Use of a Structured Observation Tool to Promote Medical Student Engagement in Trauma Resuscitations.

OBJECTIVE: We describe a novel approach to promoting medical student learning and engagement during trauma resuscitation with implementation of a structured observation and debriefing tool. DESIGN: In the context of a multifaceted quality improvement effort in our emergency room, we implemented a structured trauma observation tool (SOT) for medical students based on ATLS trauma guidelines. The SOT reflects the American College of Surgeons and Association for Surgical Education (ACS/ASE) trauma evaluation module for medical students. Two medical students from our quality improvement working group undertook a proof-of-concept study to determine whether the SOT facilitated accurate observations of trauma resuscitations and promoted educational debriefs with precepting providers. Results were encouraging, so the tool was implemented for elective use on surgical clerkships. Clerkship students who used the SOT were given the opportunity to share its impact on their experience. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained under Pro00109569. SETTING: A large level 1 trauma center at an academic hospital in the southeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: An interdisciplinary working group including surgeons, emergency medicine physicians, nurses, and students developed the observation tool. Two medical students from this team showed that the tool was effective at guiding observations and facilitating debriefs prior to its broader implementation on the general surgery clerkship. RESULTS: A total of 630 resuscitation tasks were observed during 15 trauma activations prior to implementation on the surgery clerkship. There was over 97% agreement between students observations and evaluating physicians self-reporting on which tasks were completed. Tasks on which there was disagreement were discussed to aid student learning. The tool was implemented for elective use on the surgery clerkship where students reported positive experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Early data suggest that this structured observation tool facilitates accurate trauma assessment observations and provides an opportunity for high-yield debriefs with the evaluating physician. This promotes student comprehension of ATLS principles. The SOT is being implemented as a pedagogic tool for students on the surgery clerkship to guide their observations, improve comprehension of decisions made in a hyperacute setting, and offer real time feedback as part of their learning in the trauma bay. The tool appears to be a valuable supplement which supports the ACS/ASE curriculum.

Prevalence of skin cancer in Native American kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer prevalence is well-characterized for white solid organ transplant recipients. Although the prevalence of skin cancer in non-white (Black, Asian, Hispanic) kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) has been assessed, no study has reported the prevalence of skin cancer in Native American (NA) KTRs. The aim of this study is to determine if the prevalence of skin cancer in NAKTRs is the same as in white KTRs. METHODS: We conducted a case-controlled retrospective review from a single transplant center. One hundred thirteen NAKTRs who received a transplant between 2001 and 2011 were age- and transplant-year matched with 113 white controls. RESULTS: The 226 KTRs consisted of 141 (62.4%) men and 85 (37.6%) women, with a mean age of 50.2 ± 10.8 years. There was no skin cancer found in NAKTRs prior to or post transplantation, while seven (6.2%) white KTRs had eight skin cancers prior to transplantation, and 28 (24.8%) white KTRs developed 66 skin cancers post transplantation. Twenty-two (19.5%) NAKTRs did not follow-up with dermatology at this institution. The median follow-up in NAKTRs was 3.3 years compared to 3.0 years in white KTRs. CONCLUSION: NAKTRs have a decreased prevalence of skin cancer compared to their white counterparts.

Skin Infections due to Bacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Review.

Though there is an abundance of information on cutaneous malignancies in transplant recipients, cutaneous infections in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are underrepresented in the dermatological literature. Our paper provides a comprehensive review of bacterial cutaneous infections within the solid organ transplant population. Cutaneous bacterial infections may lead to significant morbidity and even mortality in this immunosuppressed population. Thus, it is to the benefit of both dermatologists and other transplant care providers to better understand and recognize the features of cutaneous bacterial infections in SOTRs. This paper can aid providers in promptly identifying, diagnosing, and treating bacterial skin infections. This review discusses the diagnosis and treatment of the following bacterial species: Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Nocardia, Mycobacteria, and Bartonella henselae.