New stimulation procedures for language mapping in stereo-EEG.

OBJECTIVE: Cortical intracerebral electrical stimulation is an important tool for language mapping in the presurgical work-up of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Language mapping with stereo-electroencephalography (EEG) is usually performed by high-frequency stimulations (HFS: 50 Hz), whereas low-frequency stimulations (LFS: 1 Hz) are usually considered useful for primary cortices mapping. Little is known in literature about "intermediate" frequencies (IFS: 6-15 Hz). Our objective is to explore the clinical usefulness of IFS in language mapping and identify factors, beyond the electrical parameters, that impact the mapping. METHODS: We studied 23 patients submitted to stereo-EEG for presurgical evaluation. Language mapping was performed in the anterior, posterior and/or basal language region of the dominant hemisphere for language. We included all contact positions within these regions stimulated by HFS (50 Hz, 5 s, 1-3 mA) and IFS (6-15 Hz, 15 s, 5 mA). We compared the capability of both stimulation methods to induce a language deficit without afterdischarges (ADs), and we analyzed factors related to clinical examination, region, and stimulation technique by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 211 stimulations (98 HFS, 113 IFS) in 70 cortical sites within the anterior (84 stimulations), posterior (137), and basal language region (60) were included. IFS induced more frequently language deficits not associated to AD compared to HFS (37.1% vs 25.7%, p = .0043), whereas HFS provoked more diffuse AD (34.7% vs 15.0%, p = .001). Investigating multiple language functions increased the probability of revealing a deficit (odds ratio [OR] 3.16, p = .0016), independently of the stimulation method. SIGNIFICANCE: IFS are valuable for language mapping, thereby improving the probability of inducing a clinical deficit not accompanied by an AD. The completeness of the clinical examination independently affects the sensitivity of the mapping. IFS are a new tool with potential usefulness for the cortical mapping of other associative cortical regions.

Is the anatomical lesion always guilty?: A case report.

During a presurgical workup, when discordant structural and electroclinical localization is identified, further evaluation with invasive EEG is often necessary. We report a 44-year-old right-handed woman without significant risk factors for epilepsy who presented at 11 years of age with focal seizures manifest as jerking of the left side of her mouth and arm with frequent evolution to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures during sleep with a weekly frequency. During video-EEG monitoring, we observed interictal left fronto-central sharp waves and some independent sharp waves in the right fronto-central region. Habitual seizures were recorded and during the post-ictal state, the patient had left arm weakness for a few minutes. The ictal discharge on EEG was characterized by a bilateral fronto-central rhythmic slow activity more prevalent over the right hemisphere. MRI of the brain revealed a left precentral structural lesion. Considering the discordant structural and electroclinical information, we performed bilateral fronto-central stereo-EEG implantation and demonstrated clear right fronto-central seizure onset. Stereo-EEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation was performed in the right fronto-central leads with subsequent seizure freedom for 9 months. The patient then underwent surgery (right fronto-central cortectomy), and histology revealed focal cortical dysplasia type Ia. The post-surgical outcome was Engel Ia. This case underscores the presence of a structural lesion is not sufficient to define the epileptogenic zone if not supported by clinical and EEG evidence. In such cases, an invasive investigation is typically required.

Early epilepsy surgery for non drug-resistant patients.

The aim of epilepsy treatment is to achieve seizure freedom. Surgery is often still considered a late option when pharmacological treatments have failed and epilepsy has become drug-resistant. We analyse the clinical features and surgical outcome in patients who underwent surgery without experiencing drug-resistance comparing with those observed in patients who became drug-resistant. Two-hundred and fifty patients with symptomatic focal epilepsy (12.1% of patients who underwent surgery at the "Claudio Munari" Epilepsy Surgery Center) were selected on the basis of initial period of seizure freedom and followed-up for at least 12 months. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent surgery during the initial period of seizure freedom (n = 74), and those who underwent surgery after an initial seizure-free period followed by drug-resistance (n = 176). Outcomes were significantly better in non-drug-resistant patients (p < 0.001), all of whom had Engel class Ia or Ic. In the drug-resistant group, 136 patients (77.3%) had class Ia or Ic. The median post-operative follow-up was respectively 75.0 and 84.0 months. Epilepsy surgery is a successful treatment, especially for non-drug-resistant patients with focal epilepsy with structural etiology. The timing of surgery affects the outcomes, and "early" surgery should be preferred to prevent likely drug-resistance and to improve prognosis.