Subphenotypes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with high-flow oxygen.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) subphenotypes differ in outcomes and treatment responses. Subphenotypes in high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO)-treated ARDS patients have not been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To identify biological subphenotypes in HFNO-treated ARDS patients. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study including ARDS patients supported with HFNO. Plasma inflammation markers (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, and IL-33 and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 [sST2]) and lung epithelial (receptor for advanced glycation end products [RAGE] and surfactant protein D [SP-D]) and endothelial (angiopoietin-2 [Ang-2]) injury were measured. These biomarkers and bicarbonate were used in K-means cluster analysis to identify subphenotypes. Logistic regression was performed on biomarker combinations to predict clustering. We chose the model with the best AUROC and the lowest number of variables. This model was used to describe the HAIS (High-flow ARDS Inflammatory Subphenotype) score. RESULTS: Among 41 HFNO patients, two subphenotypes were identified. Hyperinflammatory subphenotype (n = 17) showed higher biomarker levels than hypoinflammatory (n = 24). Despite similar baseline characteristics, the hyperinflammatory subphenotype had higher 60-day mortality (47 vs 8.3% p = 0.014) and longer ICU length of stay (22.0 days [18.0-30.0] vs 39.5 [25.5-60.0], p = 0.034). The HAIS score, based on IL-8 and sST2, accurately distinguished subphenotypes (AUROC 0.96 [95%CI: 0.90-1.00]). A HAIS score ≥ 7.45 was predictor of hyperinflammatory subphenotype. CONCLUSION: ARDS patients treated with HFNO exhibit two biological subphenotypes that have similar clinical characteristics, but hyperinflammatory patients have worse outcomes. The HAIS score may identify patients with hyperinflammatory subphenotype and might be used for enrichment strategies in future clinical trials.

Lung allograft transbronchial cryobiopsy for critical ventilated patients: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy is an emerging technique for diagnosing pulmonary rejection. However, no prospective studies of this procedure for critically ill lung transplant recipients who require mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been performed. METHODS: From March 2017 to January 2020, we performed a prospective, randomised, comparative study to assess the diagnostic yield, histological quality and safety of transbronchial lung biopsy using biopsy forceps, a 1.9-mm cryoprobe or a 2.4-mm cryoprobe. RESULTS: 89 out of 129 consecutive transbronchial biopsy procedures (forceps group, 28 procedures; 1.9-mm cryoprobe group, 31 procedures; 2.4-mm cryoprobe group, 30 procedures) were randomised. Compared with lung samples from the forceps and 1.9-mm cryoprobe groups, lung samples from the 2.4-mm cryoprobe group allowed the most definitive diagnoses (p<0.01 and p=0.02, respectively), the most diagnoses of acute lung rejection (p<0.01 and p=0.01, respectively) and the most diagnoses of rejection severity (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively). These samples were larger (p<0.01 and p=0.04, respectively), had the most adequate alveolar tissue (p<0.01 and p=0.02, respectively), had more vessels per procedure (p<0.01 and p=0.01, respectively) and had no significant crush artefacts. Moderate bleeding was observed in 23% of cases (p=0.01 and p=0.08, respectively). No severe bleeding was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Transbronchial lung biopsy using a 2.4-mm cryoprobe allows the safe collection of lung tissue samples from critically ill lung transplant recipients who require mechanical ventilation in the ICU and has good diagnostic performance.

Hypoxemic Patients With Bilateral Infiltrates Treated With High-Flow Nasal Cannula Present a Similar Pattern of Biomarkers of Inflammation and Injury to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether patients with acute hypoxemia and bilateral opacities treated with high-flow nasal cannula and acute respiratory distress syndrome patients who were directly mechanically ventilated are similar in terms of lung epithelial, endothelial, and inflammatory biomarkers. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study. SETTING: ICUs at three university tertiary hospitals. PATIENTS: Intubated and nonintubated patients admitted to the ICU with acute hypoxemia (PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 300) and bilateral opacities. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Either high-flow nasal cannula or mechanical ventilation was initiated, at the discretion of the attending physician. We measured plasma biomarkers of lung epithelial injury (receptor for advanced glycation end products and surfactant protein D) and endothelial injury (angiopoietin-2) and inflammation (interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and interleukin-33 and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2) within 24 hours of acute respiratory distress syndrome onset. Propensity score matching was performed using six different variables (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, PaO2/FIO2, origin of acute respiratory distress syndrome, steroids, renal failure and need for vasopressors). Nonhypoxemic mechanically ventilated critically ill patients and healthy volunteers served as controls. Of the 170 patients enrolled, 127 (74.7%) were intubated and 43 (25.3%) were treated with high-flow nasal cannula at acute respiratory distress syndrome onset. After propensity score matching (39 high-flow nasal cannula patients vs 39 mechanical ventilation patients), no significant differences were observed in receptor for advanced glycation end products, surfactant protein D, angiopoietin-2, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-33, and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 between matched patients who were treated with high-flow nasal cannula and those who were intubated at acute respiratory distress syndrome onset. After matching, no differences in mortality or length of stay were observed. All biomarkers (with the exception of interleukin-33) were higher in both groups of matched acute respiratory distress syndrome patients than in both control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Acute hypoxemic patients with bilateral infiltrates treated with high-flow nasal cannula presented a similar pattern of biomarkers of inflammation and injury to acute respiratory distress syndrome patients undergoing direct mechanical ventilation. The results suggest that these high-flow nasal cannula patients should be considered as acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.