Short-term outcome of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy used as treatment of colo-rectal carcinomatosis: a multicentric study.

The aim of this study is to assess the morbidity and mortality related to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with colo-rectal carcinomatosis. A retrospective multi-institutional study from seven Italian Centers was performed. One hundred and seventy-two patients, submitted to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat carcinomatosis of colorectal origin, were recorded. Postoperative morbidity was evaluated in accordance with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03. Post-operative mortality was evaluated as patients' death within 60 days from surgical procedures. Predictors of morbidity were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. Post-operative morbidity occurred in 83 patients (48.3%): grades 1-2 in 29 cases (16.9%), and grades 3-4 in 54 (31.4%). Mortality occurred in four cases (2.3%). Number of anastomoses (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.05-2.00; p = 0.024), number of blood transfusions (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.11-1.54; p = 0.001) and chemotherapy regimen [Oxaliplatin (OX): OR 2.87; 95% CI 1.22-6.75; p = 0.015] remained, in multivariate analysis, in a statistically significant correlation with overall morbidity. The only variable that was proven to have statistically significant correlation with 3-4 morbidity was the number of blood transfusions (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.07-1.46; p = 0.005). Morbidity and mortality do not preclude the use of CRS plus HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin.

Characterization and preventability of adverse drug events as cause of emergency department visits: a prospective 1-year observational study.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a significant cause of emergency department (ED) visits, with a major impact on healthcare resource utilization. A multicentre observational study, aimed to describe frequency, seriousness and preventability of ADEs reported in four EDs, was performed in Sicily (Italy) over a 1-year period. METHODS: Two trained monitors for each ED supported clinicians in identifying ADEs of patients admitted to EDs between June 1st, 2013 and May 31st, 2014 through a systematic interview of patients or their caregivers and with an additional record review. A research team analyzed each case of suspected ADE, to make a causality assessment applying the Naranjo algorithm and a preventability assessment using Schumock and Thornton criteria. Absolute and percentage frequencies with 95% confidence interval (CI) and medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) were estimated. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate independent predictors of serious and certainly preventable ADEs. RESULTS: Out of 16,963 ED visits, 575 (3.4%) were associated to ADEs, of which 15.1% resulted in hospitalization. ADEs were classified as probable in 45.9%, possible in 51.7% and definite in 2.4% of the cases. Moreover, ADEs were considered certainly preventable in 12.3%, probably preventable in 58.4%, and not preventable in 29.2% of the cases. Polytherapy influenced the risk to experience a serious, as well as a certainly preventable ADE. Whilst, older age resulted an independent predictor only of serious events. The most common implicated drug classes were antibiotics (34.4%) and anti-inflammatory drugs (22.6%). ADEs due to psycholeptics and antiepileptics resulted preventable in 62.7 and 54.5% of the cases, respectively. Allergic reactions (64%) were the most frequent cause of ADE-related ED visits, followed by neurological effects (10.2%) that resulted preventable in 1.9 and 37.3% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: ADEs are a frequent cause of ED visits. The commonly used antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs should be carefully managed, as they are widely involved in mild to severe ADEs. Polytherapy is associated with the occurrence of serious, as well as certainly preventable ADEs, while older age only with serious events. A greater sensitivity to drug monitoring programs among health professionals is needed.

Overview of the Safety of Anti-VEGF Drugs: Analysis of the Italian Spontaneous Reporting System.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs are widely used for the treatment of several cancers and retinal diseases. The systemic use of anti-VEGF drugs has been associated with an increased risk of serious adverse reactions. Whether this risk is also related to intravitreal administration of anti-VEGF drugs is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the safety of anti-VEGF drugs in oncology and ophthalmology settings using the Italian Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS). METHODS: We selected all suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports attributed to anti-VEGF drugs and conducted descriptive frequency analyses stratified by indication of use. As a measure of disproportionality, we calculated the proportional reporting ratio with 95% confidence intervals at the level of standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) queries (SMQs). RESULTS: Of a total of 2472 anti-VEGF drug-related reports, 2173 (87.9%) and 299 (12.1%) were attributed to systemic and intravitreal use of these drugs, respectively. The frequency of serious ADRs reported was higher for intravitreal administration of anti-VEGF drugs than for systemic use in patients with cancer (58.9 vs. 34.1%) (p < 0.001) and were disproportionally associated with ischemic heart disease and thromboembolic and cerebrovascular events. Most serious ADRs related to anti-VEGF drugs in patients with cancer are known and clinically relevant (e.g., gastrointestinal and vascular disorders). CONCLUSIONS: This study documented that serious ADRs and systemic toxicity may occur not only with systemic use of anti-VEGF drugs in patients with cancer but also with intravitreal administration. Close monitoring of cardio/cerebrovascular adverse events should be considered during treatment with all anti-VEGF drugs.