Molecularly matched targeted therapy: a promising approach for refractory metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Only a fraction of patients with metastatic melanoma derive durable benefit from approved treatments. The clinical impact of personalized medicine strategies for melanoma, apart from BRAF, NRAS, or CKIT targeting, has rarely been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By means of the Group of Cutaneous Oncology of the French Society of Dermatology, we retrospectively included all patients with advanced melanoma aged 18 years and older for whom molecular testing identified one or more actionable molecular alterations and who accordingly received molecularly matched therapy. We excluded patients with only BRAF, NRAS, or CKIT alterations and patients who received molecularly matched therapy for less than 15 days. RESULTS: We included 26 patients with a median follow-up of 8 months (1-54), a median age of 63 years (24-89), and a sex ratio of 2.7. These patients had been heavily pretreated, and 64% had elevated LDH levels. The disease control rate was 38%, with 4 cases of partial response (overall response rate: 15%) and 6 of stable disease for at least 6 months. The median duration of treatment was 3.1 months (0.9-13.5). Among patients with disease control, the median duration of control was 6.6 months (2.6-13.5) and 3 cases were ongoing at the end of the study. Patients with controlled disease had GNA11, MAP2K1, FYCO1-RAF1, HRAS, ATM, CCND1, MDM2/CDK4, and CDKN2A/NRAS alterations. CONCLUSIONS: High-throughput sequencing followed by matched targeted therapy is a promising approach for patients with advanced melanoma refractory to approved treatments.

Improved survival over time with immunotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas.

PURPOSE: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common cancer in white-skinned populations. There is little information on the epidemiology of cSCC, and even less on advanced cases (acSCC). Therefore, we analyzed acSCC patients to describe their characteristics, management, and outcomes over time. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted over a period of 5 years, including all patients who started systemic therapy for acSCC. The patient characteristics, cSCC management, response to therapy, and survival were recorded. Patients were stratified into equal chronological periods (periods 1 and 2). A subgroup analysis was performed to compare patients who received immunotherapy (group 1) with those who did not (group 2). RESULTS: The study included 127 patients, and patient numbers increased by an average of 19.7% per year. Most patients were male (88/127), elderly (mean 81.6 years), with comorbidities, and 27.6% were immunocompromised. The median overall survival (OS) was higher in period 2 (20 months) than in period 1 (10 months) (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.62 [0.39; 0.98], p = 0.04). The risk of progression increased with age and immunosuppression. Of the 64 patients who received second-line therapy, 38 had immunotherapy (group 1) and 26 received other therapies (group 2). Immunotherapy reduced mortality and progression by 71% (p = 0.004) and 67% (p = 0.002), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acSCC are usually very frail and elderly. OS increased over time, with a twofold improvement between periods 1 and 2, whereas progression-free survival (PFS) did not increase. Access to immunotherapy reduced mortality in a majority of patients in period 2. Immunosuppression and advanced age were associated with lower PFS.

Clinical impact of proton pump inhibitors and other co-medications on advanced melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

PURPOSE: While several studies reported the influence of co-medications on immune checkpoint therapy and chemotherapy, it remains poorly studied with targeted therapy. Targeted therapies inhibiting BRAF and MEK had significantly improved management of advanced melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation over the last decade, we aimed to investigate the possible influence of co-mediations on the efficacy and toxicity of these targeted therapies (TT). METHODS: We conducted an observational study identifying patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors between 2013 and 2020 in the Bordeaux University Hospital. Co-medications given within 1 month before until 3 months after the initiation of targeted therapy were recorded and classified by their mechanism or by their metabolism. Survival data were analyzed with univariable and multivariable cox regression and the combined effect of multiple factors was evaluated using a factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). The impact of co-medications on toxicity related to TT was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included. Although several co-medications were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), PPIs was the only co-medication with a significant impact in multivariable analysis considering all co-medications and specific prognostic factors. Co-medications did not influence the risk, type, or timing of TT-related toxicity. Additional FAMD revealed the impact of each factor on the oncological outcomes. In a subgroup of patients, residual plasma TT concentration was available and did not differ between PPIs users and non-users. CONCLUSION: Co-medications, especially PPIs, must be carefully assessed at the time of TT initiation.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in patients who previously experienced immune-related inflammatory arthritis: a multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Another course of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is often considered in patients with cancer progression and previous immune-related adverse events, including inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA), but there are limited data regarding safety of ICI rechallenge in this setting. We aimed to assess the rate and clinical features associated with ICI-IA flare/recurrence on ICI rechallenge. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre observational study including cancer patients with ICI-IA who started a second course of ICI more than 3 months after ICI discontinuation in four French university hospitals. Primary outcome was the frequency of ICI flare/recurrence after ICI rechallenge. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included. At the time of ICI rechallenge, 18 patients reported no symptoms of ICI-IA (78%) and 5 had grade 1 (22%), 11 patients (48%) were not receiving any ICI-IA treatment, 11 (48%) were still on prednisone, 2 (9%) were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 1 (4%) on anti-IL-6. ICI-IA flare/recurrence occurred in 12 patients (52%) with a median time of 1 month after ICI rechallenge. ICI-IA phenotype, disease activity and ICI-IA treatment at the time of ICI rechallenge did not differ according to ICI-IA flare/recurrence status. CONCLUSION: In this first observational study of ICI-IA patients rechallenged with ICI, about half of the patients experienced ICI-IA flare/recurrence with a similar phenotype but occurring earlier than the initial ICI-IA, warranting close monitoring during the first month of retreatment. Risk of flare did not differ according to baseline immunosuppressive treatment at the time of rechallenge.

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Rechallenge in Advanced Melanoma Patients' Responders to a First Course of ICI: A Multicenter National Retrospective Study of the French Group of Skin Cancers (Groupe de Cancérologie Cutanée, GCC).

BACKGROUND: The long-term effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge for progressive or recurrent advanced melanoma following previous disease control induced by ICI has not been thoroughly described in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter national real-life study, we enrolled patients who had been rechallenged with an ICI after achieving disease control with a first course of ICI, which was subsequently interrupted. The primary objective was to evaluate tumor response, while the secondary objectives included assessing the safety profile, identifying factors associated with tumor response, and evaluating survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients from 12 centers were included in the study. These patients had advanced (unresectable stage III or stage IV) melanoma that had been previously treated and controlled with a first course of ICI before undergoing rechallenge with ICI. The rechallenge treatments consisted of pembrolizumab (n = 44, 52%), nivolumab (n = 35, 41%), ipilimumab (n = 2, 2%), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 4, 5%). The best overall response rate was 54%. The best response was a complete response in 30 patients (35%), a partial response in 16 patients (19%), stable disease in 18 patients (21%) and progressive disease in 21 patients (25%). Twenty-eight adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 patients (27%), including 18 grade 1-2 AEs in 14 patients (16%) and 10 grade 3-4 AEs in nine patients (11%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis. Patients who received another systemic treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy or clinical trial) between the two courses of ICI had a lower response to rechallenge (p = 0.035) and shorter PFS (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Rechallenging advanced melanoma patients with ICI after previous disease control induced by these inhibitors resulted in high response rates (54%) and disease control (75%). Therefore, ICI rechallenge should be considered as a relevant therapeutic option.

Brief Communication: Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Paraneoplastic Syndrome Associated With Merkel Cell Carcinoma Successfully Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: 2 Cases.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine cutaneous tumor with high metastatic potential. In rare cases, it can be associated with paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS), which result from an antitumor immunity against antigens produced by the tumor itself. Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) is a neurological autoimmune PNS characterized by an impairment of the neuromuscular junction, leading to proximal muscle weakness and fatigability. Although the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a breakthrough in the management of many cancers, onset or worsen of immune diseases has been described. Thereby, in patients with previous neurological PNS like LEMS, the ICI therapy for cancer may aggravate neurological symptoms and lead to irreversible impairment. We report here 2 cases of patients with metastatic MCC associated with a LEMS at the diagnosis. Both successfully received ICI therapies (anti-PDL1 avelumab and anti-PD1 pembrolizumab) without worsening of LEMS and any major immune-related adverse effects. Their neurological condition improved and disappeared concomitantly with the efficacy of immunotherapy, and we did not observe relapse of both MCC and LEMS after treatment discontinuation. Finally, we performed a complete review of the literature, which confirmed that ICI treatment could be discussed for patients with paraneoplastic LEMS, and emphasized the need for multidisciplinary management.

Real-life use of trametinib after immunotherapy failure in BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma.

BRAF V600 wild-type advanced melanomas quickly reach a therapeutic dead-end, after immunotherapy failure. Even if preclinical studies have suggested sensitivity to MEK inhibitors such as trametinib in NRAS, NF1 or GNA mutated melanoma, therapeutic options are limited for these patients. We present a retrospective monocentric study of 22 patients with advanced melanoma treated by trametinib after immunotherapy resistance. Melanomas harboured NRAS (20), NF1 (1) or GNA 11 (1) mutations. For most of them (18), anti-PD1 was associated with trametinib. A disease-control was reported in 36% of patients (8/22), with six stable diseases and two partial responses according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Median progression-free survival was 2 months (1-14) and median overall survival was 6.5 months (2-24). In patients with progressive disease (14/22), dissociated radiologic responses and clinical benefits such as pain reduction were seen in five patients. High blood level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) seemed associated with trametinib failure, without significance ( P = 0.06). Adverse events (grade 1-3) occurred in 91% of patients during the first weeks of treatment, mainly papulo-pustular rashes (77%), leg oedemas (36%), asthenia (18%) and diarrhoea (14%). This real-life study showed that trametinib may benefit some metastatic melanoma that progressed after chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Objective disease control (partial response or stable disease) using RECIST criteria was observed in 36% of patients. Because of frequent side-effects which can alter the quality of life and the short response duration, this off-label option has to be discussed with the patient. Studies with combination therapy with trametinib to improve relapse-free survival and lower side-effects are ongoing.

Case report: Parsonage-turner syndrome in a melanoma patient treated by BRAF/MEK inhibitors after immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Introduction: Combination molecular BRAF/MEK inhibitors targeted therapy has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with BRAF V600 mutated unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Most patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors will experience adverse events but neurological adverse events (nAEs) remain rare. Case report: A 42-year-old woman diagnosed with metastatic melanoma presented with an intense pain in the left shoulder 7 days after the beginning of encorafenib/binimetinib after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combination. No other triggering factors were identified. Electromyogram performed one month after the pain onset revealed a left brachial plexopathy suggestive of a Parsonage-Turner syndrome. The weakness slowly improved with intensive rehabilitation and targeted therapies were continued. Conclusion: We report the first case of Parsonage-Turner syndrome in a melanoma patient treated with encorafenib/binimetinib following checkpoint inhibitors combination.We cannot rule out the implication of ICI in the development of this syndrome but the rapid onset of the symptoms after the beginning of targeted therapies makes their involvment more likely.Given the increased use of BRAF/MEK inhibitors in managing of stage III and IV melanoma, as well as the development in stage II, clinicians should be aware of this potential side effect.

What Drives Radical Halogenation versus Hydroxylation in Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Complexes? A Combined Experimental and Computational Study.

Nonheme iron halogenases are unique enzymes in nature that selectively activate an aliphatic C-H bond of a substrate to convert it into C-X (X = Cl/Br, but not F/I). It is proposed that they generate an FeIII(OH)(X) intermediate in their catalytic cycle. The analogous FeIII(OH) intermediate in nonheme iron hydroxylases transfers OH• to give alcohol product, whereas the halogenases transfer X• to the carbon radical substrate. There remains significant debate regarding what factors control their remarkable selectivity of the halogenases. The reactivity of the complexes FeIII(BNPAPh2O)(OH)(X) (X = Cl, Br) with a secondary carbon radical (R•) is described. It is found that X• transfer occurs with a secondary carbon radical, as opposed to OH• transfer with tertiary radicals. Comprehensive computational studies involving density functional theory were carried out to examine the possible origins of this selectivity. The calculations reproduce the experimental findings, which indicate that halogen transfer is not observed for the tertiary radicals because of a nonproductive equilibrium that results from the endergonic nature of these reactions, despite a potentially lower reaction barrier for the halogenation pathway. In contrast, halogen transfer is favored for secondary carbon radicals, for which the halogenated product complex is thermodynamically more stable than the reactant complex. These results are rationalized by considering the relative strengths of the C-X bonds that are formed for tertiary versus secondary carbon centers. The computational analysis also shows that the reaction barrier for halogen transfer is significantly dependent on secondary coordination sphere effects, including steric and H-bonding interactions.

Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 orchestrates melanoma resistance combining phenotype switching and proliferation.

Combined therapy with anti-BRAF plus anti-MEK is currently used as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic melanomas harboring the somatic BRAF V600E mutation. However, the main issue with targeted therapy is the acquisition of tumor cell resistance. In a majority of resistant melanoma cells, the resistant process consists in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). This process called phenotype switching makes melanoma cells more invasive. Its signature is characterized by MITF low, AXL high, and actin cytoskeleton reorganization through RhoA activation. In parallel of this phenotype switching phase, the resistant cells exhibit an anarchic cell proliferation due to hyper-activation of the MAP kinase pathway. We show that a majority of human melanoma overexpress discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) after treatment. The same result was found in resistant cell lines presenting phenotype switching compared to the corresponding sensitive cell lines. We demonstrate that DDR2 inhibition induces a decrease in AXL expression and reduces stress fiber formation in resistant melanoma cell lines. In this phenotype switching context, we report that DDR2 control cell and tumor proliferation through the MAP kinase pathway in resistant cells in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, inhibition of DDR2 could be a new and promising strategy for countering this resistance mechanism.

Harmonization of programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and mRNA expression scoring in metastatic melanoma: a multicentre analysis.

AIMS: The aim of this multicentre study was to harmonize programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) and melanoma scoring. To provide a reference for PD-L1 expression independently of the IHC protocol, PD-L1 mRNA expression was compared with IHC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Standardized PD-L1 assays (22C3, 28-8, SP142, SP263) and laboratory-developed tests (QR1, 22C3) were evaluated on three IHC platforms with a training set (seven cases). mRNA expression was determined by RNAscope (CD274/PD-L1 probe) and analysed with image analysis. PD-L1 IHC findings were scored by seven blinded pathologists using the tumour proportion score (TPS), the combined positive score (CPS), and the MELscore. This method was validated by three blinded pathologists on 40 metastatic melanomas. Concordances among various antibody/platforms were high across antibodies [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.80 for the CPS], except for SP142. Two levels of immunostaining intensity were observed: high (QR1 and SP263) and low (28-8, 22C3, and SP142). Reproducibilities across pathologists were higher for QR1 and SP263 (ICC ≥0.87 and ICC ≥0.85 for the TPS and the CPS, respectively). QR1, SP263 and 28-8 showed the highest concordance with mRNA expression. We developed a standardized method for PD-L1 immunodetection and scoring, tested on 40 metastatic melanomas. Concordances among antibodies were excellent for all criteria, and concordances among pathologists were better for the MELscore than for other scores. CONCLUSION: Harmonization of PD-L1 staining and scoring in melanomas with good concordance is achievable with the PD-L1 IHC protocols applied to other cancers; this reproducible approach can simplify daily practice.

Positive Association Between Location of Melanoma, Ultraviolet Signature, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy.

Emerging evidence suggests a correlation between the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and the response to programmed cell death-1 protein (PD-1) monotherapy across multiple cancer types. In skin cancers, as high TMB is mostly because of ultraviolet (UV) exposure, we hypothesized a correlation between the primary melanoma cutaneous location according to sun exposure and response to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. METHODS: The aim of this study was to analyze, in advanced melanoma, the relationship between TMB, locations according to sun exposure, and response to PD-1 inhibitors. We conducted a prospective multicentric analysis, by sequencing the most recent metastatic sample before PD-1 inhibitors using FoundationOne assay. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were included, with TMB available for 94 cases. In univariate and multivariate linear regression, TMB was significantly associated with sun-exposed areas of the primary melanoma location and with age (coefficients of the association with log-TMB: non-UV location, -1.05; chronic sun-exposed area, 1.12; P value for the location, < 10-5; age, 0.021 per year, P value for age, .002). Molecular UV signature present on the metastatic site was associated with higher TMB (P = .003). Melanomas bearing a high TMB had a higher probability of response to PD-1 inhibitors compared with melanomas with a low TMB, with a dose-dependent effect following an exponential curve and a negative odds ratio of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.72, P = .004) between log-TMB and 6-month progression. CONCLUSION: Cumulative sun exposure related to skin location and molecular UV signature present on the metastatic site appear to be relevant biomarkers directly linked to TMB. Because TMB is not yet available to all for routine clinical use, the location of the primary melanoma in a sun-exposed area may play an important role in clinical decisions regarding therapeutic choice.

Analysis of tumor response and clinical factors associated with vitiligo in patients receiving anti-programmed cell death-1 therapies for melanoma: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical factors associated with vitiligo in patients receiving anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: To better characterize the occurrence of vitiligo in patients receiving anti-PD-1. METHODS: The present single-center ambispective cohort study included patients with melanoma treated with anti-PD-1. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective tumor response were compared between patients with and those without vitiligo using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Demographic and clinical factors associated with vitiligo were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 457 patients included in the study, vitiligo developed in 85 patients. The clinical presentation of vitiligo consisted of the presence of ovalar and multiple flecked white macules, mainly located on chronic sun-exposed areas. The presence of vitiligo was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival (P < .001). A Cox proportional hazards model estimation demonstrated markedly improved survival in patients with vitiligo compared with those without vitiligo (aHR [overall survival], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.12-0.33; P < .001; and aHR [progression-free survival], 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.47; P < .001). In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, men showed an independent increased risk of the development of vitiligo (odds ratio, 1.66). In contrast, the presence of pulmonary metastases was found to be an independent factor associated with a reduced risk of the development of vitiligo (odds ratio, 0.50). LIMITATIONS: Single-center ambispective cohort. CONCLUSION: Vitiligo in patients receiving anti-PD-1 for advanced melanoma is associated with a better outcome. A gender effect associated with the development of vitiligo will need further investigation.

Aseptic cystitis induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab combination for metastatic melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma. Combination of ICI with ipilimumab cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and nivolumab [anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)] improves tumoral response compared to anti-PD1 monotherapy in melanoma patients, but is associated with more severe and multiple immune-related adverse events. We report the first case of aseptic cystitis induced by ipilimumab and nivolumab combination in a 61-year-old melanoma patient. She described after two infusions, diarrhea, pollakiuria, intense bladder pain, urinary urgency, and nocturia. Repeated negative urine culture tests led to perform cystoscopy. Mucosal bladder biopsies showed lymphocytic T-cells infiltration in intraepithelial and in subepithelial connective tissue, which were consistent with the diagnosis of immune-related aseptic cystitis. Aseptic cystitis is a rare and poorly known side-effect related to ICI. Only four other cases with anti-PD1 monotherapy were found in literature, only in Japanese patients. It simulates bacterial cystitis with negative urinary tests, and is often associated with atypical symptoms like diarrhea, which may delay the diagnosis. Oral steroids appear to be the most efficient therapeutic options.

Esophageal Achalasia Induced by Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Combination: A Rare Neurological Manifestation of Immune-related Autonomic Neuropathy.

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has improved the prognosis of many cancers; a combination of nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1) and ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) is approved as first-line therapy for advanced melanoma, with objective responses obtained in more than half of patients. However, this combination is associated with a high rate of immune-related adverse events, which are often severe and multiple. Neurological immune-related adverse events are rare but feared because they can be life-threatening, their diagnosis and management are challenging, and patients can have irreversible sequelae. We reported a case of a young patient treated by nivolumab and ipilimumab combination for metastatic melanoma. Severe dysphagia with regurgitations, major weight loss, uveitis, and vitiligo occurred after 3 infusions of nivolumab and ipilimumab. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scan showed complete remission of melanoma. The endoscopic examination did not find any digestive toxicity. Esophageal manometry revealed achalasia. This was associated with mydriasis, pathologic deep breath test, and alteration of the cutaneous sympathetic response on electromyogram, which was consistent with autonomic neuropathy. This rare etiology of atypical vomiting under ICI should be known by prescribers, as ICI prescription is widening in many new cancers.

Real-World Survival in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma after Discontinuation of Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy for Objective Response or Adverse Effects: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-PD-1 has dramatically improved the survival of patients with advanced melanoma. However, there is a lack of data on maintenance of the response after treatment discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with metastatic melanoma after anti-PD-1 interruption for objective response (OR) or limiting toxicity during clinical trials. METHODS: All patients with advanced melanoma who stopped single-agent anti-PD-1 antibodies for objective response or toxicity were included between April 2014 and January 2019 in our institution (data cut-off, September 10th, 2019). Clinical and biological factors associated with relapse were studied. RESULTS: The median follow-up after introduction of treatment was 36.5 months [4.6-62.4], and the median follow-up after discontinuation of treatment was 15.7 months (2.5-45.1). Out of 65 patients, 28 patients stopped immunotherapy for limiting adverse effects (AEs) (43.1%), 25 for complete response (CR) (38.4%), and 12 for partial response (PR) or long-term stable disease (SD) (18.5%). Twelve patients relapsed (18.5%) after a median time of 9 months [1.9-40.9 months]. Seven relapsed after discontinuation for AEs, 3 after discontinuation for CR, and 2 after discontinuation for PR/SD. The median PFS after therapy discontinuation was not reached. No statistical association was found between recurrence and age, sex, increased LDH, BRAF status, presence of brain metastases, previous treatments, radiotherapy, or time on anti-PD-1 treatment. CONCLUSION: This cohort shows a global recurrence rate of 18.5% and confirms a long-lasting response after anti-PD-1 cessation regardless of the cause of discontinuation.