hypothesis is that local anaesthetics play a direct role in the erasure of pain memory. This hypothesis needs to be tested with a large patient cohort. SIGNIFICANCE: This case report provides new insights into the treatment of cancer pain. The most interesting finding is that the pain did remained absent after 45 days of continuous infusion of local anaesthetics through an interscalene catheter. We postulated that local anaesthetic drugs have an impact on pain memory.

Analgesic Drug Prescription After Carpal Tunnel Surgery: A Pharmacoepidemiological Study Investigating Postoperative Pain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a frequent cause of neuropathic pain of the upper limb. Surgery is often proposed in second-line treatment, leading to an expected decrease in analgesic drug consumption. The main objective of this study was to investigate the variations in analgesic drug prescriptions, with a special focus on constant or increasing prescription patterns, before and after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study of French beneficiaries from the health insurance system in Midi-Pyrénées area. All patients undergoing carpel tunnel surgery during a specified period were identified and included. Definition of increased or constant prescription of analgesics was based on the comparison of the accumulated defined daily doses received by months and a difference between early preoperative (2 months before) and late postoperative period (2-12 months after surgery) superior to a -3.5 margin. We performed 4 multivariate logistic regression models to identify factors associated with increased or constant analgesic drug prescription patterns (for all analgesics, opioid, antineuropathic, nonopioid drugs). RESULTS: Among the 3665 patients included, 3255 (89%) received at least 1 analgesic drug during the late postoperative period (39% [n = 1426] for opioids and 15% [n = 563] for antineuropathic drugs). Prescription of analgesic, opioid, or antineuropathic drugs was maintained or increased in the late postoperative period in 11%, 5%, and 3% of the population, respectively. High levels of preoperative pain and female sex were associated with an increase in opioid use, whereas inpatient surgery (vs ambulatory surgery), high levels of preoperative pain, and psychiatric disorders were found to be associated with an increase in antineuropathic drug use. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that approximately 3% to 5% of patients undergoing carpal tunnel surgery had persistent and even increased use of opioid or antineuropathic drugs more than 2 months after surgery, in relation with possible chronic postoperative pain. Considering the incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome, the risks associated with persistent opioid use in this population should be further monitored.

Spinal anaesthesia in outpatient and conventional surgery: A point of view from experienced French anaesthetists.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the practice of spinal anaesthesia among French anaesthetists in inpatient and outpatient settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A questionnaire was sent to members of the French Association of Anaesthetists involved in regional anaesthesia during the first 4months of 2015. The questionnaire included items on the practice of spinal anaesthesia (type of needle, local anaesthetic available, puncture and disinfection techniques, etc.) and on the anaesthetic techniques usually used in 5 surgical situations eligible for outpatient surgery (knee arthroscopy, inguinal hernia, transobturator tape, haemorrhoids, varicose veins in the lower limbs). RESULTS: Responses from 703 anaesthesiologists were analysed. Spinal anaesthesia was usually performed in a sitting position (76%) using a Whitacre needle (60%) with a 25 G (57%) diameter. Ultrasound before puncture was reported in 26% of cases due to obesity or spinal abnormalities. Among the 5 surgical situations eligible for outpatient spinal anaesthesia, the technique was typically proposed in 29-49% of cases. Bupivacaine was the most used local anaesthetic. Concerns over delays in attaining readiness for hospital discharge, urine retention, operation length, and surgeon's preference were the main reasons for choosing another anaesthetic technique in these situations. DISCUSSION: New local anaesthetics are beginning to be used for outpatient spinal anaesthesia due to their interesting pharmacodynamic profile in this context. This study will provide a basis for evaluating future changes in practice.

Hypnosis and Axillary Compartment Block for Breast Cancer Surgery: A Case Report.

Hypnosis has been proven to be a powerful tool in the management of anxiety and pain. It allows for an increase of pain threshold, which can reach the level of surgical analgesia. Recently injection of local anesthetics around the serratus muscle has been presented as an alternative to paravertebral block for cancer breast surgery. We report the successful use of hypnosis in combination with an axillary compartment block for lumpectomy and axillary lymph node dissection.

Prospective cohort study assessing chronic pain in patients following minor surgery for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Pain after tumorectomy and sentinel lymph node dissection is poorly reported in the literature. We carried out a prospective survey aimed at assessing pain three months after such minor surgery for breast cancer. METHODS: The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Most surgeries followed a standard protocol involving general anesthesia with no regional analgesia technique, laryngeal mask, sufentanil and propofol for induction, and multimodal analgesia during the postoperative period. Three months after the surgery, a questionnaire was sent to the patients with a pre-stamped envelope for return. The questions probed responses required to calculate a Brief Pain Inventory score and modified neuropathic pain score (DN3). RESULTS: Over a 5-month period, 150 patients (aged 60 (11) years, body mass index of 25 (6) kg/m2) were included in the final analysis. In the recovery room, 43% of patients required morphine at a mean dose of 5.2 (1.8) mg. Three months post surgery, 60 patients (40%) reported persistent pain for which 62% took analgesic drugs. We found no risk factor associated with this persistent pain among our studied population. Neuropathic pain was noted in 61% of patients who reported persistent pain primarily associated with periareolar incision. CONCLUSIONS: Pain persisted up to three months after minor surgery for breast cancer in 40% of patients with mostly a neuropathic component (61%).

Chronic Cancer-Related Pain: Continuous Perineural Infusion of Local Anesthetics as Alternative to Systemic Analgesic Drugs.

Pain is a major concern for patients suffering from cancer. Although opioid drugs remain the gold standard for treatment of pain, little is known about the interest of continuous analgesia techniques as alternative. The aim of the present article is to detail the feasibility and to present the diversity of continuous perineural infusion of local anesthetic. A series of five patients suffering from different cancer-related pain is presented. A continuous perineural block was proposed to patients presenting with unbearable pain in an area innervated by a plexus or a nerve despite parenteral analgesic pharmacotherapy. All blocks were performed in a surgical theatre under sterile conditions. An initial bolus dose with 3.75 mg/mL ropivacaine was injected followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg/mL of ropivacaine. Patient-controlled perineural analgesia was started at home by a nursing network. The technique, the efficacy, and the side effects were reported. Complete pain relief was noted 15 minutes after local anesthetic injection in the five cases, and efficacy was maintained during the following days at home, with no other analgesic treatment required. One patient restarted working a few weeks after catheter insertion. The catheter duration lasted for 12 to 110 days. One catheter was removed because of local anesthetic leak at the puncture point. Some paresthesia was noted in one patient. No other side effect was noted. No infection was reported. In selected patients, continuous perineural infusion of local anesthetics appears to be an attractive alternative to parenteral opioids for cancer-related pain. Further investigation is warranted to better define the place of these techniques in the armamentarium of cancer-related pain treatment.

Even a "pigtail" distal end catheter can enter the epidural space after continuous paravertebral block.

A woman with a medical history of breast cancer presented with chronic pain of the right hemithorax. To alleviate pain, a continuous paravertebral block was performed using a pigtail end catheter, introduced using ultrasound visualization (transversal technique at the inferior articular process of T6). Complete pain relief was observed. A few hours later, urinary retention was diagnosed and discharge from the ambulatory setting was canceled. On the following day, a new injection of local anesthetics through the catheter triggered paresthesia in the contralateral leg and a new urinary retention was diagnosed. A CT scan confirmed the epidural misplacement of the catheter. The latter was withdrawn, and the patient was released to home after the complete disappearance of her neurological symptoms. This case report highlights the risk of inadvertently misplacing the catheter into the epidural space during thoracic paravertebral block, even with a "pigtail" distal end type of catheter.

One half of patients reports persistent pain three months after orthopaedic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine persistent post-surgical pain prevalence after orthopaedic surgery with its impact on patient quality of life and to assess factors related to it. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. PATIENTS: A questionnaire was mailed to 2100 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery in our teaching hospital. METHODS: Pain prevalence 3 months after surgery, pain intensity, a neuropathic pain component using the DN4 questionnaire and its impact on patient quality of life were assessed. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred and ninety-two patients answered our questionnaire. Among them, 48% suffered from chronic pain. This pain had a neuropathic component in 43%, which was responsible for analgesic overconsumption and increases in sleep disturbance and sick leave. Arthrodesis, knee arthroplasty and leg fracture were linked to increased chronic post-surgical pain (OR=2.7, OR=1.8, OR=1.9, respectively; P<0.05). Elbow surgery, meniscectomy, amputation and neurolysis were linked to increased neuropathic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic, post-surgical pain is common after orthopaedic surgery, leading to analgesic consumption and sleep disturbance. Patients at high risk for developing chronic post-surgical pain must be identified preoperatively. The development of postoperative pain clinics should be one way to respond to this public health problem.

Analgesic drug consumption increases after knee arthroplasty: a pharmacoepidemiological study investigating postoperative pain.

Knee arthroplasty remains the gold standard in the treatment of severe osteoarthritis. Chronic postoperative pain has been reported with a prevalence ranging from 15% to 47%. The aim of this study was to compare analgesic drug consumption before and after surgery as an indicator of pain after knee surgery. A pharmacoepidemiological method comparing analgesics and antineuropathic issues 1 year before and 1 year after surgery was used. All patients who underwent knee arthroplasty in the Midi-Pyrenees region (2.5 million inhabitants) were identified through the Health Insurance System Database. Increase of drug issues (all analgesics, antineuropathic drugs, strong opioids) was calculated and compared between several periods surrounding the surgery (12 months, 2 months, and 10 months before and after the knee arthroplasty). A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with chronic postoperative pain. The study included 1939 patients. An increase in analgesic, antineuropathic, and opioid drug consumption was observed the year after the surgery in 47.3%, 8.6%, and 5.6% of patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis found a significant association between type of surgery (total knee vs unicompartmental arthroplasty) and analgesic consumption 1 year after surgery, and between preoperative pain and psychiatric vulnerability and increase in neuropathic drug dispensing. Conversely, older age was considered as a protective factor. This study revealed that an increase in the issue of different analgesic drugs is present in half of patients 1 year after knee arthroplasty. Several associated factors of drug consumption (preoperative pain, type of surgery, and psychiatric disorder) were identified.

A modified mid-femoral approach to the sciatic nerve block: a correlation between evoked motor response and sensory block.

BACKGROUND: The lateral sciatic mid-femoral block (LSMF), proved to be reliable, safe, and effective on both branches of the sciatic nerve with a single injection. However, we do not know which component of the sciatic nerve (the tibial [T] or the common peroneal [CP]) produces a better success rate when performing a LSMF with a single injection technique. In this prospective study we compared the success rate of the T motor response with the CP motor response. METHODS: Ninety-five patients undergoing ankle or foot surgery were enrolled. Thirty milliliters of 0.475% ropivacaine was injected at the first evoked motor response, either T or CP, with a minimal intensity between 0.3 and 0.5 mA. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included in group T and 23 in group CP. The block was considered a success when a complete sensory block of the sciatic nerve was obtained. The success rate was 90% (65) for the T response and 70% (16) for the CP response (P < 0.05). Time to perform the block (CP: 4.5 +/- 3 min vs T: 4.5 +/- 4 min; P = NS) as well as sensory and motor onset times were not significantly different between groups. No complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the evoked motor response of the T branch is associated with a higher success rate than a CP response using the modified LSMF block.

A comparison between double-injection axillary brachial plexus block and midhumeral block for emergency upper limb surgery.

In this prospective and randomized study, we compared a double-injection axillary (median and radial nerves) block with a midhumeral block in 90 patients undergoing emergency upper limb surgery. Time to perform the block, success rate, and patient tolerance were evaluated. The time to perform the block was 5 min longer in the midhumeral group. The success rate was similar in both groups (80% and 91% in groups axillary and midhumeral respectively), except for the musculocutaneous nerve. Patient tolerance was better in the axillary group. Double-injection axillary brachial plexus block is superior to midhumeral block for emergency hand surgery.

The feasibility and efficacy of short axillary catheters for emergency upper limb surgery: a descriptive series of 120 cases.

We prospectively evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a simple method for inserting 5.1-cm brachial plexus catheters using a fascial click technique. In 120 patients, after inserting an axillary catheter by a resident and verifying adequate position using a nerve stimulator, 0.7 mL/kg 1% mepivacaine was injected. Success of blockade (analgesia at 40 min in the 4 terminal nerves), analgesia efficacy, and resident autonomy were recorded. The primary success rate was 87%. Reinjections were performed preoperatively and perioperatively in 40% and 50% of patients, respectively. The resident completed the technique in 91% of cases. We conclude that this technique is easily performed by residents in training and is associated with frequent success for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.

Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters.

UNLABELLED: We prospectively tested the hypothesis that the use of a stimulating catheter improves the efficacy of continuous posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block in 100 randomized patients scheduled for elective orthopedic foot surgery. After eliciting a sciatic mediated muscular twitch at < or = 0.5 mA nerve stimulation output, the perineural catheter was advanced 2-4 cm beyond the tip of the introducer either blindly (Group C; n = 50) or stimulating via the catheter (Group S; n = 50). A bolus dose of 25 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine was followed by a postoperative patient-controlled infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (basal infusion: 3 mL/h; incremental dose: 5 mL; lockout time: 30 min). Propacetamol 2 g IV was administered every 8 h, and opioid rescue analgesia was available if required. Catheter placement required 7 +/- 2 min in Group S and 5 +/- 2 min in Group C (P = 0.056). A significantly shorter onset time of both sensory and motor blocks was noted in Group S. No difference in quality of pain relief at rest and during motion was reported between the groups. Median (range) local anesthetic consumption during the first 48 h after surgery was 239 mL (175-519 mL) and 322 mL (184-508 mL) in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). Rescue opioid analgesia was required by 12 (25%) and 28 (58%) patients in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). We conclude that the use of a stimulating catheter results in shorter onset time of posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block, similar pain relief with reduced postoperative consumption of local anesthetic solution, and less rescue opioid consumption. IMPLICATIONS: This prospective, randomized, blind investigation demonstrated that the use of a stimulating catheter for continuous posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block resulted in shorter onset time of sensory and motor blocks and less local anesthetic consumption and need for rescue pain medication after elective orthopedic foot surgery compared with blind catheter advancement.