Local treatment with deep percutaneous electrochemotherapy of different tumor lesions: pain relief and objective response results from an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation focuses on the evaluation of the efficacy of deep-seated Electrochemotherapy (ECT) in terms of pain relief and local objective response, in pre-treated patients with neither further available pharmacological treatments nor eligible for surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Deep percutaneous ECT has been performed in 20 patients subjected to systemic anaesthesia. Bleomycin was administrated intravenously before the application of the electrical pulses on the target area, employing multiple single needles depending on the size and location of the target tumor. RESULTS: Pain assessment based on Visual Analogue Scale showed significant pain relief one month after treatment in all patients, reducing from 7.5 to 3 as a median value (p-value at Wilcoxon test <0.001). Local symptom-free survival median value was 5.5 months. At the first follow-up (1-2 months), a local disease control rate (LDCR) was observed in 19/20 (95%) patients: complete responses in 2 (10%), partial responses in 8 (40%) and stable disease in 9 (45%). Local progression-free survival median value was 5.7 months. Overall, no major adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that deep percutaneous ECT can produce a significant pain reduction and a high LDCR in different tumor lesions, for anatomical site or histotype. In particular, ECT has demonstrated to be effective in various histotypes and deep-seated tumor lesions never treated before by this approach giving a new chance to physicians for reducing oncological pain in patients not eligible to other therapeutic routes. The innovative peculiarity of our study was the successful application of deep percutaneous ECT on adrenal metastasis, malignant pleural mesothelioma, uterine leiomyosarcoma and the uncommon case of a male müllerian tumor.

18F-FDG PET/CT in therapy response and in predicting responders or non-responders in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients, by using semi-quantitative mRECIST and EORTC criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in therapy response assessment according modified response evaluating criteria of solid tumors (mRECIST) and the predictive role of volume-based semi-quantitative parameters in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Furthermore modified RECIST criteria for MPM mRECIST and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria were compared and the predictive role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the post-therapy outcome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty five selected patients with MPM underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scan at baseline (1) and after therapy (2). Semi-quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters were collected for each scan and also differences (Δ) ΔSUVmax, ΔSUVav, ΔMTV, ΔTLG, response index (RI)max% and RIav% were evaluated. Radiologic response to therapy was assessed by using the mRECIST and EORTC. RESULTS: The correlation between response to therapy assessed by EORTC and mRECIST criteria was moderate (K=0.418; 95%CI:0099-0736). According to mRECIST, statistical differences between responders and non-responders were significant in the analysis of semi-quantitative parameters. According mRECIST criteria, all parameters defined a good area under the curve (AUC) but the better AUC resulted for ΔMTV (cut-off≤11.3, sensitivity=91.3%, specificity=91.7%) and ΔTLG (cut-off≤59.1, sensitivity=82.6%, specificity=100%). Kaplan-Meier curves between responders and non-responders did not show statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: The semi-quantitative analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT has an important role in MPM therapy response assessment and has a predictive role in distinguishing responders and non-responders.

Unresectable lung malignancy: combination therapy with segmental pulmonary arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting microspheres and radiofrequency ablation in 17 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of combining segmental pulmonary arterial chemoembolization (SPACE) and percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with unresectable lung neoplasms or patients with resectable neoplasms who refused surgery and to compare the local tumor progression (LTP) rate with that in previous studies of RF ablation alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval and informed consent, 17 patients with primary and metastatic lung cancer were enrolled in this prospective study. Between January 2008 and February 2011, 20 nodules (median diameter, 3.0 cm; range, 2.0-5.0 cm) were treated during 19 sessions. Antineoplastic agents loaded on 50-100-µm microspheres were selectively infused into specific pulmonary arteries. Percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided RF ablation of lung nodules was performed 48 hours after SPACE. Follow-up consisted of enhanced CT 48 hours after combination treatment was completed, after 30 days, and every 3 months thereafter. Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was performed 3 months after combination therapy and then every 6 months. The t test was used to compare groups. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. Ventilation-lung single photon emission computed tomography showed a wide area without ventilation in the lung parenchyma treated with SPACE. The LTP rate was 21% (three of 14 nodules) in 3-5-cm-diameter tumors and 0% (zero of six nodules) in tumors of 3 cm or smaller in diameter. Complete response was achieved in 65% (11 of 17) of patients at minimum follow-up of 6 months. Overall, treatment was well tolerated. Major complications were pneumothorax in five of 19 sessions (26%) and one bronchopleural fistula (one of 19, 5%). No treatment-related changes in general lung function were noted. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with RF ablation after SPACE to treat unresectable lung tumors is technically feasible, safe, and effective and may represent an advantage over RF ablation alone.