What could be the reasons of late diagnosis of breast cancer in Tunisia?

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is often diagnosed at a late stage in Tunisia with long delay in time to consultation and to diagnosis. The aim of the study was to identify explanatory factors to delayed diagnosis. METHODS: A case control analytical was performed from January 2013 to December 2014 in the department of Medical Oncology in FarhatHachedUniveristy Hospital.Patients with the diagnosis of ductal breast carcinoma were included in the study.Characteristics of a first group of 200 women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (G1)were compared to a second group of 200 patients with early stage (G2). RESULTS: Median delay in consultation and mean tumor size were significantly more important in group G1 (p<0,001).A low level of schooling, a rural origin, poor socio-economic conditions and no encouragement by the patient relatives do not allow an early diagnosis.Misinterpretation of clinical breast signs was the only explanatory factor related to the system. In multivariate study, a low level of schooling(adjusted OR=2.72; CI 95% [1,65-4,49]), no encouragement by the patient's relatives(adjusted OR=7.86; CI 95% [4,24-14,57])and more than three dependants(adjusted OR=2.49; CI 95% [1,58-3,93]) were the independent factors that could explain the delay in diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Our study confirm the inverse relationship between socio-economic and scholar level and disease stage. Health education campaigns particularly among women with a low schooling level and of rural origin could reduce time for consultation. Promoting continuing medical education could avoid diagnostic errors.

[Prognostic factors and survival of metastatic colorectal cancer in the Sousse University Hospital (Tunisia): comparative study of two treatment period of 200 patients]. / Facteurs pronostiques et survie des cancers colorectaux métastatiques au CHU de Sousse (Tunisie): etude comparative de deux périodes de traitement de 200 patients.

UNLABELLED: Between 1994 and 2005, 200 patients with metastatic colo-rectal cancers were treated in the Sousse CHU (Tunisia), we analysed two groups of patients, the group 1 was treated in the period after 1999 (N = 64), the group 2 was treated in the period between 1999 and 2005 (N = 136). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mean age of the patients was 50 years, localisation of metastases was liver in 67.3% of cases, 23% of patients had multiple metastases, 44% of cases developed metastases after a median period of 11.4 months. All patients had received first line of chemotherapy, the regimen of chemotherapy was in the group 1, Fufol in the majority of cases (76%), the regimen of chemotherapy was in the group 2, simplified LV5FU2 associated to irinotecan in the majority of cases (83%), 28% of all patients received second line of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median survival was 13.8 months in the group 1 and 19 months in the group 2. Overall survival rates at 2 years were 35% and 42% (p = 0.02) in group 1 and 2, respectively. Prognostic factors for a better survival using univariate analysis were: normal ACE (P < 0.01), normal liver analysis (P < 0.001), response after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (P < 0.0005), resection of liver metastases (P < 0.05). The multivariate analysis (cox model) revealed only one independent factor: radiologic response after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: The prognostic of patients with metastatic disease is poor, although palliative chemotherapy after the recent advances and the use of new drugs have been shown to be able to prolong survival and to improve the quality of life over best supportive care. This study report amelioration of prognostic and survival of metastatic colorectal cancers in Tunisia.