A Multi-institutional Analysis of Factors Influencing the Rate of Positive MRI Biopsy Among Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) is increasing, but its utility in detecting additional malignancy is unclear and delays surgical management (Jatoi and Benson in Future Oncol 9:347-353, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.12.186 , Bleicher et al. J Am Coll Surg 209:180-187, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010 , Borowsky et al. J Surg Res 280:114-122, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.066 ). The present study sought to identify ESBC patients most likely to benefit from preoperative MRI by assessing the positive predictive values (PPVs) of ipsilateral and contralateral biopsies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included patients with cTis-T2N0-N1 breast cancer from two institutions during 2016-2021. A "positive" biopsy result was defined as additional cancer (PositiveCancer) or cancer with histology often excised (PositiveSurg). The PPV of MRI biopsies was calculated with respect to age, family history, breast density, and histology. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression determined whether combinations of age younger than 50 years, dense breasts, family history, and pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) histology led to higher biopsy yield. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 447 received preoperative MRI and 131 underwent 149 MRI-guided biopsies (96 ipsilateral, 53 contralateral [18 bilateral]). PositiveCancer for ipsilateral biopsy was 54.2%, and PositiveCancer for contralateral biopsy was 17.0%. PositiveSurg for ipsilateral biopsy was 62.5%, and PositiveSurg for contralateral biopsy was 24.5%. Among the contralateral MRI biopsies, patients younger than 50 years were less likely to have PositiveSurg (odds ratio, 0.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.84; p = 0.041). The combinations of age, density, family history, and histology did not lead to a higher biopsy yield. CONCLUSION: Historically accepted factors for recommending preoperative MRI did not appear to confer a higher MRI biopsy yield. To prevent delays to surgical management, MRI should be carefully selected for individual patients most likely to benefit from additional imaging.

The natural history of untreated estrogen receptor-positive, Her2-negative invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Using prior mammograms from patients with delays in their breast cancer diagnoses, we sought to describe in-vivo growth kinetics of untreated breast cancer to determine if the time they became clinically apparent can be predicted. METHODS: Patient and tumor characteristics were collected from those who presented with "missed," untreated breast cancer to a breast center in a single institution. Only patients whose biopsied masses revealed estrogen receptor-positive, Her2-negative (ER+/Her2-) invasive cancers were included. Two attending radiologists reviewed images from prior mammograms. Rates of change in volume were calculated in mm3/day, and a logarithmic equation was used to calculate tumor volume doubling time (TVDT). A Spearman's Rho correlation was performed for the continuous variables, and the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare categorical data. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Logistic regression was performed to determine if patient or tumor characteristics were correlated to tumor growth velocity. RESULTS: Of the 36 ER+/Her2- invasive breast cancers included in the analysis, 13 (36%) were at least cT2 (of TNM), 7 (19%) were grade 3, and 7 (19%) were node positive at diagnosis. Grade (p = 0.043) and pathologic invasive tumor size (p = 0.001) were positively correlated to tumor growth velocity. Median TVDT was 385 days (23-1897). Age, nodal positivity, Oncotype Dx® Recurrence Score, time of diagnostic delay, and spheroid-ellipsoid discrepancy (SED) were not related to tumor growth velocity in this sample. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients with untreated ER+/Her2- invasive breast cancers, grade and pathologic tumor size were found to be positively correlated to growth velocity. The growth rates in a homogeneous group of tumors varied widely and could not be predicted. One possible explanation for this finding is that other difficult-to-measure biologic factors such as tumor microenvironment may play a greater role in tumor progression than traditional clinicopathologic characteristics.

A single institution review of new breast malignancies identified solely by sonography.

BACKGROUND: The role of sonography as a sole identifier of breast malignancy remains undetermined. Currently, the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) trial, protocol 6666, is accruing high risk patients, with dense breast tissue on mammography, to evaluate the performance of screening sonography. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective single institution review to identify the detection rate of nonpalpable, mammographically occult breast malignancies identified solely by sonography. RESULTS: A total of 34,694 breast sonograms were performed at our outpatient radiology affiliate between April 1998 and April 2006. This number includes unilateral and bilateral examinations, and, 6-month followup examinations. Computerized databases and individual charts were retrospectively reviewed. Sonographic and mammographic findings were compared to determine concordance of identified lesions. Four thousand ninety-one ultrasound guided biopsies, (fine needle aspiration biopsy [FNA] and core needle biopsy [CNB]) were performed over the 8-year period, and 452 malignancies were identified. Discarded fluid contents of pure cyst aspirations were not included in this number. Seven percent (32) of the biopsy-proved malignancies were mammographically occult, of which 59% (19) were palpable, and 31% (10) were not palpable. Of all cancers diagnosed, 2.2% were identified solely by sonography. The number of cancers identified solely by sonography relative to the total number of sonograms done was 0.03%. CONCLUSIONS: Given these results, we advocate the selective use of sonography in appropriate populations, namely, in those with palpable findings, mammographic abnormalities, and in women with dense tissue who have personal or family history of breast cancer.