Advanced Cancer in Young Adults (YAs): Living in a Liminal Space.

Young adults (YAs), defined as individuals between the ages of 18 and 39 years, experience unique challenges when diagnosed with advanced cancer. Using the social constructivist grounded theory approach, we aimed to develop a theoretical understanding of how YAs live day to day with their diagnosis. A sample of 25 YAs (aged 22-39 years) with advanced cancer from across Canada participated in semi-structured interviews. Findings illustrate that the YAs described day-to-day life as an oscillating experience swinging between two opposing disease outcomes: (1) hoping for a cure and (2) facing the possibility of premature death. Oscillating between these potential outcomes was characterized as living in a liminal space wherein participants were unsure how to live from one day to the next. The participants oscillated at various rates, with different factors influencing the rate of oscillation, including inconsistent and poor messaging from their oncologists or treatment team, progression or regression of their cancer, and changes in their physical functioning and mental health. These findings provide a theoretical framework for designing interventions to help YAs adapt to their circumstance.

The impact of survivorship care plans on adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors and their primary care providers.

PURPOSE: A cross sectional study of adolescent and young adult (AYA) head and neck (H&N) cancer survivors was performed to assess late effects. Survivorship care plans (SCPs) were generated and evaluated by participants and their primary care providers (PCPs). METHODS: AYA H&N survivors who had been discharged over 5 years prior from our institution were assessed in recall consultation by a radiation oncologist. Late effects were assessed and individualized SCPS were created for each participant. Participants completed a survey evaluating the SCP. PCPs were surveyed before the consultation and after evaluating the SCP. RESULTS: 31/36 participants (86%) completed the SCP evaluation. The SCP was considered to be a positive experience for 93% of participants. Most of the AYA participants indicated that the information provided in the SCP helped them understand the need for follow-up to assess late effects (90%). The pre-consultation PCP survey response rate was 13/27 (48%) and only 34% were comfortable in providing survivorship care for AYA H&N cancer patients. The PCP response rate to the survey that accompanied the SCP was 15/27 (55%) and the majority (93%) reported that the SCP would be helpful to care for other AYA and non-AYA cancer survivors in their practice. CONCLUSIONS: Our research suggested that AYA head and neck cancer survivors valued the SCPs as did their PCPs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The introduction of SCPs is likely to help improve survivorship and transitioning of care from the oncology clinic to PCP in this population.

Outcomes of a radiation sparing approach in medulloblastoma by subgroup in young children: an institutional review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe disease outcomes including overall survival and relapse patterns by subgroup in young pediatric patients treated for medulloblastoma with a radiation-sparing approach. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes includes treatment, relapse, and salvage therapy and late effects in children treated for medulloblastoma with a radiation-sparing approach at British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH) between 2000 and 2020. RESULTS: There were 30 patients (median age 2.8 years, 60% male) treated for medulloblastoma with a radiation-sparing approach at BCCH. Subgroups included Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) (n = 14), group 3 (n = 7), group 4 (n = 6), and indeterminate status (n = 3). Three- and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) were 49.0% (30.2-65.4%) and 42.0% (24.2-58.9%) and overall survival (OS) 66.0% (95% CI 46.0-80.1%) and 62.5% (95% CI 42.5 and 77.2%), respectively, with a median follow-up of 9.5 years. Relapse occurred in 12/25 patients following a complete response, of whom six (group 4: n = 4; group 3: n = 1; unknown: n = 1) were successfully salvaged with craniospinal axis (CSA) RT and remain alive at a median follow-up of 7 years. Disease/treatment-related morbidity included endocrinopathies (n = 8), hearing loss n = 16), and neurocognitive abnormalities (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: This radiation sparing treatment approach for young patients with medulloblastoma resulted in a durable cure in most patients with SHH subgroup medulloblastoma. In those patients with groups 3 and 4 medulloblastoma, relapse rates were high; however, most group 4 patients were salvaged with RT.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adolescent and Young Adult Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Treated with Radiotherapy.

Purpose: There are few studies of adolescent and young adult (AYA) head and neck (H&N) cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy. A recall of AYA H&N survivors was performed and this article evaluates their cross-sectional patient-reported outcomes. Methods: AYA H&N cancer survivors who had received radiotherapy in British Columbia between 1970 and 2010 participated in this study. Participants completed the Psychosocial Screen for Cancer-Revised (PSSCAN-R), Research and Development (RAND)-36 health-related quality of life, and the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey, version 2.0 (VHNSS 2.0), to evaluate late effects from treatment. Results: There were 36 participants in the study. Severe symptoms (greater than or equal to 4/10) were reported on the VHNSS 2.0 by 51% of participants for xerostomia, 35% for dysphagia, and 37% for dental/mucosal sensitivity. On the PSSCAN-R, 35% had moderate/high anxiety scores and 48% had moderate/high depression scores. The mean RAND-36 participant scores were as follows: physical functioning, 86.1; physical role functioning, 71.4; emotional role functioning, 75.1; energy/fatigue, 56.6; emotional well-being, 74.6; social functioning, 76.3; bodily pain, 71.7; and general health, 65.6. Conclusions: AYA survivors in our study reported significant late effects from H&N radiotherapy and high depression and anxiety scores, but generally high health-related quality of life. Prospective evaluation of psychosocial needs and H&N-related complications is warranted in this subgroup at high risk of late effects from treatment.

Pan-Canadian consensus recommendations for proton beam therapy access in Canada.

PURPOSE: Proton Beam Therapy (PBT)is a treatment option for select cancer patients. It is currently not available in Canada. Assessment and referral processes for out-of-country treatment for eligible patients vary by jurisdiction, leading to variability in access to this treatment for Canadian cancer patients. The purpose of this initiative was to develop a framework document to inform consistent and equitable PBT access for appropriate patients through the creation of pan-Canadian PBT access consensus recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified Delphiprocess was used to develop pan-Canadian recommendations with input from 22 PBT clinical and administrative experts across all provinces, external peer-review by provincial cancer and system partners, and feedback from a targeted community consultation. This was conducted by electronic survey and live discussion. Consensus threshold was set at 70% agreement. RESULTS: Fourconsensus rounds resulted in a final set of 27 recommendations divided into three categories: patient eligibility (n = 9); program level (n = 10); and system level (n = 8). Patient eligibility included: anatomic site (n = 4), patient characteristics (n = 3), clinical efficacy (n = 2). Program level included: regulatory and staff requirements (n = 5), equipment and technologies (n = 4), quality assurance (n = 1). System level included: referral process (n = 5), costing, budget impact and quality adjusted life years (n = 2), eligible patient estimates (n = 1). Recommendations were released nationally in June 2021 and distributed to all 43 cancer programs in Canada. CONCLUSION: A pan-Canadian consensus-building approach was successful in creating an evidence-based, peer-reviewed suite of recommendations thatsupportapplication of consistent clinical criteria to inform treatment options, facility set-up and access to high quality proton therapy.

A cross-sectional assessment of long-term effects in adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) head and neck (H&N) cancer survivors are at risk of long-term complications. A cross-sectional study of survivors recalled for clinical evaluation was performed to evaluate late effects in this population. METHODS: Surviving patients who had been diagnosed with H&N cancer between the ages of 15 and 39 years and treated with radiation therapy (RT) in British Columbia between 1970 and 2010 were invited to participate in this study. Survivors were assessed in consultation by a radiation oncologist for a complete history and physical exam. Comprehensive data collection of subjective and objective late effects of RT and screening investigations were completed. RESULTS: Of 36 AYA H&N participants, the majority were female (61%), and the most common tumour sites were thyroid (28%), oropharynx (17%), salivary gland (14%) and larynx (14%). Dental extractions post treatment was performed for 33% and dental implants for 17%. The majority (72%) reported xerostomia, 50% had dysphagia to solids and 25% hearing loss. Of the non-thyroid cancer patients who underwent RT to their neck, 45% developed hypothyroidism. There were 28% of participants with asymptomatic carotid stenosis and 27% with thyroid nodules; all were diagnosed after recall screening. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of AYA H&N cancer treated with RT reported numerous long-term complications. Comprehensive follow-up and screening guidelines should be established for this at-risk population. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: AYA H&N cancer survivors and their primary care practitioners should be educated on screening recommendations and the risk of late effects.

Palliative radiation therapy for children with cancer.

Radiation therapy (RT) is often used as a palliative treatment for children with recurrent malignant disease to ameliorate or prevent symptoms. However, no guidelines exist regarding the clinical indications or dose fractionation for palliative RT. The goal of this report is to provide guidelines for the use of palliative RT in children with cancer. In this guideline, appropriate indications for palliative RT, recommended dose-fractionation schedules, relevant toxicities, and avenues for future research are explored. RT is an effective palliative treatment for bone, brain, liver, lung, abdominopelvic and head-and-neck metastases, spinal cord compression, superior vena cava syndrome, and bleeding. Single-fraction regimens (8 Gy in one fraction) for children with short life expectancy are recommended for simple, uncomplicated bone metastases and can be considered for some patients with lung or liver metastases. A short, hypofractionated regimen (20 Gy in five fractions) may be used for other indications to minimize overall burden of therapy. There are little data supporting use of more prolonged fractionation regimens, though they may be considered for patients with very good performance status. Future research should focus on response and outcomes data collection, and to rigorously evaluate the role of stereotactic body RT in well-designed, prospective studies.

A case series of pediatric survivors of anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (APXA) is a rare subtype of CNS astrocytoma. They are generally treated as high-grade gliomas; however, uncertainty exists regarding the optimal therapy. Here, we report on 3 pediatric cases of APXA. METHODS: Our institutional database was queried for cases of APXA and 3 cases were identified. Surgical samples were processed for methylation profiling and chromosomal microarray analysis. Methylation data were uploaded to the online CNS tumor classifier to determine methylation-based diagnoses to determine copy number variations (CNVs). RESULTS: Two patients were male, 1 female, and all were aged 12 years at diagnosis. All underwent a gross total resection (GTR) and were diagnosed with an APXA. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that 2 cases were BRAF V600E positive. Methylation-based tumor classification supported the APXA diagnosis in all cases. CNV analyses revealed homozygous CKDN2A deletions in all and chromosome 9p loss in 2 cases. All patients received radiation therapy (54 Gy in 30 fractions) with concurrent temozolomide. Two patients received maintenance chemotherapy with temozolomide and lomustine for 6 cycles as per the Children's Oncology Group ACNS0423. The third patient recurred and went on to receive a second GTR and 6 cycles of lomustine, vincristine, and procarbazine. All are alive with no evidence of disease >4 years post-treatment completion (overall survival = 100%, event free survival = 67%). CONCLUSIONS: The natural history and optimal treatment of this rare pediatric tumor are not well understood. This case series supports the use of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of APXA. The genetic landscape may be informative for optimizing treatment and prognosis.

Late effects in survivors treated for lymphoma as adolescents and young adults: a population-based analysis.

PURPOSE: The study objective is to describe and quantify the incidence of treatment-induced late effects in AYA lymphoma patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) at 15-24 years of age were identified. All patients in British Columbia who received radiation therapy (RT) from 1974 to 2014 with ≥ 5-year survival post-RT were included. Late effects' analyses included only survivors who received RT to the relevant anatomical site(s) and/or relevant chemotherapy, and were reported as cumulative incidence (CI) ± standard error. RESULTS: Three hundred and five patients were identified (74% HL). Median age of diagnosis was 21 years. Median follow-up was 19.1 years for secondary malignancy and 7.2 years for other endpoints. Hypothyroidism was the most prevalent late effect, with a CI of 22.4 ± 2.8% and 35.1 ± 4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. CI of in-field secondary malignancy was 0.4 ± 0.4% at 10 years and 2.8 ± 1.2% at 20 years. CI of symptomatic pulmonary toxicity was 4.6 ± 1.5% and 6.8 ± 2.0% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and was higher in patients receiving multiple RT courses (p = 0.009). Esophageal complications occurred at a CI of 1.4 ± 0.8% at 5 years and 2.2 ± 1.1% at 10 years. CI of xerostomia/dental decay was 2.6 ± 1.3% at 5 years and 4.9 ± 2.1% at 10 years. CI of cardiac disease was at 2.3 ± 0.9% at 5 years and 4.4 ± 1.5% at 10 years. CI of infertility was 6.5 ± 1.6% at 5 years and 9.4 ± 2.1% at 10 years. CONCLUSION: Survivors of AYA lymphoma have a high incidence and diverse presentation of late effects. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: AYA lymphoma survivors should be educated about their risks of late effects and offered screening and follow-up when appropriate.

Facing the unknown: uncertain fertility in young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to describe the challenges young adult childhood cancer survivors (ACCS) experience of living with an unknown fertility status. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we analyzed data from in-depth interviews with 25 ACCS (15 females, 10 males) using content-driven inductive thematic analysis and constant comparative techniques. RESULTS: Three themes provide insight into ACCS' experiences of living with an uncertain fertility status. (1) The marked psychological burden, which included fear, worry, anxiety, and sadness, was ubiquitous. (2) Romantic relationships were negatively affected and entailed fear of disappointing one's partner, the difficulty of discussing fertility issues, and shying away from romantic relationships. (3) Communication challenges with healthcare providers were apparent across the cancer trajectory, made worse by provider knowledge gaps and dismissal of fertility concerns. (4) Well-known gender stereotypes about pregnancy and childrearing were replicated, while the emotional and life impacts that uncertain fertility could exert on males were minimized. CONCLUSION: This study provides beginning insights into the experiences of young ACCS as they navigate an unknown fertility status and highlights existing gaps in fertility-related healthcare services. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Uncertain fertility has implications for survivors' wellbeing that remain poorly addressed by the existing structure of cancer survivor and fertility services. Assessing and addressing the fertility-related needs of ACCS will continue to be a vital component of patient-centered care in the future, and research to develop comprehensive support, resources, and processes of care are vital to meet this priority need.

Evaluation of the discussion of late effects and screening recommendations in survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The study objective was to assess the discussion of late effects (LEs) and screening recommendations (SRs) for adolescent and young adults (AYAs) treated for lymphoma. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on AYA lymphoma survivors aged 15-24 years at diagnosis who received radiation therapy (RT) ± chemotherapy between 1984 and 2010 at any of the six British Columbia (BC) Cancer treatment centers across the province. Charts were reviewed to evaluate discussion of LEs and SRs. Susceptibility to specific LEs was determined by reviewing treatment details. RESULTS: Of 305 patients, 212 (70%) had documented discussion of at least one specific LE, 39 (13%) had non-specific documentation only, and 54 (18%) had no documented discussion of LEs. Accounting only for patients susceptible to each LEs, the most frequently discussed LEs was radiation-induced (RI) neoplasm (42%), and the least frequently discussed LEs was carotid artery stenosis (0.4%). The most common SRs discussed in susceptible patients was for RI breast cancer (43%). Of patients discharged between 1985 and 1999 vs 2000 and 2014, LEs were discussed in 63 vs 93% (P < 0.0005), and SRs were discussed in 30 vs 65%, respectively (P < 0.0005). Older age at discharge, presence of a discharge note, and occurrence of a discharge appointment were associated with increased discussion of SRs. CONCLUSIONS: Most survivors of AYA lymphoma received some discussion of LEs and SRs, but each relevant LEs and SRs was discussed in only a minority of susceptible patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors of AYA lymphoma and their primary care professionals may not be appropriately informed of health risks and how to screen for them.

Long term toxicity of intracranial germ cell tumor treatment in adolescents and young adults.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe the long-term toxicities of intracranial germ cell tumor (IGCT) in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. METHODS: We report late toxicities of a multi-center cohort of AYA patients treated for IGCT between 1975 and 2015. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for hormone deficiency, ototoxicity, seizure disorder, visual deterioration, cerebrovascular events, second neoplasm, psychiatric illness, and neurocognitive impairment. Statistical analysis was performed for late toxicities to evaluate the influence of select factors. RESULTS: Our patient cohort included 112 patients with IGCTs; 84% of patients had a germinoma as opposed to a non-germinomatous germ cell tumor (NGGCT), median age at radiotherapy (RT) was 19 years, and median follow-up was 8.3 years. Of the 94 patients with germinoma, 32 (34%) received both chemotherapy and RT as part of their upfront treatment, while 62 (66%) received RT alone. All 18 patients with NGGCT received chemotherapy and RT. The most common late toxicity following IGCT treatments was physician-reported neurocognitive impairment, with a 10-year cumulative incidence (CI) of 38.5%. Ten-year CI of treatment-induced ototoxicity was 39.2% for patients who received cisplatin, compared to 3.6% for those who received carboplatin but no cisplatin (p < 0.005). Suprasellar/hypothalamic tumor location was associated with 10-year CI of treatment-induced hormone deficiency (36.1 vs 6.2%, p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of AYAs treated for IGCTs experience late effects from treatment, including neurocognitive impairment, ototoxicity, and hormone deficiency. Suprasellar/hypothalamic tumor location and cisplatin were associated with a higher risk of treatment-induced hormone deficiency and ototoxicity, respectively.

Intracranial Germ Cell Tumors in Adolescents and Young Adults: A 40-Year Multi-Institutional Review of Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the practice patterns and outcomes of intracranial germ cell tumors (IGCT) in adolescents and young adults according to different therapeutic approaches. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One-hundred twelve patients with IGCT aged 15 to 39 years were managed at either XX or the XY center from 1975 to 2015. The charts were retrospectively reviewed and data collected. RESULTS: Median duration of follow-up was 8.3 years. Ninety-four patients had germinomas, and 18 had nongerminomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCT). The primary disease sites were pineal gland (37 of 94 germinoma, 14 of 18 NGGCT) and suprasellar region (23 of 94 germinoma, 2 of 18 NGGCT). Eleven patients with germinoma (12%) and 2 patients with NGGCT (11%) had radiographic spinal metastases or positive lumbar cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Event-free survival (EFS) was 84% and overall survival (OS) was 90% at 10 years for germinoma; EFS was 71% and OS was 86% at 10 years for NGGCT. For patients with germinoma, 10-year EFS was 100% after craniospinal radiation therapy (CSRT) with chemotherapy (N = 10); 100% after whole-ventricular radiation therapy (WVRT), whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), or focal radiation therapy (FRT) with chemotherapy (N = 22); 90% after CSRT alone (N = 46); and 41% after WVRT, WBRT, or FRT alone (N = 16) (P < .0005). Ten-year OS was 100%, 100%, 90%, and 72%, respectively (P = .032). For patients with NGGCT, 10-year EFS was 80% after CSRT, WBRT, or WVRT plus chemotherapy (N = 10) versus 58% after FRT plus chemotherapy (N = 8) (P = .31); 10-year OS was 90% versus 58%, respectively (P = .16). CONCLUSIONS: We report excellent overall outcomes according to treatment approach in the largest study of IGCT in adolescents and young adults to our knowledge. EFS and OS were inferior after non-CSRT without chemotherapy in germinoma.

Canadian patterns of practice for intracranial germ cell tumors in adolescents and young adults.

INTRODUCTION: The study objectives were to describe patterns of practice for intracranial germ cell tumors (IGCT) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) and to determine factors associated with practice patterns. METHODS: A survey was written containing questions on the management of two 17-year old males, one with localized pineal germinoma and the other with localized pineal non-germinomatous germ cell tumor (NGGCT). An invitation to participate anonymously in the survey was e-mailed to 119 oncologists who treat brain tumors across Canada. RESULTS: Seventy-two (61%) of the 119 oncologists participated in the study. For the germinoma case, the most common treatment approaches were whole ventricular radiotherapy (WVRT) and chemotherapy (CH) (56%), WVRT alone (15%), and craniospinal radiotherapy (CSRT) alone (10%); for physicians recommending WVRT + CH, most frequently selected whole ventricular doses were 24 Gy (57%) and 18 Gy (20%). Chemotherapy was included in the treatment of germinoma by 96% of pediatric physicians vs. 54% of adult physicians (P = 0.001). The most common treatment approaches for NGGCT were CSRT + CH (44%), WVRT + CH (21%), and pineal gland RT + CH (15%). The selection of craniospinal vs. smaller-volume RT was not associated with the physicians' specialty, percentage of practice treating brain tumors, number of IGCTs seen, or size of institution. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the management of IGCT in AYA across Canada. A 17-year old male with a localized pineal germinoma is highly likely to receive chemotherapy if managed by a pediatric oncologist, while the same patient is much less likely to receive chemotherapy if managed by an adult oncologist.

Utility of the number needed to treat in paediatric haematological cancer randomised controlled treatment trials: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess the utility of the number needed to treat (NNT) to inform decision-making in the context of paediatric oncology and to calculate the NNT in all superiority, parallel, paediatric haematological cancer, randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with a comparison to the threshold NNT as a measure of clinical significance. DESIGN: Systematic review DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Childhood Cancer Group Specialized Register through CENTRAL from inception to August 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Superiority, parallel RCTs of haematological malignancy treatments in paediatric patients that assessed an outcome related to survival, relapse or remission; reported a sample size calculation with a delta value to allow for calculation of the threshold NNT, and that included parameters required to calculate the NNT and associated CI. RESULTS: A total of 43 RCTs were included, representing 45 randomised questions, of which none reported the NNT. Among acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) RCTs, 29.2% (7/24) of randomised questions were found to have a NNT corresponding to benefit, in comparison to acute myeloid leukaemia (ALM) RCTs with 50% (3/6), and none in lymphoma RCTs (0/13). Only 28.6% (2/7) and 33.3% (1/3) had a NNT that was less than the threshold NNT for ALL and AML, respectively. Of these, 100% (2/2 ALL and 1/1 AML) were determined to be possibly clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that decision-makers in paediatric oncology use the NNT and associated confidence limits as a supportive tool to evaluate evidence from RCTs while placing careful attention to the inherent limitations of this measure.

Patterns of Practice Survey: Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities.

Background Neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) confers significant local control benefit. To determine patterns of practice, a survey of RT planning practices was undertaken. Method Members of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society and Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology participated in this survey pertaining to general practice patterns of RT for extremity STS, patterns of contouring and planning, and use of quality control measures such as guidelines, tumor boards, and quality assurance rounds. Results A total of 58 radiation oncologists treating extremity STS from 12 countries responded. 89.7% work in academically affiliated centres, and 55.2% saw at least 20 cases of extremity STS per year. Most (96.7%) had access to multidisciplinary sarcoma boards (85.5% of those discussed every referred sarcoma case). 78.6% held quality assurance rounds. Most (92.9%) used planning guidelines. Pre-operative RT was used nearly twice as much as post-operative RT. CT simulation with MR fusion was used by 94.6%. Patterns of clinical target volume (CTV) contouring for both superficial and deep STS were variable. 69.8% contoured a normal soft tissue strip for extremity sarcoma, 13.5% without routine constraints and the remainder with various constraints. Most (91.1%) used 50 Gy in 25 fractions pre-operatively and 39.6% reported using post-operative RT boost for positive margins. Post-operative dose was more variable from 59.4 Gy to 70 Gy. Conclusion Major aspects of RT planning for extremity STS were similar among the responders, and most were academically affiliated. Over twice as many employed pre-operative as opposed to post-operative RT. There was considerable heterogeneity in use of: margins for contouring, normal soft tissue strip as an avoidance structure, and boost for positive margins. This survey shows variable patterns of practice and identifies areas that may require further research.

Documentation of Late-Effects Risks and Screening Recommendations for Adolescent and Young Adult Central Nervous System, Soft Tissue, or Bone Tumor Survivors Treated with Radiotherapy in British Columbia, Canada.

PURPOSE: To assess the documentation of late-effects (LE) risks and screening recommendations in medical records of adolescent and young adult central nervous system (CNS), soft tissue, and bone tumor survivors. METHODS: The medical records of all patients diagnosed with a CNS neoplasm, an arteriovenous malformation, a soft tissue, and bone tumor, at ages 15-39 years, treated between 1985 and 2010 with radiation therapy in the province of British Columbia, Canada, surviving >5 years, alive, and discharged to the community were assessed. The documentation of LE risks and screening recommendations were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: In the medical records of 132 CNS tumor survivors and 94 soft tissue or bone tumor survivors, 15% and 13% included no documentation of LE risks, 21% and 22% included only nonspecific documentation, and 64% and 65% minimal documentation, respectively. Documentation of at least one specific LE risk increased significantly among CNS tumor patient charts (from 29% in 1980-1989, to 67% in 1990-1999, to 88% in 2000-2010, χ2 [2, N = 132] = 32.257, p < 0.000) and soft tissue or bone tumor patient charts (from 47% [1980-1989] to 56% [1990-1999] to 78% [2000-2010], χ2 [2, N = 94] = 6.702, p = 0.035). There was no documentation of a screening recommendation in 75% of CNS tumor patient charts and 91% of soft tissue and bone tumor charts. CONCLUSION: The documentation of LE risks and screening recommendations has been limited, highlighting the need to improve written communication with primary care providers.

Documentation and incidence of late effects and screening recommendations for adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: A retrospective review of adolescent and young adult (AYA) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) at British Columbia Cancer  was performed to determine the incidence of late toxicities, the documented late side effects discussed and the screening recommendations provided at the time of transfer of care to primary care providers (PCPs). METHODS: Charts (n = 162) were reviewed for all patients 15 to 35 years at diagnosis with HNC treated with RT from 1960 to 2010 who survived > 5 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: A discussion regarding the risk of long-term side effects was documented in the initial consultation for 85% of patients. The majority of patients (78%) developed > 1 documented late effect. The most common were xerostomia (44%), skin changes (28%), neck fibrosis (22%), nasal crusting (16%), epistaxis (16%), and dental decay (14%). In all, 20% were currently followed or were followed until they died. Of the 80% transferred to their PCP, 14% had a formal discharge summary. For those discharged from British Columbia Cancer, documented recommendations included regular dental care (34%) and screening for hypothyroidism (5%) and second malignancy (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of AYA HNC patients treated with RT developed late side effects, and most PCPs were not sent a discharge summary outlining screening recommendations for delayed late effects. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: AYA HNC survivors treated with RT are at high risk for late effects and would benefit from a survivorship care plan outlining these risks and screening recommendations.

Long-term effects of cancer on earnings of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors - a population-based study from British Columbia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: The patterns and determinants of long-term income among young people surviving cancer, and differences compared to peers, have not yet been fully explored. The objectives of this paper are to describe long-term income among young survivors of cancer, the impact of socio-demographic, disease, and treatment factors on long-term income, and income relative to the general population. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with comparison group from the general population, using linked population-based registries, clinical data, and tax-records. Multivariate random effects regression models were used to determine survivor income, compare long-term income between survivors and comparators, and assess income determinants. Subjects included all residents of British Columbia (BC), Canada, diagnosed with cancer before 25 years of age and surviving 5 years or more. Comparators were selected from the BC general population matched by gender and birth year. RESULTS: Young cancer survivors earned significantly less than the general population. In addition, survivors of central nervous system tumors have significantly lower incomes than lymphoma survivors. Survivors who received radiation therapy have significantly lower income. Results should be interpreted with caution as the comparator group was matched by gender and date of birth. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on original diagnosis, treatment, and other characteristics, survivors face significantly lower income than peers and may require supports to gain and retain paid employment. Lower income will affect their opportunity for independent living, and will reduce productivity in the labour force.

Clinical significance in pediatric oncology randomized controlled treatment trials: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Clinical significance in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) can be determined using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), which should inform the delta value used to determine sample size. The primary objective was to assess clinical significance in the pediatric oncology randomized controlled trial (RCT) treatment literature by evaluating: (1) the relationship between the treatment effect and the delta value as reported in the sample size calculation, and (2) the concordance between statistical and clinical significance. The secondary objective was to evaluate the reporting of methodological attributes related to clinical significance. METHODS: RCTs of pediatric cancer treatments, where a sample size calculation with a delta value was reported or could be calculated, were systematically reviewed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Childhood Cancer Group Specialized Register through CENTRAL were searched from inception to July 2016. RESULTS: RCTs (77 overall; 11 and 66), representing 95 (13 and 82) randomized questions were included for non-inferiority and superiority RCTs (herein, respectively). The minority (22.1% overall; 76.9 and 13.4%) of randomized questions reported conclusions based on clinical significance, and only 4.2% (15.4 and 2.4%) explicitly based the delta value on the MCID. Over half (67.4% overall; 92.3 and 63.4%) reported a confidence interval or standard error for the primary outcome experimental and control values and 12.6% (46.2 and 7.3%) reported the treatment effect, respectively. Of the 47 randomized questions in superiority trials that reported statistically non-significant findings, 25.5% were possibly clinically significant. Of the 24 randomized questions in superiority trials that were statistically significant, only 8.3% were definitely clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of RCTs in the pediatric oncology literature reported methodological attributes related to clinical significance and a notable portion of statistically insignificant studies were possibly clinically significance.