The value of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review to analyse the performance of the sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy, compared to axillary lymph-node dissection. METHODS: The more relevant databases were searched. Main outcomes were false-negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph-node identification rate (SLNIR), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. The pooled FNR was 0.14 (95% CI 0.11-0.17), the pooled SLNIR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92), NPV was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87), and summary accuracy was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94). SLNB performed better when more than one node was removed and double mapping was used. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB can be performed in women with a node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy. It has a better performance when used with previous marking of the affected node and with double tracer.

The value of sentinel lymph-node biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy: an overview.

PURPOSE: We conducted a systematic review to analyse the performance of the sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared to axillary lymph-node dissection, in terms of false-negative rate (FNR) and sentinel lymph-node identification rate (SLNIR), sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), need for axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND), morbidity, preferences, and costs. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library were searched. We assessed the quality of the included systematic reviews using AMSTAR2 tool, and estimated the degree of overlapping of the individual studies on the included reviews. RESULTS: Six systematic reviews with variable quality were selected. We observed a very high overlapping degree across the included reviews. The FNR and the SLNIR were quite consistent (FNR 13-14%; SLNIR ~ 90% or higher). In women with initially clinically node-negative breast cancer, the FNR was better (6%), with similar SLNIR (96%). The included reviews did not consider the other prespecified outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: It would be reasonable to suggest performing an SLNB in patients treated with NACT, adjusting the procedure to the previous marking of the affected lymph node, using double tracer, and biopsy of at least three sentinel lymph nodes. More well-designed research is needed. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020114403.

GEICAM Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women in Spain. During the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, patients with BC still require timely treatment and follow-up; however, hospitals are overwhelmed with infected patients and, if exposed, patients with BC are at higher risk for infection and serious complications if infected. Thus, health care providers need to evaluate each BC treatment and in-hospital visit to minimize pandemic-associated risks while maintaining adequate treatment efficacy. Here we present a set of guidelines regarding available options for BC patient management and treatment by BC subtype in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Owing to the lack of evidence about COVID-19 infection, these recommendations are mainly based on expert opinion, medical organizations' and societies' recommendations, and some published evidence. We consider this a useful tool to facilitate medical decision making in this health crisis situation we are facing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work presents a set of guidelines regarding available options for breast cancer (BC) patient management and treatment by BC subtype in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Owing to the suddenness of this health crisis, specialists have to make decisions with little evidence at hand. Thus, these expert guidelines may be a useful tool to facilitate medical decision making in the context of a worldwide pandemic with no resources to spare.

Can invasive breast carcinoma with close or positive margins be managed without a new surgery?

We present the long-term outcome (FU 127 months) of a prospective study with 248 breast cancer patients with close or positive surgical margin, treated with 50 Gy whole breast irradiation plus high-dose-rate boost, 3 × 4.4 Gy. Actuarial breast failure at 10/15 years was 6.5%/11.6%; with positive margin (120) 6.8%/14.8%, with margin ≤2 mm (76) 9.8%/9.8%, with margin >2 mm <5 mm (52) 2%/2%. In 90 patients aged ≤50 was 11.9%/17.8%, between 51 and 70, 3.8%/8.2%, >70, 0%. Fibrosis appeared in 26.7%. Cosmetic outcome was excellent/good in 85.8%. This approach avoids a second surgery in women >50 with positive surgical margin, or with close margins in all ages.

Multicenter validation of two nomograms to predict non-sentinel node involvement in breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Nomograms are used to predict the involvement of non-sentinel nodes (nSN) in breast cancer. This study attempts to externally validate two of the more commonly used nomograms (MSKCC and Stanford University). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred and one cases of positive SNB with posterior axillary lymphadenectomy from 11 Spanish hospitals with widespread experience of the technique were studied. In all cases, an estimate of the probability of nSN involvement was made using the MSKCC and the Stanford University nomograms. Discrimination was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. To assess the calibration of the nomogram, observed probability was plotted against the nomogram-calculated predicted probability. RESULTS: The overall predictive accuracy of the MSKCC nomogram was 0.684 (95 % confidence interval, 0.635-0.732), while in the case of that from Stanford the predictive accuracy was 0.658 (95 % confidence interval 0.607-0.709). The mean predicted probability of nSN metastases in each group of patients was correlated with the observed probability with an acceptable concordance (r = 0.820; p < 0.004 in MSKCC nomogram and r = 0.888; p < 0.001 in Stanford nomogram). CONCLUSION: These nomograms can be useful tools in the evaluation of patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel nodes but other factors, including a comprehensive clinical assessment, must be used to decide the most appropriate surgical approach for an individual patient, especially with regard to avoiding unnecessary lymphadenectomy.

Selective sentinel lymph node biopsy and primary systemic therapy in breast cancer.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become an ordinary method for breast cancer staging. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been considered one of the contraindications for sentinel lymph node biopsy due to potential secondary fibrosis and lymphatic distortion. Timing and influence on sentinel lymph node biopsy result by primary systemic therapy are current and controversial topics. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: The experience in the medical literature is reviewed. A search was performed in the following databases: Medline (through Pubmed), EMBASE, Tripdatabase and Cochrane Library, between January 1998 and December 2008. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: After analyzing the conclusions from 42 series and waiting for the end of related prospective trials, it could be concluded that sentinel lymph node biopsy is a useful diagnostic tool that should be integrated in the algorithm for the management of breast cancer patients when primary systemic therapy is needed.

[Consensus meeting on sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Spanish society of mastology and breast disease]. / Reunión de Consenso sobre la Biopsia Selectiva del Ganglio Centinela en el Cáncer de Mama. Socidad Española de Senología y Patología Mamaria.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a useful diagnostic technique in the management of breast cancer and is widely used and accepted in clinical practice. The results of this technique allow adequate staging with lower associated morbidity. However, at present, there are numerous methodological issues that remain to be resolved in on-going trials and investigations and Consensus Meetings are required to standardize the methodological variations and indications of this procedure. The conclusions of the Consensus Meeting held in Murcia, Spain, organized by The Spanish Society of Mastology and Breast Disease, are reported in this document.

Cytokine expression and dendritic cell density in melanoma sentinel nodes.

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) is the first draining node from the area in which a tumour is located. The presence or absence of SLN micrometastasis is an important prognostic factor for melanoma. As the first dissemination route for melanoma is lymphatic and we know that the immune system plays an important role in melanoma response, we hypothesize that melanoma and its corresponding SLN should constitute an immunological unit. Small portions of 54 SLNs from 37 patients undergoing selective lymphadenectomy were subjected to quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to quantify messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts of the following genes: tyrosinase, telomerase, cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), COX-2, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), IL-4, IL-10 and IL-12. In addition, 11 non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) were excised from 11 of the 37 patients and the same study was performed. Immunohistochemistry with different antibodies against dendritic cells (DCs) was performed in 10 pairs of SLNs and NSLNs. Significantly higher mRNA expression of COX-2, GM-CSF, IFN-gamma and IL-10 was found in SLNs compared with NSLNs in the overall group. DCs, as labelled by S-100 and CD1a, were significantly decreased in NSLNs compared with SLNs. These data suggest that the initial increase in GM-CSF observed in SLNs could lead to the attraction of a high number of DCs to SLNs. However, the presence of certain immunosuppressive molecules, such as IL-10 and COX-2, could block their maturation and their ability to become efficient antigen presenters.