Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 229: 169-173, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38042721

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Stapled transanal rectal resection is the most surgical procedure used for obstructed defecation syndrome, rectal prolapse, rectocele and rectal intussusception worldwide. The aim of this study is to report our experience and long time consequences and to offer a new medico-legal perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospective review medical charts of patients treated between 2006 and 2021 â€‹b â€‹y the same team directed by the same senior surgeon. We consider major complications and long time sequelaeses as main object for the discussion. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were created. IRB approved the study. After revision a medico-legal perspective was done based on major complications. RESULTS: During the study period 1726 patients, ages between 18 and 71 years old, were treated with 1280 STARR procedures and 446 "Longo" [was stopped on 2012]; all procedures were performed by the senior surgeon and visited by the team at the same control visit at 7days, 30 days and 12 and 18 months after surgery. All patients had 100 â€‹% compliance at 30 days, while 85 â€‹% had long time visit (more than 18 months). During the study period 6 â€‹% (104 subjects) of patients had minor complications while 1 patient (42 â€‹yrs female) reported total fecal incontinence after 18 months (0,05 â€‹%). This patient had mental disorder treated with drugs unknown before surgery and long time mental disorder after surgery. We focused on this last case to discuss long time complication DISCUSSION: This survey reports some interesting clinical data; respect to standard complications minor complications such as pain, bleeding and anal discomfort represent less than 10 â€‹% of procedures that is a good results in this perineal surgery. For those working with rectal mucosal prolapse, obstructed defecation syndrome, rectocele or rectal intussusception is essential to distinguish these diagnosis to have a good counselling with patient before surgery (at least 1 month before). It is essential to check these patients with a close follow-up especially after surgery, to avoid any other mental discomfort related to fecal incontinence; long time fecal incontinence, without anatomical disorders as our case, could be associated and related to drugs consumption or mental disorder, or perineal insensitivity due to surgical procedure. In conclusion it is essential to have good clinical practice to suggest STARR procedure, having idea about different diseases, different surgical approaches and different long time complications.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Incontinência Fecal , Intussuscepção , Prolapso Retal , Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Retocele/complicações , Retocele/cirurgia , Intussuscepção/cirurgia , Intussuscepção/complicações , Defecação , Constipação Intestinal/cirurgia , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/métodos , Prolapso Retal/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos
3.
Updates Surg ; 73(1): 149-156, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33409848

RESUMO

A limited ileocaecal resection is the most frequently performed procedure for ileocaecal CD and different anastomotic configurations and techniques have been described. This manuscript audited the different anastomotic techniques used in a national study and evaluated their influence on postoperative outcomes following ileocaecal resection for primary CD. This is a retrospective, multicentre, observational study promoted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), including all adults undergoing elective ileocaecal resection for primary CD from June 2018 May 2019. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and anastomotic leak rate were the secondary outcomes. 427 patients were included. The side to side anastomosis was the chosen configuration in 380 patients (89%). The stapled anastomotic (n = 286; 67%), techniques were preferred to hand-sewn (n = 141; 33%). Postoperative morbidity was 20.3% and anastomotic leak 3.7%. Anastomotic leak was independent of the type of anastomosis performed, while was associated with an ASA grade ≥ 3, presence of perianal disease and ileocolonic localization of disease. Four predictors of LOS were identified after multivariate analysis. The laparoscopic approach was the only associated with a reduced LOS (p = 0.017), while age, ASA grade ≥ 3 or administration of preoperative TPN were associated with increased LOS. The side to side was the most commonly used anastomotic configuration for ileocolic reconstruction following primary CD resection. There was no difference in postoperative morbidity according to anastomotic technique and configuration. Anastomotic leak was associated with ASA grade ≥ 3, a penetrating phenotype of disease and ileo-colonic distribution of CD.


Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Ceco/cirurgia , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Íleo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Digestion ; 102(4): 534-545, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32739919

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The main goal in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) is to achieve mucosal healing. Despite being unvalidated, the most widely used scoring system is the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES). However, the recently established and validated Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) represents an interesting alternative method in assessing endoscopic disease activity. OBJECTIVE: Due to a lack of reliable prognostic factors, the aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the UCEIS and the MES, in predicting response to biological therapy and the need for colectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, uncontrolled, single-center study on UC patients with endoscopically active disease even with concomitant conventional and/or biological therapy, who had already started or had been changed a biological treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-one UC patients were enrolled. At baseline, 71% were naive to biological therapies and 41% had an extensive colitis. At control time (median time of 11.5 months), MES and UCEIS scores significantly decreased from those at baseline (from 2.6 to 1.8 and 5 to 3.2, respectively, p < 0.001). UCEIS, but not MES, was found to be significantly associated with unresponsiveness to therapy (p = 0.040). Moreover, when UCEIS was ≥7, all patients underwent colectomy after a median time of 5 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: UCEIS may be superior to MES because of its accuracy and predictive role. Therefore, UCEIS should be considered for use in daily clinical practice.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Terapia Biológica , Colectomia , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Colonoscopia , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
6.
J Crohns Colitis ; 14(12): 1680-1686, 2020 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32413102

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Both peripheral and axial spondyloarthritis [SpA] occur in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] and represent the commonest extra-intestinal manifestation. We aimed to develop an easy and quick questionnaire through psychometric analysis, to identify peripheral and axial SpA in IBD patients within an integrated combined multidisciplinary rheumatological-gastroenterology clinic. METHODS: Initially, SpA-IBD experts generated a 42-item list covering SpA manifestations including spinal, articular, and entheseal involvement. The new questionnaire was administered before routine clinical IBD assessment. On the same day, rheumatological assessment, blinded to both history and questionnaire results, was performed to explore the presence of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society [ASAS] criteria for SpA, diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia [FM], and non-specific low back pain [NSLB]. Factorial analysis of questionnaire items to identify the main factors-receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves for sensitivity/specificity and Youden index for cut-off-were performed. RESULTS: Of the 181 consecutive patients, 56 met the ASAS SpA criteria [prevalence of 30%] with 10 new cases detected [5.5%: seven peripheral and three axial]. Through the psychometric and factorial analysis, we selected 14 items for the final questionnaire [named IBIS-Q]. The IBIS-Q was quick and performed well for detection of axial SpA and peripheral SpA (area under the curve [AUC] 0.88 with 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.830.93). A cut-off of three positive questions had a sensitivity 93% and specificity 77% for SpA patient identification. CONCLUSIONS: The IBIS-Q is a useful and simple tool to use in IBD clinics for SpA detection, with a good statistical performance. Further studies are needed to validate it.


Assuntos
Artrite/diagnóstico , Espondiloartrite Axial/diagnóstico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Adulto , Artrite/classificação , Artrite/epidemiologia , Espondiloartrite Axial/classificação , Espondiloartrite Axial/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Curva ROC , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 59(10): 2857-2863, 2020 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32068873

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Joint pain is common in subjects with IBD and is linked to several factors including SpA, drug therapy, concomitant OA or FM. The primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of primary FM and concomitant FM and SpA in a cohort of patients with IBD utilizing clinical and US assessment. METHODS: A total of 301 consecutive cases with IBD attending two IBD Units were assessed by a rheumatologist for Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria fulfilment for SpA or the 2010 ACR criteria for FM. Some 158 cases also had US entheseal examination on large insertions in the upper and lower limbs. RESULTS: Thirty-seven IBD patients (12%) met the ACR criteria for primary FM with 9% presenting with primary FM and 3.3% presenting with concomitant FM and SpA. Meeting FM criteria was not related to smoking, sedentary job, BMI or the presence of psoriasis. FM patients presented higher Leeds Enthesitis Index, BASDAI and BASFI scores than SpA patients. At US examination, patients who satisfied the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for SpA had significantly higher mean enthesis or patient power Doppler positive as compared with the IBD and FM group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We found that FM occurred in 12% of SpA patients and in this setting SpA disease activity indices performed poorly. US examination in a large patient subgroup showed a promising discriminating capacity between FM and SpA in IBD patients.


Assuntos
Fibromialgia/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Espondilartrite/epidemiologia , Adulto , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Musculoesquelética/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Espondilartrite/diagnóstico , Ultrassonografia
8.
Am J Surg ; 204(5): 684-8, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23140829

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhoids are the most frequent anal pathology. We evaluated the results of 2 techniques at 1 year after surgery. METHODS: The clinical charts and data of patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy between January 2008 and June 2010 were considered and analyzed. Patients underwent surgery with 2 techniques: transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) hemorrhoidectomy or LigaSure-vessel sealing system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO). Patients were chosen randomly to receive one technique or the other. The primary objectives were quality of life, quality of defecation, and regression of symptoms. RESULTS: Forty-six patients treated with THD and 68 patients treated with Ligasure were enrolled in the study. No significant differences were observed in the rate of postoperative surgical complications or readmissions. Short- and medium-term (1-6 mo) results showed that THD patients had a higher rate of pain resolution compared with Ligasure patients (P < .05). Functionally, all patients treated with Ligasure showed more postoperative constipation despite administration of laxatives than patients treated with THD. CONCLUSIONS: THD is an effective technique and is associated with the best short-term clinical and surgical outcomes if compared with Ligasure.


Assuntos
Hemorroidectomia/métodos , Hemorroidas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemorroidectomia/instrumentação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA