RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors for developing postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI), and to develop a nomogram prediction model. METHODS: Patients with CSCI who were admitted to 3 different medical centers between July 2011 and July 2021 were included in this study. All patients underwent cervical spine surgery. Data for patients admitted to the first 2 centers were included in a training set to establish the nomogram prediction model, and data for patients admitted to the third center were included in a validation set to externally verify the efficacy of the prediction model. For the training set, patients were divided into an infected group and a noninfected group (control group). Independent risk factors for postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with CSCI were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Additionally, a nomogram prediction model was developed and validated based on the risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 689 patients were enrolled, including 574 for the training set and 115 for the validation set. Of the patients included for the training set, 144 developed pulmonary infection, with an incidence of 25.09%; 40 patients included for the validation set developed pulmonary infection (34.78%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, American Spinal Injury Association grade, steroid pulse, high-level injury, smoking, multistage surgery, and operation duration were risk factors for the development of postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with CSCI. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model built by the training set was 0.905, and that of the receiver operating characteristic curve of the verification set was 0.917. The decision curve indicated that the model was in the range 1%-100%, and the predicted net benefit value of the model was high. CONCLUSIONS: Age, American Spinal Injury Association grade, steroid pulse, CSCI site, smoking history, number of surgical levels, and surgical duration are correlated with the development of postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with CSCI. The risk prediction model of postoperative pulmonary infection has a good prediction efficiency and accuracy.
RESUMO
Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare type of malignant B-cell lymphoma. The main feature of WM is elevated serum monoclonal immunoglobulin M, similar to multiple myeloma (MM). Unlike in MM, the rarity of destructive bone lesions in WM has been repeatedly emphasized. We report a unique case of WM with a vertebral compression fracture as the first symptom. This case highlights that the presence or absence of bone destruction may not clearly distinguish between WM and MM. The possibility of WM should be considered in patients with vertebral fracture and destruction as the first presentation. Performing vertebral bone marrow aspiration biopsy during percutaneous vertebroplasty is a convenient and effective method to assist in the diagnosis of WM.
Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão , Linfoma de Células B , Mieloma Múltiplo , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenstrom , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenstrom/complicações , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenstrom/diagnóstico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenstrom/patologiaRESUMO
Background: Extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma/primary neuroectodermal tumor (EES/PNET) is a rare, malignant, small round blue cell tumor, which usually involves the larynx, kidneys, and esophagus. The most common metastatic sites are lung and bone. The incidence of epidural EES/PNET was 0.9%, and a detailed search of the PubMed literature found only 7 case reports of epidural ESS/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction in children. Case description: We report a case of epidural ESS/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction in a child with chest and back pain as the first symptom, which worsened after half a year and developed incomplete paralysis of both lower extremities and urinary incontinence. She underwent emergency surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and died of lung metastases 8 months after surgery. Conclusion: Primary epidural tumors are mostly benign, such as spinal meningiomas and neuromas. Contrary to what has been previously thought, we report a case of malignant epidural EES/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction without bone destruction; The rarity of epidural EES/PNET at the cervicothoracic junction in children has led to a lack of data, particularly on prognostic factors and recurrence patterns. Due to the difficulty of early diagnosis and high mortality, spine surgeons must explore and increase their awareness of this disease.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the conventional surgical treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease. Recently, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has been developed to address some of the shortcomings associated with ACDF by preserving function of the motion segment. Controversy still surrounds regarding whether CDA is better. METHODS: We systematically searched six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Clinical, Ovid, BIOSIS and Cochrane registry of controlled clinical trials) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2014 in which CDA was compared with ACDF for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. Effective data were extracted after the assessment of methodological quality of the trials. Then, we performed the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen relevant RCTs with a total of 4061 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that CDA was superior to ACDF regarding better neurological success (P < 0.00001), greater motion preservation at the operated level (P < 0.00001), fewer secondary surgical procedures (P < 0.00001), and fewer rates of adverse events (P < 0.00001) but inferior to ACDF regarding operative times (P < 0.00001). No significant difference was identified between the two groups regarding blood loss (P = 0.87), lengths of hospital stay (P = 0.76), neck pain scores (P = 0.11) and arm pain scores (P = 0.78) reported on a visual analog scale. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis revealed that CDA demonstrated superiorities in better neurological success, greater motion preservation at the operated level, lower rate of adverse events and fewer secondary surgical procedures compared with ACDF. However, the benefits of blood loss, lengths of hospital stay, neck and arm pain functional recovery are still unable to be proved.