Review of the allocation criteria for heart transplant in Spain in 2023. SEC-Heart Failure Association/ONT/SECCE consensus document.

Heart transplant (HT) remains the best therapeutic option for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). The allocation criteria aim to guarantee equitable access to HT and prioritize patients with a worse clinical status. To review the HT allocation criteria, the Heart Failure Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (HFA-SEC), the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery (SECCE) and the National Transplant Organization (ONT), organized a consensus conference involving adult and pediatric cardiologists, adult and pediatric cardiac surgeons, transplant coordinators from all over Spain, and physicians and nurses from the ONT. The aims of the consensus conference were as follows: a) to analyze the organization and management of patients with advanced HF and cardiogenic shock in Spain; b) to critically review heart allocation and priority criteria in other transplant organizations; c) to analyze the outcomes of patients listed and transplanted before and after the modification of the heart allocation criteria in 2017; and d) to propose new heart allocation criteria in Spain after an analysis of the available evidence and multidisciplinary discussion. In this article, by the HFA-SEC, SECCE and the ONT we present the results of the analysis performed in the consensus conference and the rationale for the new heart allocation criteria in Spain.

Gender differences in heart transplantation: Twenty-five year trends in the nationwide Spanish heart transplant registry.

The study of gender differences may lead into improvement in patient care. We have aimed to identify the gender differences in heart transplantation (HT) of adult HT recipients in Spain and their evolution in a study covering the years 1993-2017 in which 6740 HT (20.6% in women) were performed. HT indication rate per million inhabitants was lower in women, remaining basically unchanged during the 25-year study period. HT rate was higher in men, although this decreased over the 25-year study period. Type of heart disease differed in men versus women (p < .001): ischemic heart disease 47.6% versus 22.5%, dilated cardiomyopathy 41.3% versus 34.6%, or other 36% versus 17.8%, respectively. Men were more frequently diabetics (18% vs. 13.1% p < .001), hypertensives (33.1% vs. 24% p < .001), and smokers (21.7% vs. 12.9% p < .001), respectively. Women had more pre-HT malignancies (7.1% vs. 2.8% p < .001), and their clinical status was worse at HT due to renal function and mechanical ventilation. Adjusted survival (p = .198) and most of the mortality-related variables were similar in men and women. Death occurred more frequently in women due to rejection (7.9% vs. 5.1% p < .001) and primary failure (18.2% vs. 12.5% p < .001) and in men due to malignancies (15.1% vs. 6.6% p < .001).

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists modulate galectin-3 and interleukin-33/ST2 signaling in left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the specific role of the 2 available mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), eplerenone and spironolactone, on the modulation of galectin-3 (Gal-3) and interleukin (IL)-33/ST2 signaling in an experimental model of left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: The molecular mechanisms of benefits of MRAs in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after MI not well understood. METHODS: MI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction were induced by permanent ligation of the anterior coronary artery in 45 male Wistar rats, randomly assigned to no therapy (MI group, n = 15) or to receive MRAs (100 mg/kg/day) for 4 weeks; either eplerenone (n = 15) or spironolactone (n = 15) was used. A sham group was used as a control (n = 8). Elements of the pathway for Gal-3 including transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß and SMAD3, as well as that for IL-33/ST2 (including IL-33 and soluble ST2 [sST2]) were analyzed in the infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Expression of markers of fibrosis (collagen types I and III, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1) and inflammation (IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemotactic protein-1) was also examined. RESULTS: In the infarcted myocardium, compared with sham animals, the MI group had higher concentrations of Gal-3, TGF-ß, SMAD3, IL-33, and sST2, as well as higher concentrations of markers of fibrosis and inflammation. Treatment with MRAs down-regulated Gal-3, TGF-ß, and SMAD3 and enhanced IL-33/ST2 signaling with lower expression of sST2; protective IL-33 up-regulation was unaffected by MRAs. Modulation of Gal-3 and IL-33/ST2 signaling induced by MRAs correlated with lower expression levels of fibrosis and inflammatory markers. No differences were found between eplerenone and spironolactone. In the noninfarcted myocardium, compared with sham animals, the MI group exhibited a higher expression of Gal-3 and IL-33, but no signs of inflammation or fibrosis were observed; in the presence of MRAs, IL-33 expression was significantly up-regulated, but Gal-3 was unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: MRAs play a pivotal role in the Gal-3 and IL-33/ST2 modulation in post-MI cardiac remodeling.

Soluble ST2 is a marker for acute cardiac allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Soluble ST2 (sST2), an interleukin (IL)-1 receptor family member, has a role in immunologic tolerance and has also emerged as a biomarker of cardiac stretch and remodeling. The sST2 role in heart transplantation is still unknown. METHODS: From the heart transplantation population at our institution (n = 74), we selected a subset of 26 patients who had an acute rejection episode in the first year after transplantation (35%; 52 ± 14 years; 76% men). Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) results obtained at the time of the first rejection episode represented the rejection cohort (n = 26). Each patient served as a control to himself or herself, with EMB without rejection obtained before and after the rejection episode (n = 52). All laboratory measurements and blood samples were obtained at the time of EMB. RESULTS: sST2 concentrations rose significantly in the context of acute rejection (130 [60 to 238] versus 51 ng/mL [28 to 80]; p = 0.002). Tertile analyses of sST2 concentrations revealed a graded association with rejection (p = 0.002) and repeated measurement analyses showed that sST2 concentrations were significantly modulated by the presence of rejection (p = 0.001). In receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, sST2 had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72; the optimal cutoff point was 68 ng/mL (positive predictive value of 53%, negative predictive value of 83%), which predicted acute cellular rejection (odds ratio [OR] 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 14.5; p = 0.004). The addition of sST2 values to those for the N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) resulted in a significant improvement on the integrated discrimination index (IDI) for rejection (relative improvement of 24%; p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: sST2 concentrations are modulated by the presence of acute rejection and provide complementary predictive ability to NT-proBNP for the biochemical identification of rejection.

Complementary prognostic value of cystatin C, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic Peptide and cardiac troponin T in patients with acute heart failure.

The aims of this study were to compare the prognostic value of cystatin C over creatinine and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and to evaluate whether it provides complementary information to cardiac biomarkers in the risk stratification of an unselected cohort of patients with acute heart failure. Consecutive hospitalized patients with established diagnoses of acute heart failure were prospectively studied. Blood samples were collected on hospital arrival to determine cystatin C, cardiac troponin T, and N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Clinical follow-up was obtained, and the occurrence of mortality and/or heart failure readmission was registered. One hundred thirty-eight patients (median age 74 years, interquartile range 67 to 80; 54% men) were studied. During a median follow-up period of 261 days (interquartile range 161 to 449), 60 patients (43.5%) presented with adverse events. After multivariate adjustment, cystatin C, N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin T, New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, and diabetes mellitus were identified as independent predictors of mortality and/or heart failure readmission. In contrast to creatinine and the MDRD equation, the highest cystatin C tertile (>1.50 mg/L) was a significant independent risk factor for adverse events (hazard ratio 3.08, 95% confidence interval 1.54 to 6.14, p = 0.004). A multimarker approach combining cardiac troponin T, N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and cystatin C improved risk stratification further, showing that patients with 2 (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 5.71) or 3 (hazard ratio 3.64, 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 8.56) elevated biomarkers had a higher risk for adverse events than patients with no elevated biomarkers (p for trend = 0.015). In conclusion, in this unselected cohort, cystatin C was a stronger predictor of adverse events than conventional measures of kidney function. In addition, cystatin C offered complementary prognostic information to cardiac biomarkers and could help clinicians perform more accurate risk stratification of patients with acute heart failure.

Usefulness of serial monitoring of B-type natriuretic peptide for the detection of acute rejection after heart transplantation.

Serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is increased after heart transplantation (HT), but it has not been well established whether BNP could be used to detect acute rejection in asymptomatic patients after HT. A total of 259 routine endomyocardial biopsy specimens from 50 consecutive patients after HT (83% men; age 50 +/- 15 years) were studied. Serial BNP measurements were performed at the time of each biopsy. BNP was evaluated as an absolute level (picograms per milliliter) and percentage of change from the previous biopsy (BNP - BNP at previous biopsy)/BNP at previous biopsy] x 100). Rejection was defined as grade > or =2R International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grading system. BNP correlated independently with time after HT (p <0.001), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (p <0.001), creatinine (p = 0.001), and age (p = 0.0012). Asymptomatic rejection was found in 15 biopsy specimens (6%), for which absolute BNP (106 pg/ml; interquartile range [IQR] 67 to 495) did not differ from nonrejection biopsy specimens (92 pg/ml; IQR 49 to 230; p = 0.286). BNP percentage of change showed a median of +60% (IQR -29 to +154%) in rejection versus -17% (IQR -47 to +19%) in nonrejection biopsy specimens (p = 0.009). After multivariable adjustment, BNP percentage of change was a consistent predictor of rejection (+10%; odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.09, p = 0.021). Receiver-operator characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.643 to 0.768) and identified percentage of change <+38% as an optimal cut-off point, with a negative predictive value of 97%. In conclusion, serial monitoring of BNP, evaluated as a percentage of change, may be a useful noninvasive tool in the clinical management of rejection.