Global public health impact of recovered supplies from operating rooms: a critical analysis with national implications.

BACKGROUND: In modern operating rooms, clean and unused medical supplies are routinely discarded and can be effectively recovered and redistributed abroad to alleviate the environmental burden of donor hospitals and to generate substantial health benefits at resource-poor recipient institutions. METHODS: We established a recovery and donation program to collect clean and unused supplies for healthcare institutions in developing nations. We analyzed items donated over a 3-year period (September 2010-November 2013) by quantity and weight, and estimated the projected value of the program under potential nationwide participation. To capture the health benefits attributable to the donated supplies at recipient institutions, we partnered with two tertiary-care centers in Guayaquil, Ecuador and conducted a pilot study on the utility of the donated supplies at the recipient institutions (October 2013). We determined the disability-adjusted life years (DALY) averted for all patients undergoing procedures involving donated items and estimated the annual attributable DALY as well as the cost per DALY averted both by supply and by procedure. RESULTS: Approximately, 2 million lbs (907,185 kg) per year of medical supplies are recoverable from large non-rural US academic medical centers. Of these supplies, 19 common categories represent a potential for donation worth US $15 million per year, at a cost-utility of US $2.14 per DALY averted. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital operating rooms continue to represent a large source of recoverable surgical supplies that have demonstrable health benefits in the recipient communities. Cost-effective recovery and need-based donation programs can significantly alleviate the global burden of surgical diseases.

A retrospective identification of gastroesophageal reflux disease as a new risk factor for surgical site infection in cerebral palsy patients after spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular scoliosis is a known risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal fusion, with reported infection rates as high as 11.2%. Although risk factors such as antibiotic timing have been previously addressed, our objective was to identify intrinsic risk factors for SSI in cerebral palsy (CP) patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. We hypothesized that CP patients who develop SSI after spine fusion would have a risk profile similar to those who develop nosocomial infection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed records from patients with CP who developed infections after spinal fusion from January 1998 until July 2008, who were identified by our Infection Control Officer using National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System criteria (N = 34). Demographically and procedurally matched controls without infection were identified from our spine database (N = 37). We compared these groups for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), use of gastric acid inhibitors, presence of preoperative decubitus ulcer, previous infection, and postoperative ventilation. Multivariable logistic regression was then performed to assess the relative contributions of the predictors to "deep infection" and "any infection." RESULTS: Of 30 evaluable infected patients, 70% had incisional SSI. Although many of the infections were polymicrobial, the most common pathogens identified were Gram-negative bacilli. Many significant predictors were identified by univariable logistic regression for any infection and deep infection. Multivariable logistic regression found a significant effect only for GERD (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-21.3; P = 0.002) for any infection, whereas the effect of therapy with gastric acid inhibitors did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio, 6.1 [95% confidence interval, 0.84-44.6]; P = 0.07). No significant interaction between the 2 factors was detected. Among our controls and infected patients altogether, 46.3% had GERD. CONCLUSIONS: We show that GERD increases the risk for infection in CP patients after spine fusion. Prospective multicenter studies are necessary to further validate the predictive value of this risk factor.