Inequities in occupational diseases recognition in France.

BACKGROUND: In France, complex cases of occupational disease (OD) are submitted to regional committees who are in charge of accepting, or rejecting, the claim. Their mean annual acceptance rate varies from one region to another, which may reflect differences in the cases, or discrepancies between committees. The objective of this study was to assess the comparability of the decisions of the committees on the basis of standardized cases. METHODS: Three experienced occupational physicians specialized in OD were asked to develop 28 clinical cases representative of claims for compensation usually seen in these committees. The cases, in the form of short vignettes, were submitted to the 18 French regional committees, asking if they would recognise each case as an OD. RESULTS: All committees participated. The acceptance rate (recognition of the case as an OD) varied, ranging from 18% to 70%. All the committees took the same decision for only 7 out of the 28 cases, but half accepted and half refused for 3 cases. For 10 cases, one quarter of the committees gave a decision different than the other 75%. The highest discordance rates were observed for the cases concerning musculoskeletal disorders and asbestos related diseases. CONCLUSION: The committees take very different decisions in terms of recognition of OD, especially for the most frequently compensated OD in France, i.e. musculoskeletal disorders and asbestos related diseases. This is a major source of injustice for the employees who seek compensation and there is a need to develop methods to harmonize decisions between committees.

[Evaluation of permanent disability levels in occupational pulmonary diseases]. / Comment évaluer en 2019 les taux d'incapacité permanente des pathologies professionnelles pulmonaires ?

Compensation for occupational pulmonary diseases requires the establishment of guidelines based on standardized and objective criteria, in order to provide compensation that is as fair as possible to patients who suffer from them. A review of the elements necessary for the examination of an individual file was carried out by a working group. It is accepted that respiratory functional exploration is the key element in assessing the level of permanent disability in all of these conditions, with the exception of thoracic malignancies. Guiding scales have been developed for the respiratory impairment of three types of conditions: occupational asthma, thoracic malignancy, and other respiratory diseases. Additional criteria for increasing the permanent disability level are also proposed in order to take into account professional prejudice, in particular the possibility or not of continuing the occupational activity, in the same job or after changing to another. For certain respiratory diseases, a periodic reassessment of the initially attributed permanent disability level is recommended as well as the initial one at the time of definitive cessation of occupational activity.

Systemic sclerosis and exposure to heavy metals: A case control study of 100 patients and 300 controls.

OBJECTIVE: This case control study assessed: 1) the relationship of systemic sclerosis (SSc) related to exposure to heavy metals; and 2) the risk of SSc related to occupational exposure in male and female patients. METHODS: From 2005 to 2008, 100 patients with a definite diagnosis of SSc were included in the study; 3 age, gender, and smoking habit matched controls were selected for each patient. All SSc patients and controls underwent detection and quantification of heavy metal traces in hair samples, using multi-element inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). RESULTS: SSc patients exhibited higher median levels of the following metals: antimony (p=0.001), cadmium (p=0.0003), lead (p=0.02), mercury (p=0.02), molybdenum (p=0.04), palladium (p<0.0001) and zinc (p=0.0003). A marked association between SSc and occupational exposure was further found for: 1) antimony (p=0.008) and platinum (p=0.04) in male patients; and 2) antimony (p=0.02), cadmium (p=0.001), lead (p=0.03), mercury (p=0.03), palladium (p=0.0003) and zinc (p=0.0001) in female patients CONCLUSION: The results show the impact of occupational risk factors in the development of SSc for: antimony, cadmium, lead, mercury, molybdenum, palladium and zinc. Thus, occupational exposure should be systematically checked in all SSc patients at diagnosis. Finally, the association between SSc and occupational exposure may be variable according to patients' gender.

Prospective study to evaluate the association between systemic sclerosis and occupational exposure and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) has complex pathogenesis and likely multifactorial causes. Environmental exposures have been suggested to play a role in SSc pathogenesis, including occupational exposure to pollutants and chemicals as well as use of drugs leading to modulation of immune response. Thus, this case-control study aimed to assess: the relationship between SSc and occupational exposure; and the risk of SSc related to occupational exposure in male and female patients. METHODS: From 2005 to 2008, 100 patients with a definite diagnosis of SSc were included in the study; 3 age, gender, and smoking habits matched controls were selected for each patient. A committee of experts evaluated blindly occupational exposure to crystalline silica, white spirit, organic solvents, ketones, welding fumes, epoxy resins, and pesticides; an occupational exposure score was calculated for all subjects. Our findings were compared with previous data in the literature. RESULTS: Increased ORs for SSc were found for: crystalline silica (p<0.0001), white spirit (p<0.0001), aromatic solvents (p=0.0002), chlorinated solvents (p=0.014), trichlorethylene (p=0.044), ketones (p=0.002) and welding fumes (p=0.021). Elevated risk associated with high final cumulative score in SSc was observed for: crystalline silica, white spirit, chlorinated solvents, trichlorethylene, aromatic solvents, any type of solvents, ketones and welding fumes. A marked association between SSc and occupational exposure was further found for: 1) crystalline silica, chlorinated solvents, trichloroethylene, white spirit, ketones and welding fumes in male patients; and 2) white spirit, aromatic solvents, any type of solvent and ketones in female patients. Finally, we did not find an association between SSc and: 1) the use of drugs that have been speculated to play a role in SSc onset (anorexigens, pentazocine, bromocriptine, l-tryptophan); 2) implants - that are prosthesis, silicone implants, and contact lenses; and 3) dyeing hair. In the literature, SSc has been associated with occupational exposure to silica and solvents, while the association between SSc and specific organic solvents and welding fumes has been anecdotally reported. CONCLUSION: The following occupational factors have an impact in the development of SSc: crystalline silica, white spirit, aromatic solvents, chlorinated solvents, trichlorethylene, ketones and welding fumes. The risk of SSc appears to be markedly associated with high cumulative exposure. Finally, the association between SSc and occupational exposure may be variable according to gender.

Assessment of bibliographic databases performance in information retrieval for occupational and environmental toxicology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficiency of the major bibliographic databases by assessing the percentage of references among the total literature available that can be retrieved from each database. We also evaluated the best database combinations to carry out an exhaustive search. METHODS: BIOSIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, NIOSH-TIC, and TOXLINE were searched on two topics: allergy to latex and asbestos and mesothelioma, in the title, abstract, or keywords (textwords). This search was performed for the years 1994 and 1995. All the records were classified by journal and author's name and were verified for each record whether or not it was indexed in each database. Statistical analysis was performed with chi 2 test. RESULTS: 777 articles in 510 issues were found. The efficiency of each database (percentage of articles recovered) and of combinations varied between 11% and 63% for one database and between 42% and 86% for a combination of two databases. The reasons why these differences exist between databases, and within a database, between two different subjects or two different years are reported. CONCLUSION: Firstly, it is not advisable to assert that a bibliography is complete when only one database is searched. Secondly, the efficiency of the databases may be quite different. Finally, it is suggested that the best way to be as exhaustive as possible is to search two or more databases-for example, in EMBASE and TOXLINE, or to a lesser extent EMBASE and MEDLINE. This seems to be the best compromise solution between time consumed for searching and efficiency.