Outcomes and Quality of Life After Resorbable Synthetic Ventral Hernia Repair in Contaminated Fields.

INTRODUCTION: The ideal mesh type for hernia repair in a contaminated field remains controversial. Data regarding outcomes beyond 1 year and the impact on quality of life (QoL) are unknown. This study aims to evaluate the long-term surgical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after contaminated repair with poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh. MATERIALS METHODS: Patients undergoing a contaminated hernia repair with P4HB between 2015 and 2020 were identified. Surgical site occurrences and hernia recurrences were recorded. Long-term PROs as defined by the Abdominal Hernia-Q and Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included with a mean age of 54.5 years, a body mass index of 34 kg/m2, and a defect size of 356.9 ± 227.7 cm2. Median follow-up time was 49 months with a reoperation rate of 14.5% and a hernia recurrence rate of 7.3%. Of the 55 patients, 37 completed preoperative and postoperative PRO questionnaires. When comparing preoperative with postoperative Abdominal Hernia-Q, there was significant improvement in overall PROs (2.1 vs 3.5, P < 0.001). This improvement was maintained with no significant changes between postoperative scores over the course of 5 years. Patients with complications saw the same improvement in postoperative PRO scores as those without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a low hernia recurrence and acceptable long-term reoperation rates in patients undergoing hernia repair with P4HB mesh in a contaminated setting. We demonstrate a sustained significant improvement in QoL scores after hernia repair. These data yield insight into the long-term outcomes and QoL improvement, providing physicians further knowledge to better counsel their patients.

Rigid External Distractors in Midface Fractures: A Review of Relevant and Related Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Literature discussing the use of rigid external distraction devices in midfacial trauma is limited. Rigid external distraction devices have been described for use in craniofacial surgery, allowing for distraction and stabilization of bony segments. In complex facial trauma, bony fragments are often comminuted and unstable, making traditional approaches with internal fixation difficult. Moreover, these approaches require subperiosteal dissection, limiting blood supply that is important for bone healing. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the role of rigid external distraction devices for the treatment of complex facial trauma. METHODS: We performed a literature review of rigid external distraction devices, as relevant both for facial trauma and for other craniofacial indications, to better elucidate their use and efficacy in complex facial fractures. RESULTS: The review revealed only 2 articles explicitly describing rigid external distraction devices for facial trauma, while 6 other articles describing its use for other craniofacial cases. An important benefit associated with the use of rigid external distraction devices is their ability to provide controlled traction of bony segments while also allowing for movement as needed for fracture reduction. Various articles describe performing internal fixation following rigid external distraction device usage, while others emphasize that internal fixation is not necessarily indicated if the rigid external distraction device is left intact long enough to ensure bony healing. One potential setback described is unfamiliarity with using the rigid external distraction device, which can preclude its use by many surgeons. In addition, the literature review did not provide any uniform guidelines or recommendations about how long rigid external distraction devices should remain intact. CONCLUSION: Based on relevant literature, rigid external distraction devices have been shown to be useful in the stabilization and treatment of complex facial fractures. Further studies should be conducted to better elucidate the specific indications for rigid external distraction devices in complex facial trauma.

An Analysis of Trends in National Residency Matching Program Match Data for Orthopedic Surgery.

Due to electronic residency applications, US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores are frequently used by orthopedic surgery program directors to screen applicants. Prospective applicants therefore often use Step 1 scores as a proxy for specialty competitiveness. The goal of this investigation was two-fold: (1) to determine whether trends in Step 1 scores are indicative of trends in competitiveness of orthopedic surgery and (2) to report the characteristics that optimize a US medical student's match success. A retrospective review of published National Resident Matching Program data from 2009 to 2018 was performed for orthopedic surgery residency applicants. Additional data from the Charting Outcomes reports were used for specific analyses of applicant characteristics. From 2009 to 2018, the number of orthopedic surgery residency positions grew at an annual rate of 1.51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37% to 1.64%; P<.001), accommodating the 1.26% (95% CI, 0.63% to 1.90%; P=.006) annual increase in the number of applicants who ranked orthopedic surgery as their preferred specialty choice (only choice or first choice). There were no significant changes in the applicant-to-position ratio (95% CI, -0.85% to 0.37%; P=.483) or the match rate for US seniors who ranked orthopedic surgery as their preferred choice (95% CI, -0.23% to 0.87%; P=.313). Increases in mean Step 1 scores of matched orthopedic surgery applicants parallel national Step 1 growth trends (0.49% vs 0.44%, respectively). Although orthopedic surgery is currently a competitive specialty to match into, this has been the case since 2009. Increasing Step 1 scores of matched applicants is not unique to orthopedic surgery and should not be misinterpreted as a proxy for increasing competitiveness of the specialty. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e616-e622.].

Relevance of Academic Productivity in the Assessment of Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants.

BACKGROUND: The academic productivity of an integrated plastic surgery applicant is strongly considered during the ranking process but is often difficult to assess. The h-index is a tool that provides an objective measure of both the quality and impact of an author's academic works. The goals of this study were to assess whether the h-index of recently matched plastic surgery interns correlates with their home and eventual residency program characteristics. METHODS: A database of all 2018 interns in integrated plastic surgery programs was created. The SCOPUS database was queried for the h-indices for each individual. RESULTS: In 2018, 77 integrated plastic surgery programs offered a total of 168 PGY1 positions; data was able to be obtained for 131 individuals. The mean h-index was 1.26 (range 0-14), with a mean of 4.22 publications (range 0-58). The h-index increased in concordance with overall number of publications. The h-index of applicants matching at Top 50 NIH Funded institutions had a significantly higher h-index (1.57) compared to those that matched to all other institutions (0.76) (p<0.05). Applicants matching at a "top 20" program as determined by Doximity reputation rankings also had a significantly higher h-index (1.96) compared to those matching at all other programs (0.83) (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The h-index of recently matched integrated plastic surgery interns correlates with several factors including program reputation and level of NIH funding. As applicants become increasingly well-qualified and the number of the publications increases commensurately, programs that place an emphasis on academic productivity may consider incorporating the h-index into their evaluation.

Effects of Operating Room Size on Surgical Site Infection Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a devastating complication after spine surgery. Many factors have been identified, but the influence of operating room (OR) size on infection rate has not been assessed. METHODS: Two thousand five hundred and twenty-three patients who underwent open lumbar spine fusion at a single institution between 2010 and 2016 were included. Patients were dichotomized into large versus small groups based on OR volume. Bivariate logistic regression and a final multivariate model following a multicollinearity check were used to calculate odds of infection for all variables. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients (2.5%) developed SSIs with 46 (73%) in the larger OR group and 17 (27%) in the smaller OR group. The rate of SSIs in larger ORs was 3.02% compared with 1.81% in smaller ORs. Significant parameters impacting SSI in bivariate analysis included an earlier year of surgery, BMI > 30, more comorbidities, more levels decompressed and fused, smoking, and larger OR volumes. Multivariate analysis identified BMI > 30, Elixhauser scores, smoking, and increasing levels decompressed as significant predictors. Topical vancomycin was found to significantly decrease rate of infection in both analyses. CONCLUSIONS: OR size (large versus small) was ultimately not a significant predictor of infection related to rates of SSIs, although it did show a clinical trend toward significance, suggesting association. Future prospective analysis is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.