Risk factors for nodal involvement in early-stage rectal cancer: a new scoring system based on the analysis of 326 cases.

BACKGROUND: the purpose of this study was to identify which clinicopathological features of early-stage rectal cancer (ESRC) are significantly correlated with the risk of local-regional lymph node metastases (LNM) and to quantify the strength of this association through a novel scoring system. According to several case studies, about 20% of operated ESRC are found with occult lymph nodal metastases at the histological examination. The low frequency of local recurrence in these tumors treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) compared to transanal approaches highlights the role of mesorectal lymph nodes as a site of metastatic location. METHODS: Overall, 386 consecutive patients with ESRC treated with radical resection and TME were examined in a retrospective, observational multi-centric study, operated between 2007 and 2019 in seven centers. Demographic and tumor related clinicopathological characteristics were identified, collected and analyzed. Each variable was specifically weighted based on the strength of its association with the presence of nodal metastases. A scoring system using these weighted variables was developed. RESULTS: Six variables were found to be significantly associated with local regional LNM: lymphatic invasion combined with vascular invasion, poor differentiation (G3), stage T2, age ≥60 years, male sex, perineural invasion. A novel scoring system weighted on the presence of each of these variables able to quantify the risk of LNM in ESRC was developed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed scoring system is a good predictor of the risk of LNM and should be of help in the decision-making process for ESRC cases diagnosed either by local excision or endoscopic biopsy.

What should we intend for minimally invasive treatment of colorectal cancer?

Non-inferiority of laparoscopic treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials although operative and perioperative management varies widely among centers. Literature data in English language published up to April 15, 2014 were analyzed in order to give an up to date analysis that would highlights the key aspects of a modern and factual minimally invasive treatment of CRC. Laparoscopic resection is the first choice treatment of colon cancer. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer should be considered an investigational procedure to be performed in high volume centers with special interest in laparoscopy and colorectal surgery. Less invasive approaches should be taken into account with the aim of reducing surgical stress. The adoption of ERAS programs has demonstrated to optimize short-term results. Future research should be directed to prove possible long-term advantages, in terms of overall and disease-free survival, of minimally invasive treatment of CRC.

Analysis of risk factors for lymph nodal involvement in early stages of rectal cancer: when can local excision be considered an appropriate treatment? Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Background. Over the past ten years oncological outcomes achieved by local excision techniques (LETs) as the sole treatment for early stages of rectal cancer (ESRC) have been often disappointing. The reasons for these poor results lie mostly in the high risk of the disease's diffusion to local-regional lymph nodes even in ESRC. Aims. This study aims to find the correct indications for LET in ESRC taking into consideration clinical-pathological features of tumours that may reduce the risk of lymph node metastasis to zero. Methods. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of casistics of ESRC treated with total mesorectal excision with the aim of identifying risk factors for nodal involvement. Results. The risk of lymph node metastasis is higher in G ≥ 2 and T ≥ 2 tumours with lymphatic and/or vascular invasion. Other features which have not yet been sufficiently investigated include female gender, TSM stage >1, presence of tumour budding and/or perineural invasion. Conclusions. Results comparable to radical surgery can be achieved by LET only in patients with T(1) N(0) G(1) tumours with low-risk histological features, whereas deeper or more aggressive tumours should be addressed by radical surgery (RS).