Impact of Inflammatory Burden on Voriconazole Exposure in Oncohematological Pediatric Patients Receiving Antifungal Prophylaxis after Allogeneic HCT.

(1) Background: The impact of inflammation on voriconazole exposure in oncohematological pediatric patients represents a debated issue. We aimed to investigate the impact of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels on voriconazole exposure in oncohematological pediatric patients requiring allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). (2) Methods: Pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HCT and receiving therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided voriconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis between January 2021 and December 2023 were included. The ratio between concentration and dose (C/D) of voriconazole was used as a surrogate marker of total clearance. A receiving operating characteristic curve analysis was performed by using CRP, PCT, or IL-6 values as the test variable and voriconazole C/D ratio > 0.188 or >0.375 (corresponding to a trough concentration value [Cmin] of 3 mg/L normalized to the maintenance dose of 16 mg/kg/day in patients of age < 12 years and of 8 mg/kg/day in those ≥12 years, respectively) as the state variable. Area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. (3) Results: Overall, 39 patients were included. The median (IQR) voriconazole Cmin was 1.7 (0.7-3.0) mg/L. A CRP value > 8.49 mg/dL (AUC = 0.72; 95%CI 0.68-0.76; p < 0.0001), a PCT value > 2.6 ng/mL (AUC = 0.71; 95%CI 0.63-0.77; p < 0.0001), and an IL-6 value > 27.9 pg/mL (AUC = 0.80; 95%CI 0.71-0.88; p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with voriconazole overexposure. Consistent results were found in patients aged <12 and ≥12 years. (4) Conclusions: A single specific threshold of inflammatory biomarkers may be linked to a significantly higher risk of voriconazole exposure in oncohematological pediatric patients after HCT, irrespective of age. Adopting a TDM-guided strategy could be useful for minimizing the risk of voriconazole overexposure.

Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the Italian council for the optimization of antimicrobial use.

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are common surgical emergencies and are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospital settings, particularly if poorly managed. The cornerstones of effective IAIs management include early diagnosis, adequate source control, appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and early physiologic stabilization using intravenous fluids and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients. Adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy in patients with IAIs is of paramount importance because inappropriate antimicrobial therapy is associated with poor outcomes. Optimizing antimicrobial prescriptions improves treatment effectiveness, increases patients' safety, and minimizes the risk of opportunistic infections (such as Clostridioides difficile) and antimicrobial resistance selection. The growing emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms has caused an impending crisis with alarming implications, especially regarding Gram-negative bacteria. The Multidisciplinary and Intersociety Italian Council for the Optimization of Antimicrobial Use promoted a consensus conference on the antimicrobial management of IAIs, including emergency medicine specialists, radiologists, surgeons, intensivists, infectious disease specialists, clinical pharmacologists, hospital pharmacists, microbiologists and public health specialists. Relevant clinical questions were constructed by the Organizational Committee in order to investigate the topic. The expert panel produced recommendation statements based on the best scientific evidence from PubMed and EMBASE Library and experts' opinions. The statements were planned and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) hierarchy of evidence. On November 10, 2023, the experts met in Mestre (Italy) to debate the statements. After the approval of the statements, the expert panel met via email and virtual meetings to prepare and revise the definitive document. This document represents the executive summary of the consensus conference and comprises three sections. The first section focuses on the general principles of diagnosis and treatment of IAIs. The second section provides twenty-three evidence-based recommendations for the antimicrobial therapy of IAIs. The third section presents eight clinical diagnostic-therapeutic pathways for the most common IAIs. The document has been endorsed by the Italian Society of Surgery.

Efficacy of a Novel Prophylactic Scheme of Fosfomycin Trometamol in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Findings from a Prospective Monocentric Single-Arm Study.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel prophylactic scheme of fosfomycin trometamol in patients undergoing elective HoLEP (holmium laser enucleation of the prostate) or TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate) procedures for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia and undergoing elective HoLEP or TURP procedures during the period February 2022-June 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Two 3 g oral fosfomycin trometamol doses 12 h apart were administered at 8.00 p.m. on day -1 (i.e., the day before HoLEP or TURP procedure) and at 8.00 a.m. on day 0 (i.e., the day of the surgical procedure). The following outcomes were assessed: prevalence of fever occurring in the first 48 h after surgical procedure; prevalence of urological complications occurring after the surgical procedure; prevalence of proven urinary tract infections (UTIs) and/or bloodstream infections (BSIs) at 14 days post-procedure; and prevalence of emergency department admission for UTI-related sepsis at 14 days post-procedure. Univariate analysis comparing patients with and without proven UTI, BSI, or emergency department admission at 14 days post-procedure was carried out. Overall, 96 patients (median age 70 years) undergoing HoLEP (82.3%) or TURP (17.7%) were prospectively included. Median (IQR) time of surgical procedure after the morning fosfomycin dose was 226.5 min (range 88.5-393.75 min). Fever in the post-surgical 48 h occurred in 3/96 patients (3.1%). Prevalence of proven UTI at 14 days was as low as 1.0% (1/96), whereas no patient had proven BSI or UTI-related sepsis requiring emergency department admission at 14 days. Our findings support the contention that a prophylactic scheme based on two doses of fosfomycin trometamol 12 h apart before surgical intervention may represent a valuable strategy for preventing infectious complications in urologic patients undergoing HoLEP or TURP. Larger definitive confirmatory studies are warranted.

Tolerability of pulsed high-dose L-AmB as pre-emptive therapy in patients at high risk for intra-abdominal candidiasis: A phase 2 study (LAMBDA study).

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) has a high mortality rate. However, the correct management of a critically ill patient with suspected IAC remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of pulsed high-dose liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in patients with suspected IAC managed with a beta-D-glucan (BDG)-guided strategy. METHODS: This phase 2 prospective study enrolled adult patients with intra-abdominal sepsis following surgery. Patients received a single dose of L-AmB 5 mg/kg on day 1. On day 3, L-AmB was discontinued in patients with a negative basal BDG result, and continued (3 mg/kg/daily) in patients with a positive basal BDG result or microbiologically confirmed IAC. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of adverse events, defined using the Common Toxicity Criteria classification. RESULTS: In total, 40 patients were enrolled from January 2019 to August 2022. Fifteen (37.5%) patients were male, and the median age was 65 [interquartile range (IQR) 49-76] years. Thirty-one (77.5%) patients underwent urgent surgery, and the principal indication was secondary/tertiary peritonitis (n=22, 55%); half of the patients had undergone a previous surgical operation within the preceding 30 days. Five (12.5%) patients met the criteria for septic shock at enrolment. The median APACHE II score on admission to the intensive care unit was 12 (IQR 10-15). IAC was excluded in 33 (85%) patients, but IAC was probable and proven in five (12.5%) and two (5%) patients, respectively. The single dose of L-AmB 5 mg/kg was well tolerated in all patients, and no early or late severe adverse events related to the drug were reported. L-AmB was discontinued in 65% of patients following a negative basal BDG result. The all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 15%, and no deaths were related to L-AmB administration or uncontrolled IAC. The mortality rates for patients with and without proven IAC were 0% and 15.8%, respectively (P=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of proven IAC among critically ill high-risk patients was low (5%). A single dose of L-AmB 5 mg/kg, with prompt withdrawal in the case of a basal negative BDG result, seems to be a safe and effective approach in this population.

A descriptive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of continuous infusion ceftazidime-avibactam for treating DTR gram-negative infections in a case series of critically ill patients undergoing continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).

PURPOSE: To explore pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam for treating difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative (DTR-GN) infections in critical patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam for DTR-GN infections during CVVHDF were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations were measured at steady-state and the free fraction (fCss) was calculated. Total clearance (CLtot) of both agents were calculated and the impact of CVVHDF intensity was assessed by linear regression. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime-avibactam was defined as optimal when both fCss/MIC≥4 for ceftazidime and fCss/CT > 1 for avibactam were achieved. Relationship between ceftazidime-avibactam PK/PD targets and microbiological outcome was assessed. RESULTS: Eight patients with DTR-GN infections were retrieved. Median fCss were 84.5 (73.7-87.7 mg/L) for ceftazidime and 24.8 mg/L (20.7-25.8 mg/L) for avibactam. Median CLtot was 2.39 L/h (2.05-2.96 L/h) for ceftazidime and 2.56 L/h (2.12-2.98 L/h) for avibactam. Median CVVHDF dose was 38.6 mL/h/kg (35.9-40.0 mL/kg/h). CLtot were linearly correlated with CVVHDF dose (r = 0.53;p = 0.03, and r = 0.64;p = 0.006, respectively). The joint PK/PD targets were optimal granting microbiological eradication in all the assessable cases. CONCLUSION: CI administration of 1.25-2.5 g q8h ceftazidime-avibactam may allow prompt attainment and maintenance of optimal joint PK/PD targets during high-intensity CVVHDF.

Real-World Comparison of Isavuconazole and Voriconazole in Terms of the Need for Dosage Adjustments Guided by Clinical Pharmacological Advice During Primary Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Pediatric Patients with Hemato-Oncological Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence concerning optimal azole dosing regimens currently exists for antifungal prophylaxis in hemato-oncological pediatric patients. METHODS: Hemato-oncological children receiving intravenous or oral isavuconazole or voriconazole for primary antifungal prophylaxis at IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna during November 2020 to October 2021 and undergoing CPA programs based on real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were retrospectively analyzed. CPAs for isavuconazole and voriconazole and the number of dosage adjustments were collected. Normalized trough concentrations [(C min )/dose/kg] were calculated for both drugs at each TDM assessment, and the coefficient of variation was determined. The efficacy and safety of the drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixteen hemato-oncological pediatric patients received azole prophylaxis (mean age and weight: 9.1 ± 4.9 years and 32.6 ± 16.0 kg; 6 isavuconazole and 10 voriconazole). Sixty and 89 CPAs were delivered as isavuconazole and voriconazole, respectively. Dosage adjustments were needed in 3.3% of cases for isavuconazole and 53.9% of cases for voriconazole ( P < 0.001). At first TDM, achievement of the desired target during standard dosing regimens was higher for isavuconazole (83.3%) than for voriconazole (10.0%; P = 0.008). Dispersion of normalized concentrations was higher for voriconazole (CV = 139.1% vs. CV = 79.4%). Elevation of ALT and aspartate aminotransferase levels between baseline and the third month was higher in patients receiving voriconazole (median, 28 vs. 90 U/L; P = 0.038, and 19 vs. 65.5 U/L; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that there is limited variability in isavuconazole exposure in hemato-oncological pediatric patients receiving azole prophylaxis , resulting in a low need for CPA-guided dosage adjustments.

Impact of Maximizing Css/MIC Ratio on Efficacy of Continuous Infusion Meropenem Against Documented Gram-Negative Infections in Critically Ill Patients and Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis to Support Treatment Optimization.

Introduction: optimal treatment of Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients is challenged by changing pathophysiological conditions, reduced antimicrobial susceptibility and limited therapeutic options. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of maximizing Css/MIC ratio on efficacy of continuous infusion (CI) meropenem in treating documented Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients and to perform a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis to support treatment optimization. Materials and Methods: Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify whether a cutoff of steady-state meropenem concentration (Css)-to-minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (Css/MIC) ratio correlated with favorable clinical outcome. A non-parametric approach with Pmetrics was used for pharmacokinetic analysis and covariate evaluation. The probability of target attainment (PTA) of the identified Css/MIC ratio was calculated by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Cumulative fraction of response (CFRs) were calculated against common Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii as well. Results: a total of 74 patients with 183 meropenem Css were included. CART analysis identified a Css/MIC ratio ≥4.63 as cutoff value significantly associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed the association [OR (95%CI): 20.440 (2.063-202.522); p < 0.01]. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) was the only covariate associated with meropenem clearance. Monte Carlo simulations showed that, across different classes of renal function, dosages of meropenem ranging between 0.5 and 2 g q6h over 6 h (namely by CI) may grant PTAs of Css/MIC ratios ≥4.63 against susceptible pathogens with an MIC up to the EUCAST clinical breakpoint of 2 mg/L. The CFRs achievable with these dosages were very high (>90%) against Enterobacterales across all the classes of renal function and against P. aeruginosa among patients with CLCR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, and quite lower against A. baumannii. Discussion: our findings suggest that Css/MIC ratio ≥4.63 may be considered the pharmacodynamic target useful at maximizing the efficacy of CI meropenem in the treatment of Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients. Dosages ranging between 0.5 g q6h and 2 g q6h by CI may maximize the probability of favorable clinical outcome against meropenem-susceptible Gram-negative pathogens among critically ill patients having different degrees of renal function.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Coronavirus Disease (COVID)-19: Rationale, Clinical Evidence and Safety Issues.

We are witnessing a paradigm shift in drug development and clinical practice to fight the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and a number of clinical trials have been or are being testing various pharmacological approaches to counteract viral load and its complications such as cytokine storm. However, data on the effectiveness of antiviral and immune therapies are still inconclusive and inconsistent. As compared to other candidate drugs to treat COVID-19, Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including baricitinib and ruxolitinib, possess key pharmacological features for a potentially successful repurposing: convenient oral administration, favorable pharmacokinetic profile, multifunctional pharmacodynamics by exerting dual anti-inflammatory and anti-viral effects. Baricitinib, originally approved for rheumatoid arthritis, received Emergency Use Authorization in November 2020 by the Food and Drug Administration in combination with remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients ≥ 2 years old who require supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. By July 2021, the European Medicines Agency is also expected to issue the opinion on whether or not to extend its use in hospitalised patients from 10 years of age who require supplemental oxygen. Ruxolitinib, approved for myelofibrosis, was prescribed in patients with COVID-19 within an open-label Emergency Expanded Access Plan. This review will address key milestones in the discovery and use of JAK inhibitors in COVID-19, from artificial intelligence to current clinical evidence, including real world experience, and critically appraise emerging safety issues, namely infections, thrombosis, and liver injury. An outlook to ongoing studies (clinicaltrials.gov) and unpublished pharmacovigilance data is also offered.

Evidence and Current Use of Levosimendan in the Treatment of Heart Failure: Filling the Gap.

Levosimendan is a distinctive inodilator combing calcium sensitization, phosphodiesterase inhibition and vasodilating properties through the opening of adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels. It was first approved in Sweden in 2000 for the short-term treatment of acutely decompensated severe chronic heart failure when conventional therapy is not sufficient, and in cases where inotropic support is considered appropriate. After more than 20 years, clinical applications have considerably expanded across critical care and emergency medicine, and levosimendan is now under investigation in different cardiac settings (eg, septic shock, pulmonary hypertension) and for non-cardiac applications (eg, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). This narrative review outlines key milestones in levosimendan history, by addressing regulatory issues, pharmacological peculiarities and clinical aspects (efficacy and safety) of a drug that did not receive great attention in the heart failure guidelines. A brief outlook to the ongoing clinical trials is also offered.

Bone fracture as a novel immune-related adverse event with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Case series and large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with different immune-related adverse events (irAEs), the potential effect on the skeleton is poorly defined albeit biologically plausible and assessable through pharmacovigilance. We described a case series of patients experiencing skeletal fractures while on ICIs at the National Cancer Institute of Milan. To better characterize the clinical features of skeletal irAEs reported with ICIs, we queried the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and performed disproportionality analysis by means of reporting odds ratios (RORs), deemed significant by a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95% CI) > 1. Bone AEs emerging as significant were scrutinized in terms of demographic and clinical data, including concomitant irAEs or drugs affecting bone resorption or causing bone damage. Four patients with skeletal events while on ICIs were included in our case series, of which three exhibited vertebral fractures. In FAERS, 650 patients with bone and joint injuries and treated with ICIs were retrieved, accounting for 822 drug-event pairs. Statistically significant ROR was found for eight, two and one bone AEs respectively with PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, being pathological fracture (N = 46; ROR = 3.17; LL95%CI = 2.37), spinal compression fracture (42; 2.51; 1.91), and femoral neck fracture (26; 2.38; 1.62) the most common. Concomitant irAEs or drugs affecting bone metabolism were poorly reported. The increased reporting of serious vertebral fractures in patients without concomitant irAEs and no apparent preexisting risk factors could suggest a possible cause-effect relationship and calls for close clinical monitoring and implementation of dedicated guidelines.

Influenza Vaccination and Myo-Pericarditis in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Investigating the Likelihood of Interaction through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and VigiBase.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on whether the influenza vaccine could exacerbate immune-related adverse events, including myopericarditis (MP), in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is still conflicting. We explored this issue through a global real-world approach. METHODS: We queried the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and VigiBase to retrieve cases of MP in which the influenza vaccine and ICIs were recorded as suspect and were concomitantly reported. For the included cases, causality assessment and Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS) algorithms were applied. RESULTS: There were 191 and 399 reports of MP with the influenza vaccine that were retrieved (VAERS and VigiBase, respectively). No case of MP reporting the concomitant use of ICIs and the influenza vaccine was found in VAERS, while three cases of myocarditis were retrieved in VigiBase. All of the cases were unclassifiable for a causality assessment because of the lack of data concerning latency. According to the DIPS, one report was categorized as possible and two as doubtful. CONCLUSION: The paucity of cases coupled with the doubtful causality assessment make the potential interaction between influenza vaccines and ICIs in cancer patients negligible from clinical and epidemiological standpoints. These findings support the cardiovascular safety of the influenza vaccination, which remains strongly recommended in cancer patients, especially in the current COVID-19 era.

The Complex Management of Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer in the COVID-19 Era: Drug Interactions, Thromboembolic Risk, and Proarrhythmia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiotoxicity by anticancer agents has emerged as a multifaceted issue and is expected to affect both mortality and morbidity. This review summarizes clinical challenges in the management of oncological patients requiring anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) also considering the current outbreak of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, since this infection can add challenges to the management of both conditions. Specifically, the aims are manyfold: (1) describe the evolving use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in AF patients with cancer; (2) critically appraise the risk of clinically important drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between DOACs and oral targeted anticancer agents; (3) address expected DDIs between DOACs and candidate anti-COVID drugs, with implications on management of the underlying thrombotic risk; and (4) characterize the proarrhythmic liability in cardio-oncology in the setting of COVID-19, focusing on QT prolongation. RECENT FINDINGS: AF in cardio-oncology poses diagnostic and management challenges, also due to the number of anticancer drugs recently associated with AF onset/worsening. Oral targeted drugs can potentially interact with DOACs, with increased bleeding risk mainly due to pharmacokinetic DDIs. Moreover, the vast majority of oral anticancer agents cause QT prolongation with direct and indirect mechanisms, potentially resulting in the occurrence of torsade de pointes, especially in susceptible patients with COVID-19 receiving additional drugs with QT liability. Oncologists and cardiologists must be aware of the increased bleeding risk and arrhythmic susceptibility of patients with AF and cancer due to DDIs. High-risk individuals with COVID-19 should be prioritized to target preventive strategies, including optimal antithrombotic management, medication review, and stringent monitoring.

Quantification of 1,3-ß-d-glucan by Wako ß-glucan assay for rapid exclusion of invasive fungal infections in critical patients: A diagnostic test accuracy study.

OBJECTIVES: Rapid and reliable exclusion of invasive fungal infections (IFI) by markers able to avoid unnecessary empirical antifungal treatment is still a critical unmet clinical need. We investigated the diagnostic performance of a newly available ß-d-Glucan (BDG) quantification assay, focusing on the optimisation of the BDG cut-off values for IFI exclusion. METHODS: BDG results by Wako ß-glucan assay (lower limit of detection [LLOD] = 2.16 pg/mL, positivity ≥ 11 pg/mL) on two consecutive serum samples were retrospectively analysed in 170 patients, admitted to haematological wards (N = 42), intensive care units (ICUs; N = 80), or other wards (N = 48), exhibiting clinical signs and/or symptoms suspected for IFI. Only patients with proven IFI (EORTC/MSG criteria) were considered as true positives in the assessment of BDG sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. RESULTS: Patients were diagnosed with no IFI (69.4%), proven IFI (25.3%) or probable IFI (5.3%). Two consecutive BDG values < LLOD performed within a median of 1 (interquartile range: 1-3) day were able to exclude a proven IFI with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value (primary study goal). Test's specificity improved by using two distinct positivity and negativity cut-offs (7.7 pg/mL and LLOD, respectively), but remained suboptimal in ICU patients (50%), as compared to haematological or other patients (93% and 90%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The classification of Wako's results as negative when < LLOD, and positive when > 7.7 pg/mL, could be a promising diagnostic approach to confidently rule out an IFI in both ICU and non-ICU patients. The poor specificity in the ICU setting remains a concern, due to the difficulty to interpret positive results in this fragile population.

Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis.

INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency has suspended the use of ulipristal acetate (UPA) in the treatment of uterine fibroids and is reassessing its association with a risk of liver injury. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to characterize the post-marketing reporting of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with UPA and investigate the underlying pharmacological basis. METHODS: We queried the worldwide FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and performed a disproportionality analysis, selecting only hepatic designated medical events (DMEs) where UPA was reported as suspect. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated, and we considered a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95% CI) > 1 as significant. Physiochemical/pharmacokinetic features were extracted to assess the risk of hepatotoxicity by applying predictive DILI risk models. Mifepristone and leuprolide were selected as comparators. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of liver disorders was reported for UPA than for mifepristone (2.9 vs. 0.8%; p < 0.00001) and leuprolide (2.9 vs. 1.6%; p = 0.015). As regards hepatic DMEs, statistically significant RORs were found for autoimmune hepatitis (N = 5; LL95% CI 16.8), DILI (n = 5; LL95% CI 5.9), and acute hepatic failure (N = 5; LL95% CI 9.3). No signals of DILI emerged for mifepristone and leuprolide acetate. UPA and mifepristone showed high lipophilicity and hepatic metabolism (predicted intermediate DILI risk). Leuprolide exhibited contrasting features, resulting in no DILI concern. Inhibition of different liver transporters and the presence of a reactive metabolite were also recognised for UPA. CONCLUSION: Different drug properties previously linked to the occurrence of DILI may partially explain the reporting pattern observed with UPA. Our "bedside-to-bench" approach may support regulators in the risk-benefit assessment of UPA.

Risk of bradyarrhythmia related to ticagrelor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Ticagrelor was related to bradycardia in DISPERSE-II trial. This risk has been integrated into the European risk-management plan, and its use is warned in at-risk patients. Nevertheless, this risk was not systematically assessed nor measured. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of bradyarrhythmia associated with ticagrelor. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA-SOURCE: MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI web of Science, clinicaltrial.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in patients treated with ticagrelor or comparator(s). META-ANALYSIS: Risk of bias in each RCT was assessed using Cochrane tool. Relative Risks (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) were calculated for each RCT, and pooled using fixed-effect or random-effects models, when appropriate. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. A potential publication bias was searched. RESULTS: Among 82 eligible studies, event data were missing for 56 studies, due to detected reporting bias (i.e. inability to confirm zero events). Fifteen RCTs were selected and the combined RR of bradyarrhythmia was 1.15 (95 %CI 1.05-1.26), and 1.29 (1.02-1.65) for severe bradyarrhythmia. The risk appeared to be dose dependent. Restricting the analysis only to RCTs performed in patients without previous bradyarrhythmia resulted in a non-increased risk. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed the risk of bradyarrhythmia or severe bradyarrhythmia related to ticagrelor, and its use in patients without previous bradycardia was effective in preventing it. The evidence coming from this meta-analysis was low to moderate due to missing outcome in 2/3 of eligible studies. Waiting for access to these data, the use of ticagrelor in patients with risk factors of bradycardias should be avoided.

Lessons to be Learnt from Real-World Studies on Immune-Related Adverse Events with Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Clinical Perspective from Pharmacovigilance.

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) caused a paradigm shift both in drug development and clinical practice; however, by virtue of their mechanism of action, the excessively activated immune system results in a multitude of off-target toxicities, the so-called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), requiring new skills for timely diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach to successfully manage the patients. In the recent past, a plethora of large-scale pharmacovigilance analyses have characterized various irAEs in terms of spectrum and clinical features in the real world. This review aims to summarize and critically appraise the current landscape of pharmacovigilance studies, thus deriving take-home messages for oncologists. A brief primer to study design, conduction, and data interpretation is also offered. As of February 2020, 30 real-world postmarketing studies have characterized multiple irAEs through international spontaneous reporting systems, namely WHO Vigibase and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. The majority of studies investigated a single irAE and provided new epidemiological evidence about class-specific patterns of irAEs (i.e. anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 [CTLA-4] versus anti-programmed cell death 1 [PD-1] receptor, and its ligand [PD-L1]), kinetics of appearance, co-occurrences (overlap) among irAEs, and fatality rate. Oncologists should be aware of both strengths and limitations of these pharmacovigilance analyses, especially in terms of data interpretation. Optimal management (including rechallenge), predictivity of irAEs (as potential biomarkers of effectiveness), and comparative safety of ICIs (also in terms of combination regimens) represent key research priorities for next-generation real-world studies.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Direct oral anticoagulants are now recommended by major guidelines as first-choice agents for both stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and treatment/prevention of venous thromboembolism in non-cancer patients. Although there are no published head-to-head trials comparing different direct oral anticoagulants, a growing body of evidence from indirect comparisons and observational studies is suggesting that each direct oral anticoagulant may have a specific risk profile. This review aims to (1) synthesize and critically assess the latest evidence in comparative effectiveness and safety research in the aforementioned consolidated therapeutic uses, by performing an overview of systematic reviews and (2) highlight current challenges, namely underexplored areas, where research should be directed, also considering ongoing unpublished studies. The evidence gathered so far on the risk-benefit profile of direct oral anticoagulants is appraised in the light of existing guidelines to discuss whether further implementation should be proposed.

Ibrutinib: from bench side to clinical implications.

The activation of the B cell receptor (BCR) is nowadays known to play a primary role in the etiopathogenesis of a multitude of B cell malignancies, being one of the main factors responsible for the enhanced proliferation and survival of transformed cells. Thanks to the characterization and continuous discovery of the pathways driving B cell proliferation in consequence to BCR activation, it has been possible to develop a small molecule inhibitor specifically antagonizing the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), an enzyme located in an early strategic position within the whole pathway. Ibrutinib, formerly PCI-32765, is a first in class, potent, specific, irreversible and relatively safe BTK inhibitor, demonstrating so far an impressive efficacy in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), Waldenström macroglobulinemia and multiple myeloma. This review will summarize the most important pharmacological evidences available as of today and will take in consideration the latest findings regarding the mechanism of action of ibrutinib.