Investigations into the Concentrations and Metabolite Profiles of Doping Agents and Antidepressants in Human Seminal Fluid Using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

Exogenous substances, including drugs and chemicals, can transfer into human seminal fluid and influence male fertility and reproduction. In addition, substances relevant in the context of sports drug testing programs, can be transferred into the urine of a female athlete (after unprotected sexual intercourse) and trigger a so-called adverse analytical finding. Here, the question arises as to whether it is possible to distinguish analytically between intentional doping offenses and unintentional contamination of urine by seminal fluid. To this end, 480 seminal fluids from nonathletes were analyzed to identify concentration ranges and metabolite profiles of therapeutic drugs that are also classified as doping agents. Therefore, a screening procedure was developed using liquid chromatography connected to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, and suspect samples (i.e., samples indicating the presence of relevant compounds) were further subjected to liquid chromatography-high-resolution accurate mass (tandem) mass spectrometry. The screening method yielded 90 findings (including aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor modulators, diuretics, stimulants, glucocorticoids, beta-blockers, antidepressants, and the nonapproved proliferator-activated receptor delta agonist GW1516) in a total of 81 samples, with 91% of these suspected cases being verified by the confirmation method. In addition to the intact drug, phase-I and -II metabolites were also occasionally observed in the seminal fluid. This study demonstrated that various drugs including those categorized as doping agents partition into seminal fluid. Monitoring substances and metabolites may contribute to a better understanding of the distribution and metabolism of exogenous substances in seminal fluid that may be responsible for the impairment of male fertility. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrates that doping agents as well as clinically relevant substances are transferred/eliminated into seminal fluid to a substantial extent and that knowledge about drug levels (and potential consequences for the male fertility and female exposure) is limited. The herein generated new dataset provides new insights into an important and yet little explored area of drug deposition and elimination, and hereby a basis for the assessment of contamination cases by seminal fluid in sports drug testing.

Transvesical Suprapubic Externalization of Ureteral Stents - Introduction of a Surgical Innovation at the Development Stage.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In this study, we describe our first experiences with the new method of transvesical suprapubic externalization of ureteral stents. This method is assessed in patients with incurable ureteral obstruction and concomitant bladder dysfunction, and is classified according to the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-Term Study (IDEAL) recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2009 to 2015, transvesical suprapubic externalization of ureteral stents was applied in 14 (8 males, 6 females) patients with incurable ureteral obstruction of malignant (n = 9, 64%) or benign (n = 5; 36%) etiology. All the patients had concomitant bladder pathologies that impaired quality of life (QoL). Classification according to IDEAL followed the respective recommendations. RESULTS: Only minor complications, except 1 major complication not directly related to the procedure, were observed. QoL improvement was reported in all patients. The duration for this surgery was 45 (17-86) min; however, it varied between genders (female 37 min, male 51 min). The mean follow-up period was 26.6 months ranging from 12 to 73 months. Transvesical suprapubic externalization of ureteral stents resulted in a stable renal function and the elimination of urinary leakage via a compromised bladder in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Transvesical externalization of ureteral stents is a feasible method for urinary diversion, which seems to improve patients' QoL in appropriate indications. The method can be classified as IDEAL stage 2a.

Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Trial for Mesh Optimization by Autologous Plasma Coating in Prolapse Repair: IDEAL Stage 3.

INTRODUCTION: Mesh-related complications especially after vaginal implantation have raised awareness lately because of severe adverse reactions and legal aspects. About 20% of patients suffer from complications after mesh insertion in the anterior vaginal wall. Autologous plasma coating of meshes prior to implantation has shown potential to improve the biocompatibility of meshes in vivo and in vitro. This innovative approach has been developed according to the IDEAL recommendations for surgical innovations. The method has still to be assessed at stage 3 accordingly. METHODS: A protocol is developed for a prospective single-blinded randomized controlled phase II trial for biocompatibility optimization of anterior vaginal meshes for prolapse repair by autologous plasma coating versus non-coated meshes. RESULTS: The protocol aims at fulfilling the requirements for stage 3 (assessment) according to IDEAL. Eligible for inclusion are women with primary cystocele, requiring a surgical procedure, suitable for randomization, and willing to be randomized. Participants will be followed up by postal questionnaires (6 months post surgery and 12 months post randomization) and will also be reviewed in clinic 12 and 24 months post surgery. Primary endpoint is the assessment of mesh-related complications following the Clavien-Dindo classifications. QoL, sexual function assessment, efficacy, and validation of an already developed long-term register are considered secondary endpoints. To afford a calculated 10% reduction of postoperative complications through plasma-coated meshes vs. non-coated meshes at 1-year follow-up, a total 214 women in each arm will be necessary to achieve 80% power at a significance level of 5%. CONCLUSION: The protocol for this randomized clinical trial represents the conditions to assess the surgical innovation of plasma coating of meshes in order to improve the meshes' biocompatibility at stage 3 according to the IDEAL recommendations.

Metastatic penile carcinoma - an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options.

INTRODUCTION: Penile carcinoma has an incidence of 4,000 cases in Europe. The therapy and prognosis depend decisively on the lymph node status. Lymph node metastases are detected in 23-65% cases depending on the histopathological pattern. Due to improved diagnostic methods an early detection of tumor stage is possible. Multimodal therapeutic concepts can offer curability for a subset of patients, even those suffering from advanced disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Current data on penile cancer based on a selective review of the literature by PubMed and the EAU guidelines 2009. RESULTS: Invasive diagnostic tools, such as fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB), improved the diagnosis of lymph node status considerably and reduced the morbidity in specialized centers. The application of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for metastases detection needs further evaluation due to inconsistent results. Inguinal lymphadenectomy is the therapeutic standard in case of metastases proof. It was possible to reduce the complications due to the new modified operation techniques. Patients with extended lymph node and distant metastases have a poor prognosis. Different systemic polychemotherapy regimes are applied currently and are associated with poor outcome (response rates <50%) and high morbidity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients with unresectable and relapsing lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, inconsistent therapy regimens are applied for metastatic penile cancer. Standardization is urgently needed through the development of high-quality studies and long-term registers in order to lower the morbidity and increase the efficiency of diagnosis and therapy.

Combined treatment with pazopanib and vinflunine in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma refractory after first-line therapy.

The role of pazopanib in the second-line setting of refractory metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium has not been defined clearly. The aim of this phase I/II trial was to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combining pazopanib and vinflunine in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium after failure of first-line platinum-containing therapy. From May 2011 to December 2011, five patients were enrolled in this trial. Pazopanib was the investigated compound; four levels were planned (200, 400, 600, and 800 mg/day). Vinflunine was dosed at 280 mg/m for the first dose and 320 mg/m every 3 weeks thereafter. After the definition of a tolerated dose for the combined therapy, a subsequent phase II study was planned. At the starting level, pazopanib 200 mg/day, dose-limiting toxicities were observed in two of five patients. One patient experienced grade 4 febrile neutropenia, which led to treatment discontinuation. A second patient showed grade 3 hepatobiliary disorder with an increase in γ-glutamyltransferase. The study was interrupted at dose level 1 for safety reasons. The initially planned phase II study was therefore not carried out. This phase I study showed that combined therapy of daily pazopanib (200 mg) and vinflunine (280/320 mg/m) every 3 weeks is poorly tolerated in patients with refractory advanced urothelial cancer.