Post-interventional infectious complications in percutaneous transabdominal lymphatic interventions: an observational study.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the occurrence of infectious complications and inflammatory reactions after transabdominal lymphatic-interventions. 63 lymphatic-interventions were performed in 60 patients (male/female: 35/25; mean age 56 [9-85] years) [chylothorax n = 48, chylous ascites n = 7, combined chylothorax/chylous ascites n = 5]. Post-interventional clinical course and laboratory findings were analyzed in the whole cohort as well as subgroups without (group A; n = 35) and with peri-interventional antibiotics (group B; n = 25) (pneumonia n = 16, drainage-catheter inflammation n = 5, colitis n = 1, cystitis n = 1, transcolonic-access n = 2). No septic complications associated with the intervention occurred. Leucocytes increased significantly, peaking on post-interventional day-1 (8.6 ± 3.9 × 106 cells/mL vs. 9.8 ± 4.7 × 106 cells/mL; p = 0.009) and decreased thereafter (day-10: 7.3 ± 2.7 × 106 cells/mL, p = 0.005). CRP-values were pathological in 89.5% of patients already at baseline (40.1 ± 63.9 mg/L) and increased significant on day-3 (77.0 ± 78.8 mg/L, p < 0.001). Values decreased thereafter (day-15: 25.3 ± 34.4 mg/L, p = 0.04). In subgroup B, 13/25 patients had febrile episodes post-interventionally (pneumonia n = 11, cystitis n = 1, drainage-catheter inflammation n = 1). One patient developed biliary peritonitis despite continued antibiotics and underwent cholecystectomy. Baseline leucocytes and CRP-levels were higher in group B than A, but with comparable post-interventional profiles. Clinically relevant infectious complications associated with transabdominal lymphatic-interventions are rare irrespective of peri-interventional antibiotic use. Post-interventional elevation of leucocytes and CRP are observed with normalization over 10-15 days.

From research to clinical practice: a European neuroradiological survey on quantitative advanced MRI implementation.

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative MRI (qMRI) methods provide versatile neuroradiological applications and are a hot topic in research. The degree of their clinical implementation is however barely known. This survey was created to illuminate which and how qMRI techniques are currently applied across Europe. METHODS: In total, 4753 neuroradiologists from 27 countries received an online questionnaire. Demographic and professional data, experience with qMRI techniques in the brain and head and neck, usage, reasons for/against application, and knowledge of the QIBA and EIBALL initiatives were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-two responders in 23 countries used the following techniques clinically (mean values in %): DWI (82.0%, n = 223), DSC (67.3%, n = 183), MRS (64.3%, n = 175), DCE (43.4%, n = 118), BOLD-fMRI (42.6%, n = 116), ASL (37.5%, n = 102), fat quantification (25.0%, n = 68), T2 mapping (16.9%, n = 46), T1 mapping (15.1%, n = 41), PET-MRI (11.8%, n = 32), IVIM (5.5%, n = 15), APT-CEST (4.8%, n = 13), and DKI (3.3%, n = 9). The most frequent usage indications for any qMRI technique were tissue differentiation (82.4%, n = 224) and oncological monitoring (72.8%, n = 198). Usage differed between countries, e.g. ASL: Germany (n = 13/63; 20.6%) vs. France (n = 31/40; 77.5%). Neuroradiologists endorsed the use of qMRI because of an improved diagnostic accuracy (89.3%, n = 243), but 50.0% (n = 136) are in need of better technology, 34.9% (n = 95) wish for more communication, and 31.3% need help with result interpretation/generation (n = 85). QIBA and EIBALL were not well known (12.5%, n = 34, and 11.0%, n = 30). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical implementation of qMRI methods is highly variable. Beyond the aspect of readiness for clinical use, better availability of support and a wider dissemination of guidelines could catalyse a broader implementation. KEY POINTS: • Neuroradiologists endorse the use of qMRI techniques as they subjectively improve diagnostic accuracy. • Clinical implementation is highly variable between countries, techniques, and indications. • The use of advanced imaging could be promoted through an increase in technical support and training of both doctors and technicians.

RIG-I detects infection with live Listeria by sensing secreted bacterial nucleic acids.

Immunity against infection with Listeria monocytogenes is not achieved from innate immune stimulation by contact with killed but requires viable Listeria gaining access to the cytosol of infected cells. It has remained ill-defined how such immune sensing of live Listeria occurs. Here, we report that efficient cytosolic immune sensing requires access of nucleic acids derived from live Listeria to the cytoplasm of infected cells. We found that Listeria released nucleic acids and that such secreted bacterial RNA/DNA was recognized by the cytosolic sensors RIG-I, MDA5 and STING thereby triggering interferon ß production. Secreted Listeria nucleic acids also caused RIG-I-dependent IL-1ß-production and inflammasome activation. The signalling molecule CARD9 contributed to IL-1ß production in response to secreted nucleic acids. In conclusion, cytosolic recognition of secreted bacterial nucleic acids by RIG-I provides a mechanistic explanation for efficient induction of immunity by live bacteria.