Patient self-reported experience and satisfaction with golimumab and etanercept treatments for rheumatic diseases: A cohort study.

Golimumab and etanercept both exhibit good efficacy in treating rheumatic diseases, while the patient self-reported measurement of treatment improvement and injection experience lacks sufficient evidence. Hence, this study aimed to compare the satisfaction with disease improvement and injection experience and the level of injection site reactions (ISRs) between golimumab-treated and etanercept-treated patients with rheumatic diseases. A total of 312 patients with rheumatic diseases were serially enrolled. Among them, 158 patients received golimumab (golimumab group); the other 154 patients were treated with etanercept (etanercept group) according to the actual disease status, physician advice, and patient willingness. Satisfaction with disease improvement was assessed using the 7-point Likert scale; satisfaction with injection experience and level of ISRs were both determined by the 5-point Likert scale. Satisfaction degrees with global injection experience (P = .025), injection device (P = .008), injection frequency (P = .010), and injection convenience (P = .003) were superior in the golimumab group to the etanercept group, while satisfaction degrees with global disease improvement, symptom relief, and speed of action did not vary (all P > .050) between the 2 groups. Discomfort (P = .005), swelling (P < .001), pain (P = .028), and burning (P = .035) levels were lower in the golimumab group than in the etanercept group. In addition, among 56 patients with a history of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment before golimumab, 40 (71.4%) patients preferred golimumab to other tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. After switching to golimumab treatment, the level of ISRs in most patients was reduced or comparable. Golimumab achieves a satisfying injection experience and relieves the level of ISRs over etanercept in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Comparison and subsets analysis of peripheral CD4+T cells in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a disease that transformed from psoriasis (PsO), and its underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Overactivation of the immune system is a key factor driving inflammatory diseases. Our goal is to define the unbalanced subsets of peripheral blood CD4 +T cells between PsO and PsA patients. Blood samples from 43 patients (23 PsA and 20 PsO) and 36 healthy donors (HD) were studied. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were separated from blood and underwent fluorescent staining to assess CD4+T cell subsets by flow cytometry. We found that frequencies of various CD4+T cells including Th1, Th2, Th17, and Tfh were higher in the patients with PsO or PsA than those of healthy donors, indicating the general expansion of CD4+T cells in inflammatory conditions. More importantly, we observed the significant imbalance of Th1/Th2 between patients with PsO and PsA. Pearson correlation analysis showed that Th1/Th2 ratio was positively correlated with disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA), Tfh/Tfr ratio was positively correlated with DAPSA score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score in PsA patients. Together, our results highlight the CD4+T cell changes in the transition from PsO to PsA, may contribute to early assessment and intervention.

Expression of CD44 and the survival in glioma: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Higher tumor expression of CD44, a marker of cancer stem cells (CSCs), is associated with poor overall survival (OS) in various cancers. However, the association between CD44 and poor OS remains inconsistent in glioma. We aimed to evaluate the potential predictive role of CD44 for prognosis of glioma patients in a meta-analysis. METHODS: Observational studies comparing OS of glioma patients according to the level of CD44 were identified through searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane's Library databases. Meta-analyses were performed with a random- or fixed-effect model according to the heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the influences of study characteristics. RESULTS: Eleven retrospective cohort studies were included. Results showed that increased CD44 expression in tumor predicted poor OS in glioma patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.97, P=0.04). Subgroup analyses showed that higher tumor CD44 expression significantly predicted poor OS in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) stages II-III glioma (HR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.53-5.89, P=0.002), but not in patients with glioblastoma (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.76-2.08, P=0.47; P for subgroup difference = 0.03). Results were not statistically different between subgroups according to patient ethnicity, sample size, CD44 detection method, CD44 cutoff, HR estimation, univariate or multivariate analysis, or median follow-up durations (P-values for subgroup difference all >0.10). CONCLUSION: Higher tumor expression of CD44 may predict poor survival in patients with glioma, particularly in those with WHO stage II-III glioma.