Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 12(11): 782-791, 2023 Nov 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37812760

RESUMO

AIMS: The role of coronary calcification on clinical outcomes among different revascularization strategies in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) has been rarely investigated. The aim of this investigation is to evaluate the role of coronary calcification, detected by coronary angiography, in the whole spectrum of patients presenting with acute ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present study was a post hoc analysis of the MATRIX programme. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke up to 365 days. Among the 8404 patients randomized in the MATRIX trial, data about coronary calcification were available in 7446 (88.6%) and therefore were included in this post hoc analysis. Overall, 875 patients (11.7%) presented with severe coronary calcification, while 6571 patients (88.3%) did not present severe coronary calcification on coronary angiography. Fewer patients with severe coronary calcification underwent percutaneous coronary intervention whereas coronary artery bypass grafting or medical therapy-only was more frequent compared with patients without severe calcification. At 1-year follow-up, MACE occurred in 237 (27.1%) patients with severe calcified coronary lesions and 985 (15%) patients without severe coronary calcified lesions [hazard ratio (HR) 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66-2.20, P < 0.001]. All-cause mortality was 8.6% in patients presenting with and 3.7% in those without severe coronary calcification (HR 2.38, 1.84-3.09, P < 0.001). Patients with severe coronary calcification incurred higher rate of MI (20.1% vs. 11.5%, HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.53-2.1, P < 0.001) and similar rate of stroke (0.8% vs. 0.6%, HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.61-3.02, P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Patients with ACS and severe coronary calcification, as compared to those without, are associated with worse clinical outcomes irrespective of the management strategy.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Humanos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/complicações , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 34(11): E763-E775, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36227013

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve patient symptoms, but it remains controversial whether it impacts subsequent clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we queried PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases (last search: September 15, 2021). We investigated the impact of CTO-PCI on clinical events including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), stroke, subsequent coronary artery bypass surgery, target-vessel revascularization, and heart failure hospitalizations. Pooled analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 58 publications with 54,540 patients were included in this analysis, of which 33 were observational studies of successful vs failed CTO-PCI, 19 were observational studies of CTO-PCI vs no CTO-PCI, and 6 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In observational studies, but not RCTs, CTO-PCI was associated with better clinical outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality, MACE, and MI were 0.52 (95% CI, 0.42-0.64), 0.46 (95% CI, 0.37-0.58), 0.66 (95% CI, 0.50-0.86), respectively for successful vs failed CTO-PCI studies; 0.38 (95% CI, 0.31-0.45), 0.57 (95% CI, 0.42-0.78), 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42-0.99), respectively, for observational studies of CTO-PCI vs no CTO-PCI; 0.72 (95% CI, 0.39-1.32), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.38-1.25), and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.46-2.37), respectively for RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: CTO-PCI is associated with better subsequent clinical outcomes in observational studies but not in RCTs. Appropriately powered RCTs are needed to conclusively determine the impact of CTO-PCI on clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Infarto do Miocárdio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Razão de Chances , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto
3.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 78(8): 840-853, 2021 08 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34412818

RESUMO

The authors developed a global chronic total occlusion crossing algorithm following 10 steps: 1) dual angiography; 2) careful angiographic review focusing on proximal cap morphology, occlusion segment, distal vessel quality, and collateral circulation; 3) approaching proximal cap ambiguity using intravascular ultrasound, retrograde, and move-the-cap techniques; 4) approaching poor distal vessel quality using the retrograde approach and bifurcation at the distal cap by use of a dual-lumen catheter and intravascular ultrasound; 5) feasibility of retrograde crossing through grafts and septal and epicardial collateral vessels; 6) antegrade wiring strategies; 7) retrograde approach; 8) changing strategy when failing to achieve progress; 9) considering performing an investment procedure if crossing attempts fail; and 10) stopping when reaching high radiation or contrast dose or in case of long procedural time, occurrence of a serious complication, operator and patient fatigue, or lack of expertise or equipment. This algorithm can improve outcomes and expand discussion, research, and collaboration.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos
4.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 33(3): E146-E154, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33570501

RESUMO

AIMS: Radiation exposure is a limiting factor for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) lesions. This study was designed to analyze changes in patient radiation dose for CTO-PCI and parameters associated with radiation dose. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed a cohort of 12,136 procedures performed by 23 operators between 2012 and 2017 from the European Registry of CTO-PCI. Radiation exposure was recorded as air kerma (AK) and dose area product (DAP). A dose rate index (DRI) was calculated as AK per fluoroscopy time to normalize for individual differences in fluoroscopy time. The lesion complexity increased from Japanese-CTO (J-CTO) score of 2.19 ± 1.44 to 2.46 ± 1.28, with an increase of retrograde procedures from 31.1% to 40.7%; still, procedural success improved from 87.7% to 92.1%. Fluoroscopy time remained similar, but AK decreased by 14.9%, from 2.35 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 1.29-4.14 Gy) to 2.00 Gy (IQR, 1.08-3.45 Gy) and DAP decreased by 21.5%, from 130 Gy•cm² (IQR, 70-241 Gy•cm²) to 102 Gy•cm² (IQR, 58-184 Gy•cm²). Radiation exposure was determined by the lesion complexity (J-CTO score) and procedural complexity (antegrade or retrograde). DRI was determined by fluoroscopy frame rate and type of equipment used, but the major influence remained interoperator differences. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation exposure decreased during the observation period despite an increase in lesion and procedural complexity. While many operators already achieved a goal of low radiation exposure, there were considerable interoperator differences in radiation management, indicating further potential for improvement.


Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Exposição à Radiação , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 98(2): 238-245, 2021 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32857911

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is a potentially life-threatening complication during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and the best strategy for its management is yet to be proved. We aimed to analyze the safety, efficacy, and long-term clinical outcomes of the block and deliver (BAD) technique, as only anecdotal cases are reported in literature. METHODS: From January 2016 to January 2020, all consecutive patients treated with the BAD technique at five high-volume centers in Italy were retrospectively identified. RESULTS: 25 CAPs treated with the BAD technique were included. The most frequently perforated artery was the left anterior descending artery (32%) and spring-coil wires with a hydrophilic coating were the most common culprit wires (68%). Mean sealing time was 46.9 ± 60.1 min, with no significant differences between CTO-PCIs and non-CTO PCIs (p = .921). Acute successful sealing of the CAP was achieved in 96% of the cases. Immediate cardiac tamponade occurred in 28% of patients, four during CTO PCI and three during non-CTO PCI (p = .55). Two patients required pericardiocentesis during hospitalization, one patient developed acute kidney injury, and one patient underwent cardiac surgery due to severe mitral regurgitation. At 1-year follow-up no significant differences were observed between groups in terms of POCE (25 vs 25%, p = .628) and its individual components. CONCLUSION: The BAD technique proved to be effective for the management of CAP, showing high successful sealing rates. Rates of in-hospital events and at 1-year follow-up did not significantly differ between patients suffering CAP during CTO revascularization or during non-CTO PCI.


Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Doença Crônica , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/cirurgia , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
EuroIntervention ; 17(3): 212-219, 2021 Jun 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32894229

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Equipment delivery in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be challenging and it is associated with a higher risk of device entrapment. Data regarding the incidence of device entrapment during CTO PCI are lacking. AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and procedural characteristics of device entrapment in patients undergoing PCI for CTOs and discuss management strategies for dealing with it. METHODS: Device entrapment was characterised in a large consecutive series of 2,361 CTO PCI cases performed by five high-volume CTO Italian operators between January 2015 and January 2020. RESULTS: Device entrapment occurred in 36 out of 2,361 cases (1.5%) and consisted of coronary guidewires in 13 (0.5%), microcatheters in 6 (0.2%), balloons in 6 (0.2%), rotational atherectomy burrs in 10 (0.4%) and guiding catheter extension in 1 patient (0.04%). Complete device retrieval was achieved in 63.9%, with at least partial removal of material in 97.2%. Vessel recanalisation was still possible in 86.1% of cases even after device entrapment. Intraprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in 3 patients (8.3%), tamponade with urgent pericardiocentesis in 1 (2.8%) and emergency surgical removal of the entrapped device in 1 patient (2.8%). Mean radiation dose was 4.7±2.3 Gy. At 30-day follow-up, one patient died with stent thrombosis of a non-target vessel and another required repeat percutaneous revascularisation. CONCLUSIONS: Device entrapment during CTO revascularisations is a rare but potentially severe complication. We describe and discuss current techniques of percutaneous retrieval that can be employed to achieve procedural success safely.


Assuntos
Aterectomia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária , Infarto do Miocárdio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Doenças Vasculares , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/epidemiologia , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Humanos , Incidência , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Circulation ; 140(5): 420-433, 2019 07 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31356129

RESUMO

Outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have improved because of advancements in equipment and techniques. With global collaboration and knowledge sharing, we have identified 7 common principles that are widely accepted as best practices for CTO-PCI. 1. Ischemic symptom improvement is the primary indication for CTO-PCI. 2. Dual coronary angiography and in-depth and structured review of the angiogram (and, if available, coronary computed tomography angiography) are key for planning and safely performing CTO-PCI. 3. Use of a microcatheter is essential for optimal guidewire manipulation and exchanges. 4. Antegrade wiring, antegrade dissection and reentry, and the retrograde approach are all complementary and necessary crossing strategies. Antegrade wiring is the most common initial technique, whereas retrograde and antegrade dissection and reentry are often required for more complex CTOs. 5. If the initially selected crossing strategy fails, efficient change to an alternative crossing technique increases the likelihood of eventual PCI success, shortens procedure time, and lowers radiation and contrast use. 6. Specific CTO-PCI expertise and volume and the availability of specialized equipment will increase the likelihood of crossing success and facilitate prevention and management of complications, such as perforation. 7. Meticulous attention to lesion preparation and stenting technique, often requiring intracoronary imaging, is required to ensure optimum stent expansion and minimize the risk of short- and long-term adverse events. These principles have been widely adopted by experienced CTO-PCI operators and centers currently achieving high success and acceptable complication rates. Outcomes are less optimal at less experienced centers, highlighting the need for broader adoption of the aforementioned 7 guiding principles along with the development of additional simple and safe CTO crossing and revascularization strategies through ongoing research, education, and training.


Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Doença Crônica , Circulação Colateral/fisiologia , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Angiografia Coronária/normas , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/cirurgia , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 20(2): 117-119, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30747927

RESUMO

The majority of myxomas are located in the left atrium (75%) followed by the right atrium (20%). In rare cases, myxomas can be found in the ventricles, with 2.5% reported for myxomas in the left ventricle. Systemic emboli, mostly cerebral, occur in two thirds of such patients, while coronary emboli are rare. Here we report a case of left ventricular myxoma causing infero-postero-lateral myocardial infarction, successfully treated by intracoronary thromboaspiration of myxoma embolus.


Assuntos
Embolia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cardíacas/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Mixoma/complicações , Adulto , Embolia/complicações , Feminino , Neoplasias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Ventrículos do Coração/patologia , Humanos , Mixoma/diagnóstico
10.
Eur Heart J ; 36(45): 3189-98, 2015 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26333367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Through contemporary literature, the optimal strategy to manage coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs) remains under debate. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the Italian Registry of Chronic Total Occlusions (IRCTO) was to provide data on prevalence, characteristics, and outcome of CTO patients according to the management strategy. METHODS: The IRCTO is a prospective real world multicentre registry enrolling patients showing at least one CTO. Clinical and angiographic data were collected independently from the therapeutic strategy [optimal medical therapy (MT), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)]; a comparative 1-year clinical follow-up was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1777 patients were enrolled for an overall CTO prevalence of 13.3%. The adopted therapeutic strategies were as follows: MT in 826 patients (46.5%), PCI in 776 patients (43.7%), and CABG in the remaining 175 patients (9.8%). At 1-year follow-up, patients undergoing PCI showed lower rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (2.6% vs. 8.2% and vs. 6.9%; P < 0.001 and P < 0.01) and cardiac death (1.4% vs. 4.7% and vs. 6.3%; P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) in comparison with those treated with MT and CABG, respectively. After propensity score-matching analysis, patients treated with PCI showed lower incidence of cardiac death (1.5 vs. 4.4%; P < 0.001), acute myocardial infarction (1.1 vs. 2.9%; P = 0.03), and re-hospitalization (2.3 vs. 4.4% P = 0.04) in comparison with those managed by MT. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed how CTO PCI might significantly improve the survival and decrease MACCE occurrence at 1 year follow-up in comparison with MT and/or CABG.


Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Idoso , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária/mortalidade , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Oclusão Coronária/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/mortalidade , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/terapia
11.
Lancet ; 385(9986): 2465-76, 2015 Jun 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25791214

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether radial compared with femoral access improves outcomes in unselected patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management. METHODS: We did a randomised, multicentre, superiority trial comparing transradial against transfemoral access in patients with acute coronary syndrome with or without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who were about to undergo coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to radial or femoral access with a web-based system. The randomisation sequence was computer generated, blocked, and stratified by use of ticagrelor or prasugrel, type of acute coronary syndrome (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, troponin positive or negative, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome), and anticipated use of immediate percutaneous coronary intervention. Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The 30-day coprimary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and net adverse clinical events, defined as major adverse cardiovascular events or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) major bleeding unrelated to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The analysis was by intention to treat. The two-sided α was prespecified at 0·025. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01433627. FINDINGS: We randomly assigned 8404 patients with acute coronary syndrome, with or without ST-segment elevation, to radial (4197) or femoral (4207) access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. 369 (8·8%) patients with radial access had major adverse cardiovascular events, compared with 429 (10·3%) patients with femoral access (rate ratio [RR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·74-0·99; p=0·0307), non-significant at α of 0·025. 410 (9·8%) patients with radial access had net adverse clinical events compared with 486 (11·7%) patients with femoral access (0·83, 95% CI 0·73-0·96; p=0·0092). The difference was driven by BARC major bleeding unrelated to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (1·6% vs 2·3%, RR 0·67, 95% CI 0·49-0·92; p=0·013) and all-cause mortality (1·6% vs 2·2%, RR 0·72, 95% CI 0·53-0·99; p=0·045). INTERPRETATION: In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management, radial as compared with femoral access reduces net adverse clinical events, through a reduction in major bleeding and all-cause mortality. FUNDING: The Medicines Company and Terumo.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Artéria Femoral , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Artéria Radial , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Idoso , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Causas de Morte , Angiografia Coronária , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 15(4): 209-13, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24746599

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Radiation absorbed by interventional cardiologists is a frequently under-evaluated important issue. Aim is to compare radiation dose absorbed by interventional cardiologists during percutaneous coronary procedures for acute coronary syndromes comparing transradial and transfemoral access. METHODS: The randomized multicentre MATRIX (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by TRansradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of angioX) trial has been designed to compare the clinical outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes treated invasively according to the access site (transfemoral vs. transradial) and to the anticoagulant therapy (bivalirudin vs. heparin). Selected experienced interventional cardiologists involved in this study have been equipped with dedicated thermoluminescent dosimeters to evaluate the radiation dose absorbed during transfemoral or right transradial or left transradial access. For each access we evaluate the radiation dose absorbed at wrist, at thorax and at eye level. Consequently the operator is equipped with three sets (transfemoral, right transradial or left transradial access) of three different dosimeters (wrist, thorax and eye dosimeter). Primary end-point of the study is the procedural radiation dose absorbed by operators at thorax. An important secondary end-point is the procedural radiation dose absorbed by operators comparing the right or left radial approach. Patient randomization is performed according to the MATRIX protocol for the femoral or radial approach. A further randomization for the radial approach is performed to compare right and left transradial access. CONCLUSIONS: The RAD-MATRIX study will probably consent to clarify the radiation issue for interventional cardiologist comparing transradial and transfemoral access in the setting of acute coronary syndromes.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Angiografia Coronária , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Doses de Radiação , Radiografia Intervencionista , Projetos de Pesquisa , Absorção de Radiação , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Protocolos Clínicos , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Hemorragia/etiologia , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Hirudinas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Saúde Ocupacional , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Dosimetria Termoluminescente , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 14(1): 9-13, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23337379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but some concerns remain about its safety and efficacy in centers without on-site cardiac surgery (OCS). METHODS: The Infermi Hospital in Rivoli, Italy, is a community hospital without OCS with a high volume catheterization laboratory (>800 PCI and >150 primary PCI per year), which provides a 24-hour primary PCI service to a population of 583.000 and is only 14 km far from the nearest OCS hospital. We analyzed clinical and procedural data, as well as 30-day outcome, of all STEMI patients treated by primary PCI within 12 hours from symptom onset. RESULTS: From September 2001 to June 2010, 1302 patients with a suspect of STEMI underwent urgent coronary angiography. Of these, 1251 (96.1%), underwent primary PCI. A successful myocardial revascularization was achieved in 1172 patients (93.7%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in 7.1%. Multivariate predictors of 30-day mortality were: age ≥75 years (OR 3.96, p=0.0003), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (OR 35.0, p=0.02), cardiogenic shock at presentation (OR 33.4, p<0.0001), anterior STEMI (OR 1.82, p=0.036) and total ischemic time ≤3 hours (OR 0.55, p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Primary PCI is a reperfusion strategy feasible and effective in unselected high-risk STEMI patients even in hospitals without OCS with a high volume of routine and emergency interventional procedures.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Angiografia Coronária , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hospitais Comunitários , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico por imagem , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Razão de Chances , Seleção de Pacientes , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Cidade de Roma , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 24(12): 645-9, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23220979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Very few data have been published for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) caused by unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) and very little is known about the results in this subgroup of patients in a hospital with high-volume catheterization laboratories (cath labs) without on-site cardiosurgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2009, a total of 38 patients with evolving STEMI and ULMCA as the culprit lesion treated with primary angioplasty were enrolled in our registry. Despite dramatic clinical presentation (73.7% cardiogenic shock, 15.8% cardiac arrest and resuscitation maneuvers, 81.6% additive EuroSCORE >13, and 89.5% distal bifurcation involvement), angiographic success was obtained in 84.2% and final TIMI 3 flow was achieved in 34 (89.5%), while target lesion failure occurred in 47.4% (mostly [42.1%] during the in-hospital phase). Most of the patients discharged from hospital had no events at follow-up (47.4%), and notably no target lesion revascularization was required during the follow-up phase. CONCLUSIONS: Primary angioplasty in patients presenting with ULMCA as the culprit lesion in a STEMI setting appears to be technically feasible and a good alternative to surgical revascularization. Mortality in this group of patients tends to be high, but lower than mortality of untreated patients; the majority of events are concentrated during the in-hospital phase. Procedural delay related to activation of operator's staff in off-duty hours doesn't correlate with a worse prognosis.


Assuntos
Angioplastia/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Departamentos Hospitalares , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Am J Cardiol ; 109(12): 1717-21, 2012 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22440126

RESUMO

Data on the long-term prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in young patients are limited. The aim of the present study was to report the immediate and long-term clinical outcomes in a consecutive series of young patients with premature coronary artery disease who underwent PCI with stent implantation. During the study period (2005 to 2010), 214 consecutive patients aged ≤40 years who had undergone PCI with a bare metal stent or drug-eluting stent implantation were retrospectively selected and analyzed. Primary end point of this study was the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at short- and long-term follow-up. Mean age was 36.3 ± 3.5 years and 88.3% of patients were men. Three-quarters were active smokers and all patients had ≥1 conventional cardiovascular risk factor. The total number of implanted stents was 272 (154 bare metal stent and 118 drug-eluting stent). During the hospital stay, no patient died, and the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was 2.3%. No additional events had occurred at 30 days of follow-up. At a median follow-up of 757 days (interquartile range 365 to 1,818), the overall death rate was 0.9%, and a new revascularization procedure was needed in 12.6% of patients. The major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event-free survival rate at the median follow-up point and 1,818 days was 89.6% and 84.2%, respectively. Active smoking and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% were independent predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. In conclusion, PCI in young patients lead to excellent results in short- and long-term follow-up and should be considered as the treatment of choice. Traditional risk factors are important prognostic determinants of adverse events and might help identify higher risk patients within this cohort.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Stents , Adulto , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Stents Farmacológicos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 79(6): 979-87, 2012 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21735530

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Best revascularization strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and unprotected left main (ULM) coronary disease is still debate reflecting lack of convincing data. OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical feasibility and efficacy of ULM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ACS and describe the practice of a center without on-site surgical back-up over a 7-year period. METHODS: Data on high-risk patients with ACSs undergoing percutaneous ULM treatment were prospectively collected in an independent registry. Primary end-points of this study were immediate and long-term outcomes expressed as target lesion failure (TLF, composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization). RESULTS: Between January 2003 and January 2010, 200 consecutive patients were included in this study. Angiographic success was obtained in 95% of patients but procedural success was 87% primarily affected by an 11% of in-hospital cardiac mortality. At median follow-up of 26 months (IQ 10-47), the overall TLF rate was 28.5%, with 16.0% of cardiac death, 7.0% of MI, and 10.5% of clinically driven target lesion revascularization rates. Cumulative definite/probable stent thrombosis was 3.5%. Elevated EuroSCORE value and pre-procedural hemodynamic instability were the strongest predictors of TLF. Temporal trend analysis showed progressive but not significant improvement for both immediate (P = 0.110) and long-term (P = 0.073) outcomes over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center study based on current clinical practice in patient with ULM disease and ACS confirmed PCI as feasible revascularization strategy in absence of on-site cardio-thoracic support. Nevertheless, the outcome of these high-risk patients is still hampered by a sensible in-hospital mortality rate.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Angiografia Coronária , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 9(11): 1088-94, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18852578

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The treatment of complex long lesions of proximal left anterior descending artery involving the origin of diagonal branch is controversial. The aim of the present study is the evaluation of safety and clinical results of percutaneous coronary angioplasty with drug-eluting stents. METHODS: Since June 2002, we instituted a prospective longitudinal registry of all consecutive patients according to inclusion criteria. Default strategy was drug-eluting stent implantation on left anterior descending coronary artery and provisional stenting of side branch. We enrolled 232 patients; only 35 were sent to surgery, 12 were treated with bare metal stents and eight with medical therapy. RESULTS: Provisional stenting was possible in 197 patients, whereas two stents were necessary in 35 patients. Final kissing balloon inflation was performed in 90% of patients. Overall, 30-day fatality linked with subacute stent thrombosis was 0.4%. Other in-hospital complications were 2.6% non-Q and 0.4% Q wave myocardial infarction. Global incidence of stent thrombosis was 1.7% (0.8% subacute, 0.4% late and 0.4% very late) with 50% fatality rate. Two patients died during follow-up; early and late mortality was 1.7%. Target lesion revascularization or target vessel revascularization was 7.3%, all managed by additional percutaneous intervention or medically. CONCLUSION: In our population of patients with complex 'off-label', bifurcated, long lesion of left anterior descending artery involving the main diagonal branch, the treatment by drug-eluting stents on left anterior descending artery and provisional stenting of the diagonal is possible in the absolute majority of patients with excellent long-term outcome.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Stents Farmacológicos , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Ital Heart J Suppl ; 5(11): 847-54, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15633428

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion therapy of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with primary coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is becoming an accepted therapeutical strategy because of a lower incidence of reinfarction, of hemorrhagic stroke and for a greater reduction of the infarct size in comparison to thrombolytic therapy. In this study we evaluated the feasibility and the effectiveness of such a strategy in two hospitals without on-site heart surgery but with a high volume of admission for acute coronary syndrome and a high caseload of elective interventional procedures. METHODS: Since January 2001 we started a program of primary PTCA for all STEMI patients presenting within 12 hours of symptom onset. An interventional team (physician, nurse and technician) were on call in a 24/7/365 fashion. Aspirin, heparin and abciximab were administered in the emergency room to all patients. Immediately after the procedure patients were given clopidogrel. RESULTS: Up to December 2003, 464 patients (mean age 63 +/- 12 years, 19.8% female) underwent primary PTCA. The symptom-emergency room interval was 3 +/- 3.9 hours, while the door-to-balloon time was 52.5 +/- 39.4 min. A TIMI 0-1 flow in the infarct-related artery was present in 55.8% of patients. Seventy patients (15.1%) presented with shock. In 430 patients (92.7%) a TIMI 3 flow was restored followed by a reduction in ST-segment elevation > 50% in 356 patients (76.7%). Total in-hospital mortality was 4.9% (23 out of 464 patients). The mortality of patients with shock was 31.4% (22 out of 70 patients). Two patients (0.4%) underwent emergency bypass. Four patients (0.8%) were electively referred to surgery prior to discharge in order to complete revascularization, which could not be obtained with further PTCA. The rate of major hemorrhagic complications was 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Primary PTCA for STEMI is a reperfusion strategy feasible and effective even in hospitals without on-site heart surgery, provided that a high volume of routine and emergency interventional procedures is maintained and when such a strategy is timely performed according to international guidelines.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA