Open and Endoscopic Endonasal Optic Nerve Decompression for Craniofacial Fibrous Dysplasia in an Adolescent: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia (CFFD) is a benign, bony disease that may affect the skull base.1,2 Most cases are asymptomatic and observed; however, advanced disease can present with cranial neuropathy or craniofacial deformity requiring intervention.3-5 A 16-year-old adolescent girl with known CFFD involving the sphenoid and frontal bones with severe bilateral optic canal narrowing developed progressive right eye visual decline and frontal cosmetic deformity. Visual acuity worsened oculus dextrus (OD) to 20/30 with a new superior nasal scotoma and 20% loss in the retinal nerve fiber layer and remained oculus sinister (OS) 20/20. The patient was recommended a staged subfrontal craniotomy for right optic decompression and simultaneous correction cosmetic deformity followed by endonasal right optic decompression. On postoperative day one, visual acuity OD improved to 20/20; however, she developed OS visual decline to 20/800. Curiously, there were no episodes of intraoperative hypotension or additional iatrogenic compression. Use of methylprednisolone led to improvement OS 20/400. Given persistent visual decline, urgent second stage endonasal bilateral optic nerve decompression, rather than unilateral, was performed. Postoperatively, vision improved to OS 20/200. At one month, her vision improved to OD 20/15 and OS returned to 20/20 with a paracentral scotoma and 29% decline in left retinal nerve fiber layer with further improvement anticipated. This video describes a multidisciplinary, multistaged approach in treatment of optic nerve compression due to CFFD in addition to the management of unanticipated contralateral visual decline. The patient consented to the procedure and publication of her image. No Institutional Review Board/ethics committee approval was necessary for this case report.

Pack Years of Tobacco Cigarette Smoking as a Predictor of Bony Fusion after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Smoking tobacco cigarettes negatively impacts bone healing after spinal fusion. Smoking history is often assessed based on current smoker and nonsmoker status. However, in current research, smoking history has not been quantified in terms of pack years to estimate lifetime exposure and assess its effects. Our goal was to investigate the influence of smoking history, quantified in pack years, on bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent ACDF for cervical disc degeneration between September 21, 2017 and October 17, 2018 was conducted. Patient demographics, procedural variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for bony fusion following ACDF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal discrimination threshold for smoking history pack years in association with nonfusion. RESULTS: Among 97 patients identified, 90 (93%) demonstrated bony fusion on postoperative imaging. Mean number of smoking history pack years was 6.1 ± 13 for the fusion group and 16 ± 21 for the nonfusion group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that increased pack years of tobacco cigarette smoking was a significant predictor of nonfusion (95% confidence interval, [1.0,1.1], P = 0.045). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that 6.1 pack years best stratified the risk for nonfusion (area under the curve, 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of tobacco cigarette smoking ≥6.1 pack years may have an increased risk of nonfusion after ACDF.

An online calculator using machine learning for predicting survival in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant intracranial tumor affecting the pediatric population. Despite advancements in multimodal treatment over the past 2 decades yielding a 5-year survival rate > 75%, children who survive often have substantial neurological and cognitive sequelae. The authors aimed to identify risk factors and develop a clinically friendly online calculator for prognostic estimation in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma. METHODS: Pediatric patients with a histopathologically confirmed medulloblastoma were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000-2018) and split into training and validation cohorts in an 80:20 ratio. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the univariate and multivariate survival predictors. Subsequently, a calculator with those factors was developed to predict 2-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival as well as median survival months for pediatric patients with medulloblastoma. The performance of the calculator was determined by discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred fifty-nine pediatric patients with medulloblastoma met the prespecified inclusion criteria. Age, sex, race, ethnicity, median household income, county attribute, laterality, anatomical location, tumor grade, tumor size, surgery status, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were variables included in the calculator (https://spine.shinyapps.io/Peds_medullo/). The concordance index was 0.769 in the training cohort and 0.755 in the validation cohort, denoting clinically useful predictive accuracy. Good agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes was demonstrated by the calibration plots. CONCLUSIONS: An easy-to-use prognostic calculator for a large cohort of pediatric patients with medulloblastoma was established. Future efforts should focus on improving granularity of population-based registries and externally validating the proposed calculator.

Expected motor function change following decompressive surgery for spinal metastatic disease.

Background: Motor function in patients with spinal metastatic disease (SMD) directly impacts a patient's ability to receive systemic therapy and overall survival. Spine surgeons may be in the challenging position to advise a patient on expected motor function outcomes and determine a patient's suitability as a surgical candidate. We present this study to provide this critical information on anticipated motor function change to spine surgeons. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing spinal surgery for SMD at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer institute were prospectively enrolled. Patient motor function status before and after surgery was assessed using the standard 0 to 5 five-point muscle strength grading scale. The difference in presurgical and postsurgical motor function (proximal and distal) was used to assess motor function changes following surgery. Results: A total of 171 patients were included. The mean age was 62.7±10.46 years and 40.9% (70) were female. Common primary malignancy types were lung (49), kidney (28), breast (25), and prostate (23). The average proximal and distal motor function difference was 0.38 (standard deviation=1.02, p<.0001) and 0.32 (standard deviation=0.91, p<.0001) respectively showing an improvement following surgery. Patients with proximal presurgical motor function of 2, 3, and 4 had an improved motor function in 73%, 77%, and 73% of the patients. Patients with distal presurgical motor function of 2, 3, and 4 had an improved motor function in 80%, 89%, and 70% of the patients. Conclusions: Most patients undergoing surgery for SMD have a modest improvement in motor function following surgery. The degree of improvement in most instances is less than 1 point on a 0 to 5 motor function scale. This is critical knowledge for a spinal surgeon when evaluating SMD patients with significant preoperative motor function deficits. These results aid spinal surgeons in setting expectations and evaluating the need for rapid spinal decompression.

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine (C2-T1): systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,165 patients and 16,669 screws.

Lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation are among the most popular techniques for posterior fusion of the cervical spine. Early research prioritized the LMS approach as the trajectory resulted in fewer neurovascular complications; however, with the incorporation of navigation assistance, the CPS approach should be re-evaluated. Our objective was to report the findings of a meta-analysis focused on comparing the LMS and CPS techniques in terms of rate of various complications with inclusion of all levels from C2 to T1. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases with final inclusion criteria focused on identifying studies that reported outcomes and complications for either the CPS or LMS technique. These studies were then pooled, and statistical analyses were performed from the cumulative data. A total of 60 studies comprising 4165 participants and 16,669 screws placed within the C2-T1 levels were identified. Within these studies, the LMS group had a significantly increased odds for lateral mass fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 43.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62-711.42), additional cervical surgeries (OR = 5.56, 95%CI = 2.95-10.48), and surgical site infections (SSI) (OR = 5.47, 95%CI = 1.65-18.16). No other significant differences between groups in terms of complications were identified. Within the subgroup analysis of navigation versus non-navigation-guided CPS placement, no significant differences were identified for individual complications, although collectively significantly fewer complications occurred with navigation (OR = 5.29, 95%CI = 2.03-13.78). The CPS group had significantly fewer lateral mass fractures, cervical revision surgeries, and SSIs. Furthermore, navigation-assisted CPS placement was associated with a significant reduction in complications overall.

Vertebral Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and/or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) can be catastrophic complications associated with adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. These complications are markedly influenced by osteoporosis, leading to additional vertebral fracture and pedicle screw loosening. The MRI-based vertebral bone quality score (VBQ) is a newly developed tool that can be used to assess bone quality. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of the VBQ score in predicting PJK and/or PJF (PJF/PJK) after ASD correction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients age ≥50 years who had received ASD surgery of 5 or more thoracolumbar levels. Demographic, spinopelvic parameters, and procedure-related variables were collected. Each patient's VBQ score was calculated using preoperative T1-weighted MRI. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine potential risk factors of PJK/PJF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and area-under-the-curve values were generated for prediction of PJK/PJF. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included (mean age, 64.1 ± 6.8 years). Among them, 34 patients (29.3%) developed PJK/PJF. Mean VBQ scores were 3.13 ± 0.46 for patients with PJK/PJF and 2.46 ± 0.49 for patients without, which was significantly different between the 2 groups ( P < .001). On multivariate analysis, VBQ score was the only significant predictor of PJK/PJF (odds ratio = 1.745, 95% CI = 1.558-1.953, P < .001), with a predictive accuracy of 94.3%. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing ASD correction, higher VBQ was independently associated with PJK/PJF occurrence. Measurement of VBQ score on preoperative MRI may be a useful adjunct to ASD surgery planning.

Meta-analysis of overall survival and postoperative neurologic deficits after resection or biopsy of butterfly glioblastoma.

Butterfly glioblastoma (bGBM) is a grade 4 glioma with a poor prognosis. Surgical treatment of these cancers has been reviewed in the literature with some recent studies supporting resection as a safe and effective treatment instead of biopsy and adjuvant therapy. This meta-analysis was designed to determine whether there are significant differences in overall survival (OS) and postoperative neurologic deficits (motor, speech, and cranial nerve) following intervention in patients who underwent tumor resection as part of their treatment, compared to patients who underwent biopsy without surgical resection. A literature search was conducted using PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Embase (Elsevier) to identify articles from each database's earliest records to May 25, 2021, that directly compared the outcomes of biopsy and resection in bGBM patients and met predetermined inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of the two management strategies on OS and postoperative neurologic deficits. Six articles met our study inclusion criteria. OS was found to be significantly longer for the resection group at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.05) and 12 months (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.10-12.76) than for the biopsy group. No statistically significant differences were found in OS at 18 and 24 months. Resection was associated with an increased rate of postoperative neurologic deficit (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.02-4.09). Resection offers greater OS up to 1 year postintervention than biopsy alone; however, this comes at the cost of higher rates of postoperative neurologic deficits.

Vertebral bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has been associated with poor bone quality. Current evidence suggests that the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score correlates with poor bone quality. PURPOSE: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess whether the VBQ score can predict the occurrence of postoperative cage subsidence after TLIF surgery. DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective single-center cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing single-level TLIF for degenerative spine disease between February 2014 and October 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Extent of subsidence. METHODS: Demographic, procedure-related, and radiographic data were collected for study patients. VBQ scores were determined from preoperative T1-weighted MRI. Subsidence was defined as ≥2 mm of migration of the cage into the superior or inferior end plate or both. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the correlation between potential risk factors for subsidence and actual subsidence rates. RESULTS: Subsidence was observed among 42 of the 74 study patients. The mean VBQ scores were 2.9±0.5 for patients with subsidence and 2.5±0.5 for patients without subsidence. The difference among groups was significant (p=.003). On multivariate logistic regression, a higher VBQ score was significantly associated with an increased risk of subsidence (OR=1.5, 95% CI=1.160-1.973, p=.004) and was the only significant independent predictor of subsidence after TLIF. CONCLUSION: We found that a higher VBQ score was significantly associated with cage subsidence following TLIF. The MRI-VBQ score may be a valuable tool for assisting in identifying patients at risk of cage subsidence following TLIF.

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine: systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 1768 patients and 8636 screws.

Lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation for the treatment of subaxial cervical spine instability or deformity has been traditionally associated with few neurovascular complications. However, cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation has recently increased in popularity, especially with navigation assistance, because of the higher pullout strength of the pedicle screws. To their knowledge, the authors conducted the first meta-analysis comparing the complication rates during and/or after CPS and LMS placement for different pathologies causing cervical spine instability. A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase from inception to January 12, 2021 was performed to identify studies reporting CPS and/or LMS-related complications. Complications were categorized into intraoperative and early postoperative (within 30 days of surgery) and late postoperative (after 30 days from surgery) complications. All studies that met the prespecified inclusion criteria were pooled and cumulatively analyzed. A total of 24 studies were conducted during the time frame of the search and comprising 1768 participants and 8636 subaxially placed screws met the inclusion criteria. The CPS group experienced significantly more postoperative C5 palsy (odds ratio [OR] = 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-9.53, p < 0.05). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between the LMS and CPS groups. There were no significant differences between the CPS and LMS groups in terms of neurovascular procedure-related complications other than significantly more C5 palsy in the CPS group.

Spinal cord glioblastoma multiforme in a patient with Noonan syndrome: A clinical report.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, there are only 3 reported cases of central nervous system malignancies in patients with Noonan syndrome in the literature, all of which are intracranial pathologies. To our knowledge, there are no cases of spinal cord glioblastoma multiforme reported in the literature. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the case of a 12-year-old girl with Noonan syndrome who presented with back pain and new onset neurological deficits and was found to have a spinal cord lesion. T10-L1 laminoplasty with safe maximal resection was done. Postoperative pathological analysis identified this lesion as a high-grade astrocytoma consistent with glioblastoma multiforme. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord glioblastoma multiforme is a rare occurrence in the general population, particularly in a patient with an underlying diagnosis of Noonan syndrome. Patients with spinal cord tumors can present with a multitude of clinical signs and symptoms and treatment should not be delayed.

Navigation-Guided Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screws in Revision Spine Surgery: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Traditionally, lateral mass screws (LMSs) have been the mainstay of posterior fixation in the subaxial spine. Although LMSs provide adequate fixation, cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) facilitate high fusion rates (90.5%) and provide for greater bone purchase, better reduction, lower rates of screw loosening or pull out, 2 times greater biomechanical advantage, superior stabilization, decreased development of pseudarthrosis, and decreased revision surgeries compared to LMSs.1-4 In addition, CPSs can be a powerful bail-out option after lateral mass construct failure. Navigation-guided CPS placement has been reported to have an accuracy of 90.3%.5 Navigation has the added advantage of mitigating screw malposition for the placement of CPS because of the smaller pedicle sizes and variability in cervical anatomy.1,3,6 The potential risks of subaxial CPS placement include the risks of vertebral artery injury, spinal cord injury, and injury to adjacent neurovasculature.2 The overall radiographic breach rate with intraoperative imaging is reported to range from 2.9% of 22.9%, with the majority of breaches occurring in the lateral direction.7,8 Despite radiographic breaches, the occurrence of nerve root injury (0.31% per screw), vertebral artery injury (0.15% per screw), and spinal cord injury (0% per screw) is rare.3,7 Here, we demonstrate navigation-assisted C1-C2 posterior fusion, with combined C1 LMSs and C2 pedicle screws with subaxial pedicle screw revision of prior failed instrumentation.3 The patient gave informed consent for surgery and video recording. Institutional review board approval was deemed unnecessary.