Characterization of genetic variants of GIPR reveals a contribution of ß-arrestin to metabolic phenotypes.

Incretin-based therapies are highly successful in combatting obesity and type 2 diabetes1. Yet both activation and inhibition of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) in combination with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) activation have resulted in similar clinical outcomes, as demonstrated by the GIPR-GLP-1R co-agonist tirzepatide2 and AMG-133 (ref. 3) combining GIPR antagonism with GLP-1R agonism. This underlines the importance of a better understanding of the GIP system. Here we show the necessity of ß-arrestin recruitment for GIPR function, by combining in vitro pharmacological characterization of 47 GIPR variants with burden testing of clinical phenotypes and in vivo studies. Burden testing of variants with distinct ligand-binding capacity, Gs activation (cyclic adenosine monophosphate production) and ß-arrestin 2 recruitment and internalization shows that unlike variants solely impaired in Gs signalling, variants impaired in both Gs and ß-arrestin 2 recruitment contribute to lower adiposity-related traits. Endosomal Gs-mediated signalling of the variants shows a ß-arrestin dependency and genetic ablation of ß-arrestin 2 impairs cyclic adenosine monophosphate production and decreases GIP efficacy on glucose control in male mice. This study highlights a crucial impact of ß-arrestins in regulating GIPR signalling and overall preservation of biological activity that may facilitate new developments in therapeutic targeting of the GIPR system.

Gluco-metabolic response to exogenous oxytocin in totally pancreatectomized patients and healthy individuals.

Oxytocin has been proposed to possess glucose-stabilizing effects through the release of insulin and glucagon from the pancreas. Also, exogenous oxytocin has been shown to stimulate extrapancreatic glucagon secretion in depancreatized dogs. Here, we investigated the effect of exogenous oxytocin on circulating levels of pancreatic and gut-derived glucose-stabilizing hormones (insulin [measured as C-peptide], glucagon, glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP-1], and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide). We studied nine pancreatectomized (PX) patients and nine healthy controls (CTRLs) (matched on age and body mass index) before, during, and after an intravenous infusion of 10 IU of oxytocin administered over 12 min. Oxytocin did not increase plasma glucagon levels, nor induce any changes in plasma glucose, C-peptide, or GIP in any of the groups. Oxytocin decreased plasma glucagon levels by 19 ± 10 % in CTRLs (from 2.0 ± 0.5 [mean ± SEM] to 1.3 ± 0.2 pmol/l, P = 0.0025) and increased GLP-1 by 42 ± 22 % in PX patients (from 9.0 ± 1.0-12.7 ± 1.0 pmol/l, P = 0.0003). Fasting plasma glucose levels were higher in PX patients compared with CTRLs (13.1 ± 1.1 vs. 5.1 ± 0.1 mmol/l, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, the present findings do not support pancreas-mediated glucose-stabilizing effects of acute oxytocin administration in humans and warrant further investigation of oxytocin's gluco-metabolic effects.

Safety of native glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in humans.

In this systematic review, we assessed the safety and possible safety events of native glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)(1-42) in human studies with administration of synthetic human GIP. We searched the PubMed database for all trials investigating synthetic human GIP(1-42) administration. A total of 67 studies were included. Study duration ranged from 30 min to 6 days. In addition to healthy individuals, the studies included individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes, type 1 diabetes, chronic pancreatitis and secondary diabetes, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, diabetes caused by a mutation in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha gene, end-stage renal disease, chronic renal insufficiency, critical illness, hypoparathyroidism, or cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. Of the included studies, 78% did not mention safety events, 10% of the studies reported that no safety events were observed in relation to GIP administration, and 15% of the studies reported safety events in relation to GIP administration with most frequently reported event being a moderate and transient increased heart rate. Gastrointestinal safety events, and changes in blood pressure were also reported. Plasma concentration of active GIP(1-42) increased linearly with dose independent of participant phenotype. There was no significant correlation between achieved maximal concentration of GIP(1-42) and reported safety events. Clearance rates of GIP(1-42) were similar between participant groups. In conclusion, the available data indicate that GIP(1-42) in short-term (up to 6 days) infusion studies is generally well-tolerated. The long-term safety of continuous GIP(1-42) administration is unknown.

Effects of Exogenous GIP and GLP-2 on Bone Turnover in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.

CONTEXT: Individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have an increased risk of bone fractures despite normal or increased bone mineral density. The underlying causes are not well understood but may include disturbances in the gut-bone axis, in which both glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) are regulators of bone turnover. Thus, in healthy fasting participants, both exogenous GIP and GLP-2 acutely reduce bone resorption. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the acute effects of subcutaneously administered GIP and GLP-2 on bone turnover in individuals with T2D. METHODS: We included 10 men with T2D. Participants met fasting in the morning on 3 separate test days and were injected subcutaneously with GIP, GLP-2, or placebo in a randomized crossover design. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and regularly after injections. Bone turnover was estimated by circulating levels of collagen type 1 C-terminal telopeptide (CTX), procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), sclerostin, and PTH. RESULTS: GIP and GLP-2 significantly reduced CTX to (mean ± SEM) 66 ± 7.8% and 74 ± 5.9% of baseline, respectively, compared with after placebo (P = .001). In addition, P1NP and sclerostin increased acutely after GIP whereas a decrease in P1NP was seen after GLP-2. PTH levels decreased to 67 ± 2.5% of baseline after GLP-2 and to only 86 ± 3.4% after GIP. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous GIP and GLP-2 affect CTX and P1NP in individuals with T2D to the same extent as previously demonstrated in healthy individuals.

The importance of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor activation for the effects of tirzepatide.

Tirzepatide is a unimolecular co-agonist of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors recently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency. Tirzepatide treatment results in an unprecedented improvement of glycaemic control and lowering of body weight, but the contribution of the GIP receptor-activating component of tirzepatide to these effects is uncertain. In this review, we present the current knowledge about the physiological roles of the incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP, their receptors, and previous results of co-targeting the two incretin hormone receptors in humans. We also analyse the molecular pharmacological, preclinical and clinical effects of tirzepatide to discuss the role of GIP receptor activation for the clinical effects of tirzepatide. Based on the available literature on the combination of GLP-1 and GIP receptor activation, tirzepatide does not seem to have a classical co-activating mode of action in humans. Rather, in vitro studies of the human GLP-1 and GIP receptors reveal a biased GLP-1 receptor activation profile and GIP receptor downregulation. Therefore, we propose three hypotheses for the mode of action of tirzepatide, which can be addressed in future, elaborate clinical trials.

Rare Heterozygous Loss-of-Function Variants in the Human GLP-1 Receptor Are Not Associated With Cardiometabolic Phenotypes.

CONTEXT: Lost glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) function affects human physiology. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to identify coding nonsynonymous GLP1R variants in Danish individuals to link their in vitro phenotypes and clinical phenotypic associations. METHODS: We sequenced GLP1R in 8642 Danish individuals with type 2 diabetes or normal glucose tolerance and examined the ability of nonsynonymous variants to bind GLP-1 and to signal in transfected cells via cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) formation and ß-arrestin recruitment. We performed a cross-sectional study between the burden of loss-of-signaling (LoS) variants and cardiometabolic phenotypes in 2930 patients with type 2 diabetes and 5712 participants in a population-based cohort. Furthermore, we studied the association between cardiometabolic phenotypes and the burden of the LoS variants and 60 partly overlapping predicted loss-of-function (pLoF) GLP1R variants found in 330 566 unrelated White exome-sequenced participants in the UK Biobank cohort. RESULTS: We identified 36 nonsynonymous variants in GLP1R, of which 10 had a statistically significant loss in GLP-1-induced cAMP signaling compared to wild-type. However, no association was observed between the LoS variants and type 2 diabetes, although LoS variant carriers had a minor increased fasting plasma glucose level. Moreover, pLoF variants from the UK Biobank also did not reveal substantial cardiometabolic associations, despite a small effect on glycated hemoglobin A1c. CONCLUSION: Since no homozygous LoS nor pLoF variants were identified and heterozygous carriers had similar cardiometabolic phenotype as noncarriers, we conclude that GLP-1R may be of particular importance in human physiology, due to a potential evolutionary intolerance of harmful homozygous GLP1R variants.

Acarbose diminishes postprandial suppression of bone resorption in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: The alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose is an antidiabetic drug delaying assimilation of carbohydrates and, thus, increasing the amount of carbohydrates in the distal parts of the intestines, which in turn increases circulating levels of the gut-derived incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). As GLP-1 may suppress bone resorption, acarbose has been proposed to potentiate meal-induced suppression of bone resorption. We investigated the effect of acarbose treatment on postprandial bone resorption in patients with type 2 diabetes and used the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2 to disclose contributory effect of acarbose-induced GLP-1 secretion. METHODS: In a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study, 15 participants with metformin-treated type 2 diabetes (2 women/13 men, age 71 (57-85 years), BMI 29.7 (23.6-34.6 kg/m2), HbA1c 48 (40-74 mmol/mol)/6.5 (5.8-11.6 %) (median and range)) were subjected to two 14-day treatment periods with acarbose and placebo, respectively, separated by a six-week wash-out period. At the end of each period, circulating bone formation and resorption markers were assessed during two randomised 4-h liquid mixed meal tests (MMT) with infusions of exendin(9-39)NH2 and saline, respectively. Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) was also assessed. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, acarbose impaired the MMT-induced suppression of CTX as assessed by baseline-subtracted area under curve (P = 0.0037) and nadir of CTX (P = 0.0128). During acarbose treatment, exendin(9-39)NH2 infusion lowered nadir of CTX compared to saline (P = 0.0344). Neither parathyroid hormone or the bone formation marker procollagen 1 intact N-terminal propeptide were affected by acarbose or GLP-1 receptor antagonism. Acarbose treatment induced a greater postprandial GLP-2 response than placebo treatment (P = 0.0479) and exendin(9-39)NH2 infusion exacerbated this (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment with acarbose reduced postprandial suppression of bone resorption. Acarbose-induced GLP-1 secretion may contribute to this phenomenon as the impairment was partially reversed by GLP-1 receptor antagonism. Also, acarbose-induced reductions in other factors reducing bone resorption, e.g. glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, may contribute.

Separate and combined effects of long-term GIP and GLP-1 receptor activation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a structured summary of a study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Due to reports of severely reduced insulinotropic effect of the incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in type 2 diabetes (T2D), GIP has not been considered therapeutically viable. Recently, however, tirzepatide, a novel dual incretin receptor agonist (activating the GIP receptor and the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor) has demonstrated greater glucose and body weight-lowering properties as compared to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy. The contribution of GIP receptor activation to effects of tirzepatide remains unknown. We will evaluate the glucose-lowering effect of exogenous GIP in the context of pharmacological GLP-1 receptor activation in patients with T2D. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this randomised, double-blind, four-arm parallel, placebo-controlled trial, 60 patients with T2D will be included (18-74 of age; on diet and exercise and/or metformin therapy only; glycated haemoglobin 6.5-10.5% (48-91 mmol/mol)). Participants will be randomised to an 8-week run-in period with subcutaneous (s.c.) placebo or semaglutide injections once-weekly (0.5 mg). Participants will then be randomised to 6 weeks' add-on treatment with continuous s.c. placebo or GIP infusion (16 pmol/kg/min). The primary endpoint is change in mean glucose levels (assessed by 14-day continuous glucose monitoring) from the end of the run-in period to end of trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The present study was approved by the Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics in the Capitol Region of Denmark (identification no. H-20070184) and by the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT no. 2020-004774-22). All results, positive, negative and inconclusive, will be disseminated at national and/or international scientific meetings and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT05078255 and U1111-1259-1491.

The naturally occurring GIP(1-30)NH2 is a GIP receptor agonist in humans.

OBJECTIVE: The gut hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an important regulator of glucose and bone metabolism. In rodents, the naturally occurring GIP variant, GIP(1-30)NH2, has shown similar effects as full-length GIP (GIP(1-42)), but its effects in humans are unsettled. Here, we investigated the actions of GIP(1-30)NH2 compared to GIP(1-42) on glucose and bone metabolism in healthy men and in isolated human pancreatic islets. METHODS: Nine healthy men completed three separate three-step glucose clamps (0-60 minutes at fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level, 60-120 minutes at 1.5× FPG, and 120-180 minutes at 2× FPG) with infusion of GIP(1-42) (4 pmol/kg/min), GIP(1-30)NH2 (4 pmol/kg/min), and saline (9 mg/mL) in randomised order. Blood was sampled for measurement of relevant hormones and bone turnover markers. Human islets were incubated with low (2 mmol/L) or high (20 mmol/L) d-glucose with or without GIP(1-42) or GIP(1-30)NH2 in three different concentrations for 30 minutes, and secreted insulin and glucagon were measured. RESULTS: Plasma glucose (PG) levels at FPG, 1.5× FPG, and 2× FPG were obtained by infusion of 1.45 g/kg, 0.97 g/kg, and 0.6 g/kg of glucose during GIP(1-42), GIP(1-30)NH2, and saline, respectively (P = .18), and were similar on the three experimental days. Compared to placebo, GIP(1-30)NH2 resulted in similar glucagonotropic, insulinotropic, and carboxy-terminal type 1 collagen crosslinks-suppressing effects as GIP(1-42). In vitro experiments on human islets showed similar insulinotropic and glucagonotropic effects of the two GIP variants. CONCLUSIONS: GIP(1-30)NH2 has similar effects on glucose and bone metabolism in healthy individuals and in human islets in vitro as GIP(1-42).

The Importance of Endogenously Secreted GLP-1 and GIP for Postprandial Glucose Tolerance and ß-Cell Function After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery.

Enhanced secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) seems to be essential for improved postprandial ß-cell function after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) but is less studied after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Moreover, the role of the other major incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), is relatively unexplored after bariatric surgery. We studied the effects of separate and combined GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and GIP receptor (GIPR) blockade during mixed-meal tests in unoperated (CON), SG-operated, and RYGB-operated people with no history of diabetes. Postprandial GLP-1 concentrations were highest after RYGB but also higher after SG compared with CON. In contrast, postprandial GIP concentrations were lowest after RYGB. The effect of GLP-1R versus GIPR blockade differed between groups. GLP-1R blockade reduced ß-cell glucose sensitivity and increased or tended to increase postprandial glucose responses in the surgical groups but had no effect in CON. GIPR blockade reduced ß-cell glucose sensitivity and increased or tended to increase postprandial glucose responses in the CON and SG groups but had no effect in the RYGB group. Our results support that GIP is the most important incretin hormone in unoperated people, whereas GLP-1 and GIP are equally important after SG, and GLP-1 is the most important incretin hormone after RYGB.

The Gut-Bone Axis in Diabetes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe recent advances in the understanding of how gut-derived hormones regulate bone homeostasis in humans with emphasis on pathophysiological and therapeutic perspectives in diabetes. RECENT FINDINGS: The gut-derived incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is important for postprandial suppression of bone resorption. The other incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), as well as the intestinotrophic glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) has been shown to suppress bone resorption in pharmacological concentrations, but the role of the endogenous hormones in bone homeostasis is uncertain. For ambiguous reasons, both patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes have increased fracture risk. In diabetes, the suppressive effect of endogenous GIP on bone resorption seems preserved, while the effect of GLP-2 remains unexplored both pharmacologically and physiologically. GLP-1 receptor agonists, used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, may reduce bone loss, but results are inconsistent. GIP is an important physiological suppressor of postprandial bone resorption, while GLP-1 and GLP-2 may also exert bone-preserving effects when used pharmacologically. A better understanding of the actions of these gut hormones on bone homeostasis in patients with diabetes may lead to new strategies for the prevention and treatment of skeletal frailty related to diabetes.

Endogenous Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Contributes to Sitagliptin-Mediated Improvement in ß-Cell Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) degrades the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). DPP-4 inhibitors improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, but the importance of protecting GIP from degradation for their clinical effects is unknown. We included 12 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean ± SD BMI 27 ± 2.6 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.1 ± 1.4% [54 ± 15 mmol/mol]) in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study to investigate the contribution of endogenous GIP to the effects of the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin. Participants underwent two randomized, 13-day treatment courses of sitagliptin (100 mg/day) and placebo, respectively. At the end of each treatment period, we performed two mixed-meal tests with infusion of the GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 (1,200 pmol/kg/min) or saline placebo. Sitagliptin lowered mean fasting plasma glucose by 1.1 mmol/L compared with placebo treatment. During placebo treatment, postprandial glucose excursions were increased during GIP(3-30)NH2 compared with saline (difference in area under the curve ± SEM 7.3 ± 2.8%) but were unchanged during sitagliptin treatment. Endogenous GIP improved ß-cell function by 37 ± 12% during DPP-4 inhibition by sitagliptin. This was determined by the insulin secretion rate/plasma glucose ratio. We calculated an estimate of the absolute sitagliptin-mediated impact of GIP on ß-cell function as the insulinogenic index during sitagliptin treatment plus saline infusion minus the insulinogenic index during sitagliptin plus GIP(3-30)NH2. This estimate was expressed relative to the maximal potential contribution of GIP to the effect of sitagliptin (100%), defined as the difference between the full sitagliptin treatment effect, including actions mediated by GIP (sitagliptin + saline), and the physiological response minus any contribution by GIP [placebo treatment + GIP(3-30)NH2]. We demonstrate insulinotropic and glucose-lowering effects of endogenous GIP in patients with type 2 diabetes and that endogenous GIP contributes to the improved ß-cell function observed during DPP-4 inhibition.

Gastric Aspiration Improves Postprandial Glucose Tolerance Without Causing a Compensatory Increase in Appetite and Food Intake.

INTRODUCTION: AspireAssist® allows aspiration of ~30% of an ingested meal through a percutaneous gastrostomy tube, reducing caloric uptake. We evaluated the acute effects of gastric aspiration on postprandial glucose tolerance, responses of gluco-regulatory and appetite-regulating hormones, appetite sensations, and food intake. METHODS: Seven AspireAssist®-treated individuals underwent two separate experimental days each involving a mixed meal test (MMT) with double-blinded aspiration and sham aspiration, respectively. Seven age and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls underwent one MMT. MMTs were followed by an ad libitum meal. RESULTS: Postprandial glucose tolerance was improved during aspiration vs. sham visits (median [interquartile range] baseline-subtracted area under the curve (bsAUC) 170 [88.4;356] vs. 388 [239;456] mmol/L × min, p = 0.025). Reduced responses (bsAUCs) of C-peptide (113 [28.4;224] vs. 302 [215;433] nmol/L × min, p = 0.014), cholecystokinin (223 [59.4;402] vs. 467 [416;546] pmol/L × min, p = 0.005), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (4.63 [1.49;9.04] vs. 15.4 [9.59;18.9] nmol/L × min, p = 0.025), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (532.8 [274.5;1,278] vs. 1,296 [746.2;1,618] pmol/L × min, p = 0.032) were observed during aspiration vs. sham visits. Responses of glucagon, gastrin, ghrelin and peptide YY, appetite sensations, and ad libitum food intake were unaffected by aspiration. Responses of plasma glucose, gut hormones, appetite sensations, and food intake were similar during sham and control visits. CONCLUSION: Gastric aspiration improved postprandial glucose tolerance without causing compensatory increases in appetite or food intake, pointing to acute beneficial metabolic effects of aspiration therapy together with previously reported body weight-lowering effects.

GLP-1 and GIP receptor signaling in beta cells - A review of receptor interactions and co-stimulation.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) are two class B1 G protein-coupled receptors, which are stimulated by the gastrointestinal hormones GLP-1 and GIP, respectively. In the pancreatic beta cells, activation of both receptors lead to increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Marketed GLP-1R agonists such as dulaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide and semaglutide constitute an expanding drug class with beneficial effects for persons suffering from type 2 diabetes and/or obesity. In recent years another drug class, the GLP-1R-GIPR co-agonists, has emerged. Especially the peptide-based, co-agonist tirzepatide is a promising candidate for a better treatment of type 2 diabetes by improving glycemic control and weight reduction. The mechanism of action for tirzepatide include biased signaling of the GLP-1R as well as potent GIPR signaling. Since the implications of co-targeting these closely related receptors concomitantly are challenging to study in vivo, the pharmacodynamic mechanisms and downstream signaling pathways of the GLP-1R-GIPR co-agonists in general, are not fully elucidated. In this review, we present the individual signaling pathways for GLP-1R and GIPR in the pancreatic beta cell with a focus on the shared signaling pathways of the two receptors and interpret the implications of GLP-1R-GIPR co-activation in the light of recent co-activating therapeutic compounds.

The glucagon receptor antagonist LY2409021 has no effect on postprandial glucose in type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) pathophysiology includes fasting and postprandial hyperglucagonemia, which has been linked to hyperglycemia via increased endogenous glucose production (EGP). We used a glucagon receptor antagonist (LY2409021) and stable isotope tracer infusions to investigate the consequences of hyperglucagonemia in T2D. DESIGN: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study was conducted. METHODS: Ten patients with T2D and ten matched non-diabetic controls underwent two liquid mixed meal tests preceded by single-dose administration of LY2409021 (100 mg) or placebo. Double-tracer technique was used to quantify EGP. Antagonist selectivity toward related incretin receptors was determined in vitro. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, LY2409021 lowered the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from 9.1 to 7.1 mmol/L in patients and from 5.6 to 5.0 mmol/L in controls (both P < 0.001) by mechanisms involving reduction of EGP. Postprandial plasma glucose excursions (baseline-subtracted area under the curve) were unaffected by LY2409021 in patients and increased in controls compared to placebo. Glucagon concentrations more than doubled during glucagon receptor antagonism. The antagonist interfered with both glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptors, complicating the interpretation of the postprandial data. CONCLUSIONS: LY2409021 lowered FPG concentrations but did not improve postprandial glucose tolerance after a meal in patients with T2D and controls. The metabolic consequences of postprandial hyperglucagonemia are difficult to evaluate using LY2409021 because of its antagonizing effects on the incretin receptors.

Effects of endogenous GIP in patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The insulinotropic effect of exogenous, intravenously infused glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is impaired in patients with type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effects of endogenous GIP in relation to glucose and bone metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes using a selective GIP receptor antagonist and hypothesized that the effects of endogenous GIP were preserved. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study. METHODS: Ten patients with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes (mean±s.d.; HbA1c 52 ± 11 mmol/mol; BMI 32.5 ± 4.8 kg/m2) were included. We infused a selective GIP receptor antagonist, GIP(3-30)NH2 (1200 pmol/kg/min), or placebo (saline) during two separate, 230-min, standardized, liquid mixed meal tests followed by a meal ad libitum. Subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, GIP(3-30)NH2 reduced postprandial insulin secretion (Δbaseline-subtracted area under the curve (bsAUC)C-peptide% ± s.e.m.; -14 ± 6%, P = 0.021) and peak glucagon (Δ% ± s.e.m.; -11 ± 6%, P = 0.046) but had no effect on plasma glucose (P = 0.692). Suppression of bone resorption (assessed by circulating carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX)) was impaired during GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion compared with placebo (ΔbsAUCCTX; ±s.e.m.; -4.9 ± 2 ng/mL × min, P = 0.005) corresponding to a ~50% reduction. Compared with placebo, GIP(3-30)NH2 did not affect plasma lipids, meal consumption ad libitum or adipose tissue triglyceride content. CONCLUSIONS: Using a selective GIP receptor antagonist during a meal, we show that endogenous GIP increases postprandial insulin secretion with little effect on postprandial glycaemia but is important for postprandial bone homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The role of endogenous GIP and GLP-1 in postprandial bone homeostasis.

The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are well known for their insulinotropic effects and they are thought to affect bone homeostasis as mediators in the so-called entero-osseous axis. We examined the contributions of endogenous GIP and GLP-1, respectively, to postprandial bone homeostasis, in healthy subjects in two randomized and double-blind crossover studies. We included healthy men who received either four oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) (n = 18, median age 27 (range 20-70), BMI 27.2 (22.4-37.0) kg/m2) or liquid mixed meal tests (MMTs) (n = 12, age 23 (19-65), BMI 23.7 (20.3-25.5) kg/m2) with infusions of 1) the GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2, 2) the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2, 3) both GIP(3-30)NH2 and exendin(9-39)NH2, or 4) placebo infusions (saline) on four separate visits. Bone resorption was evaluated from levels of circulating carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX) and bone formation from levels of procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP). During placebo infusions, baseline-subtracted area under the curve values for CTX were -39 ± 5.0 (OGTT) and -57 ± 4.3 ng/ml × min (MMT). When GIP(3-30)NH2 was administered, CTX suppression was significantly diminished compared to placebo (-30 ± 4.8 (OGTT) and -45 ± 4.6 ng/ml × min (MMT), P = 0.0104 and P = 0.0288, respectively, compared to placebo. During exendin(9-39)NH2 infusion, CTX suppression after OGTT/MMT was similar to placebo (P = 0.28 (OGTT) and P = 0.93 (MMT)). The relative contribution of endogenous GIP to postprandial suppression of bone resorption during both OGTT and MMT was similar and reached 22-25%. There were no differences in P1NP concentrations between interventions. In conclusion, endogenous GIP contributes by up to 25% to postprandial suppression of bone resorption in humans whereas an effect of endogenous GLP-1 could not be demonstrated.

GIP and GLP-1 Receptor Antagonism During a Meal in Healthy Individuals.

CONTEXT: The actions of both endogenous incretin hormones during a meal have not previously been characterized. OBJECTIVE: Using specific receptor antagonists, we investigated the individual and combined contributions of endogenous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) to postprandial glucose metabolism, energy expenditure, and gallbladder motility. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover design. SETTING: On four separate days, four liquid mixed meal tests (1894 kJ) over 270 minutes (min). PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twelve healthy male volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Infusions of the GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 (800 pmol/kg/min), the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2 (0-20 min: 1000 pmol/kg/min; 20-270 min: 450 pmol/kg/min), GIP(3-30)NH2+exendin(9-39)NH2, or placebo/saline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Baseline-subtracted area under the curve (bsAUC) of C-peptide. RESULTS: Infusion of GIP(3-30)NH2+exendin(9-39)NH2 significantly increased plasma glucose excursions (bsAUC: 261 ± 142 mmol/L × min) during the liquid mixed meals compared with GIP(3-30)NH2 (180 ± 141 mmol/L × min; P = 0.048), exendin(9-39)NH2 (171 ± 114 mmol/L × min; P = 0.046), and placebo (116 ± 154 mmol/L × min; P = 0.015). Correspondingly, C-peptide:glucose ratios during GIP(3-30)NH2+exendin(9-39)NH2 infusion were significantly lower than during GIP(3-30)NH2 (P = 0.0057), exendin(9-39)NH2 (P = 0.0038), and placebo infusion (P = 0.014). GIP(3-30)NH2 resulted in significantly lower AUCs for glucagon than exendin(9-39)NH2 (P = 0.0417). Gallbladder ejection fraction was higher during GIP(3-30)NH2 compared with placebo (P = 0.004). For all interventions, energy expenditure and respiratory quotient were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Endogenous GIP and GLP-1 lower postprandial plasma glucose excursions and stimulate insulin secretion but only endogenous GIP affects gallbladder motility. The two incretin hormones potentiate each other's effects in the control of postprandial glycemia in healthy men.

No Acute Effects of Exogenous Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide on Energy Intake, Appetite, or Energy Expenditure When Added to Treatment With a Long-Acting Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist in Men With Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Dual incretin receptor agonists in clinical development have shown reductions in body weight and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes, but the impact of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor activation remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the effects of high-dose exogenous GIP on energy intake, energy expenditure, plasma glucose, and glucose-regulating hormones in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind design, men with type 2 diabetes (n = 22, mean ± SEM HbA1c 6.8 ± 0.1% [51 ± 1.5 mmol/mol]) treated with metformin and long-acting GLP-1R agonists were subjected to two 5-h continuous infusions (separated by a washout period of ≥3 days): one with GIP (6 pmol/kg/min) and another with saline (placebo). After 60 min of infusion, a liquid mixed-meal test was performed, and after 270 min of infusion, an ad libitum meal was served for evaluation of energy intake (primary end point). RESULTS: Energy intake was similar during GIP and placebo infusion (648 ± 74 kcal vs. 594 ± 55 kcal, respectively; P = 0.480), as were appetite measures and energy expenditure. Plasma glucagon and glucose were higher during GIP infusion compared with placebo infusion (P = 0.026 and P = 0.017) as assessed by area under the curve. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes, GIP infusion on top of treatment with metformin and a long-acting GLP-1R agonist did not affect energy intake, appetite, or energy expenditure but increased plasma glucose compared with placebo. These results indicate no acute beneficial effects of combining GIP and GLP-1.