Systematic review analyzing significance of endometrial cavity fluid during assisted reproductive techniques.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study is to estimate the prevalence of endometrial cavity fluid (ECF) in Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) cycles and analyze its effects on pregnancy outcome in such cycles. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for articles. The reference lists of relevant publications were explored for other studies. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies that had assessed the pregnancy outcome in ART cycles and had commented on ECF accumulation were included. Pregnancy outcomes were assessed in all ART cycles where ECF was observed and were compared to the non-ECF cycles. RESULTS: A total of nine studies were included in the meta-analysis for a total of 28,210 cycles. Pooled analysis of the prevalence of ECF cycles out of total cycles in females undergoing ART using a fixed effect model showed that it was 14% (95% CI is 13% to 14%; I2 = 99%, p = < 0.01). The random effect model prevalence of ECF cycles was around 7% (95% CI: 4% to 10%). There was a statistically significant (25%) decrease in pregnancy rates per cycle transfer in the ECF cycle versus the non-ECF cycle group during ART [OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.67-0.84), p < 0.001; moderate quality evidence]. When ECF size was compared, there was a statistically significant increase in pregnancy rates if ECF size was less than 3.5 mm versus greater than or equal to 3.5 mm [OR = 13.67, 95% CI = 1.43-130.40), p = 0.02; high quality evidence]. Sub-group analysis revealed that the ECF present at the time of embryo transfer significantly decreased the pregnancy rates by 26% as compared to the group where the ECF was not present at the time of embryo transfer [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.65-0.85), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis proposes that the presence of ECF significantly decreases the implantation and pregnancy rates of ART cycles, and even more so if its size is greater than 3.5 mm. Interventions to decrease ECF formation or treat it have enhanced the pregnancy outcome in ART cycles. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: Date: 17th September 2020; Number: CRD42020182262.

The anatomical measurements of vulva in Indian women: A cross-sectional prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the anatomical dimensions of the vulva in adult Indian women. To analyze their correlations with age, body mass index (BMI), parity, and mode of delivery. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care university hospital in India, among 400 women aged 18 years and above. Various vulval measurements were taken, and Pearson's correction was applied to variables like age, BMI, parity, and mode of delivery. RESULTS: Mean length of glans of clitoris was 5.2 ± 1.43 mm, the labia minora width was 2.6 ± 0.74 cm, length of introitus was 1.3 ± 0.59 cm, and perineal body length was 2.3 ± 0.60 cm. The range of some measurements was extensive, for example labia minora width ranged from 0.7 to 4.9 cm. Normal centile curves were constructed for vulval measurements according to age groups. Statistically significant positive correlations of age, BMI, and obstetrical history were seen with labia minora width (r = 0.165, P = 0.001; r = 0.284, P < 0.001; r = 0.246, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The centile curves can be used as a reference for the Indian population of different ages. These can be used when counseling women coming for female genital cosmetic surgery.

Postmenopausal Bleeding as a Late Sequela of Pelvic Fracture.

Postmenopausal bleeding is one of the common presenting complaints in the gynecological outpatient department. The common causes of which are atrophic endometritis, vaginitis, estrogen therapy, cancer endometrium, and cancer cervix. Hereby, we present a rare case of a 65-year-old female presented with postmenopausal bleeding who had history of trauma 1 year back with pelvic bone fracture. The cause of postmenopausal bleeding, in this case, is abnormal bony protrusion secondary to malunited pelvic fracture causing laceration of the right lateral vaginal wall. The case was managed by local osteotomy and vaginal wall repair.

Improving reproductive outcomes of intrauterine insemination: Does endometrial scratch injury help? A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE(S): Current evidence suggests that endometrial injury improves clinical pregnancy rate while having no effect on miscarriages in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. However, there is no substantial evidence to advocate the use of endometrial injury to benefit the outcomes of IUI treatment. Additionally, there is no clear consensus about the ideal timing, underlying mechanism and optimum intensity of endometrial injury required. The study examines the effect of intentional endometrial injury/scratch in the early proliferative phase of stimulated cycle on reproductive outcomes (clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates and miscarriage occurrence) of intra-uterine insemination treatment (IUI). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective, randomized control interventional study was conducted in a tertiary level teaching institution from April 2018 to February 2020. 150 eligible couples requiring IUI treatment who agreed to participate were randomly allocated on 1:1 basis to either control or intervention group. The trial participants received up to 3 cycles ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate and intra-uterine insemination. In addition, women in intervention group were subjected to endometrial scratch injury on day 6-7 of their stimulated cycle. 154 cycles in control arm and 128 cycles in intervention group were analyzed for clinical pregnancy, miscarriages and pain experienced by the women during endometrial scratch injury using the statistical package SPSS (version 21). RESULT: Similar cumulative clinical pregnancy rates (12.5% Vs 13.6%, RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.44-3.37, p = 0.713), biochemical pregnancy rates (17.1% vs 22.9%, RR 1.43, CI 0.59-3.47, p = 0.421) and ongoing pregnancy rates (10.93% Vs 11.47%, RR 1.05, CI 0.35-3.21, p = 924) were observed in control and intervention arms. Likewise, the relative risk of miscarriage occurrence in the intervention arm was 1.32 (95% CI 0.39-4.32, p = 1.000) which was not statistically different from control group. Mean pain score of 6.93 on numerical pain rating scale was experienced by women whilst having endometrial scratch injury. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to defend the use of endometrial scratch injury in intra-uterine insemination treatment, as it is moderately painful and have uncertain beneficial influence on reproductive outcomes.