RESUMO
Haploidentical hematopoietic-cell transplantation using post-transplant cyclophosphamide(Haplo-PTCy) is a feasible procedure in children with haematologic malignancies. However, data of a large series of children with acute leukaemia(AL) in this setting is missing. We analysed 144 AL Haplo-PTCy paediatric recipients; median age was 10 years. Patients had acute lymphoblastic(ALL; n = 86) or myeloblastic leukaemia(AML; n = 58) and were transplanted in remission(CR1: n = 40; CR2: n = 57; CR3+: n = 27) or relapse (n = 20). Bone marrow was the graft source in 57%; donors were father (54%), mother (35%), or sibling (11%). Myeloablative conditioning was used in 87%. Median follow-up was 31 months. At day +100, cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil recovery and acute GVHD (II-IV) were 94% and 40%, respectively. At 2-years, CI of chronic GVHD and relapse, were 31%, 40%, and estimated 2-year overall survival (OS), leukaemia-free survival (LFS) and graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 52%, 44% and 34% respectively. For patients transplanted in remission, positive measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to transplant was associated with decreased LFS (p = 0.05) and GRFS (p = 0.003) and increased risk of relapse (p = 0.02). Mother donor was associated with increased risk of chronic GVHD (p = 0.001), decreased OS (p = 0.03) and GRFS (p = 0.004). Use of PBSC was associated with increased risk of chronic GVHD (p = 0.04). In conclusion, achieving MRD negativity pre-transplant, avoiding use of mother donors and PBSC as graft source may improve outcomes of Haplo-PTCy in children with AL.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Criança , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicações , Mães , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Transplante Haploidêntico/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Amifostine protects normal tissue from the cytotoxic damage induced by radiation and chemotherapy. In this study, 39 consecutive newly diagnosed children with osteosarcoma were assessed; 20 received amifostine and 19 did not. The chemotherapy regimen included an induction phase of three cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m2), carboplatin (500 mg/m2), and doxorubicin (60 mg/m2), followed by surgery. Alternating cycles of cisplatin/ifosfamide (9 mg/m2), ifosfamide/doxorubicin, carboplatin/doxorubicin, and ifosfamide/carboplatin were administered every 3 weeks to complete 26 weeks of treatment. Amifostine was administered 15 minutes before the infusions of cisplatin and carboplatin in a total of 193 infusions. Side effects during infusions and renal, hearing, and bone marrow toxicities were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Hypotension was observed in 28 (14.5%) infusions. No patient required discontinuation of therapy. Fewer than two episodes of vomiting occurred in 130 (71%) infusions and two to five episodes occurred in 51 (28%) infusions, and no patient had grade 4 toxicity. There was no difference between the two groups regarding renal toxicity (creatinine clearance). Neutropenia and leukopenia were significantly less frequent in the amifostine group. No difference was observed in platelet and hearing toxicities. Amifostine was well tolerated in doses of 740 mg/m2 in children and adolescents, and myelotoxicity was less severe in the amifostine group. This was a pilot study for further evaluation in a larger randomized trial.
Assuntos
Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Amifostina , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carboplatina , Cisplatino , Doxorrubicina , Ifosfamida , Osteossarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Osteossarcoma/patologia , Osteossarcoma/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Infections are one of the major complications in children undergoing chemotherapy. Monotherapy with either ciprofloxacin or ceftriaxone is safe and efficient in low-risk patients (solid tumors and stage I/II lymphomas). The same drugs may be used in an outpatient setting, decreasing costs and the risk of nosocomial infections. PROCEDURE: Low-risk patients (N = 70) with episodes of fever and neutropenia (N = 116) were randomized to receive either oral ciprofloxacin or intravenous ceftriaxone as outpatients. Only one patient had a central venous catheter. RESULTS: Episodes of fever and neutropenia were classified as fever of unknown origin (41% vs. 32%) or clinically documented infection (56% vs. 63%) in the ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone groups, respectively. Most of these infections were of upper respiratory tract, skin, or gastrointestinal origin. The mean duration of neutropenia was 5 vs. 6 days. Fever persisted for 1-9 days (mean 2 vs. 3 days). Therapy was successful with no modifications in 83% vs. 75% of the episodes. Patients were admitted in 7% vs. 4% of the episodes. No bone or joint side effects were seen in either group. All patients survived. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient therapy with either oral ciprofloxacin or intravenous ceftriaxone for fever and neutropenia is effective and safe in pediatric patients with solid tumors and stage I/II non-Hodgkin lymphoma (low-risk patients).