Walking one hour per day and the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with outcome in palliative second-line immunotherapy for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether routinary walking activity and the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with outcomes in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 64 patients diagnosed with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck and treated with immunotherapy (Programmed Death-1 and Programmed Death-ligand-1 proteins inhibitors) at two tertiary centers. We compared a group that performed uninterrupted physical activity for 1 h per day and controls who performed no activity. The derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was calculated as follows: [neutrophils / (leukocytes - neutrophils)]. Progression-free survival and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: We included 28 (44%) and 36 (56%) patients in the activity and non-activity groups, respectively. Patient characteristics, treatment details, and tumor Programmed Death-ligand-1 expression were not associated with either progression-free survival or overall survival. Physical activity was an independent beneficial factor for progression-free survival (p < 0.001) and overall survival (p < 0.001). By contrast, a derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio <3.5 was an independent beneficial factor for overall survival (p = 0.013), but not for progression-free survival (p = 0.328). CONCLUSIONS: Walking one hour per day and having a high proportion of lymphocytes to neutrophiles (expressed as a low derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) independently predict a better prognosis in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck treated with immunotherapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Gal-1 Expression Analysis in the GLIOCAT Multicenter Study: Role as a Prognostic Factor and an Immune-Suppressive Biomarker.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent primary malignant brain tumor and has a dismal prognosis. Unfortunately, despite the recent revolution of immune checkpoint inhibitors in many solid tumors, these have not shown a benefit in overall survival in GBM patients. Therefore, new potential treatment targets as well as diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive biomarkers are needed to improve outcomes in this population. The ß-galactoside binding protein Galectin-1 (Gal-1) is a protein with a wide range of pro-tumor functions such as proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and immune suppression. Here, we evaluated Gal-1 expression by immunohistochemistry in a homogenously treated cohort of GBM (the GLIOCAT project) and correlated its expression with clinical and molecular data. We observed that Gal-1 is a negative prognostic factor in GBM. Interestingly, we observed higher levels of Gal-1 expression in the mesenchymal/classical subtypes compared to the less aggressive proneural subtype. We also observed a Gal-1 expression correlation with immune suppressive signatures of CD4 T-cells and macrophages, as well as with several GBM established biomarkers, including SHC1, PD-L1, PAX2, MEOX2, YKL-40, TCIRG1, YWHAG, OLIG2, SOX2, Ki-67, and SOX11. Moreover, Gal-1 levels were significantly lower in grade 4 IDH-1 mutant astrocytomas, which have a better prognosis. Our results confirm the role of Gal-1 as a prognostic factor and also suggest its value as an immune-suppressive biomarker in GBM.

In silico validation of RNA-Seq results can identify gene fusions with oncogenic potential in glioblastoma.

RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) can identify gene fusions in tumors, but not all these fusions have functional consequences. Using multiple data bases, we have performed an in silico analysis of fusions detected by RNA-Seq in tumor samples from 139 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients to identify in-frame fusions with predictable oncogenic potential. Among 61 samples with fusions, there were 103 different fusions, involving 167 different genes, including 20 known oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), 16 associated with cancer but not oncogenes or TSGs, and 32 not associated with cancer but previously shown to be involved in fusions in gliomas. After selecting in-frame fusions able to produce a protein product and running Oncofuse, we identified 30 fusions with predictable oncogenic potential and classified them into four non-overlapping categories: six previously described in cancer; six involving an oncogene or TSG; four predicted by Oncofuse to have oncogenic potential; and 14 other in-frame fusions. Only 24 patients harbored one or more of these 30 fusions, and only two fusions were present in more than one patient: FGFR3::TACC3 and EGFR::SEPTIN14. This in silico study provides a good starting point for the identification of gene fusions with functional consequences in the pathogenesis or treatment of glioblastoma.

RNA sequencing and Immunohistochemistry Reveal ZFN7 as a Stronger Marker of Survival than Molecular Subtypes in G-CIMP-negative Glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma is the most aggressive brain tumor in adults and has few therapeutic options. The study of molecular subtype classifications may lead to improved prognostic classification and identification of new therapeutic targets. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subtype classification has mainly been applied in U.S. clinical trials, while the intrinsic glioma subtype (IGS) has mainly been applied in European trials. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 432 patients with uniformly treated, newly diagnosed glioblastoma, we built tissue microarrays for IHC analysis and applied RNA sequencing to the best samples to classify them according to TCGA and IGS subtypes. RESULTS: We obtained transcriptomic results from 124 patients. There was a lack of agreement among the three TCGA classificatory algorithms employed, which was not solely attributable to intratumoral heterogeneity. There was overlapping of TCGA mesenchymal subtype with IGS cluster 23 and of TCGA classical subtype with IGS cluster 18. Molecular subtypes were not associated with prognosis, but levels of expression of 13 novel genes were identified as independent prognostic markers in glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype-negative patients, independently of clinical factors and MGMT methylation. These findings were validated in at least one external database. Three of the 13 genes were selected for IHC validation. In particular, high ZNF7 RNA expression and low ZNF7 protein expression were strongly associated with longer survival, independently of molecular subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: TCGA and IGS molecular classifications of glioblastoma have no higher prognostic value than individual genes and should be refined before being applied to clinical trials.

Organ preservation in patients with advanced laryngeal tumours. Results of induction chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in actual clinical practice. / Preservación de órgano en pacientes con tumores avanzados de laringe. Resultados de la quimioterapia de inducción versus quimio-radioterapia en la práctica clínica real.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A high percentage of patients with locally advanced larynx carcinomas are candidates for inclusion in organ preservation protocols. The objective of this study is to compare the results of two schemes of preservation, induction chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy, in patients with locally advanced larynx carcinomas in the context of actual clinical practice. METHODS: Our retrospective study included 157 patients with locally advanced tumours of the larynx (T3-T4) treated with induction chemotherapy (n = 121) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 36). RESULTS: From 121 patients who began treatment with induction chemotherapy, 6 died due to toxicity, 37 were treated with surgery, and 78 completed the preservation scheme; 36 patients received treatment with chemoradiotherapy. There were no significant differences in 5-year disease-specific survival between both treatments: 68.9% in induction chemotherapy versus 75.7% in chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.259). In 45.9% of patients the laryngeal function was preserved. Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy had a tendency to have better 5-year laryngeal dysfunction-free survival than patients treated with induction chemotherapy (55.6% versus 44.8%, p = 0.079). CONCLUSION: Patients included in a protocol of organ preservation achieved a 5-year laryngeal dysfunction-free survival of 45.9%. There were no significant differences in disease-specific survival among patients treated with induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Organ preservation after treatment with induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced carcinomas (T3-T4) of oral cavity and oropharynx. / Preservación de órgano tras un tratamiento con quimioterapia de inducción en pacientes con carcinomas localmente avanzados (T3-T4) de cavidad oral y orofaringe.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: With the goal of achieving functional preservation, one of the treatment strategies for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck is to initiate treatment with induction chemotherapy (CT) and decide the second therapeutic manoeuvre depending on the response. The objective of this study is to evaluate organ preservation capacity based on this therapeutic approach in patients with tumours of the oral cavity and oropharynx. METHODS: A retrospective study of 246 patients with locally advanced carcinomas of the oral cavity or oropharynx (cT3-T4) initially treated with induction CT. RESULTS: After induction CT 28% of patients achieved a complete response of the primary location of the tumour, 43.1% a partial response greater than 50%, and 28.9% a reduction less than 50% or persistence. After the induction CT treatment 70 patients (28.5%) underwent surgical treatment, and 176 (71.5%) radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Considering the patients treated non-surgically (n=176), organ preservation for patients with a complete response (n=66) was 65.2%, for those patients with a partial response greater than 50% (n=75) it was 30.7%, and for patients with a partial response less than 50% or persistence (n=35) it was 14.3%. CONCLUSION: The response to treatment with induction CT has prognostic value in patients with locally advanced carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Patients who are candidates for conservative treatment with RT or CRT would be those who achieve a complete response after induction treatment.

Glioblastoma TCGA Mesenchymal and IGS 23 Tumors are Identifiable by IHC and have an Immune-phenotype Indicating a Potential Benefit from Immunotherapy.

PURPOSE: Molecular subtype classifications in glioblastoma may detect therapy sensitivities. IHC would potentially allow the identification of molecular subtypes in routine clinical practice. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 124 uniformly treated, newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma were submitted to RNA sequencing, IHC, and immune-phenotyping to identify differences in molecular subtypes associated with treatment sensitivities. RESULTS: We detected high molecular and IHC overlapping of the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) mesenchymal subtype with instrinsic glioma subtypes (IGS) cluster 23 and of the TCGA classical subtype with IGS cluster 18. IHC patterns, gene fusion profiles, and immune-phenotypes varied across subtypes. IHC revealed that the TCGA classical subtype was identified by high expression of EGFR and low expression of PTEN, while the mesenchymal subtype was identified by low expression of SOX2 and high expression of two antibodies, SHC1 and TCIRG1, selected on the basis of RNA differential transcriptomic expression. The proneural subtype was identified by frequent positive IDH1 expression and high Olig2 and Ki67 expression. Immune-phenotyping showed that mesenchymal and IGS 23 tumors exhibited a higher positive effector cell score, a higher negative suppressor cell score, and lower levels of immune checkpoint molecules. The cell-type deconvolution analysis revealed that these tumors are highly enriched in M2 macrophages, resting memory CD4+ T cells, and activated dendritic cells, indicating that they may be ideal candidates for immunotherapy, especially with anti-M2 and/or dendritic cell vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: There is a subset of tumors, frequently classified as mesenchymal or IGS cluster 23, that may be identified with IHC and could well be optimal candidates for immunotherapy.

A phase II randomized, multicenter, open-label trial of continuing adjuvant temozolomide beyond 6 cycles in patients with glioblastoma (GEINO 14-01).

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for glioblastoma is radiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for 6 cycles, although the optimal number of cycles of adjuvant temozolomide has long been a subject of debate. We performed a phase II randomized trial investigating whether extending adjuvant temozolomide for more than 6 cycles improved outcome. METHODS: Glioblastoma patients treated at 20 Spanish hospitals who had not progressed after 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide were centrally randomized to stop (control arm) or continue (experimental arm) temozolomide up to a total of 12 cycles at the same doses they were receiving in cycle 6. Patients were stratified by MGMT methylation and measurable disease. The primary endpoint was differences in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02209948). RESULTS: From August 2014 to November 2018, 166 patients were screened, 7 of whom were ineligible. Seventy-nine patients were included in the stop arm and 80 in the experimental arm. All patients were included in the analyses of outcomes and of safety. There were no differences in 6-month PFS (control 55.7%; experimental 61.3%), PFS, or OS between arms. MGMT methylation and absence of measurable disease were independent factors of better outcome. Patients in the experimental arm had more lymphopenia (P < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001), and nausea and vomiting (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing temozolomide after 6 adjuvant cycles is associated with greater toxicity but confers no additional benefit in 6-month PFS. KEY POINTS: 1. Extending adjuvant temozolomide to 12 cycles did not improve 6-month PFS.2. Extending adjuvant temozolomide did not improve PFS or OS in any patient subset.3. Extending adjuvant temozolomide was linked to increased toxicities.

Pseudoprogression as an adverse event of glioblastoma therapy.

We explored predictive factors of pseudoprogression (PsP) and its impact on prognosis in a retrospective series of uniformly treated glioblastoma patients. Patients were classified as having PsP, early progression (eP) or neither (nP). We examined potential associations with clinical, molecular, and basal imaging characteristics and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) as well as the relationship between PFS and PPS in the three groups. Of the 256 patients studied, 56 (21.9%) were classified as PsP, 70 (27.3%) as eP, and 130 (50.8%) as nP. Only MGMT methylation status was associated to PsP. MGMT methylated patients had a 3.5-fold greater possibility of having PsP than eP (OR: 3.48; 95% CI: 1.606-7.564; P = 0.002). OS was longer for PsP than eP patients (18.9 vs. 12.3 months; P = 0.0001) but was similar for PsP and nP patients (P = 0.91). OS was shorter-though not significantly so-for PsP than nP patients (OS: 19.5 vs. 27.9 months; P = 0.63) in methylated patients. PPS was similar for patients having PsP, eP or nP (PPS: 7.2 vs. 5.4 vs. 6.7; P = 0.43). Neurological deterioration occurred in 64.3% of cases at the time they were classified as PsP and in 72.8% of cases of eP (P = 0.14). PsP confounds the evaluation of disease and does not confer a survival advantage in glioblastoma.

Phase II trial of dacomitinib, a pan-human EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in recurrent glioblastoma patients with EGFR amplification.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a multicenter, 2-stage, open-label, phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GB) and epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) amplification with or without variant III (EGFRvIII) deletion. METHODS: Patients with first recurrence were enrolled in 2 cohorts. Cohort A included patients with EGFR gene amplification without EGFRvIII mutation. Cohort B included patients with EGFR gene amplification and EGFRvIII mutation. Dacomitinib was administered (45 mg/day) until disease progression/unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; RANO criteria) at 6 months (PFS6). RESULTS: Thirty patients in Cohort A and 19 in Cohort B were enrolled. Median age was 59 years (range 39-81), 65.3% were male, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0/1/2 were 10.2%/65.3%/24.5%, respectively. PFS6 was 10.6% (Cohort A: 13.3%; Cohort B: 5.9%) with a median PFS of 2.7 months (Cohort A: 2.7 mo; Cohort B: 2.6 mo). Four patients were progression free at 6 months and 3 patients were so at 12 months. Median overall survival was 7.4 months (Cohort A: 7.8 mo; Cohort B: 6.7 mo). The best overall response included 1 complete response and 2 partial responses (4.1%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients (24.5%: eight in Cohort A and four in Cohort B). Diarrhea and rash were the most common AEs; 20 (40.8%) patients experienced grade 3-4 drug-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Dacomitinib has a limited single-agent activity in recurrent GB with EGFR amplification. The detailed molecular characterization of the 4 patients with response in this trial can be useful to select patients who could benefit from dacomitinib.

Bevacizumab and temozolomide versus temozolomide alone as neoadjuvant treatment in unresected glioblastoma: the GENOM 009 randomized phase II trial.

We sought to determine the impact of bevacizumab on reduction of tumor size prior to chemoradiotherapy in unresected glioblastoma patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive temozolomide (TMZ arm) or temozolomide plus bevacizumab (TMZ + BEV arm). In both arms, neoadjuvant treatment was temozolomide (85 mg/m(2), days 1-21, two 28-day cycles), concurrent radiation plus temozolomide, and six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. In the TMZ + BEV arm, bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) was added on days 1 and 15 of each neoadjuvant cycle and on days 1, 15 and 30 of concurrent treatment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed response to neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the impact on outcome of MGMT methylation in tumor and serum. One hundred and two patients were included; 43 in the TMZ arm and 44 in the TMZ + BEV arm were evaluable for response. Results favored the TMZ + BEV arm in terms of objective response (3 [6.7 %] vs. 11 [22.9 %]; odds ratio 4.2; P = 0.04). PFS and OS were longer in the TMZ + BEV arm, though the difference did not reach statistical significance. MGMT methylation in tumor, but not in serum, was associated with outcome. More patients experienced toxicities in the TMZ + BEV than in the TMZ arm (P = 0.06). The combination of bevacizumab plus temozolomide is more active than temozolomide alone and may well confer benefit in terms of tumor shrinkage in unresected patients albeit at the expense of greater toxicity.

Phase II trial of irinotecan and metronomic temozolomide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

This phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of metronomic temozolomide (TMZ) in combination with irinotecan in glioblastoma (GB) at first relapse. Patients with GB at first relapse received TMZ 50 mg/m/2day divided into three doses, except for a single 100 mg/m2 dose, administered between 3 and 6 h before every irinotecan infusion. Irinotecan was given intravenously at the previously established dose of 100 mg/m2 on days 8 and 22 of 28-day cycles. Treatment was given for a maximum of nine cycles or until progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Vascular endothelial growth factor and its soluble receptor 1, thrombospondin-1, microparticles, and microparticle-dependent procoagulant activity were measured in blood before treatment. The primary objective was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Twenty-seven evaluable patients were enrolled. Six-month PFS was 20.8%. Median PFS was 11.6 weeks (95% confidence interval: 7.5-15.7). Stable disease was the best response for nine (37.5%) patients, with a median duration of 11.2 weeks (4.2-35.85 weeks). No differences in PFS or response were observed among patients who relapsed during or after completion of adjuvant TMZ. Grade 3/4 adverse events included lymphopenia (15%), fatigue, diarrhea and febrile neutropenia (3.7% each), lymphopenia, neutropenia, and nausea/vomiting (11.1% each). One patient died from pneumonia and one patient died from pulmonary thromboembolism. Pretreatment levels of angiogenesis biomarkers, microparticles, and microparticle-related procoagulant activity were elevated in patients compared with healthy volunteers. This regimen is feasible, but failed to improve the results obtained with other second-line therapies in recurrent GB.

Sunitinib administered prior to radiotherapy in patients with non-resectable glioblastoma: results of a phase II study.

Sunitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with direct anti-tumor and anti-angiogenesis activity targeting VEGFR 1-2, PDGFR α-ß, c-kit, bFGF, (CSF-1), FLT3 and RET. The present trial examined the activity of sunitinib in 12 patients with newly diagnosed, non-resectable glioblastoma. Patients (≤75 years of age with performance status [PS] ≥2 and minimental status [MMS] ≥25) were treated post-biopsy with sunitinib 37.5 mg daily for 8 weeks pre-radiotherapy, during radiotherapy (60 Gy, 6 weeks) and post-radiotherapy until disease progression. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR; RANO criteria) after 8 weeks of sunitinib and patient tolerance. Secondary endpoints were percentage of patients free of neurological deterioration pre-radiotherapy, percentage of patients completing radiotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 1-year survival. A Simon 2-stage design (12 →20) based on ORR was applied to calculate the number of patients needed to detect at least 10 % response with α error of 0.05 and ß error of 0.10. The trial was closed because it did not meet minimal activity criteria. ORR was 0 % with only 1/12 patients (8.3 %) achieving stable disease after sunitinib treatment. No patient showed reduction in gadolinium enhancement. The most frequent G3/4 toxicities were fatigue (24.9 %) and diarrhea (16.6 %); one patient died of a CNS hemorrhage; 10/12 patients (83.3 %) deteriorated neurologically before radiation therapy; median PFS was 7.7 weeks (95 % CI: 7.2-8.2); median OS was 12.8 weeks (95 % CI: 0.5-23.8 weeks); 1-year survival was 0 %. Sunitinib has no activity as monotherapy in glioblastoma, and further investigation of its efficacy in this setting is unwarranted.

Efficacy of erlotinib in patients with relapsed gliobastoma multiforme who expressed EGFRVIII and PTEN determined by immunohistochemistry.

Epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) alteration is a common feature in most of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Robust response of anti-EGFR treatments has been mostly associated with the EGFR deletion mutant variant III (EGFRvIII) and expression of PTEN. We have performed a prospective trial in order to confirm the efficacy of erlotinib treatment in patients with relapsed GBM who expressed EGFRvIII and PTEN. All patients included in the trial were required to be PTEN (+++), EGFR (+++) and EGFRvIII (+++) positives by immunohistochemistry. This new phase II trial enrolled 40 patients and was design to be stopped in case of fewer than two responses in the first 13 patients. Patient eligibility included histopathology criteria, radiological progression, more than 18 years old, Karnofsky performed status, KPS > 50, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. There was no limit to the number of prior treatments for relapses. No enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs were allowed. The primary endpoints were response and progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6). Thirteen patients (6 men, 7 women) with recurrent GBM received erlotinib 150 mg/day. Median age was 53 years, median KPS was 80, and median prior treatments for relapses were 2. There was one partial response and three stable diseases (one at 18 months). PFS at 6 months was 20 %. Dose reduction for toxicity was not needed in any patient. Dermatitis was the main treatment-related toxicity, grade 1 in 8 patients and grade 2 in 5 patients. No grade 3 toxicity was observed. Median survival was 7 months (95 % IC 1.41-4.7). As conclusion, monotherapy with erlotinib in GBM relapses patients with high protein expression for PTEN (+++), EGFR (+++), and EGFRvlII (+++) showed low toxicity but minimal efficacy and the trial stopped.

A phase I study of irinotecan in combination with metronomic temozolomide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

To determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan administered every 2 weeks, in combination with a fixed and continuous administration of temozolomide, in patients with glioblastoma at first relapse. Patients received oral temozolomide at a fixed and continuous dose of 50 mg/m divided into three daily doses, except for a single 100 mg/m dose, administered before every irinotecan infusion. Irinotecan was given intravenously on days 8 and 22 of 28-day cycles. The starting dose of irinotecan was 100 mg/m, and this was escalated by increments of 15 mg/m in cohorts of 3-6 evaluable patients. Determination of the dose-limiting toxicity was based on toxicities recorded from day 1 of the first cycleto day 8 of the third cycle. Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs were not allowed. Tumor response was assessed by MRI every 8 weeks. Twelve patients were enrolled in this phase I study. The three patients enrolled at dose level 1 and six of nine patients enrolled at dose level 2 were evaluable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was 100 mg/m. The dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic and gastrointestinal. Nine patients were evaluable for response: one patient achieved a partial response, four patients remained stable, and four patients had disease progression. The combination of metronomic temozolomide and irinotecan every 2 weeks can be safely administered at the recommended doses; a phase II study with this combination was started and has completed accrual.

Detoxifying antitumoral drugs via nanoconjugation: the case of gold nanoparticles and cisplatin.

Nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as a potential tool to improve cancer treatment. Among the proposed uses in imaging and therapy, their use as a drug delivery scaffold has been extensively highlighted. However, there are still some controversial points which need a deeper understanding before clinical application can occur. Here the use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to detoxify the antitumoral agent cisplatin, linked to a nanoparticle via a pH-sensitive coordination bond for endosomal release, is presented. The NP conjugate design has important effects on pharmacokinetics, conjugate evolution and biodistribution and results in an absence of observed toxicity. Besides, AuNPs present unique opportunities as drug delivery scaffolds due to their size and surface tunability. Here we show that cisplatin-induced toxicity is clearly reduced without affecting the therapeutic benefits in mice models. The NPs not only act as carriers, but also protect the drug from deactivation by plasma proteins until conjugates are internalized in cells and cisplatin is released. Additionally, the possibility to track the drug (Pt) and vehicle (Au) separately as a function of organ and time enables a better understanding of how nanocarriers are processed by the organism.

SEOM guideline for the treatment of malignant glioma.

High-grade gliomas are an infrequent disease diagnosed usually in the fifth or sixth decade. Careful histopathological diagnosis is essential because tumour grade and type condition the treatment. Magnetic resonance with gadolinium is considered the standard radiologic exploration and should be followed by tissue sampling. Treatment of these patients should be decided in a multidisciplinary committee. Surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the basis of patients' treatment, with the best results obtained when the three of them can be used.

Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent malignant glioma shows high overall survival in a multicenter retrospective pooled series of the Spanish Neuro-Oncology Research Group (GEINO).

There is no 'standard of care' for recurrent malignant glioma (MG). Our aim is to confirm the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab 10 mg/kg plus irinotecan 125 mg/m² (or 340 mg/m² if enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs) every 2 weeks for a maximum of 1 year in a retrospective pooled series of patients with recurrent MG. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age 18 years and above, histology of MG, progression after radiation and temozolomide, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of at least 60, and signed informed consent for bevacizumab compassionate use. Response was assessed by MRI using the Macdonald criteria and evaluation of the FLAIR sequence every 8 weeks. A total of 130 patients were enrolled; 72% had glioblastoma (GBM). The median age of the patients was 53 years (20-78); the median KPS was 80%; the median number of prior chemotherapy lines was 2 (1-5); the median interval between the diagnosis of MG and inclusion was 14.6 months (2-166); and the median number of bevacizumab infusions was 8 (1-39). The median follow-up duration was 7.2 months (1-47). The median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months for GBM and 11.2 months for anaplastic glioma (AG). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months for GBM and 4.6 months for AG. The response rate was 56% for GBM and 68% for AG. Neurological and KPS improvements were observed in 49 and 45% of patients. Only KPS less than 80% was associated with a worse significant response rate (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.96). The most frequent grades 3-4 toxicities were asthenia (7%), diarrhea (6%), and thromboembolic events (5%). There were five toxic deaths (4%). Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent MG improves responses, progression-free survival, and OS compared with historical data. KPS of at least 80% was a predictive factor for response and OS.

Efficacy of sequential high-dose doxorubicin and ifosfamide compared with standard-dose doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: an open-label randomized phase II study of the Spanish group for research on sarcomas.

PURPOSE: To assess the progression-free survival (PFS) and antitumor response to standard-dose doxorubicin compared with sequential dose-dense doxorubicin and ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable advanced soft tissue sarcoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) < 2, between the ages 18 and 65 years, and with adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function were entered in the study. The stratifications were: ECOG PS (0 v 1), location of metastases, and potentially resectable disease. Patients were randomly assigned to either doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) given as a bolus injection every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (arm A) or doxorubicin at 30 mg/m(2) per day for 3 consecutive days once every 2 weeks for 3 cycles followed by ifosfamide at 12.5 g/m(2) delivered by continuous infusion over 5 days once every 3 weeks for 3 cycles with filgastrim or pegfilgastrim support (arm B). RESULTS: Between December 2003 and September 2007, 132 patients were entered onto the study. Febrile neutropenia, asthenia, and mucositis were more frequent in the arm B. The interim preplanned analysis for futility allowed the premature closure. Objective responses were observed in 23.4% of assessable patients in arm A and 24.1% in arm B. PFS was 26 weeks in the arm A and 24 weeks in arm B (P = .88). Overall survival did not differ between the two therapeutic arms (P = .14). CONCLUSION: Single-agent doxorubicin remains the standard treatment in fit patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

What can nanotechnology do to fight cancer?

The marriage of physics, chemistry and biology at the namometric scale, nanotechnology, is a powerful technology which is predicted to have a large impacto on life sciences and particularly cancer treatment. In the following we will show some examples of applications which has already reached clinical treatments as new ideas which may positively influence the understanding, diagnosis and therapy of cancer.