Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 87: 105681, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838423

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic strategies for multiple sclerosis (MS) aim to suppress the immune response and reduce relapse rates. As alternative treatments, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are being explored. MSCs show promise in repairing nerve tissue and reducing autoimmune responses in people with MS (pwMS). OBJECTIVE: This review delves into the literature on the efficacy and safety of MSC therapy for pwMS. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify relevant articles from five databases until January 2024. The inclusion criteria encompassed interventional studies. Efficacy and safety data concerning MSC therapy in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and primary progressive MS (PPMS) groups were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A comprehensive analysis encompassing 30 studies revealed that individuals who underwent intrathecal (IT) protocol-based transplantation of MSCs experienced a noteworthy improvement in their expanded disability status scale (EDSS) compared to the placebo group. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was -0.28; 95 % CI -0.53 to -0.03, I2 = 0 %, p-value = 0.028); however, the intravenous (IV) group did not show significant changes in EDSS scores. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) did not significantly decrease among pwMS (WMD = -0.34; 95 % CI -1.05 to 0.38, I2 = 98 %, p-value = 0.357). Favorable results were observed in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with only 19.11 % of pwMS showing contrast-enhanced lesions (CEL) in the short term and no long-term MRI activity. The most common complications in both short-term and long-term follow-ups were infection, back pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the safety potential of MSC therapy for pwMS. While MRI-based neural regeneration shows significant treatment potential, the effectiveness of MSC therapy remains uncertain due to study limitations and ineffective outcome measures. Further research is needed to establish efficacy and optimize evaluation methods for MSC therapy on pwMS.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Humanos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/efeitos adversos , Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/terapia , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 84: 105455, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330723

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is uncommon for individuals with demyelinating disease, notably multiple sclerosis (MS), to be diagnosed with intracranial gliomas. It has been debated whether or not the concurrence of these two disorders is accidental. Clinically, it may be challenging to diagnose someone who has MS and an intracranial tumor simultaneously. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the glioma patients following MS. METHODS: We collected 63 studies from 1672 databases from January 1990 to February 2023, and our inclusion criteria involved peer-reviewed case reports/series studies reporting concurrent MS and glioma in patients, considering various types of gliomas. RESULTS: We included 145 cases, 51% were women and 49 % were men, with an average age of 47.4 years. Common symptoms of glioma at admission included seizures (31.2 %), hemiparesis (15.6 %), and headache (14.3 %). 75 % of patients had primarily with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). MS treatments included interferon(IFN)-ß (44.6 %), glatiramer acetate (GA) (21.4 %), fingolimod (19.6 %), and natalizumab (19.6 %). The average time between MS and glioma diagnosis was 12.1 years, with various timeframes. Among the 59 reported cases, 45.8 % led to patient fatalities, while the remaining 54.2 % managed to survive. CONCLUSION: This co-occurrence, though rare, suggests potential underlying shared mechanisms or vulnerabilities, possibly at a genetic or environmental level. An interdisciplinary approach, combining the expertise of neurologists, oncologists, radiologists, and pathologists, is vital to ensure accurate diagnosis and optimal management of affected individuals. Nonetheless, there is still a significant lack of information regarding this phenomenon, necessitating large-scale population-based studies and experimental research.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Esclerose Múltipla , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicações , Glioma/terapia , Glioma/complicações , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/fisiopatologia , Relatos de Casos como Assunto
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(3)2024 Jan 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38339371

RESUMO

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, and estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer accounts for a significant proportion of cases. While various treatments are available, endocrine therapies are often the first-line treatment for this type of breast cancer. However, the development of drug resistance poses a significant challenge in managing this disease. ESR1 mutations have been identified as a common mechanism of endocrine therapy resistance in ER+ breast cancer. The first-generation selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) fulvestrant has shown some activity against ESR1 mutant tumors. However, due to its poor bioavailability and need for intramuscular injection, it may not be the optimal therapy for patients. Second-generation SERDs were developed to overcome these limitations. These newer drugs have improved oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics, making them more convenient and effective for patients. Several oral SERDs are now in phase III trials for early and advanced ER+ breast cancer. This review summarizes the background of oral SERD development, the current status, and future perspectives.

4.
Clin Case Rep ; 11(6): e7605, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37361664

RESUMO

Key clinical message: According to this report, a biopsy revealed a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis in a patient with a history of MS. The development of the disease can be slowed down by early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Abstract: Neurosarcoidosis is a rare type of sarcoidosis that affects the central nervous system (CNS). Herein, we present a case of neurosarcoidosis with a history of multiple sclerosis (MS). Based on the pathological findings of the biopsy, a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis was established. The administration of appropriate treatment at an early stage can assist in decelerating its progression.

5.
Clin Case Rep ; 11(4): e7280, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37113637

RESUMO

Key Clinical Message: Malignancies were reported in some studies following taking Fingolimod. We reported a case of bladder lymphoma after taking Fingolimod. Physicians should consider the carcinogenic effects of Fingolimod in long-term use and replace it with safer medicines. Abstract: Fingolimod is a medication with a potential cure to control multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Here we describe a 32-year-old woman with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who developed bladder lymphoma induced by long-term use of Fingolimod. Physicians should consider the carcinogenic effects of Fingolimod in long-term use and replace it with safer medicines.

6.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 59: 103680, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35176641

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor modulator that is used for the relapsing form of MS. There are controversial reports regarding the incidence of cancer in patients with MS who were treated with fingolimod. Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled incidence of cancer in patients with MS who were treated with various dose of fingolimod. METHOD: Two expert researchers searched systematically PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and google scholar as well as references of the included studies, and conference abstracts which were published up to November 2021. RESULTS: We found 5231 articles by literature search, after deleting duplicates 3070 remained. Thirty-four articles remained for meta-analysis. Totally, 64,135 patients with MS who received fingolimod were enrolled. The total number of patients with cancer was 2561. The pooled incidence of cancer in patients with MS who received fingolimod was 2.02% (95% CI:2.00-3.01%, I2 = 97.8%, P < 0.001). The pooled incidence of cancer in group who received 0.5 mg was 2.01%(95%CI:1.00-2.04%) (I2 = 91.7%, P < 0.001). The pooled incidence of cancer in the group that received 1.25 mg was 3.01%(95%CI:2.02-5.01%) (I2 = 67.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The result of this systematic review and meta-analysis shows that the pooled prevalence of cancer in MS patients who received fingolimod was 2%. The risk of cancer is higher in patients with MS who received 1.25 mg fingolimod 1.25 mg than cases who received 0.5 mg.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente , Esclerose Múltipla , Neoplasias , Cloridrato de Fingolimode/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA