Clinical value of right hemicolectomy for appendiceal carcinoids using pathologic criteria.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal carcinoids (AC) are usually adequately treated by appendectomy. The European Neuroendocrine Tumours Society (ENETS) has recently reconsidered the previous pathologic criteria to identify patients at high risk of extra-appendiceal disease, who are thought to require right hemicolectomy (RHC). AIM: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate previous and currently introduced criteria, in identifying patients with AC in whom RHC is justified. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients who underwent RHC for AC were retrospectively identified. Demographic and follow-up data were collected and appendectomy specimens were reviewed for the presence of indications leading to RHC defined as: tumor diameter ≥2 cm, tumor location at the base, mesoappendiceal extension, mitotic index Ki-67≥2%. RHC specimens were examined to identify evidence of extra-appendiceal disease, remaining and/or metastatic disease. RESULTS: Four patients fulfilled two criteria and 8 one criterion for RHC. Two patients had tumors ≥2.0 cm, 5 located at the base, 8 invading the mesoappendix and periappendiceal fat; Ki-67 PI was 1% in all cases measured except one, in which it was 3%. Post-RHC, 3 patients (25%) had extra-appendiceal disease (no residual disease was identified in surgical margins); 1 had tumor at the colon specimen and 2 had lymph node metastasis. All 3 patients fulfilled only one pathologic criterion; 1 had tumor mesoappendiceal extension and 2 tumor location at the base of the appendix. CONCLUSIONS: Applying previous and currently introduced pathologic criteria, 25% of high-risk patients with AC had identifiable extra-appendiceal disease following RHC that might be not detected following the recently introduced ENETS criteria.

Two different schedules of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma relapsing after a 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combination. A randomized study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan as second-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) failing or relapsing after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (LV) standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Irinotecan was randomly administered in two different schedules (once every 3 weeks, and every 10 days) in patients failing prior 5-FU plus LV. Patients were randomized to two treatment groups: group A received irinotecan 350 mg/m2 every 21 days and group B received irinotecan 175 mg/m2 days 1 and 10 every 21 days. RESULTS: Group A comprised 60 patients: 34 male/26 female, median age 64 years (range 48-70 years), and median Karnofsky performance status (PS) 90. Their metastatic sites included liver (n=47), lymph nodes (n=27), lung (n=14), abdomen (n=14), pelvis (n=8), "other" (n=2), and local recurrence (n=12). Group B comprised 60 patients: 36 male/24 female, median age 62 years (46-70 years), and median PS 90. Their metastatic sites included liver (n=49), lymph nodes (n=29), lung (n=17), abdomen (n=16), pelvis (n=11), "other" (n=2), and local recurrence (n=13). Group A showed the following responses: complete response (CR) 2, partial response (PR) 12, stable disease (SD) 21, progressive disease (PD) 26, overall response rate (ORR) 23%, tumor growth control 58%. Group B showed the following responses: CR 1, PR 14, SD 22, PD 23; ORR 25%; tumor growth control 62%. Toxicities included acute cholinergic syndrome (group A 53%, group B 19%; P<0.0001), late-onset diarrhea grade 1/2 (group A 21%, group B 46%) and grade 3/4 (group A 41%, group B 66%; P<0.0001), nausea and vomiting grade 1/2 (group A 34%, group B 59%) and grade 3/4 (group A 30%, group B 12%; P<0.0001), neutropenia grade 3/4 (group A 27%, group B 28%; P<0.03), with febrile neutropenia seen in only four patients in group A, anemia grade more than 2 (group A 28%, group B 12%; P<0.05), asthenia grade more than 3 (group A 24%, group B 18%; P<0.001), and alopecia grade more than 3 (group A 40%, group B 34%; P<0.2). CONCLUSIONS: . The present study indicates that, in patients with ACC who have relapsed after 5-FU plus LV, the administration of irinotecan fractionated into two doses every 21 days yields a similar efficacy to, but a much lower incidence of toxicity than, the same total dose of irinotecan administered once every 21 days.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer with a combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and gemcitabine: a multicenter phase II study by the Greek Cooperative Group for Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine (GEM) and irinotecan (CPT-11) is evaluated in previously untreated patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to July 2001, 60 patients with pancreatic cancer (85% stage IV) were enrolled in a two-step extended phase II trial. Patients were treated with gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and CPT-11 (300 mg/m2 on day 8) in cycles of 3 weeks. No prophylactic use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) was initially planned. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis one (1.7%) complete and 14 (23.3%) partial responses were achieved [objective response rate (ORR) 24.7%; 95% confidence interval 14.04% to 35.96%]. Twenty-two (36.7%) and 23 (38.3%) patients had stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median duration of response was 5 months, the median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7 months and the median overall survival 7 months. One-year survival was 22.5%. Pain improvement and asthenia during treatment were observed in 45% and 43% of patients, respectively; weight gain occurred in 19.5% of patients. Grade 3 anemia occurred in three (5%) patients who required transfusion of six packed red blood cell (RBC) units. Ten (16.7%) additional patients with grade 2 anemia were treated with recombinant erythropoietin. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in seven (11.7%) patients and grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 27 (45%). Ten patients developed febrile neutropenia, two of whom died due to sepsis. Prophylactic use of rhG-CSF was eventually required in 93 (28.3%) of 329 administered cycles. Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan is an active chemotherapy regimen against pancreatic cancer with a 25% ORR. Toxicity was acceptable for the great majority of patients but with a high percentage of hematopoietic growth factor administration.

Comparison of docetaxel/cisplatin to docetaxel/gemcitabine as first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: early results of a randomized trial.

The study compares docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) and docetaxel plus gemcitabine (DG) regimens for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were randomized to receive either the DC or the DG combination. They were stratified according to age, performance status (PS) and stage of disease. Three hundred seventeen patients entered the study. Of them, 162 received the DC regimen and 155 the DG regimen. There were no differences in the patients' characteristics between the two study arms. Preliminary analysis included 132 evaluable patients in the DC arm and 114 in the DG arm. Three complete responses (CR) (2.3%) and 39 partial responses (PR) (30%) were documented in the DC arm (response rate (RR) 32.3%; 95% CI 23.87-39.76%), whereas 1 CR (0.9%) and 38 PR (33%) were documented in the DG arm (RR: 33.9%; 95% CI 25.5-42.92%). No differences in the RR, response duration, time to tumor progression, overall survival and 1-year survival were observed between the two groups. Regarding toxicity, there were no significant differences in grade 3-4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia between the two arms. However, grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 40 patients (33%) treated with the DC regimen and in 31 patients (22%) treated with the DG regimen (P=0.01). Twenty-four (16%) patients in the DC arm and 20 (14%) in the DG arm developed febrile neutropenia. There was one death due to sepsis in each arm. Non-haematological toxicity was mild and equal in the two arms, with the exception of grade 3-4 nausea and diarrhoea, which were more frequent in the DC arm. In conclusion, preliminary results showed that the DG regimen was as effective as the DC regimen. The toxicity profile of the DG combination was relatively milder. Hence, cisplatin cannot be considered longer as a mandatory component of chemotherapy against NSCLC.

A randomized open-label parallel-group study comparing ondansetron with ondansetron plus dexamethasone in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose epirubicin. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The purpose of this multicenter randomized, open-label, parallel-group study was to assess whether the addition of low-dose dexamethasone to ondansetron results in improved control of chemotherapy-induced emesis in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy with high-dose epirubicin. METHODS & STUDY DESIGN: Patients were randomized to receive either 24 mg of ondansetron or 24 mg of ondansetron plus 8 mg of dexamethasone administered as an intravenous infusion 30 minutes prior to administration of chemotherapy. Both groups of patients received 8 mg of ondansetron given orally from day 2 to 5 two times daily. Fifty-three patients received ondansetron and 50 received ondansetron plus dexamethasone. The patients recorded nausea and the number of vomits and retches daily on diary cards. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the ondansetron plus dexamethasone group experienced neither vomiting nor retching during the first day of the first course of chemotherapy compared to those receiving ondansetron alone (79.6% vs 53.8%, P = 0.0062). Furthermore, there was a trend in favor of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the control of nausea. There was no statistically significant difference between ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus ondansetron alone in protecting patients from emesis between days 2 and 5 of the first course of chemotherapy (66.7% vs 62.7%, P = 0.68). This was probably due to the small sample size. Ondansetron was well tolerated, with 15 patients (15%) reporting adverse events such as headache or constipation. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that ondansetron given intravenously in combination with dexamethasone is more effective than ondansetron alone in the control of acute emesis in patients undergoing their first course of chemotherapy with high-dose epirubicin. No difference between the regimens was found with regard to nausea and delayed emesis control.

Docetaxel in combination with carboplatin for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a multicentre phase I study.

Docetaxel and carboplatin have shown in vitro and in vivo activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of their combination. Chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, age<75 years old, performance status (WHO) 0-2, with adequate bone marrow, renal, liver and cardiac function, were treated with docetaxel and carboplatin. Docetaxel was given at escalated doses starting from 70 mg/m(2) with increments of 10 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin also administered at escalated doses starting from AUC 5 to 7 AUC (mg/ml. min); the regimen was administered every 3 weeks. No colony-stimulating factor or intrapatient escalation was allowed. The toxicity of the regimen was assessed during the first chemotherapy cycle. 35 enrolled patients received a total of 114 chemotherapy cycles (median 3 cycles/patient; range: 1-8). All patients were assessable for toxicity. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity of the regimen; overall, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 16 (14%) cycles; six (5%) neutropenic episodes were complicated with fever but there was no septic death. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was uncommon (two cycles; 2%). Grade 3/4 diarrhoea occurred in 5 (14%) patients whilst neurotoxicity, fatigue and mucositis were extremely uncommon. Two MTDs were defined: the MTD(1) was docetaxel 80 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 7 mg/ml x min whilst MTD(2) was docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml x min. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated outpatient regimen for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC. This regimen merits further investigation in phase II trials.

Front-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer with docetaxel and epirubicin: a multicenter dose-escalation study. The Greek Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (GBCCG).

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of docetaxel (D) in combination with epirubicin (Epi) in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven chemotherapy-naïve metastatic breast cancer patients aged < 75 years with PS (WHO) 0-2 and adequate bone marrow, renal, liver and cardiac function, were enrolled in the study. Epi was given as a five-min bolus i.v. infusion on day 1 (d1) in escalated doses with increments of 10 mg/m2; D was given in a one-hour infusion after appropriate premedication on either day 1 or on day 2 in escalated doses with increments of 10 mg/m2. The patients' median age was 60 years, 42 (89%) had a PS (WHO) 0-1, 16 (34%) were premenopausal and 25 (53%) had visceral disease. RESULTS: When the two drugs were given on the same day, the MTD1 was reached at the doses of Epi 60 mg/m2 and D 80 mg/m2; administration of G-CSF could not result in a dose intensification. When the drugs were given on two consecutive days, the MTD2 was reached at the doses of Epi 80 mg/m2 (d1) and D 90 mg/m2 (d2). The dose-limiting events were febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia, which developed in 30 (64%) patients during the study; among 227 delivered cycles grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 64 (28%) cycles but only 22 (10%) of them were complicated by fever. There were no septic deaths. Grade 1-2 neurosensory toxicity occurred in nine (19%) patients, mild edema in eight (17%) and allergic reactions in five (11%). Four (9%) patients presented a greater than 10% decrease of LVEF and treatment discontinuation was required in two of them; none of the patients developed congestive heart failure. Nevertheless, one patient suddenly died 10 days after treatment initiation of myocardial ischemia, and this death is considered treatment-related. Five (14.7%) complete and thirteen (38.2%) partial responses (ORR: 53.9%; 95% confidence interval: 36.1%-69.7%) were observed in 34 evaluable patients. Ten (29.4%) and six (17.6%) patients had stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median duration of response and time to tumor progression were five and seven months, respectively. The median survival has not yet been reached. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of epirubicin and docetaxel is a feasible and well tolerated regimen, but the MTD depends on the administration schedule of the drugs.

Salvage chemotherapy in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients with docetaxel and gemcitabine: a multicenter phase II trial. Greek Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: The activity of the docetaxel-gemcitabine combination in women with disease progression after initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was investigated in a multicenter phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with metastatic breast cancer who had disease relapse or progression after completion of an anthracycline-based front-line regimen were treated with gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 8. G-CSF 150 mucg/m2/d s.c. was given from day 9 to day 16 and the treatment was repeated every three weeks. The patients' median age was 57 years and the performance status (WHO) was 0 for 26, 1 for 20 and 2 for 6 patients. The treatment was second-line for 27 (52%) and > or = third-line for 25 (48%) patients. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. RESULTS: Complete response occurred in seven (14%) patients and partial response in 21 (40%) for an overall response rate of 54% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 40%-67%). Fifteen (29%) patients had stable disease and nine (17%) progressive disease. Of 25 patients previously treated with taxanes. 11 (44%) responded (1 CR, 10 PR). Interestingly, in four patients with disease progression while receiving docetaxel or paclitaxel monotherapy, the docetaxel + gemcitabine combination achieved partial responses. Responses were observed at all metastatic sites (local disease 62%, lymph nodes 58%, skin 44%, lung 47% and liver 36%) with a median duration of response of 3.6 months (range 1-16) and a median time to disease progression of eight months (range 2-18.5). Grade 3 neutropenia developed in 10 (19%) and grade 4 in five (10%) patients. Neutropenia was associated with infection in four patients without toxic deaths. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia developed in nine (17%) patients and grade 4 in two (4%). Non-hematologic toxicity was usually mild. CONCLUSION: The docetaxel-gemcitabine combination is an active and well tolerated salvage treatment in patients with MBC. Previous treatment with taxanes does not preclude a good clinical response to this regimen.

Diffuse large cell lymphomas: identification of prognostic factors and validation of the International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Index. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

Several clinical prognostic factors have been identified that predict treatment outcome in patients with diffuse large cell lymphomas. An International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Index (IPI) has been recently formulated. We tried to identify the clinical prognostic factors that predict treatment outcome in Greek patients with diffuse large cell lymphomas and validated the IPI in these patients. The possible prognostic variables for tumor response, relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in 239 consecutive patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens. In univariate analysis, factors associated with poor response were stages III-IV, performance status (PS) >/=2, spleen and bone marrow involvement, more than one extranodal site involved, increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) value, hemoglobin (Hb) <12 g/dl, albumin <3.5 g/dl, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >50 mm/h. Multivariate analysis identified stage, PS, more than one extranodal site involved, increased LDH level, and ESR > 50 mm/h as the factors more predictive of poor response. For RFS, multiple Cox analysis found stages III-IV and bone marrow involvement to be statistically significant. For OS, multiple Cox analysis identified stage III-IV, PS >/=2, bone marrow involvement, more than one extranodal site involved, increased LDH level and ESR > 50 mm/h as negative prognostic factors. Patients stratified in the different risk groups of the IPI had a significantly different outcome regarding complete response (CR) rate, RFS and OS. In conclusion, although age >60 years was not recognized as an adverse factor in this analysis, our patients stratified in the different groups of the IPI had significant differences in CR rate, 2-year RFS and OS verifying the prognostic significance of the index. Bone marrow involvement and ESR > 50 mm/h, parameters that are not included in the IPI, adversely affected survival.

Tropisetron in the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting in patients treated with high dose epirubicin.

Tropisetron is a novel selective antagonist of the type-3 serotonin (5-HT3) receptor, with proven efficacy in the control of emesis related to cancer treatment. Epirubicin in doses of > 100 mg/m2 has a high emetogenic potential. This study was designed to determine whether a single intravenous administration of tropisetron could prevent acute nausea and vomiting in patients treated with high dose epirubicin. Forty chemotherapy naive breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin at a dose of 110 mg/m2 on an outpatient basis were enrolled in the study. Tropisetron 5 mg i.v. was used as antiemetic prophylaxis. "On demand" treatment with tropisetron 5 mg p.os was used for the rescue of patients who failed on the initial i.v. dose. Complete control of acute nausea and vomiting had 62.5% (95% C.I. 47.2-77.8), partial control 15% (95% C.I. 3.8-26.2) and 22.5% (95% C.I. 9.3-35.7) insufficient control or failure. Headache was the most common adverse event reported in 3 patients (7.5%) and constipation in 2 patients (5%). Interestingly, patients with a negative experience of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy and those treated for metastatic disease, had a better control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. In conclusion, a single 5 mg i.v. dose of tropisetron is safe and effective in preventing acute emesis in patients treated with high dose epirubicin.

Chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin and carboplatin (Carbo-MVE) in transitional cell urothelial cancer. A Hellenic Co-Operative Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase II study in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of Carbo-MVE (carboplatin 250 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, methotrexate 25 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 15 and 22, vinblastine 2.5 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 15 and 22 and epirubicin 25 mg/m2 day 1). The regimen ws to be repeated every 28 days. METHODS: Forty-six patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder entered the study. Patients with metastatic disease were treated for 6 cycles, while patients with locally advanced or locoregional disease had 4 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by cystectomy or radiotherapy. RESULTS: Toxicity was generally mild and treatment well tolerated. The overall response rate was 54.4%, with 26% complete and 28.3% partial response rates. The median survival was 17.5 months with the complete responders to live significantly longer (64.82 months) than those who had a partial response (20.5 months), stable disease (15 months) or progressive disease (8.5 months). Survival was also significantly longer in patients with good performance status as well as in patients with locally advanced or locoregional disease. Finally, patients who had cystectomy as definitive treatment survived significantly longer (32 months) than those who had been irradiated (16 months). CONCLUSIONS: The Carbo-MVE regimen appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

A phase II study of paclitaxel in platinum pretreated ovarian cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study.

Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 175 mg/m2 in a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks in platinum pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. 51 patients with a median age of 57 years entered the study. 33 (65%) presented with stage III and 18 (35%) with stage IV disease. 39 patients (76%) were previously treated with only one and 12 (24%) with two regimens. The median interval from the last previous chemotherapy was 4 months (range, 1-65). Ninety-eight per cent of the planned dose of paclitaxel was actually delivered. Overall and complete response rate was 26% (13/51) and 16% (8/51), respectively. All complete responses were observed among patients previously treated with only one regimen. Median time to progression was 10.26 months (range, 4.9-25.2+) and median survival 15.6 months (range, 1.3-27.1+). Factors influencing survival were performance status and the number of previous regimens.

A randomized study of epirubicin monotherapy every four or every two weeks in advanced breast cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact on the response rate in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) of the doubling of the dose intensity (DI) of epirubicin monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1991 until April 1996, 167 patients with ABC were randomized to receive epirubicin (110 mg/m2) either every four (81 patients, group A) or every two weeks (86 patients, group B). Filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg/daily) was administered prophylactically on days 2-12 of each cycle. RESULTS: The two groups were equally balanced in terms of major patient and tumor characteristics. Even though the median cumulative dose of epirubicin was identical in the two groups (651 mg/m2), the median DI of epirubicin was doubled in group B (27.2 vs. 52.9 mg/m2/wk, respectively). The complete response (CR) rate was significantly increased in group B (5%, 95% CI: 0.16%-9.84% vs. 17%, 95% CI: 8.9%-25.08%, P = 0.011), although overall response rates were similar (49% vs. 53%, P = 0.5957). Also, there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 0.43-43.3+) no significant difference was observed in the duration of response (median, 10 months vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.5130), time to progression (median, 7.2 months vs. 7.4 months, P = 0.2970) or survival (median, 14.6 months vs. 14.9 months, P = 0.4483). Logistic regression analysis showed that performance status was a significant variable for response (P = 0.0068) and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that performance status was significant for survival (P = 0.0049), while the presence of multiple metastases (P = 0.0020) was significant for time to progression. CONCLUSION: Doubling the planned DI of epirubicin monotherapy significantly increases the CR rate but has no influence on time to progression or survival in patients with ABC.

Recombinant interferon ALFA-2A in combination with carboplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin in the treatment of advanced malignant melanoma.

Thirty-four patients with advanced malignant melanoma were treated with recombinant alpha-interferon (IFN) and chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin (CVB). CVB was given for four cycles and IFN for 1 year or until progression. Of the 34 analyzed patients, 17 (50%) achieved an objective response, including two complete (6%) and 15 partial responses (44%). Responses were noted in cutaneous, lymph node, and pulmonary sites, with a median time to disease progression of 5 months (range, 3-20 months). The median survival from onset of therapy was 8 months (range, 1-22 months) for the 34 patients. Ninety-four percent of the patients experienced flu-like symptoms and 82% fatigue or weakness. Leukopenia grade 3-4 was observed in four patients (12%). There were two toxicity-related deaths (6%); one from bleomycin-induced pneumonitis and one from neutropenic sepsis. It is concluded that the addition of IFN to CVB regimen, in this study, showed no apparent advantage on response rates, disease-free interval, or survival. The observed treatment-related mortality was unacceptably high. IFN administered as maintenance therapy following CVB conferred no survival benefit.

Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil and interferon-gamma in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

Preclinical data have shown a synergism between 5-fluorouracil and interferon-gamma against human colon carcinoma cell lines. We conducted a phase II trial of this combination in 34 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. 5-Fluorouracil was administered as an intravenous bolus of 500 mg/m2 weekly and interferon-gamma subcutaneous injection at a dose of 200 micrograms (6 x 10(6) IU) 3 times a week. Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. There was one complete and two partial responses (response rate 9.0%, 95% CI 1.98-25.02%). Eleven patients (34%) had stable disease. Common toxicities included fever 81%, nausea/vomiting 19%, diarrhea 16%, flu-like syndrome 16%, malaise 12.5% and leukopenia 12.5%. These results indicate that the above combination of 5-fluorouracil and interferon-gamma has an unimpressive activity in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Toxicity was very tolerable.

Cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, fluorouracil versus conventional CMF as adjuvant treatment in node-positive breast cancer patients. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

362 evaluable node-positive patients with stage II breast cancer were randomized, receiving either 6 cycles of conventional CMF or 6 cycles of the combination of cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2), mitoxantrone (Novantrone 10 mg/m2), and fluorouracil (500 mg/m2; CNF). After a median follow-up of 51 months, 64 (36%) patients relapsed in the CMF group and 60 (33%) in the CNF group (p=0.8276). By Cox multivariate analysis, tumor size, menopausal status and number of involved nodes were retained as independently significant variables. Toxicities were remarkably similar in both groups. It appears that after a median follow-up of 51 months there is no significant difference in relapse-free survival between node-positive patients with breast cancer who received either 6 cycles of the conventional CMF or the CNF combination as adjuvant treatment.

A phase II study of paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines.

33 women with advanced breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3 h infusion every 3 weeks. The median age was 53 years (range 30-72) and the median performance status was 1 (range 0-2). 24 (73%) patients had visceral metastases while 22 (67%) had > or = two involved sites. 23 (70%) patients received anthracycline or mitoxantrone in an adjuvant setting and 21 (64%) for advanced disease. There were two (6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1-20%) complete responses (CRs) and 12 (36%, 95% CI 20-55%) partial responses (PRs). Median dose intensity of paclitaxel delivered was 58 mg/m2/week. Median time to progression was 24 weeks (range 4-61) and median survival was 41 weeks (range 8-66). Grade 3-4 toxicities included leucopenia (9%), stomatitis (3%), alopecia (91%), neurotoxicity (9%), infection (3%) and diarrhoea (3%). In conclusion, paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 exhibits significant activity in advanced breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines.

High-dose epirubicin and r-met-hu G-CSF (filgrastim) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study.

The delivery of high-dose epirubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer usually entails serious myelotoxicity and frequent treatment delays. Concurrent administration of G-CSF probably allows the administration of epirubicin on schedule with minimal morbidity. From August 1990 to February 1992, 42 women with advanced breast cancer were treated with six cycles of epirubicin 110 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg per day for 14 days was administered subcutaneously starting 24 hours after chemotherapy. All patients had multiple metastatic sites, and 39 had visceral metastases. All cases were evaluable for response, toxicity, and survival. Treatment was delayed in only two cases. The actually administered average dose per unit time per patient amounted to 99.6% of the dose prescribed by the protocol. Two (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [C.I.] 0-16%) patients demonstrated a complete response and 14 (33%; 95% C.I. 19-49%) a partial response. Median time to progression was 31 weeks and median survival was 60 weeks. Severe granulocytopenia was seen in six patients; stomatitis and diarrhea in one patient each. Myoskeletal pain was noticed in 23 (55%) patients, while cardiac problems were reported in 3 cases. The present study shows that the prophylactic use of r-met-hu G-CSF allows the administration of high-dose epirubicin every 4 weeks with minimal morbidity and an improved quality of life.

Intensive chemotherapy with high-dose epirubicin every 2 weeks and prophylactic administration of filgrastim in advanced breast cancer.

50 women with advanced breast cancer were treated with an intensified regimen which consisted of high-dose epirubicin (110 mg/m2) every 2 weeks and filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg) subcutaneously for 13 days, starting 24 h after chemotherapy. 44 patients completed all six cycles. The median interval between cycles of treatment was 14.3 days. The actually administered median dose per unit time per patient was 53 mg/m2/week, amounting to 97.2% of the dose prescribed by the protocol. 7 [14%, 95% confidence interval (C.I.) 4-24%] patients achieved a complete and 25 (50%, 95% C.I. 36-64%) a partial response. Median time to progression was 32 weeks and median survival 64 weeks. Stomatitis and fever each occurred in 7 (14%) patients. Grade 3 haematological toxicity was observed in 6 (12%) patients. 1 (2%) patient developed grade 4 cardiac toxicity. This intensified regimen appears to be a well tolerated and effective treatment in advanced breast cancer.

Carboplatin and oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer refractory to anthracyclines.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of the carboplatin and oral etoposide combination in patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were treated with a maximum of 6 cycles of carboplatin (300 mg/m2) and etoposide (200 mg/m2) every 4 weeks. Prior treatment with an anthracycline was given as adjuvant in 17 patients and as first line treatment for advanced disease in 10 patients. RESULTS: Only 12 (44%) patients completed all 6 cycles of chemotherapy. The median administered dose of carboplatin was 72 mg/m2/week and of etoposide 143 mg/m2/week. Two (7.5%) complete and 4 (15%) partial responses were observed. Both complete responses occurred in patients who received only mitoxantrone-containing adjuvant treatment, and lasted for 36 and 92+ weeks. The main toxicities included anemia (56%), leukopenia (56%), nausea/vomiting (50%) and alopecia (79%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin and oral etoposide is effective and should probably be considered as an alternative therapeutic option for patients with advanced breast cancer refractory to anthracyclines.