Anticoagulants and reduced thrombus load in abdominal aortic aneurysms assessed with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between intraluminal thrombus (ILT) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth and rupture risk remains ambiguous. Studies have shown a limited effect of antiplatelet therapy on ILT size, whereas the impact of anticoagulant therapy on ILT is unresolved. This study aims to evaluate an association between antithrombotic therapy and ILT size assessed with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) examination in a cohort of patients with AAA. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 309 patients with small AAAs were examined with 3D-CEUS. Patients were divided into three groups based on prescribed antithrombotic therapy: anticoagulant (n = 36), antiplatelet (n = 222), and no antithrombotic therapy (n = 51). Patient ILT size was calculated in volume and thickness and compared between the three groups. RESULTS: Patients on anticoagulants had a significantly lower estimated marginal mean ILT volume of 16 mL (standard error [SE], ±3.2) compared with 28 mL (SE, ±2.7) in the no antithrombotic group and 30 mL (SE, ±1.3) in the antiplatelet group when adjusting for AAA volume (P < .001) and comorbidities (P < .001). In addition, patients on anticoagulant therapy had significantly lower estimated marginal mean ILT thickness of 10 mm (SE, ±1.1) compared with 13 mm (SE, ±0.9) in the no antithrombotic group of and 13mm (SE, ±0.4) in the antiplatelet group when adjusting for AAA diameter (P = .03) and comorbidities (P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: A 3D-CEUS examination is applicable for ILT assessment and demonstrates that patients with AAA on anticoagulant therapy have lower ILT thickness and volume than patients with AAA on antiplatelet therapy and those without antithrombotic therapy. Causality between anticoagulants and ILT size, and extrapolation to AAA growth and rupture risk, is unknown and merits further investigations, to further nuance US-based AAA surveillance strategy.

Three-dimensional ultrasound improves identification of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms reaching the threshold for repair.

OBJECTIVE: Conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) has been the recommended and preferred modality for the diagnosis and surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Measurement of the aneurysm diameter using three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) has shown promising results in a research setting, improving agreement and reproducibility. However, studies evaluating 3D-US in a clinical context are lacking, which could hinder the optimal usage of this new modality. In the present study, we investigated the clinical value of 3D-US for AAA surveillance compared with the current standard 2D-US examination. METHODS: Data from 126 patients with infrarenal AAAs <50 mm and 55 mm (female and male, respectively) were available for analysis. Eligibility was determined using the standard 2D-US anteroposterior (AP) diameter with a dual-plane technique. All the patients had subsequently undergone additional 3D-US and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Using CTA as the reference standard, the maximal standard 2D-US AP diameter was compared with that from 3D-US. RESULTS: All 126 AAAs were, per the inclusion criteria, small, with no intervention indicated. With the addition of 3D-US imaging to the 2D-US-based surveillance program, the AAA diameter threshold (50 and 55 mm) was exceeded for 31 of the 126 patients (25%). These 31 patients were withdrawn from the present study and referred for treatment planning. Compared with the CTA AP diameter (mean, 49 ± 7.2 mm), the mean 3D-US AP diameter (mean, 49 ± 6.7 mm) was significantly more accurate than the standard mean 2D-US AP diameter (45 ± 6.2 mm; kappa value, 0.86 ± 0.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.96; kappa value, 0.01 ± 0.04; 95% confidence interval, -0.05 to 0.09, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: For clinical use, the AAA diameter assessment using 3D-US was significantly more accurate than that with 2D-US and can substantially change the clinical management, from surveillance to operative treatment, for approximately one fourth of patients with an AAA. Further studies evaluating the clinical consequences of the 2D to 3D paradigm shift in AAA diagnostics are warranted, including sensitivity, specificity, agreement, and reproducibility estimation.

Three-dimensional ultrasound is a reliable alternative in endovascular aortic repair surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) has already demonstrated improved reproducibility with a high degree of agreement (intermodality variability), reproducibility (interoperator variability), and repeatability (intraoperator variability) compared with conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) when estimating the maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The aim of the present study was, in a clinical, multicenter setting, to evaluate the accuracy of 3D-US with aneurysm model quantification software (3D-US abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA] model) for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) sac diameter assessment vs that of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 2D-US. METHODS: A total of 182 patients who had undergone EVAR from April 2016 to December 2017 and were compliant with a standardized EVAR surveillance program were enrolled from five different vascular centers (Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; L'hospital de la Timone, Paris, France; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio) in four countries. All image acquisitions were performed at the local sites (ie, 2D-US, 3D-US, CTA). Only the 2D-US and CTA readings were performed both locally and centrally. All images were read centrally by the US and CTA core laboratory. Anonymized image data were read in a randomized and blinded manner. RESULTS: The sample used to estimate the accuracy of the 3D-US AAA model and 2D-US included 164 patients and 177 patients, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference between CTA and 3D-US was -2.43 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.20 to 0.14; P = .07) with a lower and upper limit of agreement of -8.9 mm (95% CI, -9.3 to -8.4) and 2.7 mm (95% CI, 2.3-3.2), respectively. For 2D-US and CTA, the mean difference was -3.62 mm (95% CI, -6.14 to -1.10; P = .002), with a lower and upper limit of agreement of -10.3 mm (95% CI, -10.8 to -9.8) and 2.5 mm (95% CI, 2-2.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-US AAA model showed no significant difference compared with CTA for measuring the anteroposterior diameter, indicating less bias for 3D-US compared with 2D-US. Thus, 3D-US with AAA model software is a viable modality for anteroposterior diameter assessment for surveillance after EVAR.

Three- and Two-Dimensional Ultrasound is as Accurate as Computed Tomography in Aortic Sac Assessment after Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: To compare aortic sac changes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) assessed by three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US), two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US), and traditional computed tomographic angiography (CTA). METHODS: Using volume assessment with three-dimensional CTA (3D-CTA-volume) as the gold standard, this study investigated aortic sac changes at three and 12 months after EVAR with three different ultrasound methods (2D-US anterior-posterior (AP) diameter, 3D-US AP centerline diameter, and 3D-US partial volume), and traditional CT multiplanar outer-to-outer diameter (CT-MPR OTO diameter). From august 1st, 2011 to January 2014, consecutive EVAR patients (n = 113) were available for analysis in two time intervals; 1) between preoperative and three-month follow-up and 2) between three and 12 month follow-up. RESULTS: The risk of missing true aortic sac growth (false negative finding) at three-month postoperative visit using 3D-US partial volume, 3D-US AP centerline diameter, 2D-US AP diameter, and CT-MPR OTO diameter was 19%, 21%, 22%, and 18%, respectively. Corresponding low sensitivities (0% to 21%) and kappa-values (<0.50) in detecting aortic sac changes were found. The risk of missing true growth between three and 12 months were lower (6%, 5%, 6%, and 6%, respectively), and matching sensitivities 33%, 33%, 17%, and 17%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All tested methods for aortic sac changes were as good as traditional CT-MPR OTO diameter and corresponded poorly with 3D-CTA-volume at three months postoperative visit but substantially better after 12 months where the residual sac change was more profound.

Clinical validation of three-dimensional ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) examination is a relatively new modality that can be used for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surveillance, and may offer improved reproducibility over conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interoperator reproducibility of maximum anterior-to-posterior diameter by nonphysician ultrasound technicians in a typical vascular laboratory setting, on patients with infrarenal AAAs using 3D-US and 2D-US examination. METHODS: A total of 134 consecutive patients with asymptomatic infrarenal AAAs were screened. Of the 134 patients, 28 (21%) were screen failures. From the remaining 106 patients, 3 (2.8%) had missing data and 13 (12.3%) had technically unacceptable image quality. As a result, 90 patients were included for final analysis. Ultrasound image acquisitions were performed during the single visit. The 2D-US images were evaluated at the time of examination by the respective ultrasound technicians who acquired them. All 3D-US images were evaluated offline by both ultrasound technicians after a wash-out period of at least 6 weeks. RESULTS: Excellent interoperator reproducibility was observed for measuring maximum diameter using 3D-US (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97), and good agreement among ultrasound technicians (mean difference, -0.08 mm; limits of agreement, -3.17; 3.00 mm). When using 3D-US examination, 74 of the 90 patients (82%) were estimated within 2 mm of interoperator variability. Of 90 patients, 52 (58%) were estimated to be within the same variability by 2D-US examination. Estimating AAA diameter using 3D-US was superior to 2D-US with respect to interoperator reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: Both 3D-US and 2D-US examination demonstrated good reproducibility among two vascular ultrasound technicians with superior agreement from 3D-US examination. The present results support the broader use of 3D-US in standard AAA surveillance programs.

Contrast Enhanced Three Dimensional Ultrasound for Intraluminal Thrombus Assessment in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of intraluminal thrombus (ILT) on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) progression can be investigated non-invasively by three dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS). The aim was to validate 3D-CEUS ILT volume and thickness measurements against computed tomography angiography (CTA), and to determine inter- and intra-operator reproducibility. METHODS: The design was for a planned comparison of 3D-CEUS and CTA and of repeated 3D-CEUS measurements in a blinded set up. Consecutive patients with asymptomatic AAA (n = 137, maximum diameter 30-55 mm) from a single centre were consecutively assessed by CTA and 3D-CEUS in a blinded setup. After exclusion of failed CTA (n = 2) and inconclusive 3D-CEUS (n = 8), 127 3D-CEUS/CTA pairs were analysed by Bland-Altman plots. 3D-CEUS inter- and intra-operator reproducibility were determined in a subgroup (n = 30) measured twice by two blinded investigators. RESULTS: In 24 of 127 (19%) patients, no ILT was found on 3D-CEUS. Intraluminal thrombus absence was confirmed by 3D-CTA analysis in all but two cases. Mean ILT volume difference between 3D-CEUS and CTA was 2.2 mL (5% of mean volume) and range of variability (ROV) amounted to ± 10.2 mL. Mean ILT thickness difference was 0.6 mm with a ROV of ± 4.6 mm 3D-CEUS inter-operator variations of ILT volume and thickness measurements were low (ROV ± 8.8 mL and ±2.9 mm, respectively). The corresponding intra-operator ROVs were ±7.5 mL and ±3.3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-CEUS demonstrated good reproducibility and a good agreement with CTA when estimating ILT volume and maximum thickness in AAA patients. It is a promising research tool to investigate potential interactions between ILT, AAA growth, and rupture.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Vascular Surgery: Review and Update.

Accurate imaging methods associated with minimum patient risk are important tools for clinical decision-making in vascular surgery. Today, traditional imaging methods, such as computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography are the preferred modalities. Ultrasound has only challenged these methods in assessment of carotid disease, aortic aneurysms, venous insufficiency, and thromboembolism and in surveillance of in situ bypasses. These practice patterns may change with the introduction of second-generation ultrasound contrast agents which are easy to use, manageable, and safe. This topical review attempts to summarize and highlight the current evidence and future prospects for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in vascular surgery, with a particular focus on opportunities in carotid and lower limb arteriosclerotic disease and surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair.

von Willebrand Factor and Prekallikrein in Plasma Are Associated With Thrombus Volume in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Disruption of the endothelial lining may be one of the events linking intraluminal thrombus and abdominal aortic aneurysm growth. In the present study, we examined whether von Willebrand factor activity in plasma, contact proteins of blood coagulation, and inflammatory biomarkers may be associated with intraluminal thrombus volume in search of a biochemical marker of endothelial damage and thrombus size. DESIGN: Prospective study, correlating potential endothelial biomarkers and intraluminal thrombus volume acquired by computed tomography angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma was consecutively obtained from 38 patients with asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. von Willebrand factor activity, thrombin generation time, factor XII, and prekallikrein concentration were measured in plasma on automated and in-house platforms. In total, 8 patients were excluded due to ongoing anticoagulant therapy, renal impairment, or nonappearance, thus leaving 30 patients for further analysis. All patients had computed tomography angiography, and intraluminal volume was quantified off-line by OsiriX 6.5. RESULTS: Median intraluminal thrombus volume was 42.7 mL. Spearman correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between thrombus volume, von Willebrand factor activity (ρ = 0.56, P = .0013), and prekallikrein concentration in plasma (ρ = 0.54, P = .002). CONCLUSION: von Willebrand factor activity and concentration of prekallikrein may both be of importance regarding the evolution of thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm and possible biomarkers for aneurysm growth.

[Pseudoaneurysm in the subclavian artery as a long-term complication to clavicula fracture].

Post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm in the subclavian artery is a rare complication to clavicula fracture, but it seldom requires intervention, and therefore screening for pseudoaneurysms is not recommended after a relevant trauma. This case report confirms that a pseudoaneurysm can develop slowly and can manifest even several years after the primary trauma. A 79-year-old patient presented herself with a 20 × 20 cm large pulsating tumour on the left side of her neck, and a pseudoaneurysm on the subclavian artery had been diagnosed as a late complication to a clavicula fracture nine years before. This case was rare because of the late-onset aneurysm, manifesting itself by the large size and neurological symptoms. The patient was treated with stent grafting without further surgical intervention, resulting in relief from neurological symptoms and a decreasing size of the pseudoaneurysm. Antithrombotic treatment after the endovascular procedure was not recommended.