Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 32(11): 1447-1451, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675775

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Exclusion of organic disorders involving the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) is a mandatory step before considering a biopsy-avoidance diagnostic strategy for adult coeliac disease. We aim to evaluate the prevalence of alarm symptoms and coincidental UGI endoscopic findings at the time of diagnosis of coeliac disease. To develop consensus criteria to identify patients with coeliac disease requiring a gastroscopy and to evaluate whether alarm symptoms prompting gastroscopy were predictive of endoscopic findings. METHODS: Presenting symptoms and UGI endoscopic findings at diagnosis of coeliac disease were collected retrospectively in 278 adult patients with coeliac disease diagnosed in Pavia between January 1999 and December 2017. A panel of experts developed criteria to evaluate which clinical scenarios warrant gastroscopy, which was then applied retrospectively to patients diagnosed in Pavia. RESULTS: At least one alarm symptom was present in 177/278 patients, 121/278 met our criteria for gastroscopy. Major UGI endoscopic findings included 3 cases of autoimmune atrophic gastritis, 19 oesophagitis and 20 Helicobacter pylori infections. No organic disorders were found. Prevalence of major endoscopic findings did not differ between patients who met our criteria and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high prevalence of alarm symptoms at diagnosis, coincident major UGI endoscopic findings are rare in adult coeliac disease. These results may be relevant for future developments in coeliac disease diagnosis in adults.


Assuntos
Doença Celíaca , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Adulto , Doença Celíaca/diagnóstico , Doença Celíaca/epidemiologia , Gastroscopia , Humanos , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Br J Nutr ; 123(10): 1159-1164, 2020 05 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32077407

RESUMO

Follow-up modalities for adult coeliac patients remain controversial. Non-invasive markers to identify coeliac patients on a gluten-free diet (GFD) with persistence of villous atrophy (VA) are still lacking. We aim to develop a score to stratify coeliac patients on a GFD according to their risk of having persistent VA and to tailor follow-up modalities accordingly. The clinical notes of over 700 coeliac patients attending our unit (September 1999-November 2018) were retrospectively examined. A total of 273 patients on a GFD with a histological follow-up performed 12-24 months after diagnosis were selected. We developed a bivariable model based on diet adherence and clinical response evaluated by previously validated methods. A four-level score (0·5, 1·5, 3, 4) was obtained. Patients on a strict GFD and with good clinical conditions (score 4) have a very low risk of persistence of VA (2 (95 % CI 1, 5) %). Conversely, the risk is very high (46 (95 % CI 25, 68) %) in patients with poor adherence to a GFD and unsatisfactory clinical response (score 0·5). A score of 1·5 (poor GFD adherence and persistent well-being) is linked with a high risk (23 (95 % CI 14, 36) %). Risk is intermediate (6 (95 % CI 3, 10) %) in patients scoring 3 (strict GFD and no/partial clinical improvement). Three patients who developed complications belonged to this scenario. Patients at low risk of persistent VA can be followed-up non-invasively, whereas a biopsy should be repeated in those at high/very high risk. Case-by-case evaluation is needed in patients at intermediate risk. Studies on a larger sample size are required to confirm these data.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Doença Celíaca/diagnóstico , Doença Celíaca/patologia , Duodeno/patologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Adulto , Atrofia/diagnóstico , Biópsia/normas , Doença Celíaca/terapia , Dieta Livre de Glúten , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA