Non-cardiac surgery in patients with valvular heart disease.

In patients with significant valvular heart disease (VHD) undergoing non-cardiac surgery (NCS), perioperative adverse cardiac events are a relevant issue. Although postoperative outcomes can be adversely affected by valve-related haemodynamic instability, recommended perioperative risk scores prioritise the risk of the surgical procedure and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, neglecting the presence or extent of VHD. Perioperative management and anaesthetic approach should focus on the underlying type and severity of VHD, the compensatory mechanisms deployed by left ventricle and right ventricle and the type and risk of NCS. Due to the lack of randomised trials investigating different therapeutic approaches of valvular intervention prior to NCS, recommendations mainly rely on consensus opinion and inference based on large observational registries. As a general rule, valvular intervention is recommended prior to NCS in symptomatic patients or in those who meet standard criteria for cardiac intervention. In the absence of such conditions, it is reasonable to perform NCS with tailored anaesthetic management and close invasive perioperative haemodynamic monitoring. However, patient-specific management strategies should be discussed with the heart team preoperatively. Symptomatic patients with severe VHD or those undergoing high-risk NCS should ideally be treated at a high-volume medical centre that is equipped to manage haemodynamically complex patients during the perioperative period.

Ischemic functional mitral regurgitation: from pathophysiological concepts to current treatment options. A systemic review for optimal strategy.

OBJECTIVE: The current treatment of ischemic functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) remains debated due to differences in inclusion criteria of randomized studies and baseline characteristics. Also, the role of left ventricular pathophysiology and the role of subvalvular apparatus have not been thoroughly investigated in recent literature. METHODS: A literature search was performed from PubMed inception to June 2020. RESULTS: Novel concepts of pathophysiology, such as the proportionate/disproportionate conceptual framework, the role of papillary muscles and left ventricular dysfunction, the impact of myocardial ischemia and revascularization, left ventricular remodeling, and the effect of restrictive annuloplasty or subvalvular procedures have been reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefits associated with the use of MitraClip is more evident in patients with disproportionate FMR with greater and sustained left ventricular reverse remodeling. Importantly, in the absence of myocardial revascularization, expansion of myocardial scar tissue and non-perfused areas of ischemic myocardium occur with time, and this impact on outcomes with a longer follow-up period cannot be quantified. In advanced phases of FMR, neither mitral ring annuloplasty nor percutaneous therapies could significantly modify the established pathoanatomic alterations.

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: This executive summary of the valvular heart disease guideline provides recommendations for clinicians to diagnose and manage valvular heart disease as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Reports, and other selected database relevant to this guideline. Structure: Many recommendations from the earlier valvular heart disease guidelines have been updated with new evidence and provides newer options for diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease. This summary includes only the recommendations from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical and catheter interventions, and recommendations for medical therapy. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in developing these guidelines.

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: This executive summary of the valvular heart disease guideline provides recommendations for clinicians to diagnose and manage valvular heart disease as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Reports, and other selected database relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE: Many recommendations from the earlier valvular heart disease guidelines have been updated with new evidence and provides newer options for diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease. This summary includes only the recommendations from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical and catheter interventions, and recommendations for medical therapy. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in developing these guidelines.

A narrative review of early surgery versus conventional treatment for infective endocarditis: do we have an answer?

The most appropriate strategy and timing for surgery in infective endocarditis (IE) remains an argument of debate. Despite some authors promote the adoption of an early surgical approach (within 48 hours) to limit mortality and complications, no robust randomized trials are available on this argument and the evidence on this subject remain at the "expert opinion" level. Additionally, the different messages promulgated by the American and European guidelines contributed to fuel confusion regarding the relative priority of the surgical over medical therapy in IE. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines individuates three level of urgency: emergency surgery, to be performed within 24 hours; urgent surgery, recommended within a few days; elective surgery to be performed after 1-2 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Urgent surgery is recommended for most cases of IE. In the American Heart Association (AHA)'s guidelines define early surgery as "during the initial hospitalization and before completion of a full course of antibiotics." Some of the available evidences showed that are no proven benefits in delaying surgery if a definite diagnosis of IE has been established. However, this argument is controversial across the literature and several factors including the center specific experience can play a role in decision-making. In this review the latest evidences on IE clinical and surgical characteristics along with the current studies on the adoption of an early surgical approach are analyzed to clarify whether enough evidence is available to inform an update of the guidelines.

The Radial Artery for Coronary Bypass Grafting: The Fifth Decade.

BACKGROUND: In 1989, we reported the use of the radial artery as a second target conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. However, underpowered randomized trials have reported differences in clinical outcomes between the radial artery and other grafts. As we approach 50 years of experience with radial artery grafting, we reviewed the literature to determine the second-best target vessel for coronary operations. METHODS: An electronic review of the literature with an emphasis on randomized controlled trials, propensity-matched observational series, and meta-analyses identified a large population of patients who received arterial conduit and saphenous vein grafts. RESULTS: The radial artery has been proven to be reliable as a second target conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, with outcomes and patency rates superior to those for saphenous vein graft. It has also been proven to be both safe and effective as a third conduit in the territory of the right coronary artery. A paucity of evidence with few comparable series limits the use of the gastroepiploic artery. CONCLUSION: In its fifth decade of use, we can definitively conclude that the aorto-to-coronary radial bypass graft is the conduit of choice for coronary operations after the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery.

From Uganda to Italy: a case of nephrotic syndrome secondary to Plasmodium infection, Quartan malarial nephropathy and kidney failure.

Gentile F, Martino M, Santangelo L, Giordano P, Torres DD, Carbone V, Di Palma AM, Rossini M, Gesualdo L, Giordano P, Giordano M. From Uganda to Italy: a case of nephrotic syndrome secondary to Plasmodium infection, Quartan malarial nephropathy and kidney failure. Turk J Pediatr 2019; 61: 776-779. Malaria (M), the first parasitic infection, is sometimes associated with nephrotic syndrome (NS) in tropical areas. Kidney involvement during quartan malaria is represented by immune-complex mediated glomerulonephritis (GN). Generally, NS develops several weeks after onset of quartan fever and its clinical course proceeds slowly to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) even after eradication of the infection. We describe a case of Plasmodium malariaeassociated nephrotic syndrome and chronic proliferative glomerulopathy in a boy from Uganda. Renal biopsy revealed chronic proliferative GN with capillary wall thickening producing a double contour, segmental sclerosis and tubular atrophy. Blood Giemsa smear contained rare ring-form trophozoites and gametocytes of Plasmodium spp. This case highlights the importance of obtaining remote travel histories from immigrants presenting with nephrotic syndrome especially due to the current immigration crisis in Europe. Malaria has low prevalence or less known in our continent and requires more medical attention by European doctors.

Surgery for Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Statement of Clarification From the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Two guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and collaborating societies address the risk of aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and severe aortic enlargement: the "2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease" (Circulation. 2010;121:e266-e369) and the "2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease" (Circulation. 2014;129:e521-e643). However, the 2 guidelines differ with regard to the recommended threshold of aortic root or ascending aortic dilatation that would justify surgical intervention in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. The ACC and AHA therefore convened a subcommittee representing members of the 2 guideline writing committees to review the evidence, reach consensus, and draft a statement of clarification for both guidelines. This statement of clarification uses the ACC/AHA revised structure for delineating the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence to provide recommendations that replace those contained in Section 9.2.2.1 of the thoracic aortic disease guideline and Section 5.1.3 of the valvular heart disease guideline.

[Doubts of the cardiologist regarding an electrocardiogram presenting QRS V1-V2 complexes with positive terminal wave and ST segment elevation. Consensus Conference promoted by the Italian Cardiology Society]. / Dubbi del cardiologo davanti ad un elettrocardiogramma che presenta in V1-V3 complessi QRS con onda positiva terminale e sopraslivellamento del segmento ST. Consensus Conference promossa dalla Società Italiana di Cardiologia.

When an ECG shows (or is suspicious for) a Brugada pattern, i.e., the association of a positive terminal deflection and ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads, the cardiologist often faces several problems. Three important questions are raised by this ECG pattern: (1) is this really a Brugada ECG pattern? (2) How can be determined whether this patient is at risk for sudden death? and (3) Should this patient receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)? The term "Brugada syndrome" should be restricted to patients who have diagnostic ECG changes, as well as a history of symptoms. Asymptomatic subjects, in contrast, should be categorized as having a "Brugada ECG pattern" rather than the syndrome. Diagnostic ECG (type 1) is characterized by a J wave (a terminal positive wave) whose amplitude is > or =2 mm, and a "coved" type ST segment elevation located in the right precordial leads. These signs are usually present in leads V1 and/or V2 (lead V3 is more rarely involved, and is never the only affected one), but occasionally also can be observed in some of the limb leads. Types 2 and 3 ECGs, which are not truly diagnostic of Brugada pattern, are characterized by a "saddle back" ST segment elevation, that is > or =1 mm in type 2 and <1 mm in type 3. In Brugada ECG pattern, the QRS complex characteristically shows a positive terminal deflection that mimics an r' prime wave (the wave occurring in right bundle branch block), in the right precordial leads. Actually, it is a J wave that is very similar to the "Osborn" one observed during hypothermia. The J wave of Brugada ECG pattern is generated by a voltage gradient across the myocardial wall of the right ventricular outflow tract. This abnormal potential can be recorded only by electrodes located very close to the site where that phenomenon is originating. Displacement of the right precordial leads electrodes one or two intercostal spaces above their normal positions may, at times, disclose the diagnostic pattern when conventional leads, recorded at the fourth intercostal space, are non-diagnostic or even normal. High right precordial leads should be recorded whenever standard V1-V3 leads raise the suspicion of Brugada pattern. For example, when a relatively large positive terminal wave, even of low amplitude, is recorded, placing high right precordial leads is an option that should be considered. The ECG may show a marked variation over time, ranging from the typical pattern to a completely normal ECG and back again. In subjects with a non-diagnostic ECG, a pharmacological test with sodium channel blockers may disclose the typical Brugada pattern. In order to establish the diagnosis, several conditions that can mimic Brugada pattern must be excluded. These include right bundle branch block, early repolarization, acute myocardial ischemia, pericarditis, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypothermia and primary right ventricular diseases, particularly arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Some drugs (e.g., some antiarrhythmic drugs, psychotropic agents or antihistamines), hyperthermia and enhanced vagal tone, as it occurs after a full meal, may render Brugada pattern more evident on the ECG. Typical ventricular arrhythmia in Brugada syndrome is a polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, that can evolve into ventricular fibrillation; its mechanism is assumed to be phase 2 reentry. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia is rarely seen. Atrial fibrillation occurs more frequently in patients with the Brugada ECG pattern than in the general population. A mutation in the SCN5A gene, which encodes the alpha subunit of the cardiac sodium channel, is found in about 20% of the subjects with Brugada pattern; mutations in other genes have less frequently been described. Genetic testing is not very helpful in formulating the diagnosis, but when a mutation is found it could be useful to extend testing to first degree relatives, enabling early detection of abnormal gene carriers. Patients who have experienced an aborted sudden death have a high risk of recurrence and should receive an ICD. A history of syncope, spontaneous type 1 ECG and male sex, not family history of sudden death, are independent risk factors. The role of programmed ventricular stimulation in risk stratification remains the subject of debate. Asymptomatic patients with a Brugada ECG pattern should: (1) receive adequate information on current knowledge concerning this topic, (2) be given the list of forbidden drugs, (3) be informed to promptly treat hyperthermia, (4) be informed that clinical evaluation should be extended to their first degree relatives, 5) undergo regular cardiology follow-up. Also in this group the role of programmed ventricular stimulation in risk stratification is debated. Subjects showing a Brugada pattern after a pharmacological challenge should be followed-up with ECG and 12-lead Holter monitoring, if available, to identify the appearance of spontaneous type 1 ECG. Symptoms should be promptly reported.

Management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) benefit from aortic valve replacement (AVR). Management of severe AS in the absence of symptoms is, however, controversial and often challenging. Unselected premature AVR carries the risks of cardiac surgery; delayed AVR due to unrecognized symptoms can result in a dismal outcome. Echocardiography is the standard tool to evaluate and follow patients with AS. Nevertheless, most of the current echocardiographic parameters have limitations in predicting symptom onset and clinical outcome. The same applies to clinical parameters, exercise stress testing, and other imaging modalities used in AS evaluation and serial follow-up. Predictors of outcome could, however, help to identify asymptomatic patients who would benefit from expedited AVR with the goal to reduce mortality. This review will discuss the most relevant clinical studies and guidelines on management of asymptomatic severe AS, with an emphasis on providing concise information for identifying patients at high risk.

Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity: heart failure at the crossroads.

Trastuzumab, a drug targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, improves survival rate in women with metastatic breast cancer. Symptomatic heart failure, a serious adverse effect of trastuzumab, occurs in 1% to 4% of patients treated with the antibody, whereas left ventricular ejection fraction declines substantially in 10% of patients. The prevalence of cardiotoxic effects of trastuzumab appears to increase with exposure to anthracyclines. Serial assessment of left ventricular function with 2-dimensional echocardiography or radionuclide ventriculography is the most practical means of monitoring cardiotoxicity. Patients who develop cardiotoxicity while receiving trastuzumab therapy generally improve once use of the agent is discontinued.