Safety and utility of indwelling pleural catheters in lung transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) in lung allograft recipients is under-reported. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis between 1/1/2010 and 6/1/2022 of consecutive IPCs placed in lung transplant recipients. Outcomes included incidence of infectious and non-infectious complications and rate of auto-pleurodesis. RESULTS: Seventy-one IPCs placed in 61 lung transplant patients at eight centers were included. The most common indication for IPC placement was recurrent post-operative effusion. IPCs were placed at a median of 59 days (IQR 40-203) post-transplant and remained for 43 days (IQR 25-88). There was a total of eight (11%) complications. Infection occurred in five patients (7%); four had empyema and one had a catheter tract infection. IPCs did not cause death or critical illness in our cohort. Auto-pleurodesis leading to the removal of the IPC occurred in 63 (89%) instances. None of the patients in this cohort required subsequent surgical decortication. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IPCs in lung transplant patients was associated with an infectious complication rate comparable to other populations previously studied. A high rate of auto-pleurodesis was observed. This work suggests that IPCs may be considered for the management of recurrent pleural effusions in lung allograft recipients.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits in parallel for refractory hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: Refractory hypoxemia can occur in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome from COVID-19 despite support with venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Parallel ECMO circuits can be used to increase physiologic support. We report our clinical experience using ECMO circuits in parallel for select patients with persistent severe hypoxemia despite the use of a single ECMO circuit. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome who received VV-ECMO with an additional circuit in parallel at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2022. We report demographic characteristics and clinical characteristics including ECMO settings, mechanical ventilator settings, use of adjunctive therapies, and arterial blood gas results after initial cannulation, before and after receipt of a second ECMO circuit in parallel, and before removal of the circuit in parallel, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 84 patients with COVID-19 who received VV-ECMO during the study period, 22 patients (26.2%) received a circuit in parallel. The median duration of ECMO was 40.0 days (interquartile range, 31.6-53.1 days), of which 19.0 days (interquartile range, 13.0-33.0 days) were spent with a circuit in parallel. Of the 22 patients who received a circuit in parallel, 16 (72.7%) survived to hospital discharge and 6 (27.3%) died before discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In select patients, the additional use of an ECMO circuit in parallel can increase ECMO blood flow and improve oxygenation while allowing for lung-protective mechanical ventilation and excellent outcomes.

Clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovery in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Reports on outcomes following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in lung transplant recipients remain limited. METHODS: We performed a single-center, observational study of outcomes in lung transplant recipients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 between 5/1/2020 and 3/15/2022 that were followed for a median of 123 days. We analyzed changes in spirometry, acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD) incidence, hospitalization, mechanical ventilation needs, secondary infection, and survival. RESULTS: In our cohort of 336 patients, 103 developed coronavirus disease (COVID) (27 pre-Delta, 20 Delta, and 56 Omicron-era). Twenty-five patients (24%) required hospitalization and 10 patients ultimately died (10%). Among 85 survivors who completed ambulatory spirometry, COVID-19 did not alter change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) or forced vital capacity (FVC) over time compared to the preceding 6 months. The pre-COVID FEV1 change was -0.05 ml/day (IQR -0.50 to 0.60) compared to -0.20 ml/day (IQR -1.40 to 0.70) post-COVID (p = .16). The pre-COVID change in FVC was 0.20 ml/day (IQR -0.60 to 0.70) compared to 0.05 ml/day (IQR -1.00 to 1.10) post-COVID (p = .76). Although the cohort overall had stable lung function, 33 patients (39%) developed ALAD or accelerated chronic lung allograft dysfunction (FEV1 decline >10% from pre-COVID baseline). Nine patients (35%) with ALAD recovered lung function. Within 3 months of acute COVID infection, 18 patients (17%) developed secondary infections, the majority being bacterial pneumonia. Finally, vaccination with at least two doses of mRNA vaccine was not associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the natural history of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large cohort of lung transplant recipients. Although one third of patients develop ALAD requiring augmented immunosuppression, infection with SARS-CoV-2 is not associated with worsening lung function.

Complications Associated With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-What Can Go Wrong?

OBJECTIVES: Despite increasing use and promising outcomes, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) introduces the risk of a number of complications across the spectrum of ECMO care. This narrative review describes the variety of short- and long-term complications that can occur during treatment with ECMO and how patient selection and management decisions may influence the risk of these complications. DATA SOURCES: English language articles were identified in PubMed using phrases related to V-V ECMO, acute respiratory distress syndrome, severe respiratory failure, and complications. STUDY SELECTION: Original research, review articles, commentaries, and published guidelines from the Extracorporeal Life support Organization were considered. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from relevant literature were identified, reviewed, and integrated into a concise narrative review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Selecting patients for V-V ECMO exposes the patient to a number of complications. Adequate knowledge of these risks is needed to weigh them against the anticipated benefit of treatment. Timing of ECMO initiation and transfer to centers capable of providing ECMO affect patient outcomes. Choosing a configuration that insufficiently addresses the patient's physiologic deficit leads to consequences of inadequate physiologic support. Suboptimal mechanical ventilator management during ECMO may lead to worsening lung injury, delayed lung recovery, or ventilator-associated pneumonia. Premature decannulation from ECMO as lungs recover can lead to clinical worsening, and delayed decannulation can prolong exposure to complications unnecessarily. Short-term complications include bleeding, thrombosis, and hemolysis, renal and neurologic injury, concomitant infections, and technical and mechanical problems. Long-term complications reflect the physical, functional, and neurologic sequelae of critical illness. ECMO can introduce ethical and emotional challenges, particularly when bridging strategies fail. CONCLUSIONS: V-V ECMO is associated with a number of complications. ECMO selection, timing of initiation, and management decisions impact the presence and severity of these potential harms.

Bridge to Transplant: Central Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Pulmonary Artery Drainage.

Providing optimal support in patients with concomitant cardiac and pulmonary failure presents multiple challenges. We report a novel approach to central extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support using a minimal access approach to successfully bridge a patient to heart-lung transplant.

Clinician Ethical Perspectives on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Practice.

PURPOSE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an expensive and scarce life sustaining treatment provided to certain critically ill patients. Little is known about the informed consent process for ECMO or clinician viewpoints on ethical complexities related to ECMO in practice. METHODS: We sent a cross-sectional survey to all departments providing ECMO within 7 United States hospitals in January 2021. One clinician from each department completed the 42-item survey representing their department. RESULTS: Fourteen departments within 7 hospitals responded (response rate 78%, N = 14/18). The mean time spent consenting patients or surrogate decision-makers for ECMO varied, from 7.5 minutes (95% CI 5-10) for unstable patients to 20 minutes (95% CI 15-30) for stable patients (p = 0.0001). Few clinician respondents (29%) report patients or surrogate decision-makers always possess informed consent for ECMO. Most departments (92%) have absolute exclusion criteria for ECMO such as older age (43%, cutoffs ranging from 60-75 years), active malignancy (36%), and elevated body mass index (29%). A significant minority of departments (29%) do not always offer the option to withdraw ECMO to patients or surrogate decision-makers. For patients who cannot be liberated from ECMO and are ineligible for heart or lung transplant, 36% of departments would recommend the patient be removed from ECMO and 64% would continue ECMO support. CONCLUSION: Adequate informed consent for ECMO is a major ethical challenge, and the content of these discussions varies. Use of categorical exclusion criteria and withdrawal of ECMO if a patient cannot be liberated from it differ among departments and institutions.

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during high-risk airway interventions.

OBJECTIVES: Practice patterns for the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during high-risk airway interventions vary, and data are limited. We aim to characterize our recent experience using ECMO for procedural support during whole-lung lavage (WLL) and high-risk bronchoscopy for central airway obstruction (CAO). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who received ECMO during WLL and high-risk bronchoscopy from 1 July 2018 to 30 March 2020. Our primary end point was successful completion of the intervention. Secondary end points included ECMO-associated complications and hospital survival. RESULTS: Eight patients received venovenous ECMO for respiratory support during 9 interventions; 3 WLLs for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis were performed in 2 patients, and 6 patients underwent 6 bronchoscopic interventions for CAO. We initiated ECMO prior to the intervention in 8 cases and during the intervention in 1 case for respiratory decompensation. All 9 interventions were successfully completed. Median ECMO duration was 17.8 h (interquartile range, 15.9-26.6) for the pulmonary alveolar proteinosis group and 1.9 h (interquartile range, 1.4-8.1) for the CAO group. There was 1 cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis; there were no other ECMO complications. Seven patients (87.5%) and 4 (50.0%) patients survived to discharge and 1 year postintervention, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of venovenous ECMO to facilitate high-risk airway interventions is safe and feasible. Planned preprocedural ECMO initiation may prevent avoidable respiratory emergencies and extend therapeutic airway interventions to patients otherwise considered too high-risk to treat. Guidelines are needed to inform the utilization of ECMO during high-risk bronchoscopy and other airway interventions.

Bleeding, Thromboembolism, and Clinical Outcomes in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVES: Bleeding and thromboembolism are common during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The relative frequency of these complications and their impact on clinical outcomes have not been described, and no randomized trials exist to guide anticoagulation strategies in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Our objective was to examine the relative frequencies of bleeding and thromboembolic events and their associations with survival among a cohort of consecutive patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and anticoagulation. Eligibility criteria for this analysis were selected to emulate the population that would be recruited for a randomized trial of anticoagulation strategies during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients were excluded if they had active bleeding or thromboembolism prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation, a history of trauma or surgery in the 7 days prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation, an arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannula, or if they received greater than 48 hours of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at another institution. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcomes included bleeding and thromboembolic events, duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital survival among 55 patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Bleeding events occurred in 25 patients (45.5%), and thromboembolism occurred in eight patients (14.5%). Bleeding events were associated with longer duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (p = 0.007) and worse in-hospital survival (p = 0.02). Thromboembolic events did not appear to be associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and anticoagulation, bleeding occurred more frequently than thromboembolism and was associated with worse survival. These results highlight the need for randomized trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous IV anticoagulation among patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Rapid Training in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for a Large Health System.

Background: Despite the rapid integration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) into intensive care units over the past decade, established programs for training critical care clinicians to provide ECMO are lacking.Objective: To evaluate the development and implementation of a multidisciplinary ECMO training program for the rapid deployment of ECMO training for a high volume of critical care clinicians.Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study examining a program for rapid training of multiple disciplines of critical care clinicians to deliver ECMO during the implementation of ECMO services across the intensive care units of an academic tertiary care center between October 2018 and January 2019. The multidisciplinary ECMO training program included didactic and simulation-based teaching and emphasized new, universal clinical protocols to improve consistency of care across the institution. Pre- and post-program written examinations evaluated knowledge acquisition, and an electronically distributed program evaluation assessed perceptions of content and delivery.Results: Among the 97 clinicians who completed the program, 49 (51%) were physicians and 48 (49%) were advanced practice providers from the departments of surgery (n = 42), medicine (n = 29), and anesthesia (n = 26). There was a significant difference in knowledge about ECMO between the pre- and post-program examination score (median [interquartile range] 70% [60-80%] vs. 90% [80-90%], respectively, P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) individual gain from pre- to post-program score was 20% (10-30%). The program was perceived as useful and applicable to safe care.Conclusion: Rapid deployment of a multidisciplinary ECMO training program across a large academic center was feasible, achieved knowledge acquisition, and was positively perceived.

A Dual-Lumen Bicaval Cannula for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Single-site, dual-lumen venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ECMO) facilitates mobilization, reduces recirculation, and mitigates insertion and infectious risks of an additional access site. This study reports the experience with a bicaval dual-lumen cannula that comprises a robust physical design allowing for easy and safe cannulation, precise positioning and monitoring, and appropriate physiologic support for patients with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: Statistical analysis was performed from data gathered retrospectively from the electronic medical records of 20 adult patients who were cannulated for ECMO with this bicaval dual-lumen cannula from August 2018 through May 2019. RESULTS: Gas exchange and blood flow were optimized in all patients after cannulation (median pH, 7.42 [interquartile range {IQR}, 7.39, 7.44], ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen, 186.5 [Pao2:Fio2, 116.5, 247.0]; pump flow, 3.9 L/min [IQR, 3.1, 4.3]). Eleven patients (55%) were able to be freed from mechanical ventilation after cannulation, 9 (45%) patients underwent a tracheostomy procedure while undergoing ECMO, and no patients required reintubation. No morbidity or mortality was related to the cannulation strategy or the catheter. Two patients required cannula repositioning. Survival to decannulation was 90%, and survival to hospital discharge was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: The bicaval dual-lumen cannula maintains the advantages of upper body single-site configuration to provide the adjunctive respiratory support necessary to facilitate awakening and rehabilitation while minimizing the use of invasive mechanical ventilation. This cannula introduces design qualities that may offer advantages for acute respiratory failure requiring venovenous ECMO.

Extracorporeal life support bridge for pulmonary hypertension: A high-volume single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Application of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for advanced pulmonary hypertension (PH) is evolving and may be deployed as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) or in one of several non-BTT uses, such as bridge to recovery (BTR) to the chronic PH clinical state in the setting of an acute PH trigger, bridge through non-transplant surgery (BTNTS), or bridge post-transplantation (BPT). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all adult patients with World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension Group 1, 3, 4, or 5 PH who received ECLS at Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital between January 1, 2010 and August 18, 2018. We describe patient characteristics, outcomes, and our approach to medical and surgical management of these patients. RESULTS: There were 98 patients with significant PH in the cohort (54 female; median age, 48 years [interquartile range, 32-58]). Of these, 44 (45%) patients with PH received ECLS as non-BTT with intent to recover back to their baseline functional state, optimize therapy, or support through a definitive surgery, including 19 BTR, 17 BTNTS, and 8 BPT, and 54 (55%) patients received ECLS as BTT. In the overall cohort, 67 (68.4%) patients received venoarterial ECLS and 31 (31.6%) received venovenous (VV) ECLS. Out of 83 patients, 52 (63%) were liberated from invasive mechanical ventilation, and 85.2% of BTT patients with PH ambulated while on ECLS. Management of PH medications was individualized, often requiring titration with use of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators increased after cannulation in non-BTT. Overall 30-day survival was 73.5%, survival to ECLS decannulation was 66.3%, and survival to hospital discharge was 54.1%. All 8 BPT patients (100%) survived to hospital discharge, 64.7% of BTNTS patients survived to hospital discharge, and 32 (59.3%) BTT patients survived to lung transplantation. Early-era use of VV-ECLS for BTT had worse survival to discharge than those initially configured with venoarterial ECLS, impacting the overall survival and leading to limited use of VV-ECLS in the current era for BPT, BTNTS, and select BTR cases. CONCLUSIONS: ECLS instituted by a specialized, multidisciplinary team has a role in the management of advanced PH as BTT or as non-BTT (including BTR, BTNTS, and BPT). Careful selection of ECLS cannulation configurations, patient-specific optimization of PH medical therapies, and avoidance of endotracheal intubation may be effective strategies in managing these complex patients.

Awake Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Lung Transplantation: A 9-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used as a bridge to lung transplantation, but characteristics that influence its success are poorly understood. This large, single-center experience evaluated the implementation and outcomes of ECMO in this setting. METHODS: Data were collected for patients at our institution (New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center in New York) who received ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation from January 1, 2007 through July 10, 2016. Data were analyzed for demographics, baseline characteristics, survival, and ECMO configuration. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients received ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation. Of the 72 patients, 40 (55.6%) underwent the transplantation procedure, 37 (92.5%) survived to discharge, and 21 (84.0%) survived for 2 years. Inotropy or vasopressor support (70% vs 93.8%; p = 0.011), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (26.8 vs 30.5; p = 0.048), and ambulation (80% vs 56.2%; p = 0.030) were significantly different between the patients who underwent lung transplantation and those who did not. Patients with cystic fibrosis were more likely to have a bridge to transplantation than patients with other lung diseases (47.5% vs 25%; p = 0.050). Daily participation in physical therapy was achieved in 50 patients (69.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated favorable survival in patients receiving ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation and achieved high rates of physical therapy and avoidance of mechanical ventilation while ECMO was used in patients awaiting lung transplantation. With more than half of these patients successfully bridged to lung transplantation, we gained insight into the factors influencing patients' outcomes, including patient selection, timing of ECMO, and patient management.