How to make a specific diagnosis of panniculitis on clinical grounds alone: an integrated pathway of general criteria and specific findings.

A clinical approach to the vexing problem of diagnosis of panniculitis is traced in this paper, in order to obtain from the clinical findings, history and laboratory data of the patient useful, detailed and precise information, essential to address dermatologists to a specific clinical diagnosis of panniculitis. This approach is created in the same way as when a dermatologist faces any other dermatological disease, be it inflammatory or neoplastic. A common behavior in case of panniculitis is in fact just to take an adequate biopsy and wait for the pathologist report. This is indeed a limitation both for the dermatologist and above all for the pathologist, who is in tremendous need for detailed clinical information before signing his report. The most common types of panniculitides, taking into account their main clinical diagnostic criteria, will be considered. In particular, Erythema Nodosum, Panniculitides in Sarcoidosis, Pancreatic Panniculitis, Lupus Panniculitis, Erythema Induratum/Nodular Vasculitis and Weber-Christian Panniculitis/Rothman-Makai Pannicultis will be analyzed. Every chapter will consider general criteria (epidemiology, age and gender, distribution of the lesions, laboratory findings) and specific findings (characteristics of the lesions, i.e. redness, pain, tenderness, evolution, ulceration, sites of involvement) as well as comorbidities and systemic signs and symptoms. Detailed analysis of the general criteria integrated with the specific findings will allow the clinicians to reach a clinical diagnosis with a high degree of confidence.

Sevoflurane provides better recovery than propofol plus fentanyl in anaesthesia for day-care surgery.

To compare ease of maintenance and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and propofol plus fentanyl in day-care anaesthesia, 60 outpatients undergoing elective surgery of up to 3 h duration were randomized to receive sevoflurane or propofol as their primary anaesthetic. Induction was always carried out with propofol, but a fentanyl bolus 5 microg kg-1 was added in the propofol group. Anaesthesia was supplemented with up to 70% N2O. Significantly shorter times to extubation (10.03 min +/- 3.2 SD vs. 17.2 +/- 7.3; P < 0.001) and emergence (10.4 +/- 3.1 vs. 16.8 +/- 6.4; P < 0.001) were observed in the sevoflurane group. Patients treated with sevoflurane felt less confused, showed better performances in the digit symbol substitution test and achieved higher modified Aldrete scores sooner in the post-operative course. Maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane produces faster emergence and recovery than propofol plus fentanyl after anaesthesia of short to intermediate duration.