[Compensation of occupational diseases during monitoring of the ARDCO cohort]. / Les reconnaissances en maladie professionnelle lors du suivi de la cohorte ARDCO.

INTRODUCTION: Questions concerning under-reporting of occupational diseases (OD) linked to asbestos exposure are regularly voiced in France. Monitoring of the French multicenter Asbestos-Related Disease Cohort (ARDCO), which ensures post-occupational medical surveillance of subjects having been exposed to asbestos, provides information on (1) the medico-legal steps taken following screening by computed tomography (CT) for benign thoracic diseases, and (2) recognition of OD as a causal factor in malignant diseases. METHODS: OD recognition - and possible compensation - was analyzed in July 2021 among 13,289 volunteers in the cohort recruited between 2003 and 2005. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of the subjects in the cohort were found to have at least one recognized asbestos-related OD (78.2% benign pleural disease, 10.3% asbestosis, 14.2% lung cancer, and 6.0% mesothelioma). Only 58% of pleural plaques reported by the radiologist who performed the CT resulted in their recognition as ODs. On a parallel track, 88.7% of the mesotheliomas identified based on French National health insurance data and 46.9% of lung cancers were recognized as ODs. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of a system designed to facilitate recognition, leading to possible compensation, of asbestos-related occupational diseases. The system could be improved by better training of the medical actors involved.

[Psychological impacts of follow up for occupational asbestos exposure. Consequences after compensation for occupational disease in the SPP-A cohort]. / Impact psychologique du suivi post-professionnel amiante à long terme. Quelles conséquences après la déclaration suivie de la reconnaissance d'une maladie professionnelle chez des sujets de la cohorte SPP-A ?

INTRODUCTION: In France, long-term follow-up after occupational exposure to asbestos is recommended. This study looked at the psychological consequences in the longer term following a CT-scan, in particular the impact of having received compensation for an occupational disease. METHODS: As part of an asbestos post-exposure survey study (APExS), volunteers from Normandy were asked to complete self-assessment questionnaires about their psychological condition at different points during follow-up, including a psychological questionnaire before, then 6 months, and finally 18 to 24 months after their chest CT-scan. Information collected from 622 individuals were analyzed based on information provided as to the result of the screening and whether they had received compensation for having an occupational disease. RESULTS: The identification of an occupational disease eligible for compensation is associated with a long term increase in psychological distress. The impact of psychological state during follow-up is greater in men who reported receiving occupational disease compensation. The discovery of an asbestos-related disease during the screening is associated with a negative perception of general health and an increase in psychological distress. CONCLUSION: The receipt of compensation of an occupational disease does not seem to compensate for the negative psychological impact related to the discovery of a disease during the asbestos post-exposure follow-up.

Inequities in occupational diseases recognition in France.

BACKGROUND: In France, complex cases of occupational disease (OD) are submitted to regional committees who are in charge of accepting, or rejecting, the claim. Their mean annual acceptance rate varies from one region to another, which may reflect differences in the cases, or discrepancies between committees. The objective of this study was to assess the comparability of the decisions of the committees on the basis of standardized cases. METHODS: Three experienced occupational physicians specialized in OD were asked to develop 28 clinical cases representative of claims for compensation usually seen in these committees. The cases, in the form of short vignettes, were submitted to the 18 French regional committees, asking if they would recognise each case as an OD. RESULTS: All committees participated. The acceptance rate (recognition of the case as an OD) varied, ranging from 18% to 70%. All the committees took the same decision for only 7 out of the 28 cases, but half accepted and half refused for 3 cases. For 10 cases, one quarter of the committees gave a decision different than the other 75%. The highest discordance rates were observed for the cases concerning musculoskeletal disorders and asbestos related diseases. CONCLUSION: The committees take very different decisions in terms of recognition of OD, especially for the most frequently compensated OD in France, i.e. musculoskeletal disorders and asbestos related diseases. This is a major source of injustice for the employees who seek compensation and there is a need to develop methods to harmonize decisions between committees.

[Compensation for occupational diseases after tomodensitometry screening for benign pleuro-pulmonary disease in a multiregional post-occupational medical surveillance program of asbestos-exposed retired workers]. / Déclaration et reconnaissance en maladie professionnelle après dépistage tomodensitométrique de maladies pleuropulmonaires bénignes dans le programme multirégional de surveillance postprofessionnelle de personnes exposées à l'amiante.

BACKGROUND: Underreporting of occupational diseases related to asbestos exposure remains a matter of concern in France. The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of claims for compensation for asbestos-related non-malignant pulmonary or pleural occupational disease in subjects having undergone a chest CT-scan in a multiregional screening programme. METHODS: Among the 5444 voluntary retired asbestos-exposed subjects recruited in four regions between 2003 and 2005 who had undergone a chest CT-scan, the number of claims for compensation for an asbestos-related pulmonary or pleural benign disease was analysed in 2006 and 2010. RESULTS: Following CT-scan screening, 17.2% of participants were acknowledged as presenting with an asbestos-related non-malignant occupational disease, essentially pleural plaques, by the French National Health Insurance fund. Underreporting decreased as duration of follow-up after CT-scan increased. Nevertheless, 4 years after CT-scan, underreporting was still as high as 36% for subjects identified as presenting with pleural plaques. Mean duration between the date of CT-scan and the date of recognition as occupational disease was 7.4 months, shorter in cases where screening was coordinated by specialized centres. CONCLUSION: A plan of action for an easier claiming process for compensation of asbestos-related diseases is desired. This could probably be obtained through improved sensitization of physicians engaged in the follow-up of asbestos-exposed subjects, and by standardization of the interpretation and reporting of asbestos-related abnormalities observed on chest CT-scans.

Pulmonary nodules detected by thoracic computed tomography scan after exposure to asbestos: diagnostic significance.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the relationship between pulmonary nodules detected by radiologists using computed tomography and cumulative exposure to asbestos or asbestos-related pleuro-pulmonary diseases in 5662 asbestos-exposed subjects, and the relationship between pulmonary nodules and thoracic cancer, to determine whether a specific surveillance strategy based on cumulative asbestos exposure should be adopted. DESIGN: Standardised incidence and mortality ratios (SIR) for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma were calculated in patients with and without mention of pulmonary nodules and compared using comparative morbidity figures. RESULTS: A significant excess incidence of primary lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma was observed among subjects presenting with pulmonary nodule(s) (SIR respectively 1.95, 95%CI 1.22-2.95, and 11.88, 95%CI 3.20-30.41). However, there was no significant relationship between pulmonary nodules mentioned by radiologists and cumulative asbestos exposure or between pulmonary nodules and the presence of asbestos-related benign diseases. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the expected excess prevalence of lung cancer in subjects presenting with pulmonary nodules according to the radiologist's report, and shows the absence of relationship between the presence of nodules and level of cumulative asbestos exposure. Our study therefore offers no argument in favour of specific surveillance modalities based on estimated cumulative asbestos exposure.

Relationships between lung adenocarcinoma and gender, age, smoking and occupational risk factors: A case-case study.

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis that some risk factors for lung cancer may have more specific associations with particular histologic types remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate possible associations between adenocarcinoma and gender, age, smoking characteristics and selected occupational carcinogens in relation to other histologic types. METHODS: This study included all histologically confirmed lung cancer cases diagnosed consecutively in two French University hospitals from 1997 to 2006. All medical data were obtained by face-to-face patient interviews. Occupational carcinogen exposures of each patient were assessed by an industrial hygienist. Relationships between risk factors and adenocarcinoma were analyzed by case-case comparisons using unconditional logistic regressions (ULRs). RESULTS: A total of 1493 subjects were enrolled in this study, comprising 1303 men (87.3%), 67 nonsmokers (4.5%) and 489 adenocarcinomas (32.7%). Using ULR, no associations were observed between adenocarcinoma and age, gender or smoking characteristics except for a negative relationship with smoking duration (p<0.0001). Significant associations were observed between ADC and exposure to welding fumes and silica in the whole population and with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ever smokers. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that some risk factors, such as duration of smoking and certain occupational exposures but not gender or age, have a more important influence on the incidence of lung ADC than on other histologic types. As the distribution of histologic types may reflect underlying biological mechanisms, these findings also suggest that lung carcinogenesis pathways should be studied in relation to smoking duration and other lung cancer risk factors.

Performance of chest radiograph and CT scan for lung cancer screening in asbestos-exposed workers.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to compare, in a cohort of asbestos-exposed workers, the sensitivity and the specificity of low-radiation helical chest CT scan with chest radiograph for the biennial screening of bronchopulmonary cancer, according to the size of detected nodules. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The screening procedure consisted of biennial chest radiograph and monodetector chest CT scan, given to 972 individuals who had been highly exposed to asbestos. A total of 2555 screening procedures were performed. The study focuses on the 1230 screening procedures for which a 2-year follow-up period was available. RESULTS: Twenty-four cases of bronchopulmonary cancer were diagnosed. CT scan detected 20 cancers, 12 of which had not been detected by chest radiograph. Sensitivity of chest radiograph and CT scan were, respectively, 33% and 83%, lesions measuring over 2 mm in diameter being considered as suspect. The specificity of chest radiograph and CT scan were, respectively, 95% and 78%. Calculation of the differential false positive/true positive (FP/TP) ratio and the receiver operating characteristic curve, performed for both chest radiograph and CT scan, facilitated the determination of the best possible compromise between specificity and sensitivity, according to the diameter threshold applied for considering a nodule as suspect. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study confirms the superior sensitivity of chest CT scan compared with conventional chest radiograph, the associated loss in specificity leads to a recommended diameter of 5 mm as the threshold for considering non-calcified lesions as "suspect", for the surveillance of asbestos-exposed individuals.