Transplantation of bone marrow stem cells during cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the efficacy and safety of intramyocardial transplantation of bone marrow stem cells during coronary artery bypass graft surgery on postoperative cardiac functional parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume. METHODS: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Elsevier, Sciences online database, and Google Scholar literature search were searched. The effect sizes measured were risk ratio for categorical variables and weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval for calculating differences between mean values of baseline and follow-up cardiac functional parameters. A value of p < 0.1 for Q test, or I(2 )> 50%, indicated significant heterogeneity among studies. The literature search retrieved 2900 studies from screened databases, of which 2866 (98.6%) were excluded and 34 (619 patients) were included for scoping review. The final analysis included 9 studies (335 patients). RESULTS: Pooled effects estimates of left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume showed that bone marrow stem cell transplantation had a weighted mean difference of 4.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.41-7.72; p = 0.02) and 7.06 (95% confidence interval: -8.58-22.7; p = 0.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intramyocardial transplantation of bone marrow stem cells improves cardiac functional parameters, significantly increasing left ventricular ejection fraction with a nonsignificant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume. Also, this therapeutic method has no life-threatening complications and was therefore found to be an effective and safe method.

Posterior pericardiotomy in cardiac surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the impact of posterior pericardiotomy on incidences of atrial fibrillation and supraventricular arrhythmias, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, tamponade, and the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery. We searched for randomized controlled trials, using Medline, Embase, Elsevier and Sciences online databases as well as Google Scholar literature. The effect sizes measured were odds ratio for categorical variables and standard mean difference with 95% confidence interval for calculating differences between mean values of hospital stay in intervention and control groups. A value of p < 0.1 for Q test or I(2 )> 50% indicated significant heterogeneity between the studies. The literature search of all major databases retrieved 20 studies. After screening, 12 suitable trials were identified, which reported outcomes of 2052 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Posterior pericardiotomy had an odds ratio of 0.33 [95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.61] p < 0.001 for atrial fibrillation; odds ratio 0.32 [0.15-0.67] p = 0.003 for supraventricular arrhythmias; odds ratio 0.09 [0.04-0.19] p = 0.000 for early pericardial effusion and odds ratio 0.04 [0.02-0.08] p < 0.001 for late pericardial effusion; odds ratio 1.64 [1.23-2.20] p = 0.001 for pleural effusion, odds ratio 0.07 [0.02-0.27] p < 0.001 for tamponade, and standard mean difference = 0.01 [-0.12 to 0.14] p = 0.8 for hospital stay. Posterior pericardiotomy is a simple intraoperative technique that can improve postoperative clinical outcomes. However, the incidence of pleural effusion associated with posterior pericardiotomy might be higher.

Should the integrity of the pleura during internal mammary artery harvesting be preserved?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether preservation of the pleura during internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting improved clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. More than 210 papers were found using the reported search, of which 18 presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studies, relevant outcomes, results and study weakness of these papers are tabulated. Most studies dealt with investigating the radiographic changes, pulmonary function tests, ventilation time and also clinical consequences, such as bleeding, the need for blood transfusion, pain scores and the length of hospital stay. There is still no meta-analysis and systematic review regarding this surgical problem. Eighteen articles were found, of which 6 were prospective randomized, controlled trials and 12 were cohort studies. In these studies, some beneficial clinical outcomes were reported including: pleural effusion (15 studies), atelectasis (11 studies), pulmonary function tests (9 studies), arterial blood gases (5 studies), postoperative pain (6 studies), tamponade (2 studies), ventilation time (12 studies with), blood loss (9 studies), transfusion (4 studies), intensive care unit stay (5 studies) and hospital stay (12 studies). Based on our findings, preservation of pleural integrity seems to contribute to decreased pulmonary complications and improved clinical outcomes, such as bleeding, pain and length of hospital stay.