Acute auto-aggression syndrome following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant and lenalidomide for multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant is an important treatment modality used to achieve long-term remission in people with multiple myeloma. Complications include chemotherapy-related toxicity or infection. Rarely, clinical features consistent with autologous graft-versus-host disease, otherwise known as auto-aggression syndrome, is possible. Auto-aggression syndrome appears more commonly in patients with multiple myeloma, hypothesized to be a result of underlying immune dysregulation, conditioning chemotherapy, or treatment with immunomodulating agents. CASE REPORT: A 66-year-old female with multiple myeloma underwent an autologous stem cell transplant with melphalan conditioning chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide. Transplant was complicated by engraftment syndrome versus auto-aggression syndrome. After lenalidomide maintenance therapy initiation, she required hospitalization for auto-aggression syndrome. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Auto-aggression syndrome with gastrointestinal, hepatic, and dermatologic involvement as demonstrated by skin punch biopsy, elevated reg3α, ST2, elafin, eosinophilia, transaminitis, and persistent diarrhea beyond the engraftment period were noted. Topical and systemic steroids with a prolonged taper resulted in symptom resolution. DISCUSSION: Acute graft-versus-host disease is a complication once considered unique to allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients, but a similar syndrome termed "auto-aggression syndrome" may be seen following autologous transplant. Auto-aggression syndrome should be suspected when complications extend beyond the normal engraftment syndrome period following autologous transplant, particularly in people with multiple myeloma, and/or those who have received prior immunomodulating therapy. There should be a low threshold for obtaining biopsies in the setting of suspected auto-aggression syndrome. Early recognition and prompt initiation of corticosteroids with prolonged tapers may prevent auto-aggression syndrome relapse and readmissions.

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (AD) have been largely excluded from clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), so data on safety of ICIs among patients with pre-existing AD are relatively limited. There is a need for deeper understanding of the type and management of complications from ICI in patients with pre-existing AD. We sought to investigate the safety of ICIs in patients with pre-existing ADs as well as factors associated with AD flare. METHODS: Consecutive patients with pre-existing AD who received monotherapy as well as combination of ICI therapies at our institution from September 2015 through September 1st, 2018 were identified. Clinical information was abstracted via manual chart review. Clinical factors associated with AD flare were determined using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were identified of whom 12 developed AD flare. All flares were treated with oral or topical corticosteroids, while a patient with flare of rheumatoid arthritis was treated with tofacitinib and another patient with Crohn's flare was treated with infliximab. Female sex, smoking status, higher age at the start of ICI therapy, cancer type, such as melanoma and lung cancer as compared to other cancers, were not significantly associated with AD flare, however, patients with underlying rheumatologic AD were noted to have a five times greater likelihood of flare as compared to other non-rheumatologic AD. Nine patients developed new immune related adverse events (IRAEs) unrelated to underlying AD, such as inflammatory poly-arthropathy, neuropathy, hypothyroidism, diarrhea, lichenoid drug eruptions, which were managed with oral and/or topical corticosteroids. ICI was stopped in six patients due to AD flare, in four patients due to IRAE flare (out of which one resumed ICI after resolution of IRAE). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pre-existing AD treated with ICI, AD flare occurred in 28% of patients and were managed successfully with corticosteroids alone or with additional disease-modifying therapies. ICI could be considered in patients with AD, but with very close monitoring and preemptive multidisciplinary collaboration.