Seroprevalence of neuronal antibodies in diseases mimicking autoimmune encephalitis.

Detection of neuronal antibodies for autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes relies on commercially available cell-based assays and lineblots. However, lineblots may reveal the presence of neuronal antibodies in patients with various non-autoimmune etiologies. Herein we describe patients with non-autoimmune etiologies (cohort B) and detectable neuronal antibodies and compare them to definite cases of autoimmune encephalitis (cohort A) for differences in clinical data. All patients positive for at least one neuronal antibody were retrospectively evaluated for autoimmune encephalitis and/or paraneoplastic neurological syndrome between 2016 and 2022. 39 cases in cohort B and 23 in cohort A were identified. In cohort B, most common diagnoses were neurodegenerative disorders in 9/39 (23.1%), brain tumors in 6/39 (15.4%) while most common detected antibodies were anti-titin (N10), anti-recoverin (N11), anti-Yo (N8) and all were detected in serum only. Differential aspects between cohort A and B were CSF pleocytosis (14/23 (60.8%) vs 11/35 (31.4%), p = 0.042, respectively), MRI features suggestive of encephalitis (6/23 (26.1%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.002, respectively) and epilepsy restricted to temporal lobes (14/23 (60.9%) vs 2/30 (6.7%), p = 0.0003, respectively). A large proportion of lineblot results were non-specific when only serum was tested and were frequently found in non-autoimmune neurological conditions.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is superior to alemtuzumab in patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis and severe disability.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences of treatment outcomes regarding disease activity in patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or alemtuzumab (ATZ). METHODS: Open-label prospective single-center observational cohort study, enrolling patients with highly active RMS for treatment with ATZ or HSCT between 2014 and 2021. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (31/50 (62 %) in HSCT vs 19/50 (38 %) in ATZ group) were included. There were no significant differences in relapse rate, MRI activity or disability worsening between the two study groups during the first two years after treatment onset. However, at 3 to 5 years follow-up, HSCT was superior to ATZ in all the aforementioned aspects. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 5 years post treatment revealed superiority of HSCT in relapse rate (69.6 % vs 95.7 %, p = 0.027), MRI activity (54.5 % vs 75.1 %, p = 0.038) and disability worsening (57.1 % vs 90.9 %, p =  0.031). CONCLUSIONS: ATZ may halt disability progression early in the course of highly active RMS, but the disability starts accumulating later, while in HSCT patients disability improvement is consistent both 3 and 5 years after treatment onset.

Tumefactive demyelinating disorders as stroke mimics: Description of cases and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: tumefactive multiple sclerosis (TmMS) is a rare subtype of a demyelinating disease that develops over time. Cases of hyperacute presentations mimicking cerebrovascular disorders have been reported; however, detailed clinical and demographic data are lacking. METHODS: this study aimed to systematically review the literature on tumefactive demyelinating disorders presenting as strokes. After screening the PubMed, PubMed Central, and Web of Science databases, 39 articles describing 41 patients were identified, including 2 historical patients from our center. RESULTS: 23 (53.4%) patients were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis variants (vMS), 17 (39.5%) with inflammatory demyelinating variants (vInf), and 3 with tumors; however, only 43.5% of cases were verified histologically. In subgroup analysis, vMS differed from vInf in several aspects. Inflammatory cerebral spinal fluid parameters, including pleocytosis, proteinorachia was more commonly observed in vInf [11 (64.7%) vs. 1 (5.2%), P = 0.001 and 13/17 (76.4%) vs. 6/23 (31.5%), P = 0.02] than that in vMS. Neurological deterioration and fatal outcomes were more commonly observed in vInf [13/17 (76.4%) vs. 7/23 (30.4%), P = 0.003, and 11/17 (64.7%) vs. 0/23 (0%), P = 0.0001] than that in vMS. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicodemographic data might aid in recognizing different subtypes of TmMS and warrant consideration of unconventional therapies because outcomes may be poor in the vInf of TmMS.

Detection of aquaporin-4 antibodies for patients with CNS inflammatory demyelinating diseases other than typical MS in Lithuania.

OBJECTIVES: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is frequently associated with aquaporin-4 autoantibodies (AQP4-Ab); however, studies of NMO in Lithuania are lacking. Therefore, the main objective of our study is to assess positivity for AQP4-Ab in patients presenting with inflammatory demyelinating central nervous system (CNS) diseases other than typical multiple sclerosis (MS) in Lithuania. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the two largest University hospitals in Lithuania. During the study period, there were 121 newly diagnosed typical MS cases, which were included in the MS registry database. After excluding these typical MS cases, we analyzed the remaining 29 cases of other CNS inflammatory demyelinating diseases, including atypical MS (n = 14), acute transverse myelitis, TM (n = 8), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, ADEM (n = 3), clinically isolated syndrome, CIS (n = 2), atypical optic neuritis, ON (n = 1), and NMO (n = 1). We assessed positivity for AQP4-Ab for the 29 patients and evaluated clinical, laboratory, and instrumental differences between AQP4-Ab seropositive and AQP4-Ab seronegative patient groups. RESULTS: AQP4-Ab test was positive for three (10.3%) patients in our study, with initial diagnoses of atypical MS (n = 2) and ADEM (n = 1). One study patient was AQP4-Ab negative despite being previously clinically diagnosed with NMO. There were no significant clinical, laboratory, or instrumental differences between the groups of AQP4-Ab positive (3 [10.3%]) and negative (26 [89.7%]) patients. CONCLUSIONS: AQP4-Ab test was positive for one-tenth of patients with CNS inflammatory demyelinating diseases other than typical MS in our study. AQP4-Ab testing is highly recommended for patients presenting with not only TM and ON but also an atypical course of MS and ADEM.