Development of a UK liver transplantation selection and allocation scheme.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Equitable allocation of organs for liver transplantation remains a major area of ongoing study. In United Kingdom, it was agreed that the success of any national donor offering scheme would be judged from the point of registration on a national list for a transplant, and would therefore include outcome while waiting for the procedure. RECENT FINDINGS: Standard minimal criteria for acceptance onto a transplant list have been developed for chronic liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma and for a number of variant syndromes where current scores do not adequately reflect the risk of death without a transplant or symptom burden. Allocation by need, or on the basis of utility, or by transplant benefit (net life years gained) were compared in a simulation against current unit-based allocation. A transplant benefit model was shown to reduce deaths on the waiting list and maximise population life years. SUMMARY: Since March 2018, liver donors after brain death in United Kingdom have been offered to a national list prioritised by net life years gained - transplant benefit.

Liver transplant listing for hepatitis C-associated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma has fallen in the United Kingdom since the introduction of direct-acting antiviral therapy.

Following the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA), there have been reports of declining incidence of hepatitis C (HCV)-related liver disease as a liver transplantation indication. In this study, we assessed the impact of DAA on liver transplant indications in the UK and waiting list outcomes for patients with HCV. We assessed UK adult elective liver transplant registrants between 2006 and 2017. The aetiology of liver disease at registration was reclassified using an accepted hierarchical system and changes were assessed over time and compared before and after the introduction of DAA. Registration UKELD scores and 1-year waiting list outcomes were also compared. The proportion of waiting list patients registered with HCV-related cirrhosis reduced after the introduction of DAA from 10.5% in 2013 to 4.7% in 2016 (P < 0.001). Alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) was the leading indication for liver transplantation followed by liver cancer (26.1% and 18.4% in 2016, respectively). The proportion of registrations with Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with HCV reduced from 46.4% in 2013 to 33.7% in 2016 (P = 0.002). For patients with HCV-related cirrhosis at one year the outcomes of death, transplantation, delisting due to improvement or deterioration and awaiting a graft at 1 year were similar. For patients with HCV-related HCC, the proportion dying at 1 year reduced significantly from 2.9% to 0.0% (P = 0.04). These data demonstrate an association between DAA and reduced listing rates for HCV-related cirrhosis and HCC, but no significant changes in waiting list outcomes other than reduced mortality in the HCC group.

International comparison of liver transplant programmes: differences in indications, donor and recipient selection and outcome between Italy and UK.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Comparing liver transplant (LT) programmes internationally can improve outcomes by stimulating cross-national learning. Yet, comparison of crude outcomes, by using registry data, is limited by missing data, not allowing proper risk-adjustment for donor- and recipient-related factors. The objective of this study was to compare two European LT programmes based on high-quality national longitudinal databases prospectively collected in Italy and UK respectively. METHODS: We undertook a multicentre, international cohort study including all adults who underwent a first single organ LT in Italy (N = 1480) and the UK (N = 1003) between June 2007 and May 2009. RESULTS: Italian donors were much older compared to the UK ones. Hepatitis C virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma had higher prevalence in the Italian cohort compared to the UK one (47.5% vs. 23.1%, and 47.2% vs. 17.1% respectively). Centres' volume differed significantly, with five centres out of seven in UK vs. only two out of 20 in Italy performing >60 transplants per year. No national strategies to drive the donor-recipient matching were identified in both countries. After appropriate adjustment, a higher risk of early transplant loss was identified in the Italian cohort, whereas no differences were found in the 3-year survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: International comparison of LT programmes provides the opportunity for benchmarking between heterogeneous healthcare systems and should ideally become a vital part of national quality assurance programmes. This requires the implementation of a standardized methodology for data collection to appropriately weigh each country's patient case-mix and donor and recipients risk factors.

Time spent in hospital after liver transplantation: Effects of primary liver disease and comorbidity.

AIM: To explore the effect of primary liver disease and comorbidities on transplant length of stay (TLOS) and LOS in later admissions in the first two years after liver transplantation (LLOS). METHODS: A linked United Kingdom Liver Transplant Audit - Hospital Episode Statistics database of patients who received a first adult liver transplant between 1997 and 2010 in England was analysed. Patients who died within the first two years were excluded from the primary analysis, but a sensitivity analysis was also performed including all patients. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the impact of primary liver disease and comorbidities on TLOS and LLOS. RESULTS: In 3772 patients, the mean (95%CI) TLOS was 24.8 (24.2 to 25.5) d, and the mean LLOS was 24.2 (22.9 to 25.5) d. Compared to patients with cancer, we found that the largest difference in TLOS was seen for acute hepatic failure group (6.1 d; 2.8 to 9.4) and the largest increase in LLOS was seen for other liver disease group (14.8 d; 8.1 to 21.5). Patients with cardiovascular disease had 8.5 d (5.7 to 11.3) longer TLOS and 6.0 d (0.2 to 11.9) longer LLOS, compare to those without. Patients with congestive cardiac failure had 7.6 d longer TLOS than those without. Other comorbidities did not significantly increase TLOS nor LLOS. CONCLUSION: The time patients spent in hospital varied according to their primary liver disease and some comorbidities. Time spent in hospital of patients with cancer was relatively short compared to most other indications. Cardiovascular disease and congestive cardiac failure were the comorbidities with a strong impact on increased LOS.

A retrospective study assessing fully covered metal stents as first-line management for malignant biliary strictures.

OBJECTIVES: Fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) constitute the first type of metal stent that can easily be removed endoscopically and/or intraoperatively, which may be advantageous in the management of distal malignant biliary strictures (DMBS). To assess the efficacy of FCSEMS as first-line treatment for DMBS, we compared patency, survival and complication rates between FCSEMS, uncovered self-expanding metal stents (USEMS) and plastic stents (PS). METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective study of 315 consecutive patients with DMBS, who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and stenting (FCSEMS, USEMS or PS) at two hospitals between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2013. Stent patency and patient survival were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method; complication rates were compared using Fisher's exact test; and Cox regression analysis was used to screen for confounding factors. RESULTS: FCSEMS were associated with prolonged stent patency (median=145 days) compared with USEMS (median=110 days, P<0.003) and PS (median=34 days, P<0.001). Biliary sepsis rates were lower for FCSEMS compared with PS (4.7 vs. 17.8%, P=0.02), whereas pancreatitis rates were higher for FCSEMS compared with USEMS (7.8 vs. 1.0%, P=0.04), but not PS (2.6%, P=NS). CONCLUSION: The use of FCSEMS as first-line management for DMBS is associated with longer patency and reduced complication rates compared with the use of PS. However, the higher rate of pancreatitis compared with USEMS requires further evaluation in a large randomized controlled trial.

Time-varying impact of comorbidities on mortality after liver transplantation: a national cohort study using linked clinical and administrative data.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact of comorbidity on mortality in three periods after liver transplantation (first 90 days, 90 days-5 years and 5-10 years). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study using records from the UK Liver Transplant Audit (UKLTA) linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), an administrative database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service (NHS). Comorbidities relevant for liver transplantation were identified from the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes in HES records of admissions in the year preceding their operation. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate HRs for three different time periods after liver transplantation. SETTING: All liver transplant centres in the NHS hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: Adults who received a first elective liver transplant between April 1997 and March 2010 in the linked UKLTA-HES database. OUTCOMES: Patient mortality in three different time periods after transplantation. RESULTS: Among 3837 recipients, 45.1% had comorbidities. Recipients with cardiovascular disease had statistically significantly higher mortality in all three periods after transplantation (first 90 days: HR=2.0; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.9, 90 days-5 years: 1.6; 1.2 to 2.2, beyond 5 years: 2.8; 1.7 to 4.4). Prior congestive cardiac failure (3.2; 2.1 to 4.9) significantly increased mortality only in the first 90 days. History of non-hepatic malignancy appeared to increase risk over all periods, but significantly only in the first 90 days (1.9; 1.0 to 3.6). A diagnosis of connective tissue disease, dementia, diabetes, chronic pulmonary and renal disease did not have a significant impact on mortality in any period. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of comorbidities present at the time of transplantation changes with time after transplantation. Renal disease, pulmonary disease and diabetes had no impact on mortality in contrast to previous reports.

A comparison of MR elastography and 31P MR spectroscopy with histological staging of liver fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: Conventional imaging techniques are insensitive to liver fibrosis. This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of MR elastography (MRE) stiffness values and the ratio of phosphomonoesters (PME)/phosphodiesters (PDE) measured using (31)P spectroscopy against histological fibrosis staging. METHODS: The local research ethics committee approved this prospective, blinded study. A total of 77 consecutive patients (55 male, aged 49 ± 11.5 years) with a clinical suspicion of liver fibrosis underwent an MR examination with a liver biopsy later the same day. Patients underwent MRE and (31)P spectroscopy on a 1.5 T whole body system. The liver biopsies were staged using an Ishak score for chronic hepatitis or a modified NAS fibrosis score for fatty liver disease. RESULTS: MRE increased with and was positively associated with fibrosis stage (Spearman's rank = 0.622, P < 0.001). PME/PDE was not associated with fibrosis stage (Spearman's rank = -0.041, p = 0.741). Area under receiver operating curves for MRE stiffness values were high (range 0.75-0.97). The diagnostic utility of PME/PDE was no better than chance (range 0.44-0.58). CONCLUSIONS: MRE-estimated liver stiffness increases with fibrosis stage and is able to dichotomise fibrosis stage groupings. We did not find a relationship between (31)P MR spectroscopy and fibrosis stage. KEY POINTS: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and MR spectroscopy can both assess the liver. MRE is superior to ( 31 ) P MR spectroscopy in staging hepatic fibrosis. MRE is able to dichotomise liver fibrosis stage groupings. Gradient-echo MRE may be problematic in genetic haemochromatosis.

Candidate selection and organ allocation in liver transplantation.

Optimal candidate selection and organ allocation should offer liver transplantation to those who are sufficiently sick to justify the procedure but not too sick to benefit from it, in an order determined by patients' projected survival benefit, matching organs of sufficiently good quality to the appropriate recipients. Significant steps have been made in recent years toward devising selection and allocation criteria based on more objective and evidence-based definitions of candidate disease severity, transplant futility, organ quality, and appropriate donor-recipient matching. However, much work remains to be done in the future.

Is there disparity between risk and incidence of cardiovascular disease after liver transplant?

BACKGROUND: Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are recognized complications of liver transplantation, but whether they contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease is uncertain. We aimed first to determine the prevalence of risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) after liver transplantation and second to study the effect of liver transplantation on the predicted 10-year risk of developing CHD and the incidence of cardiovascular events in comparison with a matched local population. METHODS: Data on blood pressure, serum lipids, weight, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke were obtained retrospectively from the case notes of 181 consecutive adult liver transplant recipients (median follow-up 54 months). The Framingham coronary risk equations were used to calculate the 10-year probability of developing CHD. RESULTS: The prevalences of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia after transplantation were 77% and 62%, respectively. The predicted 10-year risk of CHD increased from 6.9% before transplantation to 11.5% at 1 year after transplantation, whereas that of a matched local population was 7%. Compared with a matched nontransplant population, the incidence ratios for MI and stroke were 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-3.06 ) and 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.18-5.22), respectively. No patients died from MI or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant recipients have a high prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease, exceeding that of the general population, and have a higher predicted risk of developing CHD. Despite this, there were no deaths from CHD or stroke during the study period.

Liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation has evolved from an experimental procedure to an acceptable therapy for end-stage liver disease. The major challenges now faced are donor organ shortage, long-term complications related to immunosuppressive therapy, and the prevention and treatment of disease recurrence.