RESUMO
Severe non-infectious or non-haemorrhagic brain edema surrounding the electrode represents a rare complication of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) surgery. The aim of this study is to report three patients with advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) who developed symptomatic brain edema after STN-DBS surgery treated with intravenous steroids with a specific profile of reversible cognitive alterations. Patients were both assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery including attention, memory, visuo-spatial and executive tasks. They were also briefly assessed for emotional and behavioural alterations, and for possible limitations in the activities of daily living. Normative data for an Italian population were available for all neuropsychological tests. The patients were firstly assessed before the surgery (baseline) as soon as they became symptomatic for the post-surgery edema and a few more times in follow-up up to ten months. In all patients we observed the resolution of cognitive deficits within six months after surgery with the corresponding reabsorption of edema at brain CT scans. The appearance of post-DBS edema is a fairly frequent and clinically benign event. However, in some rare cases it can be very marked and lead to important clinical-albeit transient-disturbances. These events can compromise, at least from a psychological point of view, the delicate path of patients who undergo DBS and can prolong the post-operative hospital stay. In this setting it could be helpful to perform a brain CT scan in 2-3 days with the aim of detecting the early appearance of edema and treating it before it can constitute a relevant clinical problem.
RESUMO
Introduction: Anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 limbic encephalitis (LGI1-LE) is an autoimmune disorder associated with antibodies to voltage-gated potassium channels (VGKC). It is a non-paraneoplastic and partially reversible encephalitis that can be diagnosed via serological testing. Untreated LGI1-LE can be associated with neurocognitive as well as neuropsychiatric sequelae. Here we report the neuropsychological and clinical profile of a patient with LGI1-LE following three different treatment approaches: plasmapheresis (PA), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and corticosteroids (CO). Method: We investigated our patient with 10 neuropsychological evaluations obtained over a 9-year follow-up period. Multiple MRI scans, EEG recordings, neurological examinations, and serum tests were also obtained. Results: The neurocognitive profile of our patient was characterized by long-term memory impairment (verbal and visual-spatial), and deficits in aspects of executive functioning and language. Neuropsychiatric symptoms of depression and anxiety were noted intermittently. Conclusions: Non-specific treatment prior to diagnosis had marginal effects on neurocognitive profile, neuropsychiatric symptoms, or control of epileptic seizure. In contrast, specific treatments for LGI1-LE following diagnosis resulted in neurocognitive improvement and epileptic control. Among the three treatments, IVIG and CO had the most beneficial impact on neurocognitive status, likely due to the continuity of administration.
Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Epilepsia , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular/imunologia , Encefalite Límbica , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/fisiopatologia , Epilepsia/etiologia , Epilepsia/fisiopatologia , Função Executiva/fisiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Idioma , Encefalite Límbica/complicações , Encefalite Límbica/imunologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Memória de Longo Prazo/fisiologia , ConvulsõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: A case report of a 74-year-old male presenting with an atypical multimodal semantic impairment. The patient was diagnosed with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) for which he received allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) due to disease progression. Following BMT, he developed a sudden onset of semantic difficulties that have remained unchanged for eight years. No other cognitive functions have been affected and his activities of daily living remain fully preserved. METHOD: The patient was assessed at our neuropsychology unit with six neuropsychological evaluations over an 8-years follow-up period following BMT. Additional semantic tests were administered during the last three evaluations. Four MRI scans (at age 62, 66, 69 and 74) and 18F-FDG PET (at age 74) were obtained. RESULTS: The patient presents a multimodal semantic impairment, including naming impairment, visual agnosia, prosopoanomia, associative prosopagnosia, topographical disorientation and impaired retrograde memory for public events. MRI scans and 18F-FDG PET revealed bilateral symmetrical atrophy (temporal > frontal) and inferior bilateral temporal lobe hypometabolism, respectively. Neuroradiological examination was unremarkable prior to BMT. CONCLUSION: Clinical diagnosis remains a challenge given the focal and stable nature of his deficits. We hypothesize that the BMT procedure might have resulted in the temporal lobe damage and subsequent semantic impairment. We recommend obtaining a thorough neuropsychological evaluation of patients who receive allogenic BMT, both prior to and following transplant.