Application of ultrasonography-elastography score to suspect porto-sinusoidal vascular disease in patients with portal vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are causes of portal hypertension characterized respectively by an intrahepatic and a pre-hepatic obstacle to the flow in the portal system. As PVT may be a consequence of PSVD, in PVT patients at presentation, a pre-existing PSVD should be suspected. In these patients the identification of an underlying PSVD would have relevant implication regarding follow-up and therapeutic management, but it could be challenging. In this setting ultrasonography may be valuable in differential diagnosis. The aim of the study was to use ultrasonography to identify parameters to discriminate between PSVD and "pure" PVT and then to suspect PVT secondary to a pre-existing PSVD. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with histologically proven PSVD and forty-eight patients affected by chronic PVT were enrolled and submitted to abdominal ultrasonography with elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI). RESULTS: ARFI was higher and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) diameter was wider in PSVD patients than in PVT patients. Thus, a prognostic score was obtained as linear combinations of the two parameters with a good discrimination capacity between PSVD and PVT (the area under the curve = 0.780; 95% confidence interval: 0.690-0.869). CONCLUSIONS: A score based on ARFI and SMV diameter may be useful to suspect an underlying PSVD in patients with PVT and to identify a subgroup of patients to be submitted to liver biopsy.

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD): Application of new diagnostic criteria in a multicenter cohort of patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The term porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) was recently proposed to replace that of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) to describe patients with typical histological lesions in absence of cirrhosis, irrespective of the presence/absence of portal hypertension (PH), and new diagnostic criteria were defined. The study aimed to compare the applicability between the diagnostic criteria of PSVD and those of INCPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 53 patients affected by PSVD were enrolled. Biochemical, clinical, ultrasound and histological data, the presence and type of associated diseases were recorded in a database. According to the new criteria, histological data and signs of PH were divided into specific and non-specific. Percutaneous and transjugular biopsies were compared to establish the usability of the two methods for diagnostic purposes. RESULTS: In 85% of the patients the diagnosis of PSVD was obtained by applying the first criterion (25 had specific histological signs with specific signs of PH); one patient presented with specific histological signs but no PH. In 8 patients the diagnosis was obtained by applying the second criterion. 19% of patients had portal vein thrombosis. Finally, the prevalence of the various histological lesions was similar between the patients submitted to percutaneous and transjugular liver biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that the diagnostic criteria of PSVD lead to the inclusion of a greater number of patients than INCPH.

Association between gut-derived endotoxins and porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder with portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) is characterised by lesions involving portal veins and sinusoids in absence of cirrhosis with an unclear pathophysiology. However, its association with immunodeficiency, bowel disorders and abdominal bacterial infections supports the role of altered intestinal permeability and gut-derived endotoxins. The study aimed at assessing the association between serological markers of increased intestinal permeability, pro-aggregating/procoagulant state and liver injury in PSVD and portal hypertension. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with biopsy-proven PSVD and portal hypertension and 33 healthy subjects were submitted to a venous blood sampling for the measurement of zonulin and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) as markers of intestinal permeability, of s-Glycoprotein VI, sP-selectin, ADAMTS13 and von Willebrand factor (vWF), as markers of platelet aggregation and microvascular inflammation, factor VIII and F1 + 2 as markers of hypercoagulability. In 17 PSVD patients, histomorphological and immunohistochemical study on liver biopsies was performed. RESULTS: Compared with controls, PSVD patients had higher levels of LPS, zonulin, vWF, factor VIII and sP-selectin, F1 + 2. ADAMTS13 was reduced. Serum LPS correlated with zonulin, sP-selectin, FVIII and vWF. At histological analysis, PSVD specimens had increased LPS localisation, toll-like receptor-4(TLR4)-positive macrophages and platelet number compared with samples from healthy liver donors. TLR4+ macrophage number correlated with portal inflammation and fibrosis. Sinusoid dilation and capillarisation were observed. PSVD biopsies showed signs of biliary damage and reduced ductular reaction without alteration in Sox9+ cell population. CONCLUSIONS: PSVD patients display an altered intestinal permeability and endotoxemia correlated to a pro-aggregating/procoagulant state; histologically, PSVD was associated with increased TLR4+ cell involvement and platelet clumps within sinusoids. Our study suggests that LPS-TLR4 pathway could contribute to the pathophysiological basis of PSVD with portal hypertension.

New Indications for TIPSs: What Do We Know So Far?

Since 1988, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been an effective therapy for portal hypertension in many settings. Thanks to continuous technical improvements and a wiser selection of patients, excellent results have been achieved with this therapeutic strategy. The historical indications for TIPS placement, in the context of liver cirrhosis, such as refractory ascites and variceal bleeding are now well established and known. However, in recent years, new indications are emerging. These have been investigated and approved in some studies but are not yet included in guidelines and clinical practice. This review aims to highlight what is new for the role of TIPS in portal vein thrombosis (especially in patients awaiting liver transplantation), in recurrent ascites and not only refractory ascites, as a neoadjuvant therapy before abdominal surgery and, finally, in the setting of noncirrhotic portal hypertension. All these new aspects are addressed in this review with a critical approach based on the literature revision and clinical practice. Future research is needed to explore and validate the new role of TIPS in these scenarios.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in non-cirrhotic non-neoplastic patients with portal vein thrombosis: A single-centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: The knowledge of natural history and prognostic factors of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is still based on a limited number of studies. AIM: To describe our single-center experience with 79 consecutive non-neoplastic non-cirrhotic patients with PVT (15 recent/64 chronic PVT). RESULTS: Among patients with recent PVT, 7 received anticoagulation alone, 4 systemic thrombolysis, 3 direct thrombolysis through a TIPS and 1 TIPS alone. Portal recanalization was achieved in 11 patients. In patients with chronic PVT, the rate of variceal progression was high (20% at one year and 50% at two years). The thrombotic involvement of splenic and superior mesenteric veins was the only risk factor for variceal enlargement. The cumulative bleeding rates were 10% at one year and 20% at two years. A multisegmental thrombosis and large varices at entry and a previous variceal bleeding were the independent predictors for variceal bleeding. The cumulative rate of new thrombotic events was 14% at one year and 18% at two years. Eight patients died, 2 because of thrombotic events. There were no bleeding-related deaths. Two-year cumulative survival rate was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the importance of anticoagulation especially when a more extended thrombosis is present. Moreover, in patients with chronic PVT, the timing of follow-up endoscopy should be based on the extension of thrombosis and not, as in cirrhosis, on the size of varices at first endoscopy.

Liver Transplantation for Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Liver Disorder: Long-term Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disorder (PSVD) is a rare disease that occasionally requires liver transplantation (LT), despite usually presenting preserved liver function. There remains a paucity of data pertaining to LT in PSVD. The aim was to identify features associated with post-LT outcomes in PSVD. METHODS: Retrospective multicentre study of 79 patients who received LT for PSVD. RESULTS: Median post-LT follow-up was 37 (range 1-261) mo. Refractory ascites 24 (30%), hepatic encephalopathy 16 (20%), and hepatopulmonary syndrome 13 (16.3%) were the most frequent indications for LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the indication in only 2 patients. Twenty-four patients died, 7 due to liver and 17 to non-liver related causes. Post-LT survival was 82.2%, 80.7%, and 68.6% at 1, 2, and 5 y, respectively. Post-LT survival was significantly better in patients without (n = 58) than in those with a persistent severe PSVD-associated condition (n = 21). Pre-LT hyperbilirubinemia levels and creatinine >100 µmol/L were also independently associated with poor survival. Six patients (7.6%) required a second LT. Recurrence of PSVD was confirmed by liver biopsy in only 1 patient and in 3 further patients it was likely. CONCLUSIONS: LT in PSVD is associated with an acceptable outcome in the absence of associated severe conditions. However, persistence of a severe associated condition, pre-LT high bilirubin levels, or creatinine >100 µmol/L impact outcome, and these are features that should be considered when evaluating PSVD patients for LT. PSVD recurrence is possible after LT and needs to be explored, at least, in cases of posttransplant portal hypertension.

Identifying Patients at High Risk of Developing Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension.

The term porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) has been recently proposed to replace the term idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) to describe patients with or without signs of portal hypertension and typical histological lesions involving the portal venules or sinusoids in the absence of cirrhosis. According to the new definition, the presence of known causes of liver disease as well as of portal vein thrombosis does not rule out PSVD. Therefore, the patients in whom the diagnosis of PSVD is possible are much more than the patients strictly fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for INCPH. In this setting, the clinical challenge for the hepatologist is to identify patients at risk of developing PSVD and to indicate liver biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. We describe some possible scenarios in which PSVD should always be suspected, and we provide some tools useful to reach the diagnosis of PSVD.

Neurological and psychiatric effects of hepatitis C virus infection.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is widespread and affects 71 million people worldwide. Although hepatic manifestations are the most frequent, ranging from chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, it is also associated with several extrahepatic manifestations. Infected patients may present non-specific neurological symptoms, regardless of the presence of liver cirrhosis. Several pathogenetic mechanisms underlying neurological symptoms have been hypothesized: neuroinvasion, immune-mediated damage, neurotransmitter alterations and cryoglobulinemia. Alterations of the central nervous system include cerebral vasculopathy, acute or subacute encephalopathy and inflammatory disorders. HCV infection may be responsible for neuropathies, of which the most frequent form is symmetrical axonal sensory or sensory-motor polyneuropathy which causes loss of leg sensitivity and weakness. Up to 50% of patients with HCV infection may experience cognitive decline and psychological disorders, such as depression and fatigue. HCV associated neurocognitive disorder is independent of the presence of liver cirrhosis and affects different domains than in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. It can be studied using specific tests that mainly explore executive functions, verbal learning and verbal recall. These disorders significantly reduce the quality of life. The new antiviral therapies improve the extrahepatic symptoms of HCV infection and their success depends on the achievement of sustained virological response. However, the effect of therapy may differ depending on the type of organ involved; neurological symptoms can be irreversible if there is organic liver damage. The aim of this review is to provide a critical overview of physiopathological mechanisms, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of the neurological and psychiatric effects of HCV infection.

Causes and Management of Non-cirrhotic Portal Hypertension​.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) includes a heterogeneous group of conditions. The aim of this paper is to make an overview on the denominations, diagnostical features and management of porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) and chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) being the main causes of NCPH in the Western world. RECENT FINDINGS: The management of NCPH consists in the treatment of associated diseases and of portal hypertension (PH). PH due to PSVD or PVT is managed similarly to PH due to cirrhosis. TIPS placement and liver transplantation are considerable options in patients with refractory variceal bleeding/ascites and with progressive liver failure. Anticoagulation is a cornerstone both in the treatment of thrombosis in PSVD and in the prevention of thrombosis recurrence in patients with portal cavernoma. Physicians should be aware of the existence of PSVD and chronic PVT and actively search them in particular settings. To now, the management of portal hypertension-related complications in NCPH is the same of those of cirrhosis. Large cooperative studies on the natural history of NCPH are necessary to better define its management.

Small hepatic veins Budd-Chiari syndrome and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria - The association of two rare entities: a case report.

Small hepatic veins Budd-Chiari syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction limited to the small intrahepatic veins, with normal appearance of the large hepatic veins at imaging. In this case only a liver biopsy can demonstrate the presence of a small vessels outflow block. Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is one of the most severe acquired thrombophilic state and represents one of the main aetiological factors of Budd-Chiari syndrome. In patient affected by PNH with liver impairment and/or ascites, Budd-Chiari syndrome must be always taken into consideration and, if necessary, a liver biopsy performed to exclude the small hepatic veins involvement. We report a case of small hepatic veins Budd-Chiari syndrome secondary to paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria.

Is porto sinusoidal vascular disease to be actively searched in patients with portal vein thrombosis?

Porto sinusoidal vascular liver disease (PSVD) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are distinct vascular liver diseases characterized, respectively, by an intrahepatic and a prehepatic obstacle to the flow in the liver portal system. PVT may also occur as a complication of the natural history of PSVD, especially if a prothrombotic condition coexists. In other cases, it is associated to local and systemic pro-thrombotic conditions, even if its cause remains unknown in up to 25% despite an active search. In our opinion, the presence of PSVD should be suspected in patients with PVT especially in those with PVT "sine causa" and the active search of this condition should be included in their diagnostic work-out. However, sometimes the diagnosis of pre-existing PSVD is very hard. Biopsy cannot be fully discriminant as similar histological data have been described in both conditions. Liver stiffness may help as it has been shown to be higher in PSVD than in "pure" PVT, due to the presence of sclerosis in the portal venous radicles observable in PSVD patients. Nevertheless, comparing liver stiffness between PVT and PSVD has until now been restricted to very limited series of patients. In conclusion, even if it is still totally hypothetical, our point of view may have clinical consequences, especially when deciding to perform a liver biopsy in patients with a higher liver stiffness and suspending the anticoagulation in patients with PVT and no detectable prothrombotic factors.

A Model for Predicting Development of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients With Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) affects patients' quantity and quality of life and places a burden on families. There is evidence that overt HE might be prevented pharmacologically, but prophylaxis would be justified and cost effective only for patients at risk. We aimed to identify patients with cirrhosis at risk for overt HE. METHODS: We collected data from October 2009 through December 2012 for 216 consecutive patients with cirrhosis (based on liver biopsy, 96 patients with minimal HE), admitted to the Gastroenterology Unit at the University of Rome. Patients were followed up and evaluated for an average of 14.7 ± 11.6 months; development of overt HE was recorded. We analyzed end-stage liver disease scores, shunt placement, previous overt or minimal HE, psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES), and levels of albumin, bilirubin, creatinine, and sodium to develop a prediction model. We validated the model in 112 patients with cirrhosis seen at the University of Padua and followed up for 12 ± 9.5 months. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 68 patients (32%) developed at least 1 episode of overt HE. Based on multivariate analysis, the development of overt HE was associated with previous HE, minimal HE (based on PHES), and level of albumin less than 3.5 g/dL (area under curve [AUC], 0.74). A model that excluded minimal HE but included albumin level and previous HE also identified patients who would develop overt HE (AUC, 0.71); this difference in AUC values was not statistically significant (P = .104). Both models were validated in the independent group of patients (3 variables: AUC, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.83; and 2 variables: AUC, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a model to identify patients with cirrhosis at risk for overt HE based on previous HE, albumin levels, and PHES. If PHES was not available, previous HE and albumin levels still can identify patients at risk. Psychometric evaluation is essential for patients with no history of HE. These findings should aid in planning studies of pharmacologic prevention of overt HE.