A Qualitative Exploration of Sacred Moments in Radiation Oncology.

Purpose: While there are many benefits to radiation oncology services, there can be emotional burdens in the care of patients with advanced cancer. Burnout is a prevalent problem in oncology. Existing literature suggests refocusing attention on providers' sense of purpose to protect against burnout. "Sacred moments" are moments of deep interconnection between people with accompanying spiritual emotions such as awe, joy, and gratitude. These moments naturally occur in health care settings, offering potential benefits to both patient and provider. Little is known about the prevalence and impact of sacred moments among health care workers in a radiation oncology setting. Methods and Materials: We conducted an exploratory qualitative study of 13 semi-structured interviews among physicians, registered nurses, and advanced practice providers of a radiation oncology consult service at a large National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center between March and May 2023. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify key themes. Data were systematically coded and analyzed in NVivo software and organized into a codebook organized by domains and themes. Results: Of the 13 health care workers interviewed, 12 interviewees reported experiencing at least one sacred moment during their clinical careers. None of the interviewees were initially familiar with the term; however, all understood the concept once explained. Interview findings were organized into four domains: (1) common elements, (2) impact, (3) barriers, and (4) provider reactions. Common elements included a moment of deep interconnection between provider and patient, often involving end-of-life patients. The impact of these moments was most commonly described as an increased sense of purpose in their role. Lack of time with patients was the most common barrier. Conclusions: Sacred moments are commonly experienced by health care workers in a radiation oncology consult service. They helped to humanize the patient, buffer against provider burnout, and increase a sense of purpose and job satisfaction.

Feasibility and acceptability of a parent-child intervention to improve step count in childhood cancer survivors exposed to cardiotoxic therapy: The STEP UP for FAMILIES Study.

BACKGROUND: Late morbidity after childhood cancer may be mitigated by healthy lifestyle behaviors. We piloted a game-based, parent-child digital intervention to increase activity in sedentary survivors. METHODS: Survivors aged 10-16 treated with cardiotoxic therapy and not meeting US physical activity guidelines were enrolled in a single-arm study with a parent. Following a 14-day run-in, participants chose a prespecified step goal and wore an accelerometer daily for 24 weeks (12-week game-based intervention; 12-week follow-up). Participants completed the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) at 24 weeks; a subset of dyads completed qualitative interviews. RESULTS: Among 129 eligible survivors, 27 enrolled (20.9% participation rate) with a parent. Four dyads were removed during the 14-day run-in period due to noncompliance. Among the 23 dyads who continued to the study, the tracker was worn for 95% of days during the 12-week intervention (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94-96) and 81% during the 12-week follow-up (95% CI: 79-82). Overall, the prespecified step goal was met for 64% (95% CI: 63-66) of days during the intervention and 37% (95% CI: 35-38) during the follow-up. At the end of study, 17/23 dyads responded to AIM; 82% of survivors and 94% of parents reported the intervention as acceptable. During qualitative interviews (n = 5), dyads noted that they liked the accountability of the "buddy system," but would have liked more personalized goal-setting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high ratings of acceptability among participants, difficulties with sustained adherence and retention were encountered in this parent-child gamification intervention. Alternate, tailored designs should be considered in the future.

Distress, Pain, and Nausea on Postoperative Days 1 and 14 in Women Recovering From Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Repeated-Measures Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and trajectory of distress, pain, and nausea and vomiting at postoperative day (POD) 1 and at POD 14 following breast-conserving surgery. SAMPLE & SETTING: 75 women aged 18 years or older receiving breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy for treatment of early-stage primary breast cancer at an ambulatory surgery center. METHODS & VARIABLES: This prospective, repeated-measures study assessed distress, pain, and nausea and vomiting using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List on POD 1 and POD 14. RESULTS: Pain and distress scores were highest on POD 1. The number of women who reported depression increased from POD 1 to POD 14. Thematic analysis revealed that family concerns, fears and worries, and postoperative issues contributed to pain and distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Women experience pain and distress during recovery at home after breast-conserving surgery. Nurses can use these results to apply evidence-based practice to reduce this symptom burden. Future nursing research should focus on targeted interventions outside of the hospital setting.

Feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of empathic communication skills training to reduce lung cancer stigma in Nigeria: a pilot study.

Effective communication about cancer diagnosis and prognosis in sub-Saharan African oncology settings is often challenged by the cancer-related shame and stigma patients and families experience. Enhancing empathic communication between health care providers, including physicians and nurses, and oncology patients and their families can not only reduce cancer stigma but also improve patient engagement, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life. To reduce lung cancer stigma, we adapted an evidence-based empathic communication skills training intervention to reduce patients' experience of stigma in Nigeria and conducted a pilot study examining the feasibility and acceptability of the empathic communication skills training. Thirty health care providers, recruited from University College Hospital, Ibadan, and Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, participated in a 2.25-hour didactic and experiential training session. Participant surveys were completed before and after the training. Overall, participants reported highly favorable training evaluations, with at least 85% of health care providers agreeing or strongly agreeing to survey items assessing training relevance, novelty, clarity, and facilitator effectiveness. Self-efficacy to communicate empathically with patients increased significantly from before-training (Mean [SD] = 3.93 [0.28]) to after-training (Mean [SD] = 4.55 [0.15]; t29 = 3.51, P < .05). Significant improvements were observed in health care provider reports of empathy toward lung cancer survivors and attitude toward lung cancer care as well as significant reductions in lung cancer blame were noted. The empathic communication skills training was feasible, well received by oncology clinicians in Nigeria, and demonstrated improvements in health care provider-reported outcomes from before- to after-training.

BREAST-Q REACT: Qualitative Assessment of the Design, Functionality, and Clinical Utility of a New Score Interpretation Tool.

BACKGROUND: The BREAST-Q real-time engagement and communication tool (REACT) was developed to aid with BREAST-Q score interpretation and guide patient-centered care. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the perspectives of patients and providers on the design, functionality, and clinical utility of REACT and refine the REACT based on their recommendations. METHODS: We conducted three patient focus groups with women who were at least 6 postoperative months from their postmastectomy breast reconstruction, and two provider focus groups with plastic surgeons, breast surgeons, and advanced practice providers. Focus groups were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: A total of 18 breast reconstruction patients and 14 providers participated in the focus groups. Themes identified by thematic analysis were organized into two categories: (1) design and functionality, and (2) clinical utility. On the design and functionality of REACT, four major themes were identified: visual appeal and usefulness; contextualizing results; ability to normalize patients' experiences, noting participants' concerns; and suggested modifications. On the clinical utility of REACT, three major themes were identified: potential to empower patients to communicate with their providers; increase patient and provider motivation to engage with the BREAST-Q; and effective integration into clinical workflow. CONCLUSION: Patients and providers in this qualitative study indicated that with some modifications, REACT has a great potential to elevate the clinical utility of the BREAST-Q by enhancing patient-provider communication that can lead to patient-centered, clinically relevant action recommendations based on longitudinal BREAST-Q scores.

When Is Telemedicine Appropriate in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer? A Mixed-Methods Assessment Among Patients and Physicians.

PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that oncology patients are satisfied with and sometimes prefer telemedicine compared with in-person visits; however, data are scarce on when telemedicine is appropriate for specific cancer populations. In this study, we aim to identify factors that influence patient experience and appropriateness of telemedicine use among a head and neck cancer (HNC) population. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods study at a multisite cancer center. First, we surveyed patients with HNC and analyzed factors that may influence their telemedicine experience using multivariate regression. We then conducted focus groups among HNC oncologists (n = 15) to evaluate their perception on appropriate use of telemedicine. RESULTS: From January to December 2020, we collected 1,071 completed surveys (response rate 24%), of which 551 first unique surveys were analyzed. About half of all patients (56%) reported telemedicine as "same or better" compared with in-person visits, whereas the other half (44%) reported "not as good or unsure." In multivariate analyses, patients with thyroid cancer were more likely to find telemedicine "same or better" (adjusted odds ratio, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.35 to 3.25]) compared with other HNC populations (mucosal/salivary HNC). Consistently, physician focus group noted that patients with thyroid cancer were particularly suited for telemedicine because of less emphasis on in-person examinations. Physicians also underscored factors that influence telemedicine use, including clinical suitability (treatment status, visit purpose, examination necessity), patient benefits (travel time, access), and barriers (technology, rapport-building). CONCLUSION: Patient experience with telemedicine is diverse among the HNC population. Notably, patients with thyroid cancer had overall better experience and were identified to be more appropriate for telemedicine compared with other patients with HNC. Future research that optimizes patient experience and selection is needed to ensure successful integration of telemedicine into routine oncology practice.

Patient and Clinician Stakeholder Perspectives on a Patient Portal Questionnaire Eliciting Illness and Treatment Understanding and Core Health-Related Values.

Introduction: Person-centered communication is foundational to cancer care. In pilot research, a questionnaire eliciting patients' illness and treatment understanding (ITU) and core health-related values (HRV) through the electronic patient portal demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy. The aim of this study was to elicit stakeholder feedback to refine the design of the portal-based intervention, remain end-user centered, and optimize future system-wide integration. Methods: Between April and June 2023, we purposively sampled patients and clinicians from a previous pilot study to participate in a 20-30-minute semistructured interview about their opinions of and experiences with the portal questionnaire on ITU and HRV. An interdisciplinary coding team used a two-phase rapid analysis to identify themes, subthemes, and illustrative participant quotations. Results: Fourteen patients (mean age = 68 years) and 12 clinicians participated (total n = 26). Colorectal cancer was the commonest malignancy (64%) among patients. Clinicians were mostly physicians (50%), nurse practitioners (33%), and registered nurses (17%), with two-thirds having >15 years of experience in their specialty. Analysis generated four themes: (1) clinical utility of questionnaire, (2) barriers to questionnaire implementation, (3) considerations and strategies for modifying the questionnaire, and (4) considerations and strategies for questionnaire implementation. Themes captured key information about incorporating this questionnaire into clinical practice. Conclusion: Patients with cancer and their clinicians found a portal-based ITU and HRV questionnaire clinically useful to improve multiple aspects of person-centered communication. Participant recommendations about questionnaire timing and sharing of questionnaire responses with the clinical team will inform future questionnaire implementation and scaling in clinical settings.